Garth Sheldon-Coulson garth.sheldoncoul...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Garth,
I'm returning to Clojure in earnest for the first time since 1.1 (and
very happy to be back!). Apologies if this question revisits old
issues.
I've revisited mostly the same 2 days ago: 87399ocg9a@thinkpad.tsdh.de
When you create a protocol, as an implementation detail, it also creates a
Java interface.
When you list protocols in a deftype or defrecord form, the generated class
actually implements that Java interface. And protocol calls to that type
call through the interface. This gives the best
David Powell d...@djpowell.net writes:
Hi David,
When you create a protocol, as an implementation detail, it also
creates a Java interface.
Is a protocal neccessarily an implementation detail? I mean, it might
be, but it can also be a public specification of the requirements types
have to
On Mar 7, 1:09 am, Tassilo Horn tass...@member.fsf.org wrote:
David Powell d...@djpowell.net writes:
Hi David,
When you create a protocol, as an implementation detail, it also
creates a Java interface.
Is a protocal neccessarily an implementation detail? I mean, it might
be, but it can
Alan Malloy a...@malloys.org writes:
Hi Alan,
IMHO, `extenders' should return also types implementing the protocol
interface directly [i.e., deftypes and defrecords], so that
(extends? P T) = (some #(= % T) (extenders P))
holds.
You're entitled to that humble opinion, but it's not
user= (boom (Record.))
AbstractMethodError user.Record.boom()Ljava/lang/Object; user/eval55
(NO_SOURCE_FILE:3)
Apparently, types/records can implement a protocol in name only.
That can't in name only since you obviously got an implementation, though
abstract.
What is behind this
Have you tried giving the full path in the :libs option?
On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:35:00 PM UTC-5, Jonas wrote:
Hi all
I was wondering if it's possible to use goog.dom.query[1] from
ClojureScript or ClojureScript One? It's a third party module but it's
bundled with the Closure
Great job answering the application questions, David! I was just wondering
if Steve Yegge could vouch for Clojure since I remember him being very
excited about the language, so maybe he might say a nice word for Clojure
participation...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
I've made some progress here:
http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Google+Summer+of+Code+2012+Application+Questions
For those with edit right please edit as you see fit and as soon as you
can, we're running out of time, thanks! :)
David
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Alexander Yakushev
http://dev.clojure.org/display/community/Google+Summer+of+Code+2012
A reminder that we're still looking for proposals from community members
and interested students. We're also looking for backup mentors - if you'd
be willing to step up this summer should something happen to a mentor
please say
Looks amazing David, I'm very interested to apply as a student if we get in
as an Organization.
Best,
Federico
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:47 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I've made some progress here:
Unfortunately, I've been unable to get vtk to compile locally.
At this point, it's seeming to me that your issue is more vtk-related
than clojure, though. Can you put a println in the callback to confirm
that it's at least being called?
One question, is it significant that your code is slightly
On 06/03/12 17:09, John Gabriele wrote:
While writing Clojure code, what Java classes, objects, and static
methods do you most often find yourself using?
I use java.lang.Math quite a lot...
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To
I am a novice at both java and clojure. I installed the counterclockwise
eclipse plugin and the labrepl as per
http://dev.clojure.org/display/doc/Getting+Started+with+Eclipse+and+Counterclockwise
.
After install one of the steps is to
Enable Clojure Support
- Right-click the labrepl
Unfortunately, the reader does not actually follow this spec, e.g. it will
happily accept :div#id.cla$$ as a valid keyword. Some web programming
clojure[script] libraries use this pseudo-CSS syntax in keywords, so if the
reader was changed to strictly follow these rules, a lot of web code
If so, how ?
Thanks !
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this
An old thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/319a1c77ed718ba/3e4be7484b7cbe38?pli=1
Also, someone proposed instead of
(f a b c)
begin to use
f(a, b, c) or something alike
but I don't have the thread link now
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Leon Talbot
Maybe this proposal:
http://grokbase.com/t/gg/clojure/11ctt573jq/list-syntax-sugar-f-x-notation
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Angel Java Lopez ajlopez2...@gmail.comwrote:
An old thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/319a1c77ed718ba/3e4be7484b7cbe38?pli=1
If so, how ?
