yes, it needs, nVCluster License (A9K-NV-CLUSTR-LIC)
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:17 PM, jure brkljacic zblajh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
do we need a licence for nV Edge functionality for RSP 440 and MOD80 LC?
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote:
i told last
i told last time they cannot load-sharing traffic for mc-lag, not sure now
can support or not.
another thing is that if you previous have hsrp/vrrp between two asr9k, now
u must change the design.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.skwrote:
I was told that if
tries to peer with any
platfrom for v6 VRRP.
Thanks,
Danny
On Friday, 8 November 2013 11:01 AM, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com
wrote:
what is the bug detail, is it related by ttl?
On Friday, November 8, 2013, Danny Pinto danny.pi...@ymail.com wrote:
Just got confirmed with a SR . Bug
one recommendation is that check the ttl value for xr and junos.
I got one case regarding iOS IOS-XR, then cannot talk, finnaly i sniffer
the detail packet and found that the default ttl value is different, so
both cannot recognise each other.
On Wednesday, November 6, 2013, Danny Pinto
what is the bug detail, is it related by ttl?
On Friday, November 8, 2013, Danny Pinto danny.pi...@ymail.com wrote:
Just got confirmed with a SR . Bug on SR. VRRP v6 on XR does not work
with other platforms.
Thanks.
Regards,
Danny
On Thursday, 7 November 2013 6:38 PM, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0
any particular reason for this?
I meant you set 9192 9178? did you consider the mpls stack labeles or
Layer 2 headers? or whatever, then finally you made this recommendation
value?
On Saturday, October 26, 2013, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On Friday, October 25, 2013 04:39:57 AM Nick
You can use show imds interface GiX/X/X to check different layer of MTU and
compare between IOS-XR and XE.
2013/5/27 Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.sk
Hi Folks,
Has anyone encountered ISIS/CLNS MTU issues between ASR1k and ASR9k please?
sh isis int / sh clns int
- shows MTU: 9177 on
-23, at 1:36 AM, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently I got the MP-BGP configurations, both the VPNv4 and VPNv6, not
sure there is any bug inside or not, SE told me just use the 4.3.0, 4.3.1
is too new.
2013/5/23 Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca
I'm looking at VPLS and my SE has
Are u talking about the inter-as mpls/vpn?
On Apr 17, 2013 3:29 PM, Mattias Gyllenvarg
mattias.gyllenv...@bredband2.se wrote:
Beware of one thing 6PE can not do.
BGPv6 over multi-hop will not work as there is no recursive lookup from v6
too v4 in your BGP speaker.
This is a feature, not a
Any specific reason why u want to upgrade from 4.3.0 to 4.3.1?
Appreciate your comments.
On May 22, 2013 8:39 PM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote:
Running 4.3.0 with MP-BGP and it works just fine. Planning a mass upgrade
of my others to 4.3.1.
4.2.x always bugged me because of odd input
regarding MP-BGP, mostly.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013-05-22, at 11:13 PM, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote:
Any specific reason why u want to upgrade from 4.3.0 to 4.3.1?
Appreciate your comments.
On May 22, 2013 8:39 PM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote:
Running 4.3.0 with MP-BGP
Hi Folks, any ideas the difference between 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 for ASR9K? I
checked the released note for both, cannot find any difference.
Currently i need to choice one for internally testing, 4.3.1 is just
released last week, don't know which one is much more stable.
Appreciate for any inputs.
2013 10:01, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks, any ideas the difference between 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 for ASR9K? I
checked the released note for both, cannot find any difference.
Currently i need to choice one for internally testing, 4.3.1 is just
released last week, don't know which one
Our platform is 9010, currently dont encounter any specific bugs.
