Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-21 Thread Mattias J
So I ended up configuring EMMA with Ant. The coverage of the test cases I have written so far (all classes except XMLMessageProvider) is now 100%. (While setting up EMMA with Ant, I ran into the ClassNotFoundError again, and remembered this occurs when the EMMA instrumentation does not take int

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread Mattias J
At 2005-04-20 21:49, you wrote: Seems like i18n is reinventing the wheel over and over. I see we are using of Sax, when Digester is the most viable choice, given the typical clients of this framework. I see where ResourceBundle is used, yet a much more robust solution is already provided through

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread Mattias J
At 2005-04-20 23:05, you wrote: There were server errors earlier today. Did you ever get this to run? Nope. Tried Maven + Emma too, without luck. It either produced coverage data OR an empty report; never used the data to create a report. I should probably read up on how Maven works (or simply ad

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread James Mitchell
ttias J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" ; "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 3:49 PM Subject: Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier At 2005-04-20 09:47, Mattias J wrote: B.t.w James: Thought I'd run your new Maven

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread Mattias J
At 2005-04-20 09:47, Mattias J wrote: B.t.w James: Thought I'd run your new Maven config to see the coverage of the tests I've added. Though I have not checked out .../commons-build/sandbox-project.xml and currently I cannot access the SVN server. Sorry if this is because I'm a newbie with Maven

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread James Mitchell
Seems like i18n is reinventing the wheel over and over. I see we are using of Sax, when Digester is the most viable choice, given the typical clients of this framework. I see where ResourceBundle is used, yet a much more robust solution is already provided through Commons Resources. Any chanc

RE: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Schaible?=
Hi Mattias, Mattias J wrote on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:18 PM: >> Another beast is the proposed DatabaseMessageProvider of Mattias. If >> it uses external deps it is qualified for a separate contrib package >> ... but just my 2c. > > I intend to avoid external dependencies by using pure > ja

RE: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread Mattias J
At 2005-04-20 12:06, you wrote: > Shall we add an i18n-contrib.jar that contains all the > optional extensions? I'd like to keep the core i18n.jar as > small as possible... Then you'll need some definition for this. IMHO MBeanInfoDescriptionBundle is as light as the rest without any deps and this

RE: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Schaible?=
Hi Daniel, >> I really liked this light-weight approach. I had a need of localized >> MBeanInfo (see contribution) and with i18n's concept, I was able to >> write also just a little Bundle impl, that is based on some >> conventions for the provided resources. > > This looks really usefull to me.

RE: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Schaible?=
Hi Daniel, Daniel Florey wrote on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 10:14 AM: > Hi Joerg (sorry - keine Umlaute hier in Jordanien...), Does not really matter, most people use o instead of oe as replacement anyway :) > thanks for your contribution! I'll take a look at it next > week. Do you have commit a

RE: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread Daniel Florey
"Jakarta Commons Developers List" schrieb am 20.04.05 09:38:37: > > Hi Daniel, > > Daniel Florey wrote on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 9:24 AM: > [snip] > > My primary goal was to keep this component simple. It has no > > dependencies to other jars and that is a big plug for the > > daily use. >

RE: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread Daniel Florey
"Jakarta Commons Developers List" schrieb am 20.04.05 09:38:37: > > Hi Daniel, > > Daniel Florey wrote on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 9:24 AM: > [snip] > > My primary goal was to keep this component simple. It has no > > dependencies to other jars and that is a big plug for the > > daily use. >

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread Mattias J
At 2005-04-20 09:23, you wrote: > Seems like i18n is reinventing the wheel over and over. I see we are using > of Sax, when Digester is the most viable choice, given the typical clients > of this framework. I see where ResourceBundle is used, yet a much more > robust solution is already provided

RE: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Schaible?=
Hi Daniel, Daniel Florey wrote on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 9:24 AM: [snip] > My primary goal was to keep this component simple. It has no > dependencies to other jars and that is a big plug for the > daily use. +1 This was the main reason I chose i18n. No deps, no new problems. > Remember my

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-20 Thread Daniel Florey
678.910.8017 > AIM: jmitchtx > Yahoo: jmitchtx > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Daniel Florey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 10:

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread agodinhost
'>'From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> '>'To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" '>'Subject: Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier '>'Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:33:33 -0400 '>' '>' '>&#x

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread James Mitchell
Freelance EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx Yahoo: jmitchtx MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Daniel Florey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 10:34 AM Subject: Re: [i18n] Entry qualifie

