On 04/16/2012 07:18 PM, Elia Pinto wrote:
2012/4/16 Török Edwin ed...@clamav.net:
On 04/16/2012 07:02 PM, Elia Pinto wrote:
Please ignore this patch. It is incomplete, i am sorry.
I will reroll it shortly.
autogen.sh is not needed, 'autoreconf -fvi' does the job.
Yes, but not check
On 02/11/2012 06:16 PM, infant deepak wrote:
Hi,
I am doing project on clamAV . I have chosen from
http://wiki.clamav.net/bin/view/Main/GoogleSummerOfCode2011
4. DOCX
Add support for parsing docx based MS Office files.
Main purpose is extracting embedded files. You will need to parse
On 02/02/2012 05:53 AM, chatsiri wrote:
Hello All,
I debug code of clamav. Aho-Corasick( AC) Algorithms concepts for
matching between virus and signature files. Step for AC is build trie (
keyword tree) for inserting signature from virus
database files. I have question in step
On 01/10/2012 07:03 AM, chatsiri wrote:
Hello All,
I built code of clamav success on M$ Virtual
You mean Visual.
C++ 10. I have an idea to build the unit_test package of clamav for testing
modules.
libcheck doesn't work on Windows right now, due its use of fork().
Although I've seen some
On 10/07/2011 04:33 PM, Stephane CHAZELAS wrote:
Hiya,
(that's on debian testing amd64 with libclamav6 0.97.2+dfsg-1)
I had a few c-icap crashes on scanning some debian packages for firefox
(for instance:
http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian/pool/main/i/iceweasel/iceweasel_7.0.1-2_amd64.deb)
On 09/29/2011 09:24 PM, Chatsiri Ratana wrote:
Hello All,
I debug clamscan programs by insert a input test to it. I have question on
function for check match string between virus and signature on database.
What a function for checking a virus and signature on database?
My view, It's should
On 07/12/2011 02:11 AM, Jerry 270 wrote:
Hi Edwin,
Thanks for your reply. I am doing a Masters degree for which the
research is analyzing investigating malware. I am interested in evaluating
algorithms used in anti-virus software, but just investigating whether this
is a
On 2011-07-11 01:00, Jerry 270 wrote:
Hi,
I am a newbie to ClamAV so require help please. I am doing a research
project and would like to evaluate the BM and AC algorithms used by ClamAV.
Is there anyway to get ClamAV to use either BM or AC on their own so scanning
speed tests can
On 07/09/2011 12:26 AM, Andrey V. Martyanov wrote:
Hi! I see that Immunet uses libclamav.dll. Doesn't this violate the clamav
license?
Immunet is part of Sourcefire.
For example, I'd like to build my own closed source commercial
antivirus kit with the clamav engine. May I do that?
No.
Best
On 07/09/2011 03:49 PM, Andrey V. Martyanov wrote:
The documentation states rather clearly that LibClamAV is GPL, not LGPL.
See http://www.clamav.net/doc/latest/html/node35.html.
Yes, but if you look at the root of the ClamAV source tree you'll see
the COPYING.LGPL file. It's unclear what is
On 07/05/2011 03:32 AM, Renato Botelho wrote:
Hello,
I can build 20110704 snapshot with external llvm-2.9 on FreeBSD
8.2 without problems, but on 0.97.1 i got the following error:
gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/work/a/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.97.1/libltdl'
gmake[2]: Leaving
On 2011-06-29 17:24, Renato Botelho wrote:
Hi people,
A FreeBSD user sent a PR [1] reporting a problem started to
happen after recently update it to 0.97.1.
Can you please take a look and let me know if it's a known
problem?
He submitted the same report to the clamav-users mailing list.
On 06/21/2011 02:45 PM, Fritz Elfert wrote:
detection but what I want to achieve with this is to exploit clamav's
ability to quickly scan over data (recursively unpacking of archives
etc.), then quarantining the desired fragments of data for later
processing. I specifically *do* need signed
On 05/19/2011 03:56 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
Hi there,
We have an option on FreeBSD ports collection to build clamav using
llvm that was already installed in the system. It reduces a lot the time
to build clamav.
