The vote to release common-lang 2.1 has passed. The following people
voted on release Lang 2.1:
Steven Caswell +1
Simon Kitching+1
Gary Gregory +1
Phil Steitz+1
Michael Heuer +1
Fredrik Westermarck +1
Stephen Colebourne +1
I
Steven Caswell wrote:
Now that RC8 (http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1) has
been up for a few days with no issues, I propose it becomes the 2.1 release.
[X] +1
[ ] -1
Regards,
Fredrik Westermarck
-
To
[X] +1
[ ] -1
(+1 with or without the javadoc fix)
(sorry about the late spot, I was away last week)
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now that RC8 (http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1) has
been up for a few days with no issues, I propose it becomes the 2.1 release.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
My +1
On 6/6/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that RC8
(http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1http://www.apache.org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1)
has been up for a few days with no issues, I propose it becomes the
2.1release.
[X ] +1
[ ] -1
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 19:40 -0400, Steven Caswell wrote:
Now that RC8 (http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1) has
been up for a few days with no issues, I propose it becomes the 2.1 release.
+1
-
To
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 4:40 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release based on RC8
Now that RC8 (http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1) has
been up for a few days with no issues, I propose it becomes the 2.1
release.
[ ] +1
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 4:40 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release based on RC8
Now that RC8 (http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1) has
been up for a few days with no issues, I propose it becomes the 2.1
release
Then that makes is a +1 from me.
Gary
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 5:58 PM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release based on RC8
Gary,
Actually, I had
+1
Phil
On 6/6/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that RC8 (http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1) has
been up for a few days with no issues, I propose it becomes the 2.1 release.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
--
Steven Caswell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take back the web -
A non-binding +1 from me. Thanks for all the work on these RCs, Steven.
michael
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Steven Caswell wrote:
Now that RC8 (http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1) has
been up for a few days with no issues, I propose it becomes the 2.1 release.
[ ] +1
[ ]
-2.1-RC6\build.xml:206: Java returned: 1
Gary
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 3:28 PM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
All,
I have
:206: Java returned: 1
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2005 3:28 PM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
All,
I have
)
[javadoc] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479)
Could be an Ant problem...
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 7:39 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
RC6
: Saturday, May 21, 2005 7:39 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
RC6 is available at
http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1http://www.apache.
org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1
Fixed is the javadoc generation to include
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 7:39 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
RC6 is available at
http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1http://www.apache.
org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1
Fixed
: Monday, May 23, 2005 11:14 AM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
That seems odd since I used maven to gen the sources. Will take a look.
Looks like your earlier problem is fixed.
On 5/23/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL
1.4.2_08.
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2005 11:14 AM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
That seems odd since I used
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 11:26 AM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
No, my mistake, I should have looked closer. There is a reference to
that version
with 1.2.2.
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2005 11:26 AM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
No, my mistake, I should
:* Steven Caswell [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, May 23, 2005 11:26 AM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC6)
No, my mistake, I should have looked closer. There is a reference to
that version
RC6 is available at
http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1http://www.apache.org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1
Fixed is the javadoc generation to include the overview and package notes
(was being omitted due to a bug in the maven javadoc plugin). Also fixed the
manifest
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 2:38 PM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC5)
I think I found the problem. I need to do some more investigation, but
it
looks like an issue with the version of the maven javadoc
Hi Steven All:
Any progress/ideas on the Javadoc problem?
Thanks,
Gary
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:16 AM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:16 AM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC5)
Gary,
Offhand I haven't a clue. I'll have to poke around and see if I can figure
1.6.2, Maven 1.0.2,
Java 1.4.2_08 on Windows XP SP2.
Gary
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 3:26 AM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC5
PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:16 AM
*To:* Gary Gregory
*Cc:* Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC5)
Gary,
Offhand I haven't a clue. I'll have to poke around and see if I can figure
it out. The docs at
http
Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 2:38 PM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC5)
I think I found the problem. I need to do some more investigation, but
it
looks like an issue with the version
List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC5)
RC5 is available at
http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1
The significant change is the exclusion of the o.c.l.text package and
associated javadocs, clover results, jdiff, clirr. I also found and
corrected the maven
Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC5)
RC5 is available at
http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1
The significant change is the exclusion of the o.c.l.text package and
associated javadocs, clover results, jdiff, clirr. I also found and
corrected
I am on Win XP SP2 with Java 1.4.2_07.
Gary
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:16 AM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC5)
Gary
10, 2005 11:16 AM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC5)
Gary,
Offhand I haven't a clue. I'll have to poke around and see if I can
figure it out. The docs at
http://people.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/docs
The method in question is deprecated. I don't know a lot about how JDiff
works, could it be marking it as removed because it is deprecaed?
On 5/6/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still seeing a Removed method in JDiff.
ReflectionToStringBuilder.toString(Object, ToStringStyle,
Still seeing a Removed method in JDiff.
ReflectionToStringBuilder.toString(Object, ToStringStyle, boolean, Class).
Not noticed by Clirr though.
Clirr didn't notice the MILLI and enum deprecations, but it did notice
ReflectionToStringBuilder deprecations that we don't list in the
release notes.
RC5 is available at http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1
The significant change is the exclusion of the o.c.l.text package and
associated javadocs, clover results, jdiff, clirr. I also found and
corrected the maven xdoc problem that caused the extra space between anchors
and
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release (new vote based on RC5)
RC5 is available at
http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1
The significant change is the exclusion of the o.c.l.text package and
associated javadocs, clover results, jdiff, clirr. I also found
Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
RC2 is now available at
http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1http://www.apache.org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1
As per discussions, site stuff was built with maven while the
distributions were build using Ant
: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
You can look at these things a dozen times and still miss the obvious.
