Michael Poole wrote:
>Andrew Miller writes:
>
>
>
>>Progs wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D channel.
>>>A is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
>>>There are only A and ABAAA in #foo.
>>>When A speaks on #foo, ABAAA is
Aaron Kaufman writes:
> It's probably bad form to explain on an open list how to use a bug to map
> out the network... : )
There is [EMAIL PROTECTED] if one is so inclined. When one thinks
there is a bug, it is generally useful to convince at least one of the
maintainers that the behavior in que
It's probably bad form to explain on an open list how to use a bug to map
out the network... : )
-AK
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Michael Poole
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 3:32 PM
To: coder-com@undernet.org
Subject: Re: [Code
Andrew Miller writes:
> Progs wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D channel.
>>A is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
>>There are only A and ABAAA in #foo.
>>When A speaks on #foo, ABAAA is +d so AB doesn't receive message, so
>>ABAAA
you missed one...
how about processing the channels +D/+d state on a channel message
before processing a users Deaf mode status? after all, it only needs
to do this to decide if it needs to send a join to a Deaf user.
personally I like the idea that a Deaf user would see all joins
regardl
On Friday 28 October 2005 14:40, Andrew Miller wrote:
> Progs wrote:
> >If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D
> > channel. A is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
> >There are only A and ABAAA in #foo.
> >When A speaks on #foo, ABAAA is +d so AB doesn't rece
Original Message
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:40:56 +1300
> Andrew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fix B: Deaf users can't join +D or +d channels, and users in +D or + d
> > channels can't become deaf.
>
> It's a bad solution. What about services ?
>
+d-k users should not
Progs wrote:
>On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:40:56 +1300
>Andrew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>There are several fixes:
>>Fix A: We need to globally synchronise delayed state, which means that
>>we need to transmit it in BURST. We can then apply the "don't propagate
>>WASDELAYED" because we ca
Andrew Miller wrote:
>Progs wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D channel.
>>A is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
>>There are only A and ABAAA in #foo.
>>When A speaks on #foo, ABAAA is +d so AB doesn't receive message, so
>>AB
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 01:40:56 +1300
Andrew Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are several fixes:
> Fix A: We need to globally synchronise delayed state, which means that
> we need to transmit it in BURST. We can then apply the "don't propagate
> WASDELAYED" because we can track delayed sta
Progs wrote:
>Hi,
>
>If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D channel.
>A is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
>There are only A and ABAAA in #foo.
>When A speaks on #foo, ABAAA is +d so AB doesn't receive message, so ABAAA
>doesn't see A's join.
>
>Bug
OK this thread is making user mode +d and channel mode +d confusing,
since they are 2 very separate modes that do very different things.
Following the differences:
User mode +d stops channel text going to the user
Channel mode +D stop JOINs being seen (initially)
A service bot that is user m
But if a service want to know who is delayed or not, and if it is +d, it can't.
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:04:29 +0200
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:16:52PM +0200, Progs wrote:
> > If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D
> > channel.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:16:52PM +0200, Progs wrote:
> If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D channel.
> A is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
There is no such thing as being 'delayed'.
In order to know where to send messages, the JOIN is propagated
to all serve
On Thursday 27 October 2005 16:16, Progs wrote:
> If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D
> channel. A is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
> There are only A and ABAAA in #foo.
> When A speaks on #foo, ABAAA is +d so AB doesn't receive message, so
> ABAAA do
And with two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA, and #foo a +D channel.
There is only A on #foo and he is *not* delayed.
When ABAAA join channel, he sees A as a delayed user.
Is it correct ?
Progs.
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:16:52 +0200
Progs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I
Hi,
If I have two servers, AA and AB, with A and ABAAA on #foo, a +D channel.
A is delayed on #foo and ABAAA is +d.
There are only A and ABAAA in #foo.
When A speaks on #foo, ABAAA is +d so AB doesn't receive message, so ABAAA
doesn't see A's join.
Bug or feature ?:)
Progs.
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 10:40 Pacific/Auckland, Richard Smith wrote:
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 09:03 Pacific/Auckland, L'archange
Eldianel wrote:
My server is ircu 2.10.11.04
and my X is CS6.0 !
I hate to point out the obvious, and i hope someone on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] really can help you,
>
> My server is ircu 2.10.11.04
> and my X is CS6.0 !
>
It's interesting how much the IRCore services illegitimately circulate.
CS6 does not work with u2.10.11, nor anything else [on Undernet's ircu
branch] above u2.10.07. It uses the "original" specifications of P10,
and therefore cannot use th
> My server works correctly the only problem it is my X ! He join the
server
> during some times and then part in ping timeout not much later without
> having answered anybody. [...]
> My server is ircu 2.10.11.04 and my X is CS6.0 !
