Re: Can we stop cocoon logging this as errors?

53.20:296 [access] (Unknown-URI) Unknown-thread/CocoonServlet: Cocoon servlet threw an Exception while trying to close stream. java.io.IOException: The stream has been closed Could this be suppressed anywhere? I don't want to switch off my logging totally alban This message m

Can we stop cocoon logging this as errors?

Title: Can we stop cocoon logging this as errors? I have a webapp/site setup using cocoon 2.0.3 but whenever there is a redirection e.g. via action or users clicking hte pages very fast... I get the following: ERROR   (2003-05-16) 13:53.20:296   [access] (Unknown-URI) Unknown-thread

Re: Logging in cocoon.

Irina, some wild guesses from a distance (maybe including the relevant parts of the code, the logkit.xconf and cocoon.xconf could help us narrowing that distance) - mismatch in the debugging level? - some of this logging is through buffered outputstreams, not untill those get flushed you will

Logging in Cocoon Source

Hi, If I want to log messages in a custom source the only way I could specify a category would be on the SourceFactory, which I did. Then in the getSource() I check whether the source produced is LogEnabled and if so pass on the Logger from the SourceFactory to the Source. In cocoon.xconf the so

Re: Using my own Logging-Class in Cocoon

On Tuesday 18 March 2003 20:53, Uwe Gerger wrote: > Hello, > i would like to use an own written Logging-class to catch all logs from > Coccon and log them as we need. > > What I have to do for configuring Cocoon in that way and what interface > I have to implement? Cocoon is

Using my own Logging-Class in Cocoon

Hello, i would like to use an own written Logging-class to catch all logs from Coccon and log them as we need. What I have to do for configuring Cocoon in that way and what interface I have to implement? Thanks -- Uwe Gerger_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/ BMW AG, TG

Re: Jetty & Logging (or rather lack thereof)

On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Tony Collen wrote: > I've been playing around with Jetty in the latest CVS checkout, and I'm > noticing all my logs are empty... it doesn't look like anything is being > logged... is logging turned off by default, or is there something else > going

Jetty & Logging (or rather lack thereof)

I've been playing around with Jetty in the latest CVS checkout, and I'm noticing all my logs are empty... it doesn't look like anything is being logged... is logging turned off by default, or is there something else going

Source Logging in Coccoon

the logger from the factory to the source. Is there any known problem or anybody that has configured logging for a source already that could help? Thanks, Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional c

Logging Error: Unknown error writing event

tServerSocketFactory"/>in Catalina_Home/conf/server.xml and JBoss_Home/conf/catalina/jboss.jcmlPlease help me as I have to track this error out asap.[17:29:56,609,STDERR] Logging Error: Unknown error writing event.[17:29:56,609,STDERR] java.lang.NullPointe

XMLForm debug logging

Hello I've got a problem with the logging mechanism. I'm quite new to cocoon and the whole java/xml stuff. So I tried to get my own XMLForm running and have some problems with it. This is why I would like to embed some debug infos in the flow-logic .java file. Therefore I setup t

Re: Logging into a user-defined category

Hi, it's me again. The task can be accomplished as in the log.xsl logicsheet. org.apache.log.Logger logger = org.apache.log.Hierarchy.getDefaultHierarchy().getLoggerFor("xxx"); and then use logger.info("message"); Regards, Felix On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Felix Roethenbacher wrote: >

Logging into a user-defined category

Hi! I have written an XSP page and want to log into a specified target (category). I can log into the category 'sitemap.generator.serverpages.xxx' by using getLogger().getChildLogger("xxx"); Is it possible to log into a lower level category (e.g. into category 'xxx')? Felix -- -

AW: Logging question

, if you don't want to change Cocoon source you should log with logkit. If you don't want to tie yourself to logkit you can let your classes implement LogEnabled or use the commons-logging package. See also Wiki Entry from Alan Hodgkinson at http://outerthought.net/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=J

Logging question

Hi! We're developing an application framework within WAS environment, having choosen Cocoon as our Presentation Framework. Currently our Logging is implemented via a facade for log4j. I've learned that Cocoon's logging is also somehow based on log4j. I'm not sure

Re: how to prevent logging passwords in request and sessionparams?

Hi Timothy, On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:43:48AM -0400, Timothy Larson wrote: > It would be helpfull if the request parameters and session attributes > were logged, but with certain ones not showing their values. > > For example: > SESSION ATTRIBUTES: > PARAM: 'username' VALUE: 'tdlarson' >

Re: how to prevent logging passwords in request andsessionparams?

og category. Vadim >Babs >- Original Message - >From: "Timothy Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 6:17 PM >Subject: how to prevent logging passwords in request and sessionparams? > > >How d

Re: how to prevent logging passwords in request and sessionparams?

