/CCIE.
-Sean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian Zeitz
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
I have an un-bias opinion. For some of us who have already done a few
exams, Boson i
no 1 source for any exam. I have heard the term, "you get what
you pay for".
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
Everybody else is bad except N
Comments inline
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
> I didn't just "pop into the group".
I must admit that my phrasing ("pop into the group") probably sounded
negative, but I can assure you that I in no way meant it to be so.
> I'm just
> trying to let people know that there are other alternatives
>
ssage board. Also, I
don't work for Network Learning, I work for EDS.
Shawn K.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
&
work Learning.
>
> Disclaimer: I have written materials for CCxx Productions and am working on
> stuff for Network Learning
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael L. Williams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:18 AM
> > To: [EMA
a
> > little before rushing out to buy the "almighty overpriced" Boson.
> >
> > Sorry, just a little grumpy this morning. I think I just realized how
> > underpaid I really am! Just thankful to have a job right now, though!
> >
> > Shawn K.
> >
>
IL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
>
> Name one alternative that's cheaper AND offers the flexibility, options
> (like toggling the "score meter", showing answers ONLY when you're wrong
> WITH references to published explanations of
7;Kaminski, Shawn G'
> Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
>
> what are the other options that are as good as Boson and cheaper?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:06 AM
&g
ave a job right now, though!
>
> Shawn K.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kris Keen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:14 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
> >
> > Champ ,
nderpaid I really am! Just thankful to have a job right now, though!
Shawn K.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Keen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
>
> Champ
Champ , cheers
What Boson do you recommend? is yours, #3 the best or should I get them all?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41563&t=41465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list
I put together a document on RIFs that you can grab for free from
www.laganiere.net
Let me know if that helps...
--- Dennis
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Keen"
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 11:47 PM
Subject: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
> All, im studying for my CCIE. Can s
onday, January 21, 2002 7:02 PM
To: Mark Odette II
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question [7:32591]
Reason being that NTFS is a journalled file system. Not sure on
NT 3.51's version of NTFS, but if you say so, probably true. (not meant to
be sarcastic, but sincere)
rprised if an AIX or SGI box did the same.
> >DB Server or not.
> >
> >Sorry... just gotta love those MickeySoft stabs that have no meaning other
> >than for slander.
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> &g
gt;it is and I wouldn't be surprised if an AIX or SGI box did the same.
>DB Server or not.
>
>Sorry... just gotta love those MickeySoft stabs that have no meaning other
>than for slander.
>
>-Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ave no meaning other
than for slander.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question [7:32591]
Just turn them off or simply unplug them.
Fortunately the IOS was not written by M
Assuming you want to save the config on there, a wr mem before the power
off may be appropriate, unless you're selling it, then maybe a wr erase.
Bri
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Mnatzakanian Serge wrote:
> Just turn them off or simply unplug them.
>
> Fortunately the IOS was not writte
Just turn them off or simply unplug them.
Fortunately the IOS was not written by Microsoft and nothing will get
corrupted!!!
-Serge.
Richard Tufaro wrote:
>
> What is the proper way to shutdown a router? not reload, but
> shutdown? Just flick the switch? Seems to brutal to me.
>
> Richard T
Flipping the switch is it... I always think of its file system as it is
"in the flash" not as vulnerable as a hard drive... we just unplug
hubs/switches/routers... Thank goodness to. Can you imagine routers
getting as pissed off as NT boxes when "improperly" shut down... we
be going n
That leads me to a related question...
would it be better for my stack of 2500's and Cat switches to leave
them on, or should I shut them off when not used. This is a lab setup.
Jeff
""Richard Tufaro"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What is the proper
Most network devices are designed never to be shutdown. Take for
instance the 2900 and 3500 series switches (either plugged and running
or not). Flipping the switch is about all you've got.
All the best !!!
