Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]

2003-02-07 Thread Juntao
actually rip is faster than IGRP [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi) a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to RIP/RIPv2. Anything is fast compared to RIP/RIPv2 ;-) It

Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]

2003-02-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi)
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: I have been using EIGRP for our routing protocol for the last couple years, which is prettly great. The controversal of selecting the routing protocol came up again recently. I would like to have your opinion on EIGRP vs. OSPF, which one is

RE: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]

2003-02-04 Thread Peter P
EIGRP easy to configure optimised for Cisco kit. Use OSPF if mixed vendor environment and if network is large scale. Requires good configurqtion knowledge as much less plug and play than EIGRP. Also OSPF is true link state so faster convergence and better scalability. EIGRP is enhanced distance

Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]

2003-02-04 Thread Juntao
OSPF no hop limit link state have 2 know how to configure it bandwith is the metric supportes areas therefore scalls well supports area and net summarization supportes cidr, vlsm fast to converge supports demand cicuits standard based djikstra is the algo used in large environments EIGRP advanced

Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]

2003-02-04 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Good answers. Here are a few additional comments. OSPF is an IETF standard, which has the following advantages: You have access to the RFCs that describe it, which can help when troubleshooting and designing network changes, even though the RFCs aren't very readable. Engineers from around the

Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]

2003-02-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi)
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: EIGRP is not an IETF standard. You said below that the spec if available, but that's not true. Cisco has lots of documentaton on EIGRP but they have not released a specification for it. AFAIK there used to be another company who manufactured routers

Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]

2003-02-04 Thread Thomas N.
Interesting! I learned OSPF on BSCN book but never deploy it. EIGRP has been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to RIP/RIPv2. It seems OSPF gets lots of favor as a stardard protocol. I am curious if OSPF support load sharing on equal / unequal paths? Thanks All for the

Re: EIGRP vs. OSPF [7:62419]

2003-02-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi)
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote: been very easy to configured and very fast converged comparing to RIP/RIPv2. Anything is fast compared to RIP/RIPv2 ;-) It seems OSPF gets lots of favor as a stardard protocol. I am curious if OSPF support load sharing on equal / unequal paths?