--- Original Message - >From: "Timothy Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 6:17 PM >Subject: how to prevent logging passwords in request and sessionparams? > > >How do you prevent logging of passwords

Re: how to prevent logging passwords in request and sessionparams?

second question : yes : see rotation tag in WEB-INF/logkit.xconf. Babs - Original Message - From: "Timothy Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 6:17 PM Subject: how to prevent logging passwords in request and sessi

how to prevent logging passwords in request and sessionparams?

How do you prevent logging of passwords held in request parameters and session attributes? I do not want to turn off logging completely. By the way, is there any sort of automated log rotation for cocoon to prevent the logs getting too big? Tim

[solved] Re: troubles with logging of non-cocoon classes...

or" ); //..etc. ... } } Babs after a good lunch, so better coding now. - Original Message - From: "Marcus Crafter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 1:59 PM Subject: Re: troubles with logging of non-cocoo

Re: troubles with logging of non-cocoon classes...

Hi Barbara, On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:04:07PM +0200, Barbara Post wrote: > I get a NPE. I followed : > http://outerthought.net/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JavaLogging method 1. > > First class is a classical custom Action, which has its logger defined in > the sitemap. > Logging of

troubles with logging of non-cocoon classes...

I get a NPE. I followed : http://outerthought.net/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JavaLogging method 1. First class is a classical custom Action, which has its logger defined in the sitemap. Logging of this action works fine. In this action I create an instance of a custom class that extends

RE: turning off logging

On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Lai, Harry wrote: > Hi Fernando, > > I ran into this same problem a little bit ago, and I solved it by setting > the log-level in the web.xml settings for the Cocoon servlet. The default > in there is DEBUG, and I just moved it up to INFO just to avoid the logger > created/

RE: turning off logging

xplanation, that'd be much appreciated. =) Thanks! Harry -Original Message- From: Fernando Padilla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 11:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: turning off logging Hello. LogKit seems to be continuously outputting log messages

RE: turning off logging

[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html - > -Original Message- > From: Fernando Padilla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 6:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

turning off logging

Hello. LogKit seems to be continuously outputting log messages - like the ones below -, even though I have tried to turn off all logging ( to avoid using up the diskspace at our hosting provider ). Has anyone run into this? Any ideas of how to ask LogKit to please not tell me everytime that

Logging Error - who can help?

Dear colleagues, I have some problems with the cocoon logger. Can anybody help me? I am working with WebSphere Application Developer, but maybe the does not depend on the tool. This is my error message: Logging Error: Could not set up Cocoon Logger, will use screen instead

RE: Logging problem with actions & subsitemaps?

> From: zze-STIENNE Nicolas FTRD/DMI/CAE > > Hello > > How could I test it ? > > I got it from the cocoon-2.0.2-src : logkit.xconf and logkit-1.0.1.jar > I don't use CVS... http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-cocoon2/src/webapp/WEB-INF/logkit. xconf?rev=1.6.2.2&only_with_tag=cocoon_2_0_3_bra

RE: Logging problem with actions & subsitemaps?

Hello How could I test it ? I got it from the cocoon-2.0.2-src : logkit.xconf and logkit-1.0.1.jar I don't use CVS... > > Make sure you have latest logkit.xconf from the 2.0.3 CVS. > > Vadim > - Please check that your quest

RE: Logging problem with actions & subsitemaps?

atements ever show up in the logs. Specifically, I'm trying to figure > out why a login doesn't work, but I can't find ANYTHING in the logs from > the DatabaseAuthenticatorAction. I haven't fiddled with any logging > setttings. > > Am I missing something sim

Logging problem with actions & subsitemaps?

gure out why a login doesn't work, but I can't find ANYTHING in the logs from the DatabaseAuthenticatorAction. I haven't fiddled with any logging setttings. Am I missing something simple? TIA, Lajos Cocoon training, co

Re: Logging and Form Validation

>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:58 AM >>> Subject: Logging and Form Validation >>> >>> >>>>

Re: Logging and Form Validation

> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:58 AM >> Subject: Logging and Form Validation >> >> >>> Group, >>> >>

Re: Logging and Form Validation

ml Diana > > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:58 AM > Subject: Logging and Form Validation > > >> Group, >> >> I am implmenting a five page form, and I am wondering how I s

