RE: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-07 Thread Evans, TJ
The reply *should* come from the IP that the request arrived at ... ... Thanks! TJ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179] When the two outside

RE: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-05 Thread Evans, TJ
-Original Message- From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179] Eventually, two separate static commands for two separate outside addresses going to two separate DMZ addresses. At the moment there is just

Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-05 Thread Gaz
Message- From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179] On a cisco router, you use the Extendable command. not sure about the pix. -Original Message- From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL

Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-04 Thread Gaz
Hi all, Has anybody tried NAT'ing two outside addresses to one internal (DMZ) address on the same port (80) in some way. Not too difficult to get round, as I can get the DNS of one site changed and use the single address outside to single inside. The advantage would be that when the web sites

Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-04 Thread Patrick Ramsey
what is the overall goal? Gaz 03/04/02 03:06PM Hi all, Has anybody tried NAT'ing two outside addresses to one internal (DMZ) address on the same port (80) in some way. Not too difficult to get round, as I can get the DNS of one site changed and use the single address outside to single

Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-04 Thread Gaz
Eventually, two separate static commands for two separate outside addresses going to two separate DMZ addresses. At the moment there is just one machine inside. Possibility of putting multiple addresses on the server but preferred option is not to do this. What I would like to miss out is the

RE: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-04 Thread Hire, Ejay
On a cisco router, you use the Extendable command. not sure about the pix. -Original Message- From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179] Hi all, Has anybody tried NAT'ing two outside

Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-04 Thread Rich
Why not add an additional ip to the internal host and have two nats? - Original Message - From: Gaz To: Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:06 PM Subject: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179] Hi all, Has anybody tried NAT'ing two outside addresses to one internal (DMZ) address on the same

Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-04 Thread ME
: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179] Hi all, Has anybody tried NAT'ing two outside addresses to one internal (DMZ) address on the same port (80) in some way. Not too difficult to get round, as I can get the DNS of one site changed and use the single address outside to single inside

Re: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When the two outside addresses are resolved to the single inside address (port 80) everything is OK but when the web server sends back a reply which of the address translations with be used? If the wrong one is picked any firewall will choke on it, and if no firewall, the other end of the

RE: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179]

2002-03-04 Thread Joseph Brunner
Voice (212) 651 - 7795 Fax -Original Message- From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 3:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Pix NAT - Two to one [7:37179] On a cisco router, you use the Extendable command. not sure about the pix. -Original