A user reported me he is having problems to build it because llvm he
has
On 2011-02-23 14:09, Renato Botelho wrote:
Hi guys,
A FreeBSD user reported a problem when he upgraded to 0.97
as you can see at [1]. Does it make any sense for you?
This has been reported on -users already, one of the 3rdparty signatures
is invalid: it uses a size of 0 for an MD5
On 2011-02-15 10:20, Julien Reveret wrote:
Hello,
I've made a few tests lately to embed malwares inside UNIX packages like
RPM or DEB packages. Once done, I scanned the packages with many
anti-virus products to check their efficiency.
Concerning clamav, there was no problem finding
On 2011-01-17 10:41, 邓尧 wrote:
Hi,
I'm reading the clamav source code, but the following in libclamav/others.h
confused me:
#define CLI_MAX_ALLOCATION (182*1024*1024)
The number 182. Should it be 128 or 182?
Not a typo, 176 MB was too small already:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:40:17 +0800
Tony Zhai tonyz...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually,I want to test everyone. We have tested
Heuristics.Encrypted.RAR, what about others?
Phishing: send an HTML email where the href
points to some site, and the contents of the link points to ebay (or
another one
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:36:29 -0500
David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
Hi,
It seems that ClamAV 0.96.5 appends some sort of hash to the virus
name. Whereas before, our tests would return a name like
Eicar-Test-Signature, now we get something like
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:09:08 -0500
David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:53:14 +0200
Török Edwin ed...@clamav.net wrote:
Where do you see this? clamd logs, clamdscan output, clamscan
output?
We connect to clamd directly on the UNIX-domain socket and send
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:34:19 -0500
David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:15:17 +0200
Török Edwin ed...@clamav.net wrote:
Works here:
[... no extended info ...]
That's bizarre!
$ clamdscan --version
ClamAV 0.96.5/11413/Thu Jul 22 09:24:53 2010
$ /usr
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:46:49 +0800
Tony Zhai tonyz...@gmail.com wrote:
I have three questions about Heuristic Scan in ClamAV .
1.What type of file will be scanned as a Heuristic scan?
All engine detections (as opposed to signature-based) are prefixed with
Heuristics.
2.How can I configure
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:56:55 +0200
Amr Thabet amr.tha...@student.alx.edu.eg wrote:
Why do you need to generate assembly code to compare Thread.ecx with
something? Is it that much faster?
You could simply put a function pointer in your structure, a pointer
to the value you want to compare, and
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:06:05 +0200
Amr Thabet amr.tha...@student.alx.edu.eg wrote:
Hello Mr. Edwin,
The real ones, or will wine's version do?
Do you need the actual code in them, or just the export tables?
it's really a linux version and it only needs the export table not
the real code.
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:21:40 +0200
Amr Thabet amr.tha...@student.alx.edu.eg wrote:
Hello Mr. Edwin,
- port it to ClamAV bytecode, i.e. make it compilable by the ClamAV
bytecode compiler see: (not a trivial task)
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:03:38 -0400
Liu Yang yangliu...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there an accurate way to measure the memory consumption of clamav
database? The methods I used are top and /proc/pid/status, but I feel
there might exist a better way to do that.
clamdtop.
Look at the 'Pool total'.
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:32:06 -0200
Renato Botelho rbga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Tomasz Kojm tk...@clamav.net
wrote:
Dear Users,
we're going to release a new version of ClamAV on Monday, October
25. ClamAV 0.96.4 will fix some issues with the PDF parser,
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:14:06 +0200
Jacek Zapala ja...@it.pl wrote:
* Török Edwin (ed...@clamav.net) [101004 14:45] wrote:
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:31:21 +0200
Jacek Zapala ja...@it.pl wrote:
Hi.