Re: Logging and Form Validation

You may want to look at this: http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/xmlform/index.html - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:58 AM Subject: Logging and Form Validation > Group, > > I am implmenting a fiv

RE: Logging and Form Validation

This is what we do for client side validation. WARNING: requires javascript but my clients are not "regular" web users. For my app I provide validation in my XSP, eg: ^$|^[0-9a-zA-Z_]+$/ig ^$|^[0-9a-zA-Z.,_\\-]+\\@[0-9a-zA-Z._\\-]+\

Re: Logging and Form Validation

Another point worth mentioning is complexity. I have done some sites stuffed so full of JS that things started breaking without any reason. JS has inherent flaws (in my experience) that prevent it from doing the complex sorts of things many clients need. For small-scale validation, no problem.

RE: Logging and Form Validation

Hi, On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Luca Morandini wrote: > wait: how many users out there are without JavaScript support ? Irrelevant question - if there is only one user without javascript support, you should support that user, surely? The point of the web being accessibility and the point of a web deve

RE: Logging and Form Validation

> Well... you are making a very general statement. Yes, the original start of this conversation qualified when you don't need to worry about JavaScript being enabled... I don't have a problem with people requiring JavaScript; they just need to understand the consequences; if they are writing f

Re: Logging and Form Validation

owsers and that JavaScript is necessary. That being the case, what is the problem? -Rob - Original Message - From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:28 PM Subject: RE: Logging and Form Validation > >

RE: Logging and Form Validation

> wait: how many users out there are without JavaScript support ? > Not many I think, and I have yet to find a customer of mine saying "it has > to work on *every* browser", usually they say "IE 5.x, IE 6.x... maybe > Netscape 6.x... possibly Opera 5" and that's it. I've done three e-commerce sit

Re: Logging and Form Validation

cc: Subject: Re: Logging and Form Validation 0

RE: Logging and Form Validation

cc: Subject: RE: Logging and Form Validation 06/07/02 03:24 PM Plea

RE: Logging and Form Validation

> How about > > Guaranteed to produce lots and lots of calls to the help desk, or perhaps just people that don't use your site (particularly attractive for someone running an e-commerce site). The fact of the matter is that some of your average users have heard that Javascript is dangerous a

Re: Logging and Form Validation

web developers could always learn Cocoon ... Vadim Gritsenko wrote: >>From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >> >>>(remember, you still must have validation on the backend) >>> >>Precisely my original point: since you have to write the server side >>validation anyway, do you reall

RE: Logging and Form Validation

> From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > (remember, you still must have validation on the backend) > > Precisely my original point: since you have to write the server side > validation anyway, do you really want to write both client and server side > validation? It is standar

RE: Logging and Form Validation

; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Logging and Form Validation > > > > Luca, > > That would work for me as well, but I have multiple forms that need to be > incrementally validated. The application that is being replaced > implemented client-side validation with five large

RE: Logging and Form Validation

[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html - > -Original Message- > From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:06 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE

RE: Logging and Form Validation

ndini" tin.it> cc: Subject: RE: Logging and Form Validation 06/0

Re: Logging and Form Validation

How about: -Rob - Original Message - From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 12:58 PM Subject: RE: Logging and Form Validation > > I beg to differ. The most part of validation is a trivial matter (

RE: Logging and Form Validation

> (remember, you still must have validation on the backend) Precisely my original point: since you have to write the server side validation anyway, do you really want to write both client and server side validation? I only do so if there is a real performance penalty with the page validation/re

RE: Logging and Form Validation

> From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > I beg to differ. The most part of validation is a trivial matter (minimum > > lenght of fields, bounds checking, ...) and this should, in my eyes, be > done > > on the client: max performance, min hassles for the user (errors are > > inte

RE: Logging and Form Validation

> I beg to differ. The most part of validation is a trivial matter (minimum > lenght of fields, bounds checking, ...) and this should, in my eyes, be done > on the client: max performance, min hassles for the user (errors are > interactivaley corrected). It's not the complexity of the validation

RE: Logging and Form Validation

ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:06 PM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: Logging and Form Validation > > > > > > > This is a major > > > sticking point for my developers that like and are comfortable with jsp

RE: Logging and Form Validation

From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:06 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: Logging and Form Validation > > > > This is a major > > sticking point for my developers that like and are comfortable with jsp >

Re: Logging and Form Validation

Peter"To: >> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Logging and Form Validation

