Good idea... I'll work on one also but I won't be able to get to it till
early next year. I'll let you know...
The k1d
""Jason"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Well to start of this exchange of labs maybe we should set some basic
> foundations:
> 1. All
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
c1sc0k1d
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 5:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
Good idea... I'll work on one also but I won't be able to get to it till
early next year. I'll let you kn
Jason (if that is your name), if you're dropping $17,000 already on your
CCIE preparation, then what's another 4% for the best labs out there that
have helped over a couple hundred CCIEs (very conservative estimate) get
their four digits? All of our labs are original, we don't violate NDA, and
we
!Hola!
I'm very new to the Cisco Certs game, but I'd like this project.
> Well to start of this exchange of labs maybe we should set some basic
> foundations:
> 1. All labs should not exceed more than 6 routers.
> I think we all know why this should be the case.
Somebody has s
routers.
Imagination and resourcefulness are also free.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
c1sc0k1d
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
Good idea... I'll work o
up
the corporate network." : )
Eric
PS - How many CCIE's on this list got there cert for little or no
cost$$$
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:30 PM
Subject: RE: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
> as an FYI, the
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> c1sc0k1d
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
>
>
> Good idea... I'll work on one also but I won't be able to get to it till
> early next year. I'll let
a good learning environment.
I wish you well in your studies.
Kevin Wigle
CCDP CCNP and other stuff
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2001 21:11
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
> !Hola!
>
> I'm very new to the Cisco Certs game, but I'
earning environment.
>
> I wish you well in your studies.
>
> Kevin Wigle
> CCDP CCNP and other stuff
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2001 21:11
> Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
>
>
> > !Hola!
>
necessity is the mother of invention, imitation is the sincerest form of
flattery. Good for you - I wish you much success in your endeavor. I won't
be participating in your 'charity organization' unless I can get a tax
write-off for the time I'd put into it. Too busy with the finishing touches
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
Seems like this list will always have someone, like this - Jason, where
every six months or so they will come along and downplay the CCIE cert. or
those that make $$$ from the CCIE cert. process. Whatever happened to that
biggest of ran
but what in life that's worth anything is?
>
> Mitch
> CCIE #6011
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
>
>
> S
Let me comment on several aspects of this thread, with the disclaimer
I am involved with a virtual rack business that will be announced
Real Soon Now, and involves the cooperative efforts of several
recognized groups.
First, let's talk about scenarios. Not long ago, I posted my
taxonomy of l
d your own
imagination to create your own labs. What a great way to learn!
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 11:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
I couldn't subscribe to this projec
Good answer, Howard.
I've been thinking about the statement that someone made that "the
knowledge isn't proprietary," referring to the knowledge one needs to pass
CCIE. The information isn't proprietary. The word "knowledge" implies
something more, however. It implies that the recipient actual
> Developing effective methods for knowledge transfer requires creativity,
> skill, time, money, awareness of the audience and their learning styles,
> and other resources. The results may be proprietary and there's nothing
> wrong with charging for them. I can't comment on the pricing. (Setting a
ay, December 24, 2001 1:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2 [7:29682]
> Developing effective methods for knowledge transfer requires creativity,
> skill, time, money, awareness of the audience and their learning styles,
> and other resources. The results may be prop
sewhere.
>
>Best wishes and merry Christmas.
>
>Chuck
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Wojtek Zlobicki
>Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 1:51 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: ccbootcamp part 2
asons I have stated
>elsewhere.
>
>Best wishes and merry Christmas.
>
>Chuck
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Wojtek Zlobicki
>Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 1:51 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subj
19 matches
Mail list logo