I'll put this on the list to fix before it goes out.
On 4/19/05, *Gary Gregory* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
The file
docs/api/index.html
in
http://people.apache.org
Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Gee, I just read my response about looking at things a dozen times, and
if I didn't know better I'd say it might have come across the wrong way.
Just so I didn't cause any confusion, my You was meant as a collective
you, not a You aimed
/overview.html
Also, how about an RC-2 to cover the last batch of commits?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:44 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Henri Yandell
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
1:41 PM
To: Henri Yandell
Cc: Gary Gregory; Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
RC2 is now available at
http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1
As per discussions, site stuff was built with maven while the
distributions were build using Ant against
/docs/apidocs
/index.html
Gary
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 1:41 PM
To: Henri Yandell
Cc: Gary Gregory; Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
RC2 is now available at
http
*To:* Henri Yandell
*Cc:* Gary Gregory; Jakarta Commons Developers List
*Subject:* Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
RC2 is now available at
http://www.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1http://www.apache.org/%7Estevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1
As per discussions, site stuff was built
:-) I'll keep on looking.
Gary
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 6:03 PM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Henri Yandell; Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
You can look at these things
Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
I think the problem is that there is more than just the JAVA_HOME and
PATH
to worry about. There are some registry setting that get changed,
specifically a setting that indicates the installed version. I'll just
wait
until tomorrow and do the RC2 build
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:44 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Henri Yandell
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Looks good. +1
I'd be glad to do the release if someone wouldn't mind walking me
through it
since I've never done one.
On 4/10/05, Henri
to cover the last batch of commits?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:44 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Henri Yandell
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Looks good. +1
:44 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Henri Yandell
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Looks good. +1
I'd be glad to do the release if someone wouldn't mind walking me
through it
since I've never done one.
On 4/10/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED
Is there a convenient way to install both JDK 1.4 and 1.2 on a Windows
system and switch between the two for building the 1.4 maven site and the
1.2 ant binaries? Or do I need to different systems with one of that
installed on each?
TIA.
On 4/17/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Write yourself tiny .bat scripts which adjust PATH and JAVA_HOME?
Should be as applicable on Windows as Linux. Different users is
another possiiblity.
As long as you add the new PATH entry at the front each time, it
should find that one first.
Hope that helps,
Hen
On 4/17/05, Steven Caswell
On 4/17/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I figured out how to get clover to work by making the following
adjustments:
In project.xml, make sure the following properties are set:
maven.jar.override=on
maven.jar.clover=1.3.2
maven.clover.license=clover.license
Yep. I
I think the problem is that there is more than just the JAVA_HOME and PATH
to worry about. There are some registry setting that get changed,
specifically a setting that indicates the installed version. I'll just wait
until tomorrow and do the RC2 build at work on a Unix box. I've gotten
On 4/17/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/17/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I figured out how to get clover to work by making the following
adjustments:
In project.xml, make sure the following properties are set:
maven.jar.override=on
: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:44 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Henri Yandell
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Looks good. +1
I'd be glad to do the release if someone wouldn't mind walking me
through it
since I've never done one.
On 4/10/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
+1
Phil
On 4/10/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposing a vote to go ahead and release Commons Lang 2.1.
The release will pretty much match the release-candidate that is in:
http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/
Stephen's recent defaultIfEmpty method will be
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:44 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Henri Yandell
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Looks good. +1
I'd be glad to do the release if someone wouldn't mind walking me
through it
since I've never done one.
On 4/10/05, Henri
On 4/17/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unsure. I thought I was committed, so things like the overview were
probably missed.
I need to take the car in on Monday, so am spending a lot of the
weekend getting next weeks work done in advance :)
Maybe Steve would like to knock out
FYI, I've committed copyright changes for 2005.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 5:54 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Proposing a vote to go ahead and release Commons Lang 2.1
Looks good. +1
I'd be glad to do the release if someone wouldn't mind walking me through it
since I've never done one.
On 4/10/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposing a vote to go ahead and release Commons Lang 2.1.
The release will pretty much match the release-candidate
Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Proposing a vote to go ahead and release Commons Lang 2.1.
The release will pretty much match the release-candidate that is in:
http://www.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.1/
Stephen's recent defaultIfEmpty method will be included
I would like to see a jdiff and clirr result, plus the final zips before
giving a +1, however if they have no issues then I will be plus one.
Stephen
Henri Yandell wrote:
Proposing a vote to go ahead and release Commons Lang 2.1.
The release will pretty much match the release-candidate that is
JDiff results are there. It highlighted one removal we'd done (and
thus binary imcompat), but it turns out the problem is that we put
@since 2.1 on something that was in 2.0. JDiff believes the @sinces by
the look of it.
So I changed that and will re-JDiff to make sure it goes away.
I'll look
Henri Yandell wrote:
Proposing a vote to go ahead and release Commons Lang 2.1.
[X] +1
[ ] -1
/Fredrik Westermarck
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi:
There are a couple of Javadoc nits I'd like to fix. I should be able to
do this today or tomorrow.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 5:54 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
.
Is this a religious issue for some [lang]'ers out there or should I just
commit?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 5:54 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Proposing a vote to go ahead
.
Is this a religious issue for some [lang]'ers out there or should I just
commit?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 5:54 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Proposing
66 matches
Mail list logo