Peter"To: >"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

RE: Logging and Form Validation

> So how would I accomplish this with Cocoon. Could I just create a > component for doing that validation and treat it as a self contained pipe? I suspect our case won't apply to you: we drive validation out of the database through some EJB's using XML templates that describe what validation ru

RE: Logging and Form Validation

Subject: RE: Logging and Form Validation

RE: Logging and Form Validation

> This is a major > sticking point for my developers that like and are comfortable with jsp > with javascript embedded. > They want to keep it at the client and I am trying to build a case for the > server through cocoon. IMNSHO, the only way you can justify client side validation is if you are r

Logging and Form Validation

Group, I am implmenting a five page form, and I am wondering how I should do the validation of fields. Can anyone give me a good comparison in brief of javascript vs. cocoon for doing the validation? I am looking for how it would be accomplished pass content of forms to bean through servlet, et

RE: NEWBIE: Logging?

The logging is turned on by default and configured in the WEB-INF/logkit.xconf file. I guess you have cocoon 2.0.2 installed? If so, have a look if you have this section at the end of the file: Remove the last for lines as they are wrong. Short

NEWBIE: Logging?

log files within cocoon/WEB-INF/logs I have used the binary download as is. Do I need to initialise the logging somewhere somehow. I have looked around on the mailing list archives and I've been to the LogKit site but have had no joy. The only logging framework I've used i

RE: logging of xslt output

April 23, 2002 6:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: logging of xslt output > > > > From: Franosch, Heike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Hi all, > > > > is it possible to log the whole xslt output? > > Yes.

RE: logging of xslt output

> From: Franosch, Heike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Hi all, > > is it possible to log the whole xslt output? Yes. Use log transformer. Vadim > > Thanks, Heike - Please check that your question has not already been answe

logging of xslt output

Hi all, is it possible to log the whole xslt output? Thanks, Heike - Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[E

RE: AW: Confused about Logging

0 Regards, JW -Original Message- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 2002-04-09 9:24:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: Confused about Logging Yes, I did so successfully with 2.0.1 and Resin 2.0.5. Is anybody out there with 2.0.2 who can try to disable logging? -Ursprüngliche Na

AW: Confused about Logging

Yes, I did so successfully with 2.0.1 and Resin 2.0.5. Is anybody out there with 2.0.2 who can try to disable logging? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Giacomo Pati [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. April 2002 11:19 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: Confused about Logging

Re: Confused about Logging

Quoting Jörn Heid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [Using Cocoon 2.0.2 in Jetty 4.0.0 on Win 2000 with JDK 1.4] > > I have changed all log-level attributes in logkit.xconf and web.xml to > FATAL-ERROR but every debug message is printed out into the four log files > and on stdout. > > Is this a problem of

Confused about Logging

[Using Cocoon 2.0.2 in Jetty 4.0.0 on Win 2000 with JDK 1.4] I have changed all log-level attributes in logkit.xconf and web.xml to FATAL-ERROR but every debug message is printed out into the four log files and on stdout. Is this a problem of 2.0.2 or Jetty? How can I generally turn out -ALL- me

Re: switching off logging?

From: "Tsui, Alban" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi > > How do you switch off logging totally in cocoon? ... In the comments, there is: > the logkit.xconf configuration is used ... > Only for startup and if the logkit.xconf is not > readable/available this log leve

switching off logging?

Hi How do you switch off logging totally in cocoon? I have tried settings: log-level FATAL-ERROR but cocoon is still logging ... by producing core.log.. What other parameters that I need to change? Alban This message may contain privileged and/or

Re: Newbie question::Redundant logging...

On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Ugo Cei wrote: > giacomo wrote: > > > > > > > > Shouldn't it be "store-janitor" instead? This is how DEBUG messages are > tagged in my logs (using C2.0.1). Oh, yes, sorry, your version is the correct one. Giacomo -

Re: Newbie question::Redundant logging...

giacomo wrote: > > Shouldn't it be "store-janitor" instead? This is how DEBUG messages are tagged in my logs (using C2.0.1). Ugo -- Ugo Cei - Consorzio di Bioingegneria e Informatica Medica P.le Volontari del Sangue, 2 - 27100 Pavia - Italy Phone: +39.0382.525100 - E-m

Re: Newbie question::Redundant logging...

> Stephen Clarke wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "giacomo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Cocoon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 1:35 PM > > Subject: Re: Newbie question::Redundant logging..

RE: Newbie question::Redundant logging...