I think Python may be easier for you, but it's not simpler than
Clojure. Simplicity is the strength of Clojure.
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Simple-Made-Easy
I can learn a new syntax almost overnight (last night I started
writing Dart code for the first time after googling
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Leon Talbot leontal...@gmail.com wrote:
If so, how ?
Thanks !
Isn't it already?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new
I think readable is in the eye of the beholder.
I've only moderate experience with Clojure, but the following example
from Open Dylan made me realize I really do prefer a concise
representation over what is considered easier to read.
Hi,
Am 07.03.2012 um 01:11 schrieb Leif:
Unfortunately, the reader does not actually follow this spec, e.g. it will
happily accept :div#id.cla$$ as a valid keyword. Some web programming
clojure[script] libraries use this pseudo-CSS syntax in keywords, so if the
reader was changed to
Looks like Dan Friedman, William Byrd and the IU Googlers they know might
be getting behind our application as vouchers.
There's no better time to submit proposals or step up to be a mentor than
now :)
David
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:47 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I've made
When's the official cutoff?
Cheers,
Chris.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:24 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like Dan Friedman, William Byrd and the IU Googlers they know might
be getting behind our application as vouchers.
There's no better time to submit proposals or step
Hello folks!
I'm proud to announce the release of Leiningen 2.0.0-preview1. While
this isn't a final stable release, it's fairly stable and should be
usable for the majority of projects. This is a near-rewrite and contains
a few backwards-compatibility breaks, but updating should be pretty
March 9th!
David
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Chris Granger ibdk...@gmail.com wrote:
When's the official cutoff?
Cheers,
Chris.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:24 PM, David Nolen dnolen.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Looks like Dan Friedman, William Byrd and the IU Googlers they know might
be
Hi,
I have recently started working in python, I don't find python very
readable at all compared to clojure.
It is more about familiarity than anything else.
On Thursday, March 8, 2012 4:39:08 AM UTC+11, Leon Talbot wrote:
If so, how ?
Thanks !
--
You received this message because you
If we're going to talk about readability at all, then we need to first
define what attributes make up that which is readable.
What commonly passes for readability is simply a variant of Easy, namely
readable means near to your current body of knowledge.
Is German less readable than English?
I
When I print myCallback I obtain this:
(println myCallback)
user = #example$myCallback example$myCallback@6e1c51b4
I have used this:
(doto coneMapper
(.SetInput (.GetOutput cone)))
And the applications runs, with not errors in the prompt too, but the
boxWidget still doesn't work.
On
I meant do:
(def myCallback
(fn []
(println Invoked!)
(let [t (vtk.vtkTransform.)]
(.GetTransform t)
(- boxWidget .GetProp3D (.SetUserTransform t)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group,
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 5:21:52 PM UTC-4, Rich Hickey wrote:
Hi all,
This reply is to the thread, not Luc specifically.
Thanks everyone for your feedback and input.
I have pushed 3 commits:
1) Fixes the inconsistency between the hash function used by Clojure maps
(was .hashCode)
It seems that callback is not called. I have added (println Testing
callback) in the definition of myCallback and there is not message in the
prompt when I run the application.
(def myCallback
(fn []
(let [t (vtk.vtkTransform.)]
(.GetTransform t)
(- boxWidget .GetProp3D
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Antonio Recio amdx6...@gmail.com wrote:
(.AddObserver interactionEvent myCallback run)
I suspect this is mis-capitalized, it need to be InteractionEvent.
--Aaron
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
Clojure is a young language, and I believe there is little argument that some
of the interfaces/implementations and associated docs could be improved. You
can find plenty of examples where functions would throw exceptions for invalid
input, others return nil in that case, and a number return
Frank Siebenlist frank.siebenl...@gmail.com writes:
My suggestion still stands: add more text to the doc-string of some of
the functions such that the user has a better understanding of what to
expect: no validation, nil, exception, expected parameter type, ???.