2013/5/21 Dumitru Ciobarcianu cisco-...@lnx.ro
On 21-May-13 11:37 AM, Xu Hu wrote:
So actually for the 4.3.1 is just a feature enhancement release? My
concern
is that maybe 4.3.0 is quite poor, that's why they release 4.3.1
Thanks Jared, can share with us some of the defects which are not fixed
currently in 4.3.1? thanks.
2013/5/22 Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net
On May 21, 2013, at 8:34 AM, Praveen Sharma (psharma) psha...@cisco.com
wrote:
Thanks Fredrick for pointing the doc reference.
Hi Xu
Both
CCO release.
Thx
Praveen
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Fredrik Vöcks
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 4:25 AM
To: Xu Hu
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Difference between 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 version
an issue
with hsrp, tac said v2 with 4.3.0(we'll be testing that in the next few
days) major note : Cisco says Max 1000 sessions per system, but we still
need clarifications on that!
Sent from my iPhone
On 16 Μαϊ 2013, at 0:06, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Currently I am
Hi Folks,
Currently I am considering which SMU need to be installed in the production
environment, when i download the 4.2.3 software, i found the packet
included some 4.2.0 SMUs, not sure whether these are the mandatory ones or
optional?
Also, any idea about the HSRPv2 support for ASR9K?
Maybe different as using for different functionality. Do u confirm two as
numbers using for the same network.
On Dec 6, 2012 7:58 PM, mert ozkul thesoulforged...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have query about ISP Design.
Why some ISP`s (Ex: BT) using dual AS`es on their network?
What are the
Hi Folks,
Below is my IPv6 configurations about MQC:
ipv6 access-list FTPV6
permit tcp any any eq ftp
class-map match-all FTPV6
match access-group name FTPV6
policy-map test
class FTPV6
set dscp cs7
interface TenGigabitEthernet9/1
ip address 2.2.2.254 255.255.255.0
load-interval 30
ipv6
Yes
On Nov 30, 2012 6:24 PM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote:
Yes, I know but does it have ISIS support for v6.
On 2012-11-30, at 1:42 AM, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote:
Definitely it can support IPv6.
2012/11/30 Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca
I'm having a bit of a hard
Definitely it can support IPv6.
2012/11/30 Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca
I'm having a bit of a hard time getting ISIS to do any v6 stuff on an
ME3400 that I'm playing around with. I'm running 12.2(58)EX on it.
I trust that this platform/version has ISIS support for v6. Right? :|
It will run in non xl mode.
On Nov 22, 2012 11:26 AM, . . raincit...@cosmo.com wrote:
Hi,
If we have a 6500 with a Sup2T XL (VS-S2T-10G-XL) that is doing BGP with
full
tables (so ~400k routes), does that mean all line cards must be XL as
well? The
FAQ here:
Normally i checked the mac-address table using show mac-address or show
arp, under which circumstance we need to use the show cam?
On Nov 2, 2012 11:59 PM, Harold 'Buz' Dale buz.d...@usg.edu wrote:
Try show cam or sh mac address-table
show arp can also be quite useful depending on the device.
Hi Arie, i heard there should depend on which ios version and which kind of
configirations u use will impact the action about hw or software switching.
On Nov 1, 2012 12:56 AM, Arie Vayner (avayner) avay...@cisco.com wrote:
Yes, same concept.
Better run on SXI or later to avoid issues with
Thanks for your information.
On Nov 4, 2012 3:49 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 03:39:12PM +0800, Xu Hu wrote:
Normally i checked the mac-address table using show mac-address or show
arp, under which circumstance we need to use the show cam
Should be end of this year, i am also waiting for the 15.3 for 7600.
On Nov 5, 2012 11:37 AM, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list
cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
Are the proposed release dates for new versions of XE documented anywhere?
Would like to know (approx) when 15.3S/3.8.0S will be
Hi Experts,
Any idea about the difference between Cisco and Juniper equipment?
In the Juniper box, by default can learn the ULA, GUA and Link-local IPv6
neighbor,
In the Cisco box, by default just can learn the GUA and Link-local IPv6
neighbor,
Below is the output captured.
xuhu1 show ipv6
Can share your configuration?
