On Sep 17, 2009, at 12:04 PM, mike wrote:
You need to read more. Geithner is monetizing our debt and Obama
and team
want to raise our debt ceiling again, this has been done several
times by
both parties. This isn't about some hated neocon vs liberal wackos,
this is
both parties ripping us
On Sep 17, 2009, at 3:21 PM Sep 17, Fred Holmes wrote:
If one doesn't like what the faceless corporate bureaucrat decides,
one can drop the insurance and go with someone else. With
government, there is no choice -- no place to escape to.
I can think of lots of places. Have you been denied a
> If one doesn't like what the faceless corporate bureaucrat decides, one can
> drop the insurance and go
> with someone else. With government, there is no choice -- no place to escape
> to.
And there's no other insurance company to escape to if you have a preexisting
condition. You'd just bet
Fred Holmes wrote:
At 02:46 AM 9/17/2009, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
It is insane to think that a faceless
corporate bureaucrat is better than a faceless federal bureaucrat.
If one doesn't like what the faceless corporate bureaucrat decides, one can
drop the insurance and go with someon
Thanks for this, valuable insight.
--- On Thu, 9/17/09, mike wrote:
From: mike
Subject: [CGUYS] ipod touch not the golden devil was: Re: [CGUYS]
COMPUTERGUYS-L Digest - 10 Sep 2009 - Special issue (#2009-870)
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@listserv.aol.com
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2009, 1:47 PM
At 02:46 AM 9/17/2009, John Duncan Yoyo wrote:
>It is insane to think that a faceless
>corporate bureaucrat is better than a faceless federal bureaucrat.
If one doesn't like what the faceless corporate bureaucrat decides, one can
drop the insurance and go with someone else. With government, the
QED
--- On Thu, 9/17/09, mike wrote:
From: mike
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] COMPUTERGUYS-L Digest - 10 Sep 2009 - Special issue
(#2009-870)
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2009, 1:38 PM
Since you address me in this section I'll assume you missed the part of
What makes you think I believe it's a golden devil? iPod touch = the cool.
Also on a related note of sorts. I emailed the list about choices in cell
phones and service, and the comments were all helpful. I had almost decided
for sure I was going to get the new mytouch from Tmobile. I had wante
Since you address me in this section I'll assume you missed the part of this
thread where a dozen others were having their spitting matches? If you
don't like the thread, don't open it, while this is a computer list we do
get into other topics but they usually are fairly well marked as non
compute
This goes across party lines to the fact that Congress listens to and
acts in the best interests of lobbyists and no longer the local guy
who elected him.
I just got finished listening to a program on NPR (Diane Rheems show)
where she interviewed an author who traced the problems with
derivat
fit of everyone. We who
come here have grown tired of pre-adolescent spitting matches.
Thank you.
--- On Thu, 9/17/09, mike wrote:
From: mike
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] COMPUTERGUYS-L Digest - 10 Sep 2009 - Special issue
(#2009-870)
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Date: Thursday, September 17,
> What I do find is that one side only mentions the problems with the other
> side. For every Madoff there is a government bureaucrat like Geithner
> ripping us off. For every wall street banker there are guys like Ted
> Stevens or Charlie Rangel.
Actually, what I think is that each side eithe
keeps
those screwing us happy because it keeps the spotlight off what they are
doing.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:21 AM, chad evans wyatt wrote:
> Ummm.. Equating thousands to billions?
>
> --- On Thu, 9/17/09, mike wrote:
>
> From: mike
> Subject: Re: [CGUYS] COMPUTERGUYS-L Digest
Ummm.. Equating thousands to billions?
--- On Thu, 9/17/09, mike wrote:
From: mike
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] COMPUTERGUYS-L Digest - 10 Sep 2009 - Special issue
(#2009-870)
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Date: Thursday, September 17, 2009, 10:30 AM
No, I accidentally hit the send button on
> What I do find is that one side only mentions the problems with the other
> side. For every Madoff there is a government bureaucrat like Geithner
> ripping us off. For every wall street banker there are guys like Ted
> Stevens or Charlie Rangel.
Actually, what I think is that each side either
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:30 AM, mike wrote:
> No, I accidentally hit the send button on my iPod touch.
>
> What I do find is that one side only mentions the problems with the other
> side. For every Madoff there is a government bureaucrat like Geithner
> ripping us off. For every wall street
No, I accidentally hit the send button on my iPod touch.
What I do find is that one side only mentions the problems with the other
side. For every Madoff there is a government bureaucrat like Geithner
ripping us off. For every wall street banker there are guys like Ted
Stevens or Charlie Rangel.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Mike wrote:
> On Sep 17, 2009, at 6:13 AM, "phartz...@gmail.com"
> wrote:
>>
>> The plundering, the Bernie Madoff's, the ongoing banking and
>> financial debacle, Wall Street crimes and misdeeds, etc., etc., etc.
