RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-27 Thread Geoffrey Cauchi
February 2002 15:35 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] You'll have to coordinate with your ISP's if you want to run BGP. To enable the feature on the 1000's, you have to upgrade to an IP Plus IOS. -Ejay -Original Message- From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay

RE: Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-26 Thread Evans, TJ
: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change

Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-26 Thread Charles Manafa
Is your server capable of running a dynamic routing protocol (RIP)? Does it support dead-gateway detection - use IRDP CM - Original Message - From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay To: Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 5:13 AM Subject: Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hey guys

RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-26 Thread Hire, Ejay
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hey guys The toplogy is this: ISP (65)(ISP 169) [R1] [R2] || || \--/ | [HOST] IP:169... IP: 65

TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay
Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could do the change

RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Chris Charlebois
Depends alot on what kind of connection you want. If you are just talking about outbound access from your site, that isn't a problem. Setup the two routers on the same subnet and use HSRP. Best practive would be to set up two HSRP address; each router will be primarary for one address and

Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread sam sneed
You would want to use both HSRP and BGP in this case. HSRP will solve the problem of changing the default gateway on the clients when a link fails. BGP will be used for fault tolerance at the ISP side. Here is a sample doc I got form the cisco site: http://www.v-man.net/support/pdf/hsrp_bgp.pdf

Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Rob Webber
For the outbound connectivity, use the HSRP track feature. That watches an interface (the WAN link to your ISP). If that interface goes down, the HSRP priority of that router gets reduced, making the other router (with the good ISP link) the HSRP primary. HSRP will make it so no changes are

Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]+ Some details of my net [7:36379]

2002-02-25 Thread Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay
Hello The mail server have 2 ips one for 65.169.240. and the second 169.158.32. network. This is de configuration havae in my server:. NETWORKING=yes HOSTNAME=MailServer #GATEWAY=169.158.32.1 GATEWAY=65.169.240.209 In this moment my gateway is 65.169.240.209, because the other (commented with

Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Patrick Ramsey
chances are bgp will not be availablefirst..he has to have the address space...second...if he didn't plan for it before hand, he's probably got a couple'a 2500's or 2600's Try running bgp on a 2500. (unless of course he uses the same isp for both connections and they work with him on

Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]+ Some details of my [7:36381]

2002-02-25 Thread Patrick Ramsey
wow...At this point I hope nobody is scanning archives for ip addresses... Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay 02/25/02 10:56AM Hello The mail server have 2 ips one for 65.169.240. and the second 169.158.32. network. This is de configuration havae in my server:. NETWORKING=yes HOSTNAME=MailServer

Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol i could do the change

RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Bill Carter
HSRP on the Ethernet Interfaces of your 2 routers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 9:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have

RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Hire, Ejay
: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have

Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Godswill Oletu
for more information. (http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/hsrp_bgp.html) Enjoy Godswill Oletu CSS1,CCDP,CCNP. - Original Message - From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay To: Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:10 AM Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent

RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Ladrach, Daniel E.
: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT or other protocol

RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Hire, Ejay
PROTECTED] Subject: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Hello i have a frecuent porblem with one of my isp, i have two cisco routers and each one to different isp. Frequentily i have to change the gateway of one of my servers, because one isp is failure. I want to know if with one of BGP, OSPF, RIP, NAT

RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Hire, Ejay
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] chances are bgp will not be availablefirst..he has to have the address space...second...if he didn't plan for it before hand, he's probably got a couple'a 2500's or 2600's Try running bgp on a 2500. (unless

RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Schneider, Matt
2500 is BGP king -Original Message- From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Do not say that a 2500 will not work for BGP. It will work just fine for a default-only

RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Ladrach, Daniel E.
Come on Track the Serial interface! Basic HSRP! Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom -Original Message- From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:20 PM To: 'Ladrach, Daniel E.'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Come

RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread John Neiberger
tail-light, which would you fix first? -Ejay -Original Message- From: Ladrach, Daniel E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Run HSRP between the two cisco routers and then point your

RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Hire, Ejay
. -Ejay -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] I'm not sure I understand your point. Assume the following topology: [R1

Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Rob Webber
ruary 25, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] Run HSRP between the two cisco routers and then point your default gateway to the VIP address. Daniel Ladrach CCNA, CCNP WorldCom -Original Message- From: Yassel Omar Izquierdo Souchay

RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread John Neiberger
to look at this and start pushing it to customers as a solution. -Ejay -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] I'm not sure I

Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Charles Manafa
This solution assumes that the subnet is routable by both providers. If this is the case, then HSRP is by far the easiest solution. CM - Original Message - From: John Neiberger To: Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371] I'm not sure I

Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread Brian
So all of you that said hsrp with travking, curious how many of you got it from the q1 issue of packet? Bri Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36474t=36371 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: Re: TWO ISP AND ONE FAILURE [7:36371]

2002-02-25 Thread John Neiberger
Not me! I've been thinking about it some more since at one point I thought it would work, then I thought it had some problems, but now I'm back to thinking it would work. One issue with this method is the ever-changing default gateway but the other issue is that of source addresses and as I