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 11 Sep, 2012, at 22:27, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
Any idea about the difference between Cisco and Juniper equipment?
In the Juniper box, by default can learn the ULA, GUA and Link-local IPv6
neighbor,
In the Cisco box, by default
learn the neighbour, after I configure one
more address using GUA, the traffic is success, but I found after I delete the
GUA, and also clear neighbour, just use the ULA, the traffic also can reach, so
I am confused about the issue.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 11 Sep, 2012, at 22:32, Phil
Hi All,
My situation is as below:
CE Router--Edge Router-Core Router---Internet
The link between CE Router and Edge Router is using ULA, the link between
Edge Router and Core Router is also using ULA, the link between Core Router
and Internet is using GUA.
Internet Router will give
Hi Experts,
Anybody have the experience about IPv6 ULA deployment?
I know this kind of address is used within a site, can well done the
intra-site communication, just like the private addresses in IPv4.
I have one question about ULA, since ULA is used as local communication, if
my site need to
, 2012-09-09 at 18:31 +0800, Xu Hu wrote:
I have one question about ULA, since ULA is used as local
communication, if my site need to internet access, how come it
translate to global IPv6 address?
You're supposed to assign a GUA to each client alongside the ULA. Source
address selection
Hi Bacon,
For the PBR hardware switched or software switched, it depends, please
check the detail as below website
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2017902
For the question which you raised Or can you not policy-route to a
non-directly-connected PE over MPLS using PBR?
The answer is, of
Log in to the non-owner SDR using admin plane authentication:
Username:@admin
Password:
Example:
Username:@admin
Password:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios_xr_sw/iosxr_r3.7/system_management/configuration/guide/yc37sdr.html
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 27 Aug, 2012, at 1:21
members.
Correct me if I have the wrong understanding of hashing algorithm.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 24 Aug, 2012, at 7:02, Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com wrote:
Flex links is an option as well.
Sent from handheld
On Aug 23, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote:
You
Hi Ryan, thanks for your information.
Xu Hu
On 24 Aug, 2012, at 20:19, Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 06:40:07, Xu Hu wrote:
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Port channel
What is the flex links about?
Because the traffic load-balance or not is depend on your settings
Just checked the flex links basic concept, is this technology same as
Juniper RTG?
2012/8/24 Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 06:40:07, Xu Hu wrote:
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Port channel
What is the flex links about?
Because the traffic load-balance or not is depend
Is anyway we can see the tcp connections in the router through show tcp or
something like that?
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 13 Aug, 2012, at 16:31, Chris Knipe sav...@savage.za.org wrote:
Hi,
Saw 4 sessions that was down and sh tcp showed thousands of
connections in a CLOSEWAIT state
How often is the flapping? 60s?
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 9 Aug, 2012, at 3:07, Sebastian Wiesinger cisco-...@ml.karotte.org wrote:
* Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com [2012-08-08 18:30]:
Are this routes all running in the ospf and bgp at the same time? If yes, it
is a normal behaviour
Try to set the load-interval to 30s, then check again.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 8 Aug, 2012, at 21:54, Aaron aar...@gvtc.com wrote:
anybody know why me3600 svi doesn't seem to show in and out bit counts that
the underlying phy int shows? all svi's (10,11,13) are in a vrf running
Are this routes all running in the ospf and bgp at the same time? If yes, it is
a normal behaviour.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 8 Aug, 2012, at 22:27, Sebastian Wiesinger cisco-...@ml.karotte.org wrote:
Hello,
I'm having a strange problem with a Cisco 6500/SUP720 running
12.2(33)SXJ3
knowledgeable
that I will look for others to confirm or deny my understandings and then
grow from it.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Xu Hu
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 10:30 AM
..) should adapt as you change it..
oli
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Xu Hu
Sent: 01 August 2012 02:33
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Fwd: IPV6 Path MTU DIscovery Test
:
cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Xu Hu
Sent: 1 août 2012 09:54
To: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Fwd: IPV6 Path MTU DIscovery Test
Must use the TCP packets? I want to just use the ping packet to test the
effect of PMTUD. Is any
] On Behalf Of Xu Hu
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 10:30 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] 6VPE deployment Issue (Core router need configure IPv6
address or not?)