02 7:59 AM >To: Cocoon >Subject: Newbie question::Redundant logging... > > >Hello, >I have noticed that Cocoon writes the following four lines in my log file >every ten seconds. This is preventing my hard drive from spinning down and >unnecessarily busying the drive. Is th

Re: Newbie question::Redundant logging...

Hi, Stephen Clarke wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "giacomo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Cocoon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 1:35 PM > Subject: Re: Newbie question::Redundant logging... > > >> On S

Re: Newbie question::Redundant logging...

- Original Message - From: "giacomo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cocoon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 1:35 PM Subject: Re: Newbie question::Redundant logging... > On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Stephen Clarke wrote: > > > Hell

Re: Newbie question::Redundant logging...

itorImpl: getFreememory()=100 Change the logkit.xconf file to: ... ... to get rid of those messages. Giacomo > > Grateful for any pointers on how to stop this logging behavior,

RE: Newbie question::Redundant logging...

Stephen, you could change the log level from DEBUG to ERROR by editing logkit.xconf. Check previuos postings on how to do this. Mind, you will loose valuable logging information during development. Best regards - Luca Morandini

Newbie question::Redundant logging...

:682 [root.sto] (Unknown-URI) Unknown-thread/StoreJanitorImpl: getJVM().freeMemory()=935640 DEBUG (2002-02-10) 06:37.10:682 [root.sto] (Unknown-URI) Unknown-thread/StoreJanitorImpl: getFreememory()=100 Grateful for any pointers on how to stop this logging behavior, or whatever it is. -- Best

Re: Cocoon Logging Issue...

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Roger I Martin PhD wrote: > I am unfamiliar with HEAD branch; the default? Yes > I just got a clean (renamed my old folder and checked out xml-cocoon2) cvs > this morning. Had the logging error. Tried avalon 4.1. Then cvs'ed and > built clean jakart

Re: Cocoon Logging Issue...

I am unfamiliar with HEAD branch; the default? I just got a clean (renamed my old folder and checked out xml-cocoon2) cvs this morning. Had the logging error. Tried avalon 4.1. Then cvs'ed and built clean jakarta-avalon, jakarta-avalon-excalibur, jakarta-avalon-logit projects this mo

RE: Cocoon Logging Issue...

PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cocoon Logging Issue... Assuming you are talking about Cocoon2 HEAD branch. When did you try? I committed new avalon jars 2 days ago. This should have solved the problem. -- Torsten On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Roger I Martin PhD wrote: > Hi, > > I see an earlier postin

Re: Cocoon Logging Issue...

; Hi team, > > Cocoon can't start when using the avalon jars that were recently > updated. I've got the following exception at context startup (Tomcat > output) : > > Starting service Tomcat-Standalone > Apache Tomcat/4.0 > Logging Error: Could not set up Cocoon Logger

Re: Cocoon Logging Issue...

Hi, I see an earlier posting Sylvain Wallez Quote { Hi team, Cocoon can't start when using the avalon jars that were recently updated. I've got the following exception at context startup (Tomcat output) : Starting service Tomcat-Standalone Apache Tomcat/4.0 Logging Error: Could

Cocoon Logging Issue...

All, We are running C2 on JRun and seeing the following error: Logging Error: Could not set up Cocoon Logger, will use screen instead org.apache.avalon.framework.configuration.ConfigurationException: cannot find LogTargetFactory class org.apache.cocoon.util.log.CocoonTargetFactory at

RE: Logging...

, December 07, 2001 12:23 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Logging... Add the following to your web.xml file (in WEB-INF) log-level DEBUG Allbeit this turns on all logging, but you could filter out everything but XIncludeTransformer with the logk

RE: Logging...

Add the following to your web.xml file (in WEB-INF) log-level DEBUG Allbeit this turns on all logging, but you could filter out everything but XIncludeTransformer with the logkit... HTH, Aaron -Original Message- From: Mitchell Christensen [mailto:[EMAIL

Logging...

Does anybody know how to "turn on" logging within a particular component? I'm looking at the source code for the XIncludeTransformer and I see lots of debug statements that start with getLogger().isDebugEnabled(), and I'm not sure how to "enable" those traces. I&#

JUnit Testing Actions with Logging...

Hello everyone, In Cocoon2 has anyone successfully configured a JUnit test case that will run an Action (or any other class) that has logging method calls in it? For example, I have an action that I am able to Unit test with out any problem until I add the following (line 45): getLogger

Logging problem

cocoons logging goes to catalina's log files. What I did wrong? Thanks in adnvance, Alexander Smirnoff - Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.or