question on ip packet

2000-08-16 Thread Luan Kim
Can someone lighten me up as to what's inside an "ip packet"? Is there a udp/tcp header in it? Is there a mac-address in it? Thanks for any input. Luan T. Kim, MCSE, CCNA* Systems/Network Infrastructure Engineer* MP3.COM, I

Re: question on ip packet

2000-08-16 Thread Marc Russell
The IP packet operates at layer three and is used for transport. The payload of an IP packet may be TCP or UDP segments that operate at layer 4 and use port numbers. The segment then of course carry their own payload of layers 5 and up. "Luan Kim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTE

RE: question on ip packet

2000-08-16 Thread Chuck Larrieu
bits. No mac - that's layer two. IP is layer three. TCP is layer 4 HTH Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Luan Kim Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 3:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Naasief Edross Subject: question

Re: question on ip packet

2000-08-16 Thread Brian
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Luan Kim wrote: > Can someone lighten me up as to what's inside an "ip packet"? Is there a > udp/tcp header in it? Is there a mac-address in it? Thanks for any > input. You are a Network Engineer for a multi-million dollar company, hold a CCNA, and are asking something tr

Re: question on ip packet

2000-08-16 Thread Luan Kim
Brian, My knowledge of tcp/ip is enough for me to configure routers/switches. I'm still learning. There is nothing wrong with a network engineer who holds a ccna cert. that doesn't know what's inside an ip packet. I have friends who are 20+ years old and are currently network engineers and work

Re: question on ip packet

2000-08-17 Thread Leon Bass
The only dumb question is one that someone is afraid to ask, don't waste time nor bandwidth, if it's not an answer. Brian it's obvious you aren't the number one CCIE in the world, because your on the list, get a life or better yet get your CCIE, I see you didn't even give Luan an answer. You don't

RE: question on ip packet

2000-08-17 Thread Bogdan Moldoveanu
17 PM To: Brian Cc: Luan Kim; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Naasief Edross Subject: Re: question on ip packet The only dumb question is one that someone is afraid to ask, don't waste time nor bandwidth, if it's not an answer. Brian it's obvious y

Re: question on ip packet

2000-08-17 Thread Flem
Luan , What ip address did you assigned to the cow ? Can I dialin ? :) This link was on the list before : http://www.radcom-inc.com/acad/protocols.htm It tells you how things look like . It will NOT however tell you how to milk a cow . flem --- Luan Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian,

Re: question on ip packet

2000-08-17 Thread Oz
the cow needs an UDDer protocol TEAT MILK stream Bucket Stool ( saves load on the backbone) redundancy ( spare bucket to take the butter overflow) use the squeeze command to start the process Load balance amongst teats. This scenario you should disable spanning tree as you need to loop f

Re: question on ip packet

2000-08-17 Thread Travis Hayes
Maybe he should know, but I also find it extremely refreshing to find a newsgroup where someone can ask a question and people are willing to either sit down and explain the answer or tell the person where to find it. Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: question on ip packet

2000-08-17 Thread Radford Dion
o the QOS, which is printed on the outside of the packet). 5. Information on what do to if you swallow the non-edible plastic toy. Hope that helps. Dion > -Original Message- > From: Travis Hayes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday 17 August 2000 16:47 > To: [E

RE: question on ip packet

2000-08-17 Thread Chuck Larrieu
attle Roundup and Pasteurization Processes Is there really any value to hands on experience here? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Flem Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 6:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: question on ip p

Re: question on ip packet

2000-08-17 Thread Thomas Lisa
ience here? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Flem > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 6:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:Re: question on ip packet > > Luan , > > What ip address did you ass

RE: question on ip packet

2000-08-17 Thread Daniel Cotts
ROFL Try milking a cow. There is immediate feedback. BTW Those with experience have strong forearms. > -Original Message- > From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 11:01 AM > To: Flem; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: questi

Re: question on ip packet

2000-08-17 Thread Nigel Taylor
ROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 5:00 PM Subject: RE: question on ip packet > I have a job offer from a dairy, but they only want to pay me at the entry > level scale because I have no hands on experience. > > I don't see why I should be paid less than the guy next to m

RE: question on ip packet

2000-08-17 Thread Traister, Blake (SBCI)
: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 3:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Naasief Edross Subject: question on ip packet Can someone lighten me up as to what's inside an "ip packet"? Is there a udp/tcp header in it? Is there a mac-address in it? Thank

Re: question on ip packet

2000-08-18 Thread Jason
There is absolutely no value whatsoever in this reply. Please stop reading if you are expecting to find any thing of value in this message. The only reason I'm replying is that I figure if I'm going to have to wade through all this cow jokes and whathaveyou, I might as well add to it. By the way,

Helping Folks Out- WAS question on ip packet

2000-08-18 Thread Chuck Larrieu
riginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: question on ip packet There is absolutely no value whatsoever in this reply. Please stop reading if you are expecting to fi

Re: Helping Folks Out- WAS question on ip packet

2000-08-19 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of >Jason >Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 12:07 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject:Re: question on ip packet > >There is absolutely no value whatsoever in this reply. Please stop reading >if you are expecting to find a

Re: Helping Folks Out- WAS question on ip packet

2000-08-20 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
ything about >>this in my reading and references there either. >> >>It's ok to ask questions that will further your knowledge about routing, >>routers, and how it all works. Honest. >> >>Chuck >> >> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

Re: Helping Folks Out- WAS question on ip packet

2000-08-21 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 11:02 PM 8/20/00, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: >If you know that a specific test asks for offsets, then I suppose you must >memorize them. A test that asks for them, IMNSHO, demonstrates more a lazy >test writer than it does understanding of the topic. Flashing back to my >clinical laboratory

Re: Out of Office AutoReply: Helping Folks Out- WAS question on ip packet

2000-08-19 Thread Paul Borghese
ECTED]> To: "Cisco Mail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2000 11:03 AM Subject: FW: Out of Office AutoReply: Helping Folks Out- WAS question on ip packet > I think we ought to start a pool - buck a guess - how many messages in this > guy's in-box whe

FW: Out of Office AutoReply: Helping Folks Out- WAS question on ip packet

2000-08-21 Thread Chuck Larrieu
TED]] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 2:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Out of Office AutoReply: Helping Folks Out- WAS question on ip packet Hello Did you try to send an email to Gabriel Neagoe, Netowrking solution consultant for S&T Romania, CCNP, CCDA,... ? Well, You are succ

Re: Out of Office AutoReply: Helping Folks Out- WAS question on ip packet

2000-08-21 Thread Kris Jacobs
in my absence - hang in there your > time will come. > > Paul Borghese > > - Original Message - > From: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Cisco Mail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2000 11:03 AM > Sub