Hi All Experts,
Let's say the topology as below:
CE-1---PE-1---P---PE-2
Hi Experts,
I have some queries about the PMTU for IPv6.
1. From my understanding, path MTU discovery in IPv6 allows a host to
dynamically discover and adjust to differences in the MTU size of every
link along a given data path, So the fragmentation is handled by the
source, if i want to test
Anybody have any good idea?
Thanks advance for any inputs,
Xu Hu
Begin forwarded message:
From: TJ trej...@gmail.com
Date: 1 August, 2012 5:23:46 GMT+08:00
To: Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPV6 Path MTU DIscovery Test
Reply-To: trej...@gmail.com
In order to test
their defaults?
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Below is the network topology, i ping from CE-2 to CE-1, during i
shutdown
the PE-4, have some packet drops.
CE connect to the backbone network using HSRP, the hear beat is through
the
CE switch. PE-1
Using the hello-interval 1, dead-interval 4.
7600 using fast-hello, but asr9000 cannot support, that's why using the 1 4.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 27 Jul, 2012, at 17:43, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 27/07/2012 04:54, Xu Hu wrote:
So i think is because of backbone network
Already double confirmed with Cisco tac, the routing should be no issue. Not
sure is it possible caused by the physical hardware. The 7600 using ws-6700
line card.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 27 Jul, 2012, at 21:06, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com
wrote:
Using the hello
Hi All,
Below is the network topology, i ping from CE-2 to CE-1, during i shutdown
the PE-4, have some packet drops.
CE connect to the backbone network using HSRP, the hear beat is through the
CE switch. PE-1 and PE-3 is the active gateway, PE-2 and PE-4 is the
standby one.
PE equipment running
Anybody have any idea?
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 26 Jul, 2012, at 21:43, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Below is the network topology, i ping from CE-2 to CE-1, during i shutdown
the PE-4, have some packet drops.
CE connect to the backbone network using HSRP, the hear
Try to search one command to type into Cisco equipment, by default cannot
recognise the third party transceiver.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 19 Jul, 2012, at 4:41, TomTom40502 tomtom40...@charter.net wrote:
Anyone else having issues with Vertex CWDM SFPs not functioning on the 20x1GE
I remember usually I just type the global command, then it works.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 19 Jul, 2012, at 9:48, Matt Addison matt.addi...@lists.evilgeni.us wrote:
transceiver permit pid all
On the interface
And
service unsupported-transceiver
In global.
Sent from my iPad
Hi All,
Anyone knows the difference between show mpls forwading and show mpls ldp
forwarding?
Best Regards,
Hu Xu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
PO0/2/0/112.0.0.2N N
On 16 July 2012 08:19, Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Anyone knows the difference between show mpls forwading and show mpls ldp
forwarding?
Best Regards,
Hu Xu
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Thanks Oil, very detail professional explanation, easy to understand.
2012/7/16 Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com
Or the show mpls forwarding = show mpls ldp forwarding + show ip route
No, the routing information is already used to establish show mpls ldp
forwarding, so it's
Yes, you are right, now my big concern is that if one packet have one DSCP
value, then after transfer through the MPLS network (deploy the MPLS EXP QOS in
the MPLS network) the output packet will attach the same DSCP value or not?
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 11 Jul, 2012, at 16:54, adam
You are using MPLS/VPN feature, by default it just support 6, if you want to
configure more, need to buy the license.