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread James Mitchell
7 AIM: jmitchtx Yahoo: jmitchtx MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 2:45 PM Subject: Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier Each marked line is the point to test, is this? I see 2 t

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread agodinhost
Each marked line is the point to test, is this? I see 2 types of marks: one in green and other in brown. What means each one? Woody http://people.apache.org/~jmitchell/i18n-docs/jcoverage/index.html '>' '>'This is a good starting point. You can see where new tests are needed for '>' '>'every

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread James Mitchell
8.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx Yahoo: jmitchtx MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Daniel Florey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 11:34 AM Subject: Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier "Jaka

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread Daniel Florey
"Jakarta Commons Developers List" schrieb am 19.04.05 17:07:46: > > I have now added more tests to ResourceBundleMessageProviderTest. If I find > time tomorrow, I might look at adding coverage or more XMLMessageProvider > tests. > Though I do not have commit access to SVN, so I assume I cannot

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread Mattias J
I have now added more tests to ResourceBundleMessageProviderTest. If I find time tomorrow, I might look at adding coverage or more XMLMessageProvider tests. Though I do not have commit access to SVN, so I assume I cannot get hold of the Clover license. Daniel: Since you are not home until next

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread Daniel Florey
onsulting / Mentoring / Freelance > EdgeTech, Inc. > 678.910.8017 > AIM: jmitchtx > Yahoo: jmitchtx > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Mattias J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta C

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread James Mitchell
Yahoo: jmitchtx MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Mattias J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 9:22 AM Subject: Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier What I currently need is better unit tests

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread agodinhost
; '>'Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:22:34 +0200 '>'To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" '>'From: Mattias J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> '>'Subject: Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier '>' '>' '>'What I cur

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread Mattias J
quot;Jakarta Commons Developers List" '>'Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:34:41 +0200 '>'From: "Daniel Florey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> '>'To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" '>'Subject: Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier '>&

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread agodinhost
If I can help ... I still alive Woody '>'-- Mensagem Original -- '>'Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" '>'Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:34:41 +0200 '>'From: "Daniel Florey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> &#x

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread Daniel Florey
"Jakarta Commons Developers List" schrieb am 19.04.05 11:27:33: > > At 2005-04-19 10:35, Daniel Florey wrote: > >We should keep both (ant/maven) working. There is a maven task that will > >automatically generate an ant script, but I've never used it. > >Maven is a great tool as it can also hand

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread Mattias J
At 2005-04-19 10:35, Daniel Florey wrote: We should keep both (ant/maven) working. There is a maven task that will automatically generate an ant script, but I've never used it. Maven is a great tool as it can also handle website generation, test reports, changelog etc. So it's worth to have a loo

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-19 Thread Daniel Florey
"Jakarta Commons Developers List" schrieb am 18.04.05 20:08:29: > > Will Ant be abandoned in favor of Maven or should I update the Ant script > to include the unit tests? (I have no experience with Maven) We should keep both (ant/maven) working. There is a maven task that will automatically g

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Mattias J wrote: Will Ant be abandoned in favor of Maven or should I update the Ant script to include the unit tests? (I have no experience with Maven) What indentation do you use for XML? I find both tabs and 2 spaces, even in the same file. (There is also a tab on line 80 in LocalizedBundle.jav

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-18 Thread Mattias J
Will Ant be abandoned in favor of Maven or should I update the Ant script to include the unit tests? (I have no experience with Maven) What indentation do you use for XML? I find both tabs and 2 spaces, even in the same file. (There is also a tab on line 80 in LocalizedBundle.java) I have set up

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-18 Thread Daniel Florey
"Jakarta Commons Developers List" schrieb am 18.04.05 11:29:38: > > At 2005-04-18 11:11, Daniel Florey wrote: > > > My though was to re-use the basename or id used when "installing" > > > ResourceBundle or XML providers. For example, after issuing > > >ResourceBundleMessageProvider.install("

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier

2005-04-18 Thread Mattias J
At 2005-04-18 11:11, Daniel Florey wrote: > My though was to re-use the basename or id used when "installing" > ResourceBundle or XML providers. For example, after issuing >ResourceBundleMessageProvider.install("errorMessages"); > I would like to be able to qualify the newly installed messages

Re: [i18n] Entry qualifier (was Re: Status?)

2005-04-18 Thread Daniel Florey
"Jakarta Commons Developers List" schrieb am 18.04.05 10:56:58: > > At 2005-04-18 10:33, Daniel Florey wrote: > > > i18n is appealing to me because it allows for multiple properties (such as > > > title and details) under a common key. We solve very similar problems in > > > our project, but I w