t: RE: BGP problem [7:60338]
>From the original post, sounds like he was getting repeated messages of
that kind.
rfc3392 is the current release. 2842 is obseleted by 3392. It does say
in the last para of section 3,
"
The Error Subcode in the message is set to Unsupported Capability.
ogs were once
from each peer or repeated messages from numerous peers.
-Original Message-
From: John Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 7:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338]
The message format is FACILITY-SEVERITY-MNEMONIC. So this
; > Charles
> >
> >
> > ""Vicuna, Mark"" wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Not quite.. code 2 only reaches subcode 5. Route loop would be code 3
> > > subcode 7.
> > >
> >
loop would be code 3
> > subcode 7.
> >
> > hth,
> > Mark.
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:43 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338
family (or other optional
capability) mismatch.
Of course, I don't have a PhD, nor my CCIE # yet, so I may not actually be
worthy of the response I've typed.
Best Regards,
John
- Original Message -
From: "Charles"
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 3:43 PM
Subject:
Check the version? on each routerh for BGP. You can configure BGP Version
by using neighbor x.x.x.x /27 version X
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60375&t=60339
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://
hth,
> Mark.
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338]
>
>
> hey,
>
> %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor x.x.x.x 2/7
>
> B
Not quite.. code 2 only reaches subcode 5. Route loop would be code 3
subcode 7.
hth,
Mark.
-Original Message-
From: Charles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BGP problem [7:60338]
hey,
%BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to
hey,
%BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor x.x.x.x 2/7
BGP-3 means it's a BGP UPDATE message error
2/7 are the error subcodes (I believe!)
2- unrecognized well known attribute
7- AS Routing loop
take a closer look at your configs, etc... is it possible you've got a loop
on your hands?
hope this
o:
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 7:34 AM
Subject: BGP problem [7:60338]
> Dear all
>
> I have been receiving this msg in all my routers during the past month
> and I have searched on how I can remove it but I didn't have any luck to
> find anything can tell on how to remove
003 4:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BGP problem [7:60338]
Dear all
I have been receiving this msg in all my routers during the past month
and I have searched on how I can remove it but I didn't have any luck to
find anything can tell on how to remove this entry to appear in my log
Th
Dear all
I have been receiving this msg in all my routers during the past month
and I have searched on how I can remove it but I didn't have any luck to
find anything can tell on how to remove this entry to appear in my log
The entry is:
%BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor x.x.x.x 2/7 (unsupp
Dear all
I have been receiving this msg in all my routers during the past month
and I have searched on how I can remove it but I didn't have any luck to
find anything can tell on how to remove this entry to appear in my log
The entry is:
%BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor x.x.x.x 2/7 (unsupp
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BGP Problem [7:6376]
Check with Interpacket. They've probably assigned a higher local preference
to routes coming from you.
CM
> -Original Message-
> From: Osama Kamal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 30 May 2001 07:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Check with Interpacket. They've probably assigned a higher local preference
to routes coming from you.
CM
> -Original Message-
> From: Osama Kamal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 30 May 2001 07:48
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: BGP Problem [7:6376]
>
We have a problem with BGP , We need your advice to isolate the cause and
solve the problem .
We have three downlinks and two upliks . We use BGP at one way
for incoming traffics .
So we advertise our own IPs through the three providers Interpacket ,
Netvision and paltel .
We successfully do BGP
After looking at the correct page, p. 328, I see nothing in those configs or
your configs to set the metric, or MED, so it is defaulting to zero. My
guess is that the "show ip bgp" output that shows the metric set to 20 for
some of those routes is wrong.
Regardless, unless you have specifically
Oops, I meant page 328, Fig 11-6
rgds
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi
I have set up a lab as per the "Internet Routing Architectures - Second
Edition sample network on Pg 313 and I have encountered a problem with
iBGP. IT does not seem to want to record the metrics from the iBGP in
the BGP tables. His network is using Ethernet interfaces and I am using
Frame
A BGP speaker must never advertise an address of a peer to that peer as a
NEXT_HOP , for a route that the speaker is originating.
Can I anyone explain it.
Thanks
Azhar Soomro
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.
You can't advertise routes out of the same interface your recieve them from.
"azhar mumtaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
20001115211919.23375.qmail@localhost">news:20001115211919.23375.qmail@localhost...
> A BGP speaker must never advertise an address of a peer to that peer as a
> NEXT_HO
Hi Group,
Anybody heard about Endless BGP Convergence Problem in Cisco IOS
Software Releases. I am multihomed to two ISP. My two routers speak to each other
with
iBGP. And one of my routeur, that is version Version 12.1(1)E3, EARLY DEPLOYMENT
RELEASE SOFTWARE, kept receiving BGP UPDATE from i
How did you manage to solve it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Raymond Mak
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BGP problem
I have solved the problem now.
Regards,
Raymond Mak
Raymond Mak wrote
I have solved the problem now.
Regards,
Raymond Mak
Raymond Mak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have local and global connection to Internet.
> When I trace from local site to internal network, it passes through
> local connection, and when I trace from global site to internal network,
> it can pass through
Hi,
I have local and global connection to Internet.
When I trace from local site to internal network, it passes through
local connection, and when I trace from global site to internal network,
it can pass through global connection. But the strange thing is when I
trace from internal network to lo
hi Anyone knows any solution to this matter :
problem goes this way :
Sometimes my in and out transfer rate went down to zero for a while. You can
see the attachment.
I checked my router log file and there wasn't any interface down.
But I checked the BGP session was down.
NeighborV
26 matches
Mail list logo