Starting from the last upgrade (0.96.3 on debian) freshclam
randomly chooses between
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:31:21 +0200
Jacek Zapala ja...@it.pl wrote:
Hi.
Starting from the last upgrade (0.96.3 on debian) freshclam randomly
chooses between ipv6/ipv4 connecting to the name that has addresses
in both protocols.
freshclam uses getaddrinfo() for resolving mirror dns name
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:05:04 -0300
Renato Botelho rbga...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/28 Török Edwin ed...@clamav.net:
Hi,
I just committed some changes to configure and the
bytecode2llvm.cpp to allow building with an external LLVM.
This will allow you to build against LLVM 2.8 when
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:33:39 +0200
Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote:
I'm trying to build 0.96.3, but configure keps getting stuck in a
tight loop whilst checking for CVE-2010-0405...
On SUSE Linux?
Try this patch:
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2287
You'll need to
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:44:35 +0800
Tony Zhai tonyz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to know the max size of the daily.cvd.
I would like to just use daily.cvd instead of both of daily.cvd and
mail.cvd
I don't think that just skipping main.cvd is a good idea, you'll miss
most signatures.
What
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
outstandingcandy outstandingca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
Does anybody know what is the following signature mean
(especially the last two sections)?
VBS.Redlof-1:3:*:666f73b2079706f735b695d3d79:0:26
See signatures.pdf, the last two are minimum
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:49:02 -0400
Liu Yang yangliu...@gmail.com wrote:
I am a beginner of ClamAV and I am working on a malware detection
project. Recently I was reading the ClamAV source code and have some
questions. One question I have is: what does ftonly mean in
scan file types only
/**
* @file /magma/providers/external/clamav.c
*
* @brief Interface for the ClamAV library.
*
* $Author: Ladar Levison $
* $Date: 2010/08/13 10:32:38 $
* $Revision: ecaee526d4ba88a141c5b889dd023b13c05c2654 $
// Scan the message. The OLE code has a bug in it that causes
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 08:35:42 -0400
Dale Walsh d...@daleenterprise.com wrote:
all older versions and dependancies have been removed, config files
updated per instructions.
Tested on PowerPC and Intel based Macs with the same results.
TEST SCAN USING CLAMSCAN: clam.ea06.exe not
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:21:10 +0100
Mark Weaver mark-cl...@npsl.co.uk wrote:
This patch adds an x64 target to the Windows build. (socket code in
this build is not guaranteed to work due to casting the 64-bit SOCKET
type to a 32-bit int, I will send a separate patch to address this).
Hi
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:45:15 +0800
candy outstandingca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all~
Thank you for solving my problem before. I still have some other
questions when analysing the codes of ClamAV. Could anybody help me
again? What does the member variable uint32_t *soff stands for?
Have a
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:37:07 +0800
candy outstandingca...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
I am very interesting in the virus engien. I want to know the whole
algorithm of scaning and trying to optimize the int
cli_scanpe(cli_ctx *ctx, icon_groupset *iconset) function.
I have read the
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:43:22 +0800
candy outstandingca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all~
When the ClamAV scanning a PE file, does it use the LLVM and why use
it?
Yes, it can execute a bytecode program when scanning PE files.
Bytecode can be executed either by the builtin interpreter (which
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:56:48 +0800
唐杰 outstandingca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all~
I am a freshman of clamav and is reading the code of clamscan
recently. I don't know why we need a filter? Does it filter some
files which can be confirmed not a virus?
Do you mean the --exclude command-line
On 06/05/2010 11:20 AM, Henri Salo wrote:
Is there an email-address where I can send my samples automatically to
ClamAV? I am collecting malware with automated scripts and checking
those with several AV-engines. I could share everything, which isn't
detected by the newest ClamAV-databases.
On 05/27/2010 06:51 PM, Mohammed Al-Saleh wrote:
Hi,
I first thought that the daily signatures are added to the main ones every
while ( and thus removed from the daily.cvd).