Phil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On B
Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "EA Louie" on 04/16/2001 03:23:27 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To: Patrick McAllister/SOC/WGL@WGL
>
> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: Stupid question - EOL? [7:793]
>
>
>
Allister/SOC/WGL@WGL
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid qu
> "Circusnuts" on 04/16/2001 02:16:34 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To: Patrick McAllister/SOC/WGL@WGL,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> cc:
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: Stupid question - EOL? [7:793]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Y
cc:
Subject: Re: Stup
Yep- I believe it EOL-ed the same time as the Catalyst 5000's (summer 2000).
Of course this does not mean Cisco has stopped supporting the box, just that
you will not be able to purchase it under the new product line-up. IOS &
parts should exist another 3 years or so.
Phil
- Original Messag
. Why would you need to do
this?
> I
> > dunno, but you can if you want to - only on SERIAL interfaces...
> >
> > Z
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: EA LOUIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: EA LOUIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> &
, but you can if you want to - only on SERIAL interfaces...
>
> Z
>
>
>
>
> >From: EA LOUIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: EA LOUIE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >CC: [EMAI
>The limit on Cisco routers is 4 Serials in the same subnet... but my
>question is:
>
>What problem does that solve? Why would I want/need to do that?
My gut tells me that this is not really a planned-for limit, and sort
of happened.
>
>Any thoughts?
As a wild guess, it might be to allow the
L PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Stupid question
>Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:29:36 -0500
>
>I'll be quite honest and say I haven't done a detailed investigation
>of the IOS implementation restrictions here. My intuition would be
>that IOS has one ARP ca
> >But ethernet interfaces cannot share a subnet.
> >
> >Kevin Wigle
> >
> >----- Original Message -
> >From: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> &
ver.
>
>But ethernet interfaces cannot share a subnet.
>
>Kevin Wigle
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, 30 March, 2001 10:41
>Subject
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 30 March, 2001 10:41
Subject: Re: Stupid question
> This isn't a stupid question, it's a very important point to make. If
> you are routing, each interface on the router must be in it
IL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Stupid question
>Date: 30 Mar 2001 10:50:28 PST
>
>"John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The IP address on a switch or hub is for management purposes only and is
> > not appli
"John Neiberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The IP address on a switch or hub is for management purposes only and is
> not applied to an actual physical port. The IP address in a switch or
> hub is applied to a virtual interface so you can use IP to test
> connectivity or telnet to the device f
Yes, two or more interfaces can share the same subnet, but bridging is
involved. You just can't assign ip networks willy nilly to interfaces. :)
What you're looking for is called IRB Bridging. An example follows. The ip
address on the BVI interface is available through both ethernet interfaces
When you connect to a brand new router for the first time you need to use a console
connection because there isn't an IP address yet to allow you to connect via telnet.
Its the same thing with switches and hubs. If you don't have an IP address on the box,
you're reduced to using console connect
The IP address on a switch or hub is for management purposes only and is
not applied to an actual physical port. The IP address in a switch or
hub is applied to a virtual interface so you can use IP to test
connectivity or telnet to the device for configuration purposes.
>>> "Wang Chia Ta" <[EMA
Sorry ... the message should have read:
Thank you for your response. Another question is when or why would you be
required to set an ip address on a switch and/or hub interface?
Thx.
Wang Chia Ta
Systems Support
Mitsubishi Motors
---
""John Neiberger"" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Thank you for your response. Another question is when or why would you be
required
to use set an ip address on a switch and/or hub interface?
Thx.
Wang Chia Ta
Systems Support
Mitsubishi Motors
---
""John Neiberger"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
sac446f2.062@fsut
This isn't a stupid question, it's a very important point to make. If
you are routing, each interface on the router must be in its own subnet.
Otherwise routing would not work. If you're bridging, then the bridged
interfaces are in the same subnet but you don't specifically assign an
IP address
Where I work, "Data Technician" is the entry-level title for my group, while
Network Analyst is the more senior position. The sys admin title doesn't
exist here, as system administration duties are divided among the LAN
support personnel and LAN analysts.