The license name is L3 MPLS/ VPN something like that, you can check from the
cisco.com.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 11 Jul, 2012, at 18:14, Nam NGUYEN nam...@gmail.com wrote
Hi Oil, this is not because of the MPLS/VPN number limitation?
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 11 Jul, 2012, at 18:41, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com
wrote:
I have a few ASR9Ks used as PE routers. Due to customer's requirements, a
lot of VRFs are created, each contains one OSPF
So what is the MPLS/VPN license limitation for?
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 11 Jul, 2012, at 19:10, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com
wrote:
I have a few ASR9Ks used as PE routers. Due to customer's requirements, a
lot of VRFs are created, each contains one OSPF instance
7600 line cards support are depend on the chassis also?
I remember 6500 7600 can buy support separately for chassis and line cards.
GSR I know is depend on the chassis.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 11 Jul, 2012, at 22:32, Rinse Kloek rinse.kl...@isp.solcon.nl wrote:
Matthew,
Another
Thanks, Oil, got the answers.
On 11 Jul, 2012, at 23:03, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com
wrote:
So what is the MPLS/VPN license limitation for?
there is no technical dependency here, and in currently shipping code, the
licenses aren't even enforced, all you'll get is some
Hi Team,
Recently test the QOS in MPLS network occur one issue.
CE---PE-1PPE-2CE.
CE and PE just running static route, PE and P running OSPF for IGP, MP-BGP,
then also LDP and MPLS/TE auto-tunnel.
In the input direction of PE-1 towards CE side, i match the DSCP value CS6,
then reset
Hi Team,
By default, the MPLS/TE weight will inherit the cost from IGP, in my
situation is that there are two same cost path in the MPLS/TE network, i
don't know which one will be choose as auto-mesh tunnel, which one will be
choose as backup tunnel, cannot find any clear answers from cisco.com.
Since the 3750 is EOS, we buy the 3900 to replace that.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 7 Jul, 2012, at 9:45, Dan Letkeman danletke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Looking at replacing a 3750G-12S-12 with an ME-3600X-24FS-M. I have
never used or seen a 3600x, and I was wondering for the basic
Lol, finally got this point. Will try to test in the real router.
Appreciate for all the experts' reply and help.
2012/6/27 Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:09:10PM +0800, Xu Hu wrote:
Since IPv6 Etherchannel cannot support for Cisco IOS so far, one
Actually we will use 15.1s for the feature support of OSPFv3 between PE CE
next month.
If you don't need any new special features, maybe SRE5 is a better choose, you
know the 15.1s released in the March, should be some unknown bugs.
HTH
Xu Hu
On 28 Jun, 2012, at 6:48, N. Max Pierson nmaxpier
Hi Experts,
Since IPv6 Etherchannel cannot support for Cisco IOS so far, one of the
solution is using the GRE tunnel sending traffic through port-channel,
hence using the bandwidth.
My IPv6 new deployment is dual-stack, since my IPv4 Etherchannel have many
sub-interface configuration and also the
...@cisco.com
Xu Hu,
I am not sure which restriction you are mentioning here... I am not aware
of such a restriction...
Could you explain a bit better your setup?
I guess your ES+ is facing your customers with EVCs (UNI), and not sure
what you have on the core facing side.
Maybe if you share some
Hi experts,
The obvious difference between 6PE and 6VPE is as follow:
6PE will just establish IPv6 neighbor between PE router?
6VPE will establish VPNv6 neighbor between PE router, then exchange the VPN
routes between 6VPE router?
Will appreciate for any comments.
Best regards,
Hu Xu.
You mean the intermedia routers just support IPv6 situation?
Xu Hu
On 25 Jun, 2012, at 18:16, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
If the intermediary routers are ipv6 capable don't omit placing an ipv6
address on interfaces. 6pe should only be a stopgap until the devices can do
native
Yeah la, LDPv6 is still during draft.