>>
>> Steve
Yes, I did write that. Do you fin
On Sep 17, 2009, at 6:13 AM, "phartz...@gmail.com"
wrote:
The plundering, the Bernie Madoff's, the ongoing banking and
financial debacle, Wall Street crimes and misdeeds, etc., etc., etc.
Steve
***
**
** List info, subsc
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:46 AM, John Duncan Yoyo
wrote:
> It is insane to think that a faceless
> corporate bureaucrat is better than a faceless federal bureaucrat.
Unless, of course, you are a 100% pure and unadulterated capitalist,
closed minded to any alternative. In order to remain compl
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:05 PM, mike wrote:
> Funny neither have you. We'll just decide those guys over there are
> idiots,
> and you are a moron...that's my clinical assessment. Play out your
> socialist fantasies elsewhere, it's hard enough dealing with your made up
> neomicrosofticon bogey
I have to admit, I love computers, the internet and email lists. They
are such fun. Nothing electronic has kept my interest longer. Not even
Nintendo or Sega. Those were fun for a couple of years, but they get
boring. Email lists never seem to get boring. Long live the internet.
Jeff Mile
Here is my attempt to steer the topic toward some sort of computer relevancy.
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/09/obamas-health-care-speech/
I will probably get bashed for suggesting factcheck.org but I like the idea of
(a non-partisan, nonprofit website that describes itself as a "'consumer
advoc
Funny neither have you. We'll just decide those guys over there are idiots,
and you are a moron...that's my clinical assessment. Play out your
socialist fantasies elsewhere, it's hard enough dealing with your made up
neomicrosofticon bogey men when you pretend to know something about
computers.
On Sep 11, 2009, at 10:47 AM Sep 11, mike wrote:
When they can't argue facts, the Democrats will argue spelling
apparently.
Or call names.
You have not presented any facts, just lots of con/neocon fantasy
shibboleths. You have not been able to process any of the real-world
facts that have
On Sep 11, 2009, at 12:06 PM Sep 11, Steve at Verizon wrote:
But this is White House projections!!! See:
That is a projection of the debt. What is the GDP increase expected
to be over the same period?
I'll give you a hint: What is one divided by one, genius?
About the only thing this discu
Sounds like here when you...'discuss' computer topics with Tom.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Chris Dunford wrote:
>
>
> And as far as name-calling goes, I'm a regular poster on several
> conservative forums. If I had a buck for every time I've been called a
> moron, an idiot, a dimwit, a tro
t.piwowar wrote:
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:21 PM, Jeff Morris wrote:
Obama claims that nationalizing health care will create jobs. The
only jobs that will be created are government jobs.
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:21 PM, Jeff Morris wrote:
Government produces no wealth and adds absolutely nothing to t
> When they can't argue facts, the Democrats will argue spelling apparently.
> Or call names.
Come on, Mike. First, facts HAVE been argued here, rather extensively. Second,
"Democrat party" -IS- name-calling. It's intentional and demeaning. Wikipedia
characterizes it as an "epithet". Joseph
McCa
When they can't argue facts, the Democrats will argue spelling apparently.
Or call names.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 7:42 AM, b_s-wilk wrote:
> Jeff Morris escribió:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hnc0CeUT-Lc There is an old saying,
>> and judging by the posts on here it is 100% accurate: Yo
Jeff Morris escribió:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hnc0CeUT-Lc There is an old saying,
and judging by the posts on here it is 100% accurate: You can't
reason people out of positions they didn't reason themselves into.
Too many people are partisan without ever really thinking about
things.
.
Wow what memories. I used to have a print of that New Yorker cover
hanging on my wall. The 80's, where did they go?
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/status_invite.php?from=550968726
On Sep 10, 2009, at 11:18 PM, t.piwowar wrote:
On Sep 10,
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:21 PM, Jeff Morris wrote:
Obama claims that nationalizing health care will create jobs. The
only jobs that will be created are government jobs.
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:21 PM, Jeff Morris wrote:
Government produces no wealth and adds absolutely nothing to the
gross nation
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:21 PM, Jeff Morris wrote:
One can draw some conclusions from the health care debate...this
chief among them: Obama is a radical liberal at best...a socialist
at worst. Same with Pelosi and Reid. I can't imagine any clear
thinking person anywhere wants our country run
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:21 PM, Jeff Morris wrote:
I find this to be true also: The greedy aren't the capitalists.
They are trying to make a living and I say power to them.
So you think the corporations who cancel your health insurance the
moment you get sick are fine upstanding examples of m
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hnc0CeUT-Lc
There is an old saying, and judging by the posts on here it is 100% accurate:
You can't reason people out of positions they didn't reason themselves into.
Too many people are partisan without ever really thinking about things.
What I am looking for
36 matches
Mail list logo