They are transferred, but main.cvd updates are rare: main.cvd is only at
version 52, while daily is at version 11072
On 05/23/2010 04:11 AM, Mohammed Al-Saleh wrote:
I've read ClamAV's Boyer-Moore implementation.
It does not seem to me that it uses Boyer-Moore algorithm at all.
It is a multi-pattern version of Boyer Moore, I don't know its exact name.
Boyer-Moore algorithm itself allows you to search for 1
On 05/18/2010 03:13 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
From: Mohammed Al-Saleh moealsa...@gmail.com
Is the virus database updated through a repository (for example svn or cvs)?
I would like to see how virus database changes over time.
Interesting. I guess there's nothing stopping you from putting
On 05/18/2010 03:18 PM, Brandon Perry wrote:
I agree that this would be neat as long as the current way is still
available. I don't want to have to install git or svn on the servers just to
be able to update my clam sigs.
Distributing the virus DB via git/svn wouldn't scale, I don't think
On 05/18/2010 09:09 PM, Mohammed Al-Saleh wrote:
Hi Edwin,
On Apr 27, 2010, at 7:19 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
On 04/26/2010 10:20 PM, Mohammed Al-Saleh wrote:
Hi Edwin,
Thanks for your reply.
I need to know the cases where ClamAV has performance bottlenecks or issues.
The best way to do
On 05/17/2010 09:26 PM, Mark Allan wrote:
Hi there,
I'm sending this to clamav-devel rather than clamav-users as I suspect I
may have missed something during the configure/compile phase rather than
at runtime. If I'm wrong, I'll happily repost to the -users list.
Please open a bugreport,
On 05/17/2010 10:21 PM, Mohammed Al-Saleh wrote:
Hi,
Is the virus database updated through a repository (for example svn or cvs)?
No.
I would like to see how virus database changes over time.
You can look at the emails on clamav-virusdb@
(although signature removals don't show up there).
On 05/14/2010 08:59 PM, Mohammed Al-Saleh wrote:
Is this a bug in ClamAV (filtering.c)?
case CLI_MATCH_NIBBLE_LOW:
spec-start = (p 0xf);
spec-end = 0xf0 | spec-start;
spec-step = 0x10;
Should not the step be 1 here?
NIBBLE_LOW means the low
On 2010-05-12 20:53, Mohammed Al-Saleh wrote:
Hi,
I have two questions. Thanks in advance for answers.
1- MAXSOPATLEN constant was commented in more than one location to contain
the value 32 but in the actual implementation its value is 8. So, was it
implemented first as 32 then changed
On 04/27/2010 02:19 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
Reini Urban wrote:
2010/4/26 nicolas dumont nicolas.dumont.pe...@gmail.com:
Could you explain why it has so much increase between 0.95.3 and 0.96
?
Is there a way, by disable some new features ( bytecoder for ex ) to
decrease the size of the lib ?
On 04/27/2010 09:58 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
Török Edwin wrote:
--enable-llvm Enable 'llvm' JIT/verifier support [default=auto]
(automatic selection based on what?)
It is automatically enabled if you have a known-to-work GNU C++
compiler installed, and you have a CPU supported by the LLVM
On 04/26/2010 01:07 PM, Reini Urban wrote:
2010/4/26 nicolas dumont nicolas.dumont.pe...@gmail.com:
Could you explain why it has so much increase between 0.95.3 and 0.96 ?
Is there a way, by disable some new features ( bytecoder for ex ) to
decrease the size of the lib ?
Is it that
On 04/24/2010 11:39 PM, Mohammed Al-Saleh wrote:
Does ClamAV use Aho-Corasick algorithm to match files against static
signatures and Boyer-Moore against signatures that have *'s and ??'s ?