Xu Hu
On 25 Jun, 2012, at 18:36, Steve McCrory smccr...@gcicom.net wrote:
AFIK as I know though, there is no native support for MPLS within IPv6,
LDP still runs over IPv4
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
For this OSPFv3 VRF-Lite/PE-CE, is support the ospfv3 between PE and CE
under vrf.
Don't quiet understand what you mean.
2012/6/22 adam vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.sk
OSPFv3 VRF-Lite/PE-CE
** **
adam
** **
*From:* Xu Hu [mailto:jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, June 22
and the router needs to be
able to route between these two VRFs
** **
adam
*From:* Xu Hu [mailto:jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, June 22, 2012 3:15 PM
*To:* adam vitkovsky
*Cc:* cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
*Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] OSPFv3 support for IOS and IOS-XR
Hi Folks,
Recently we are checking the OSPFv3 VRF support for IOS and IOS-XR.
Through the Cisco Feature Navigator, i found two related, one is MPLS VPN
OSPFv3 PE-CE, another one is OSPFv3 VRF-Lite/PE-CE, i don't know whether
this two are the same or not.
My understanding is that OSPFv3
I remember last time I also encounter such issue caused by microburst, we
change the input q size to 2000 from default 70.
And also I remember we can check the buffer loss is how many packets through
show buffer command.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 20 Jun, 2012, at 6:09, Nick Hilliard n
Many thanks for your clarification.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 14 Jun, 2012, at 7:09, Łukasz Bromirski luk...@bromirski.net wrote:
On 2012-06-13 05:55, Pete Templin wrote:
On 6/12/12 11:06 AM, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
In reality, Sup720-10GE sold with the VS prefix is a
perfectly normal
Hi Experts,
We bought VS-S720-10G engine for VSS in 6509, but now the customer don't
want use the VSS mode, they just want to use that as normal engine.
So now we are wondering if we use the 10G port for normal Layer2 or Layer3
traffic, will it impact our engine performance or CPU utilization?
Hi Phil Mayers,
Thanks for your reply.
Keep waiting for the information from other experts.
Best Regards,
Hu Xu
2012/6/12 Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk
On 12/06/12 15:28, Xu Hu wrote:
Hi Experts,
We bought VS-S720-10G engine for VSS in 6509, but now the customer don't
want use
Thanks Oil, my GSR used IOS, that's why cannot check the interface of
Standby RP.
2012/6/5 Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) oboeh...@cisco.com
My GSR have two PRP2, each PRP has three management interface which
can be
configured IP address.
But the thing is through show ip interface brief, i
Hi Folks,
My GSR have two PRP2, each PRP has three management interface which can be
configured IP address.
But the thing is through show ip interface brief, i just can see three
Ethernet interface, cannot see six Ethernet.
Now my issue is if i configure the E0 interface as ip address
Ok, do you heard about the MDRR in the GSR? What's the main purpose of this QOS
approach?
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 15 May, 2012, at 0:34, Mack McBride mack.mcbr...@viawest.com wrote:
Your question is not clear.
Yes the GSR and 7609 are very different.
The 7609 can only do policing
Hi Team,
For the IPv6, i have two basic problems;
1. In the real network, usually which kind of ipv6 addressing will use? the
normal one or EUI-64 type?
2. For the link local address, usually which kind of type will use?
manually or dynamic?
Since i don't have the real practical experience about
Doering g...@greenie.muc.de
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:03:23PM +0800, Xu Hu wrote:
1. In the real network, usually which kind of ipv6 addressing will use?
the
normal one or EUI-64 type?
This is a religious issue, and you should be able to find 5000 different
opinions on the NANOG list
-24/
2012/4/24 Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:03:23PM +0800, Xu Hu wrote:
1. In the real network, usually which kind of ipv6 addressing will use?
the
normal one or EUI-64 type?
