Re: Single area with large number networks.

Try this http://www.cisco.com/public/pubsearch.html - Original Message - From: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 11:52 PM Subject: Single area with large number networks. > > Hi, this question is really confuse me : > What are two pos

RE: Single area with large number networks.

doesn't help. I tried before. I also opened the CCIE : TCP/IP routing book, ACRC book .. but can't found the answer. Ibam > > Try this > http://www.cisco.com/public/pubsearch.html > > - Original Message - > From: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday,

Re: Single area with large number networks.

behind why I'm sure I'm correct. The thing is , I could be wrong either way how do you benefit from it ? - Original Message - From: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, Novembe

Re: Single area with large number networks.

IMHO, B is the best answer as link failures in the area will cause recalculations. D is a possible answer; however, "excessive" is a subjective word: OSPF will generate the number of LSAs necessary to build its tables and the picture of the network: it will not go beyond the number needed to

RE: Single area with large number networks.

'm sure I'm correct. The thing is , I could be > wrong either way how do you benefit from it ? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> &g

RE: Single area with large number networks.

thanks for your response. But if some router down, the nearest one will send message to DR & BDR, and DR will send multicast message (it won't be excessive) to its networks. thanks, Ibrahim > > IMHO, B is the best answer as link failures in the area will cause > recalculations. > > D is a poss

Re: Single area with large number networks.

OTECTED]> To: "Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:31 AM Subject: RE: Single area with large number networks. > > > if you said refer to www.cisco.com, why everybody still need this > mailing-list ? why there are

RE: Single area with large number networks.

ate Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 5:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Single area with large number networks. IMHO, B is the best answer as link failures in the area will cause recalculations. D is a possible answer; however, "excessive" is a subjective word:

RE: Single area with large number networks.

g is , I could be >> wrong either way how do you benefit from it ? >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Ibrahim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>

RE: Single area with large number networks.

Telling someone to use the Cisco search engine for a question like this is not helpful. It was kind of funny, but also a bit cruel, and definitely a waste of bandwidth. Answer A "more reachable errors" is clearly wrong since it's nonsense. I think answer D is wrong also because an OSPF router

RE: Single area with large number networks.

At 09:36 PM 11/14/00, Ibrahim wrote: >thanks for your response. >But if some router down, the nearest one will send message to DR & BDR, and >DR will send multicast message (it won't be excessive) to its networks. I agree it wouldn't be excessive. Within a LAN, the DR mechanism keeps adjancies

RE: Single area with large number networks.

At 11:11 AM 11/14/00 -0800, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >Answer A "more reachable errors" is clearly wrong since it's nonsense. I >think answer D is wrong also because an OSPF router doesn't really have a >link-state database. It has a topology database. (I'm not an OSPF guru, >but when tryin

RE: Single area with large number networks.

er 14, 2000 11:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Single area with large number networks. At 09:36 PM 11/14/00, Ibrahim wrote: >thanks for your response. >But if some router down, the nearest one will send message to DR & BDR, and >DR will send multicast message (it

RE: Single area with large number networks.

In defence of my earlier position that "d" is in fact the other correct answer. "Priscilla's Point: >Besides, as I look more closely at the answer, I see that it says, >"excessive link-state entries in the link-state table." What's a link-state >table? I think the test writer put a few good-so

RE: Single area with large number networks.

ck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA) Subject: RE: Single area with large number networks. But if the "right" answer consists of two choices... I

RE: Single area with large number networks.

OK, I now think the right answer is B and D also. Jenny, Pamela, and Howard have convinced me. As Howard said, Answer C, "frequent adjacencies table recalculation" is even more BS than Answer D, "excessive link-state entries in the link-state table." There's no such thing as an adjacency table