No it is not as simple as that, and it is usually the other way around.
read the cli_parse_add()
On 04/22/2010 02:10 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
Hi,
Since it's a platform i don't have access, i'll just show you the
error and you tell me if you have any idea what could be
happening.
http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/sparc64-errorlogs/a.8.20100421055147/clamav-0.96_1.log
LLVM
On 04/19/2010 09:21 AM, Dale Walsh wrote:
Foreground = yes
Debug = yes
Since you have Foreground+Debug active please redirect the stderr output
of clamd to a file.
Then scan the files in test/
Then open a bugreport on bugs.clamav.net, and attach the stderr output
(not the syslog output, since
On 2010-04-19 12:44, Dale Walsh wrote:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 05:11 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
You can remove daily.cvd/cld, and stop freshclam as temporary solution
to get 0.92 working, until you get 0.95.3, or 0.96 working.
Best regards,
--Edwin
On 2010-04-19 15:40, Dale Walsh wrote:
On Apr 19, 2010, at 07:05 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
On 2010-04-19 12:44, Dale Walsh wrote:
I submitted the clamd stderr information as requested,, is there
anything else you need?
I tested on a Mac OS X 10.5.8 ppc, with gcc 4.0.1 and all testfiles
On 2010-04-18 16:10, Mohammed Al-Saleh wrote:
Hi,
Does ClamAV do code emulation to detect viruses/worms?
No.
Unless you consider the trivial emulator in yc_poly_emulator() to be
an emulator.
Best regards,
--Edwin
___
Hi,
I just had a chat on #clamav with 2 people having problem with ClamAV
0.96 on FreeBSD 6.2. (everything was OK on FreeBSD 6.3)
The symptom is that clamscan/clamd never starts, just loops infinitely
trying to load the DB, --debug shows:
Libclamav debug: in cli_tgzload()
The system was
On 04/16/2010 07:15 PM, Henri Salo wrote:
It would be very nice to see hashes and possible CVEs in
submissions in virusdb-mailinglist. Every submission should have at
least MD5-, SHA1-checksums
Of the databases?
The database itself contains the hash, and it is digitally signed.
The public key
On 04/16/2010 07:31 PM, Henri Salo wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:18:23 +0300
Török Edwinedwinto...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/16/2010 07:15 PM, Henri Salo wrote:
It would be very nice to see hashes and possible CVEs in
submissions in virusdb-mailinglist. Every submission should have at
least
On 04/15/2010 02:58 PM, nicolas dumont wrote:
Hello !
I'm trying to compile clamav 0.96 on
FreeBSD 7.2 release
gcc 4.2.1
and I have same kind of issue as Renato :
This looks like a different issue, does GCC complain about an internal
error for you?
In function `(anonymous
On 04/15/2010 04:00 PM, nicolas dumont wrote:
2010/4/15 Török Edwined...@clamav.net
On 04/15/2010 02:58 PM, nicolas dumont wrote:
Hello !
I'm trying to compile clamav 0.96 on
FreeBSD 7.2 release
gcc 4.2.1
and I have same kind of issue as Renato :
This looks like a different issue, does
Hi,
The EOL signature for ClamAV = 0.94.2 is now live (daily 10749).
Best regards,
--Edwin
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html
Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
On 04/13/2010 07:11 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/4/13 Török Edwinedwinto...@gmail.com:
On 04/13/2010 06:59 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/145509
Any idea?
Its probably one of the broken compilers listed here:
On 04/13/2010 07:26 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/4/13 Török Edwined...@clamav.net:
On 04/13/2010 07:11 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/4/13 Török Edwinedwinto...@gmail.com:
On 04/13/2010 06:59 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/145509
Any idea?
On 04/09/2010 07:06 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
After upgrade FreeBSD ports tree to 0.96, a user filled this PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=145520
Would be nice if clamav checks installed python and detect this
situation, what do you think?
See the -users archives, yes I think
On 04/07/2010 09:21 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about the CVD that will contain a special signature
which disables all clamd installations older than 0.95. What exactly
will this do?
Will old versions always report No virus?
Or will they always report Virus?
Or
On 04/07/2010 10:17 PM, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote:
Sun Studio Compiler finds two buglets in 0.96.