> hmmm.. from my somewhat limited knowl
Did you Define sub interface function in S0,
Ade,
-Original Message-
From: Roman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 2:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid question...(no questions are stupid friend)
Ohit pings just fine. I am just trying a little
The frame-relay portion is only between the two cisco routers. The linksys
router is tied to the e0 port of one of them. Actually, I have that linksys
router/switch functioning only as a gateway/switch. It does no routing per se.
Just shoves everything not local out the WAN port and that's abou
If your running frame relay did you remember to encapsulate the link with
IETF. You know this is used for a Cisco router connecting to a non Cisco
router, just a thought.
Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the automobile had followed the same development as the computer, a
Rolls
Ohit pings just fine. I am just trying a little experiment. You
know...fix it
up, tear it down, fix it up, tear it down - ad nauseum. Anyway - it goes
something
like this. I have a Linksys (I know...don't say it) Broadband
Router/Switch that
my internal LAN accesses the internet through
Ohit pings just fine. I am just trying a little experiment. You
know...fix it
up, tear it down, fix it up, tear it down - ad nauseum. Anyway - it goes
something
like this. I have a Linksys (I know...don't say it) Broadband
Router/Switch that
my internal LAN accesses the internet through
You need a crossover to
"talk" NIC to E0. The only time you would use a patch cable, is when
you connect the router/ PC to a switch/ hub. I "personally" know when
to use each cable (I even know the pinouts), but I'm not sure if I
could clearly explain to you why this is. I can promise you
You must use a "straight" cable if you're connecting pc/router/etc. to a
hub/switch. And you definetely must use a "crossed-over" cable to connect a
pc/router to another pc/router and hub/switch to another hub/switch. Some
hubs/switches/routers may let you change manually the role of the port
(MDI
Any 10BaseT type Ethernet connection between any two devices without the use
of a hub requires a crossover cable.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Roman
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Stupid question..
Roman,
Just buy a cheap 5 port hub for this. That will work. PC to hub, and hub
to router. Also, you dont need a PC to check if ether will get through the
link. Just create a ping on router A, and when it asks for the source, put
the address for etherO. For example:
RouterA#ping
IP ad
The simplest easiest program to use is terminal.exe from Windows 3.1.
Hyperterminal is very buggy. Also make sure to properly set up the
communication settings, correct com port, speed at 9600, etc.
Moshe
> -Original Message-
> From: Quinton Maynard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thu
Yes, the console cable need to be rollover cable. Sorry for the oversight.
Sadguna Kumar Dasari
""Sadguna Kumar Dasari"" wrote in message
8g2ll1$mjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8g2ll1$mjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The above replys and if you don't have the "light blue console cable" just
> make a regu
://www.techperks.com - Your Online Certification Forum!
>From: "JoeFerg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "JoeFerg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: stupid question
>Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 08:43:54 -0400
>
>the console cabl
the console cable needs to be a rollover cable
-Joe-
"Sadguna Kumar Dasari" wrote in message
8g2ll1$mjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8g2ll1$mjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The above replys and if you don't have the "light blue console cable" just
> make a regular 8 conductor straight thru cable. But you
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Sadguna Kumar Dasari
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 11:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: stupid question
>
>
> The above replys and if you don't have the "light blue console cab
The above replys and if you don't have the "light blue console cable" just
make a regular 8 conductor straight thru cable. But you will have to end up
using rj45 to db9/db25 adapter (cisco's or the one with compatible pinout).
Kumar Dasari
"Quinton Maynard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[E
Hyperterminal will get you in. I believe that the settings are 9600,8,n,2.
Hit enter a couple of times and you should gt the login. MAke sure you are
using the correct console cable also.
Thanks,
Dennis Olson
Dynamic Network Solutions, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [
the router should come with a manual on what to do,
but if you dont have it do this:
plug the light blue console cable into the port
marked "console" on the back of the router
plug the other end of the console cable into your
serial port on your computer
use hyperterminal and connect at
59 matches
Mail list logo