This is normal behaviour I believe. You appear to be using IRCor
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 09:03 Pacific/Auckland, L'archange Eldianel
wrote:
My server is ircu 2.10.11.04
and my X is CS6.0 !
I hate to point out the obvious, and i hope someone on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] really can help you, but...
CS6.0 is not the X that Undernet has EVER used, for help with that
My server works correctly the only problem it is my X ! He join the server
during some times and then part in ping timeout not much later without
having answered anybody. Here is the configuration of my X and of my server.
You could resolve the problem for me I shall eternally be grateful to you
fo
Heya,
When I try to start GNUWorld, I get this error:
moduleLoader> Error opening module (/home/gnuworld/gnuworld/lib/libcservice.la):
/home/gnuworld/gnuworld/lib/libcservice.so.0: undefined symbol: _ZTI12PgConnection
I already have recompiled pgsql but it didn't have any effect. Could
this be b
Check the password field of your I:line. It is 1 by example.conf's default
which means there can be only one connection from the same host. This value
can be 1-9, nothing is unlimited, everything else is a connection password.
> Hello,
>
> I have installed the ircd software, the problem i have
Hello,
I have installed the ircd software, the problem i have encountered, is the following.
I have installed ircd on an intranet, which is causing a problem with the "too many
connections from host" connection error. All of the clients that will be connected to
the ircd will be those comput
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Tom Rons wrote:
> Well, as far as I know, Carlo's intent with the original P10 specification
> (which theoretically allows for 4096 clients per server and 64 servers per
> network) was to limit the size of the network, as it would split when it
> became to
> Perhaps Undernet would be more stable and in otherwise better shape if you
> were still in charge. I bet we could reach over 100k users with your help!
Well, as far as I know, Carlo's intent with the original P10 specification
(which theoretically allows for 4096 clients per server and 64 serve
Carlo,
Are you now threatening to stop maintaining a version of ircu that
undernet neither maintain nor supports, and that is only maintained and
supported (and used?) by.. hmmm.. you?
Please, I beg you to reconsider. All your time and efforts are very
appreciated, by some people. I'm sure. I th
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:41:21PM +0200, ULtimaTe_ wrote:
> I don't think that would work man,
> CS6.0 and CS5.1 aren't P10 compatible, that' your problem
> the only channelservice running on ircu2.10.* is cmaster-module in gnuworld
It it slightly annoying that people so easily steal my creation
> hello
> I have ircu2.10.11 beta and CS can not links. He is connected but he not joined
>#cservice.
>
> Can you help to links CS6.0 or 5.1
>
> thanks you ( iam french man and it's very difficult to me to find help ) +++
CS doesn't work with recent version of our daemon. One of the major
p
> Is beta 28 the HEAD revision (does it include the MODE A and u additions)?
> If so, then that might be the reason it doesn't work(?).
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 08:16:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > hello
> > I have ircu2.10.11 beta and CS can not links. He is connected but he not
join
? Last time I answered questions at
user-com I was un-subbed from list :o)
Cti-
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: [Coder-Com] problem with ircu2.10.11 beta 28
> hello
> I have ircu2.10.
]Namens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: woensdag 3 april 2002 15:17
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: [Coder-Com] problem with ircu2.10.11 beta 28
>
>
> hello
> I have ircu2.10.11 beta and CS can not links. He is connected but
> he not joined #cservice.
>
> Can
> hello
> I have ircu2.10.11 beta and CS can not links. He is connected but he not join
> ed #cservice.
I tried breaking /join in beta29, but was unable to do so. I'm afraid it
must be a problem with CS. You'll need to contact the CS developers for
assistance with this issue.
Sorry we couldn'
Is beta 28 the HEAD revision (does it include the MODE A and u additions)?
If so, then that might be the reason it doesn't work(?).
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 08:16:36AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello
> I have ircu2.10.11 beta and CS can not links. He is connected but he not joined
>#cserv
hello
I have ircu2.10.11 beta and CS can not links. He is connected but he not joined
#cservice.
Can you help to links CS6.0 or 5.1
thanks you ( iam french man and it's very difficult to me to find help ) +++
PS: please send me a mail
After I sent the other mail, he added this:
[0:30] I'm not sure.. what I'm talking about isn't a BIND problem,
it's just a weakness in the DNS protocol, period. theres nothing that can
stop it except the next-generation protocol(DNSSEC, cryptographicly signed
packets)
In a log below, with pWr, he claims there is a bug in the new code .. I'm
pasting his conversation below along with the info on a person who
supposedly had utilized the bug.
Bob
khaki is [EMAIL PROTECTED] * khaki
*** Looking up microsoft.com
*** Resolved microsoft.com to 207.46.197.102
/useri
38 matches
Mail list logo