**
CC bcrun.o
bcrun.c, line 240: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of
range: -1
Line 240 is :
unsigned int fd = -1;
An
On 04/08/2010 12:05 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Török Edwin wrote:
Would you prefer freshclam/ClamAV crash/corrupt memory when loading the
new databases with 980 byte lines?
No. I can think of ways around this to make things degrade
gracefully:
o The server
You mean to do this on all
On 04/05/2010 04:48 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
I used --threads=1 and that problem was fixed
Ok.
, now I got a core dumped:
make check-TESTS
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
FAIL: check_clamav
PASS: check_freshclam.sh
PASS: check_sigtool.sh
SKIP: check_unit_vg.sh
PASS:
On 03/12/2010 06:54 PM, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 Tomasz Kojm wrote:
G.W. Haywood wrote:
I'd like to add my voice to those who want an easy way to disable
[the bytecode interpreter] - I can see nothing in the clamd.conf
man page for 0.96-rc1 which offers any
Hi!
The ClamAV bytecode compiler version 0.10 is now available.
You can get it by using one of these commands:
$ git clone git://git.clamav.net/git/clamav-bytecode-compiler
$ git clone http://git.clamav.net/clamav-bytecode-compiler.git
The repository can be browsed online here:
On 2010-03-11 15:44, Renato Botelho wrote:
IIRC, you can use --enable-llvm=no at ./configure to disable.
That just disables the JIT, not the interpreter.
On 2010-03-11 16:26, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:29:16 + (GMT)
G.W. Haywood clamav-de...@jubileegroup.co.uk wrote:
On 03/11/2010 09:57 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Renato Botelho rbga...@gmail.com wrote:
A FreeBSD user contacted me reporting a problem building clamav
under FreeBSD 9. I reproduced it locally, using 20100308 snapshot:
[--] 3 tests from
On 03/11/2010 10:31 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
I needed to stop and start again, now I got this:
FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/bswap-inline-asm.ll (1340 of 2135)
TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/bswap-inline-asm.ll'
FAILED
Script:
--
llc
On 03/04/2010 03:12 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
I got a real 6.4 amd64 machine, and i reproduced the problem,
here is the data i collected after build with -g:
Did you set CXXFLAGS to -g? Setting CFLAGS has no effect on libclamav/c++
testegw# gdb ./llvmunittest_ADT
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
On 03/04/2010 04:07 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/3/4 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 03/04/2010 03:12 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
I got a real 6.4 amd64 machine, and i reproduced the problem,
here is the data i collected after build with -g:
Did you set CXXFLAGS to -g? Setting CFLAGS has
On 03/04/2010 06:02 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
Without -O2, results changed
#10 0x in ?? ()
#11 0x in ?? ()
#12 0x in ?? ()
#13 0x in ?? ()
#14 0x0001 in ?? ()
#15 0x in ?? ()
#16
On 03/04/2010 07:01 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/3/4 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 03/04/2010 06:02 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
Without -O2, results changed
#10 0x in ?? ()
#11 0x in ?? ()
#12 0x in ?? ()
#13 0x
On 03/04/2010 07:25 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
testegw# ldd llvmunittest_ADT
llvmunittest_ADT:
libthr.so.2 = /usr/lib/libthr.so.2 (0x8006e7000)
libstdc++.so.6 = /usr/local/lib/gcc42/libstdc++.so.6 (0x8007fe000)
libm.so.4 = /lib/libm.so.4 (0x800a0a000)
On 03/04/2010 08:51 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/3/4 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 03/04/2010 08:44 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/3/4 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 03/04/2010 08:37 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/3/4 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 03/04/2010 08:29 PM
On 03/02/2010 02:00 PM, Limor Tal wrote:
1. Can I keep using code that is older than 0.95 with the future CVD files
Why? What prevents you from upgrading?
What version are you running now?
(those that will be distributed starting from May 2010) if I do not use
sigtool and cdiff?