I'd be happy to suggest
On Mar 7, 9:39 am, Leon Talbot leontal...@gmail.com wrote:
If so, how ?
Thanks !
[Closed as: Not a real question]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Alex Baranosky
alexander.barano...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that the real question that is: if you know Python and Clojure
equally well, then which is easier to read?
Alex
I know both equally well (actually, I've logged more hours in my life
coding in Lisp
Just found a bug that only manifests when you don't have any profiles
and are running outside a project. It's fixed in git, but if you're
getting an NPE on 2.0.0-preview1 and don't have any profiles defined,
try this as a temporary workaround:
$ mkdir ~/.lein; echo {:user {:plugins []}}
Hi. I'm trying to run:
java -cp clojure-${VERSION}.jar clojure.main
on an Android phone from bash (using the 'terminal-ide' app) but I
can't make it past the error bellow. I did the jar-to-dex conversion
using:
dx --verbose --dex --output=clojure-${VERSION}.dex.jar
clojure-${VERSION}.jar
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer m...@kotka.de wrote:
However documenting everywhere that feeding garbage in might result in shit
coming out has this “things in the mirror might be closer than they appear”
taste. WTF? The mirror is not the problem. Nor is the car manufacturer
On Mar 7, 6:39 pm, Leon Talbot leontal...@gmail.com wrote:
If so, how ?
Thanks !
Please define readable.
Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Clojure group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Joachim De Beule joachim.de.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please define readable.
Thanks!
Readable is a measure of how readily apparent the meaning of a program is
from looking at it.
If you wanted to measure this objectively, one possible way to do this
would be
The Clojure-Py team is happy to announce the release of Clojure-Py 0.1.0.
https://github.com/halgari/clojure-py
Clojure-Py is an implementation of Clojure running atop the Python VM.
As it currently stands, we have translated over 235 functions from
clojure.core. This is not a clojure
It's great to see the steady activity on the clojurescript github page.
However I'm not totally comfortable developing against the master branch.
As it stands now, if I change development environments, or deploy on a
new machine, the master branch may have moved.
I could choose an arbitrary
You are right. I have capitalized InteractionEvent and now callback it is
called and it prints invoke.
The application runs but the boxWidget still doesn't work, and I obtain an
error message:
Exception in thread main java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No matching
field found: GetTransform
Congrat's on the release! I am getting the following error on my
Macbook (running 64-bit Lion, Python 2.7.1) when trying to run sudo
easy_install clojure-py:
Searching for clojure-py
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/clojure-py/
Reading https://github.com/halgari/clojure-py
Best match:
You are trying to call method GetTransform on an instance of
vtk.vtkTransform, and this method does not exist (you are probably
wanting to call that method on boxWidget, not t).
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Antonio Recio amdx6...@gmail.com wrote:
You are right. I have capitalized
Going back to the original poster's question, I think if I could make only
one change to Clojure's syntax to improve readability, I'd take a page from
other functional languages like F# and Racket and add a way to bind local
variables that doesn't indent. So, for example,
(let x 2)
code
would
You might have a difficult time getting other Clojure coders to adopt the
practice in their code, but would this be almost as good?
(let [x 2]
code)
Achieving that would be as simple as hand-indenting it that way, or adjusting
the auto-indenter of your favorite text editor to do it that way.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Andy Fingerhut andy.finger...@gmail.comwrote:
You might have a difficult time getting other Clojure coders to adopt the
practice in their code, but would this be almost as good?
(let [x 2]
code)
Achieving that would be as simple as hand-indenting it that
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Mark Engelberg mark.engelb...@gmail.com wrote:
* introducing variables creates new indenting level, making code creep to
the right
Mitigated by breaking functions into sub-functions (which is good
practice anyway).
* as code creeps to the right, you need to
The clojure community is thankful!
On Mar 7, 11:28 pm, Phil Hagelberg p...@hagelb.org wrote:
Hello folks!
I'm proud to announce the release of Leiningen 2.0.0-preview1. While
this isn't a final stable release, it's fairly stable and should be
usable for the majority of projects. This is a
52 matches
Mail list logo