This is a religious issue, and you should be able to find 5000 different
Hi Team,
Recently i was doing the Layer2 test in ASR9K routers, bellow is the
configuration of the test.
interface TenGigE0/0/0/0
description to-me3600
l2transport---*access port connect to
switch*
interface Bundle-Ether1.1200 l2transport
encapsulation dot1q
.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 2 Apr, 2012, at 16:07, Ambedkar p.ambed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am having a Cisco 6509 sup-2 switch which is booting properly. When i
diagnose it says NVRAM area is corrupted and initializing to default
values. Every time i need to boot manually.
Any
Hi, Waris,
I am very interested about the 10g port license, I don't quite understand why
the port need license, last time I used that port trouble shooting so much
time, at last find that it need license.
Since I never see any other platform need license for the port use.
Thanks and regards,
Xu
cannot support.
interface tunnel-te1
load-share 2
!!% The requested operation is not supported: Feature not supported on this
platform
!
end
Xu Hu
2012/3/30 Dmitry Kiselev dmi...@dmitry.net
Hi!
Yes, unlinke CRS, MPLSTE Unequal Load Balancing currently is not supported
on both Trident
Why just delete the Boot system command. Try just use one boot system command.
If cannot will go directly into the Rommon mode, use boot command will load the
old ios.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 30 Mar, 2012, at 15:17, Andriy Bilous andriy.bil...@gmail.com wrote:
What 'show bootvar' says
Can share your configuration? Recently I was also configuring the MPLS TE in
asr9k.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 30 Mar, 2012, at 8:28, omar parihuana omar.parihu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Group,
I'm wondering about a strange behaviour about MPLS TE on ASR9K
I have two MPLS TE tunnels
Check the load-share command under the tunnel configuration.
Thanks and regards,
Xu Hu
On 30 Mar, 2012, at 8:43, omar parihuana omar.parihu...@gmail.com wrote:
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9K6-413#show run int tunnel-te 501
Thu Mar 29 23:38:02.719 UTC
interface tunnel-te501
ipv4 unnumbered Loopback0
, but the number and path is
wrong, i trouble shooting so much time.
2.If you don't see the backup tunnel work, you need to check if you enable
the backup tunnel under the interface.
The command is like this: mpls traffic-eng interface auto-tunnel backup,
that's all.
Hu Xu
2012/2/27 Xu Hu
You just want to see the series number of supervisor in standby?
Check the show inventory raw command to see whether you can find the answer
or not.
Xu Hu
2012/3/14 Brad Clausen overkil...@gmail.com
Hey Guys,
I have 2 x 6509's running as a virtual switch (VSS). I can't for the likes
of me
Actually in our 3G network, we use the 7609 (two ACE modules) for the NAT,
in the live situation, we had 4M users.
It is quite stable for now.
Also we bought the ASR9K to expand the 3G network, maybe will migrate the
NAT to ASR9K.
Xu Hu
2012/3/14 Ruslan Pustovoitov ru...@mostelekom.net
So the problem cannot solved by TAC?
2012/2/28 James Slepicka (c-nsp) cisco-...@slepicka.net
I previously ran into this issue w/ 4500 + Sup6E running 12.2(52)SG. OSPF
adjacencies would drop during file transfers. TAC pointed me to CSCsw84727:
Writing to bootflash creates instabilities when
Hi Folks,
In my recently project, we buy the L3VPN license for the ASR9K, today, i
try to install them to the machine, but i cannot check whether it works or
not.
The key procedure is :
copy tftp://192.168.0.229/FOX1436GR1Q_20110117042020633.lic disk0:/license
location 0/RSP0/CPU0
copy
cannot active the license. Maybe
it is a bug.
Xu Hu
-- Forwarded message --
From: Xu Hu jstuxuhu0...@gmail.com
Date: 2012/2/28
Subject: ASR9K license install problem
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi Folks,
In my recently project, we buy the L3VPN license for the ASR9K, today, i
try
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