If you
On 03/01/2010 10:46 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/3/1 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 03/01/2010 09:22 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
Hello one more time,
I was trying to update clamav-devel port to a more recent snapshot
and I got some segfaults during make test, like you can see here
On 01/28/2010 12:16 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
Hello again,
I've tested this snapshot on my personal tinderboxes and got no problems,
but after commit the changes i recieved an email from QAT, freebsd automated
tests with an error on unit tests. Buildlog can be found here:
On 01/27/2010 12:48 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/1/26 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 12/22/2009 02:39 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2009/12/22 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
Yes, I opened a bug about that now:
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
On 01/27/2010 01:27 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/1/27 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 01/27/2010 12:48 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/1/26 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 12/22/2009 02:39 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2009/12/22 Török Edwin edwinto
On 12/22/2009 02:39 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2009/12/22 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
Yes, I opened a bug about that now:
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1781
For now the workaround for the user is to set the CPU for the build to
at least i486.
OK, i'll mark
On 2009-12-22 13:34, Renato Botelho wrote:
2009/12/22 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 2009-12-22 12:40, Renato Botelho wrote:
2009/12/22 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 2009-12-21 16:57, Renato Botelho wrote:
2009/12/21 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com
On 2009-12-22 13:36, Török Edwin wrote:
I'll ask user to test it, but anyway, here you can see a buildlog on
my 7.2 tinderbox that went fine, and it was built for i386 too...
http://freebsd1.asmallorange.com//logs/7.2-i386-garga/clamav-devel-20091221.log
LLVM got disabled because
On 2009-12-22 14:23, Renato Botelho wrote:
2009/12/22 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 2009-12-22 13:36, Török Edwin wrote:
I'll ask user to test it, but anyway, here you can see a buildlog on
my 7.2 tinderbox that went fine, and it was built for i386 too...
http://freebsd1
On 2009-12-22 14:28, Renato Botelho wrote:
2009/12/22 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 2009-12-22 13:36, Török Edwin wrote:
I'll ask user to test it, but anyway, here you can see a buildlog on
my 7.2 tinderbox that went fine, and it was built for i386 too...
http://freebsd1
On 2009-12-22 14:38, Renato Botelho wrote:
2009/12/22 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 2009-12-22 13:36, Török Edwin wrote:
I'll ask user to test it, but anyway, here you can see a buildlog on
my 7.2 tinderbox that went fine, and it was built for i386 too...
http://freebsd1
On 2009-12-22 14:43, Renato Botelho wrote:
2009/12/22 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
Because the compiler is too old:
checking for supported C++ compiler version... configure: error: C++
compiler too old (3.4.6)
By default, ports use the default base system compiler, of course
On 2009-12-21 16:30, Renato Botelho wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Renato Botelho rbga...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still having problems building clamav recent snapshots on
FreeBSD hosts, this time on FreeBSD 6.4 and 7.2 (x86 and
x86_64)
Here is the log:
/bin/sh ../libtool
On 2009-12-21 16:57, Renato Botelho wrote:
2009/12/21 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
Hi Renato,
Thanks for the patch, what if you only wrap the include by #ifdef
HAVE_UNISTD_H?
Something like:
#ifdef HAVE_UNISTD_H
#include unistd.h
#endif
We have a similar bug for OS X
https
On 2009-12-16 13:51, Renato Botelho wrote:
I got following error trying to build recent snapshot under FreeBSD
gmake[4]: Entering directory
`/home/garga/prs/clamav-devel/work/clamav-devel-20091216/libclamav/c++'
CXXLD tblgen
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldl
gmake[4]: *** [tblgen] Error 1
On 2009-11-16 13:54, Renato Botelho wrote:
A user reported me he is having problems building 0.95.3 under
FreeBSD 7.2, here is the error:
libtool: link: ranlib .libs/libclamunrar_iface.a
libtool: link: ( cd .libs rm -f libclamunrar_iface.la ln -s
../libclamunrar_iface.la
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
