...
I installed Mdk 9.2 RC1, and during the installation I set up the connection
through lan card - dns gateway = 10.1.1.1. When I logged in for the first
time and tried to enter some page with konqueror, it failed. I tried ping
10.1.1.1 from the konsole and it said something like connect
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4732
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-10 07:33 ---
Similar problem here with latest cooker (sync'ed about an hour ago). I don't
have a usb keyboard. However, my usb mouse, usb hub, usb printer, usb storage
devices, etc.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5398
Product: apache-conf
Component: apache-conf
Summary: Apache should not specify a default character set for
text/* types
Product: apache-conf
Version: 2.0.47-5mdk
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5398
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-08-09 16:42 ---
OK. There's an issue with text files, but there are many ways to solve this. For
example, we could add this directive in commonhttpd.conf :
AddCharset ISO-8859-1 .txt
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5308
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-09 03:06 ---
I think I am missing something here, because I do not see where you (Oden) read
that 0.29.0 can handle old repositories. So just to be sure:
In 0.28.0 an incompatible
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3385
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-28 01:27 ---
This is after a fresh install of 9.1 on an separate partition, where MySQL has
been selected during the package selection stage:
$ ls -ld /var/lib/mysql/
this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: RESOLVED
creation_date:
description:
Configuration:
- AMD Duron 1.2, 512Mb, Shuttle XPC SN41G2 Nforce2, Maxtor 120Gb
- Fresh MDK 9.1 RC2
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-16 23:37 ---
Another Me to but I did look a bit closer at the problem.
I have locale en_US.UTF-8 and /etc/init.d/mandrake_consmap is installed and I
guess triggers the problem.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3207
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3207
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 11:48 ---
Funny, I wondered if I should consider that an urpmi problem. Anyhow the
versions I am using:
$ rpm -q urpmi perl-URPM rpmtools
urpmi-4.2-30mdk
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3207
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 12:49 ---
Oops, I thought the problem was gone once I installed the newest package (at
that time MySQL-4.0.11a-4mdk), but it just happened again with the next version:
$ urpmi
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3208
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3207
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 13:54 ---
I just reproduced it by downgrading to the MySQL-4.0.11a-4mdk version (also all
related packages) and then doing urpmi MySQL-Max again. With --bug the output
changed to
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3207
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 15:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=341)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=341action=view)
debug directly of urpmi --bug MySQL-Max
Okay, tar.gz is attached.
I
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3013
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 04:58 ---
Oops. There is my comment missing.
(sorry about the noise)
Setting to CLOSED as confirmation that it is fixed.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Additional Comments
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3207
Product: MySQL-Max
Component: packaging
Summary: conflict MySQL vs MySQL-Max only partially works
Version: 4.0.11a-4mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3208
Product: MySQL-client
Component: program
Summary: mysql_install_db doesn't look for mysqld-max
Version: 4.0.11a-4mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3208
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 07:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=335)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=335action=view)
makes it look also for mysqld-max, not only mysqld
The patch fixes the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3009
Product: grpmi
Component: grpmi
Summary: improve handling of MD5 sum mismatch
Version: 9.1-11mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 04:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=302)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=302action=view)
How the output of rpm -q --scripts MySQL-Max should look like
Sorry,
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3013
Product: MySQL
Component: packaging
Summary: wants to install info page, but that has moved to MySQL-
common
Version: 4.0.11a-3mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-05 20:43 ---
The originally reported problem is fixed (that is, de-installing all MySQL
packages and doing urpmi MySQL-Max results in a working MySQL server with
version
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-05 23:18 ---
The 3.23 tables are not updated and stopping MySQL fails somehow:
$ urpmi MySQL-Max
installing /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/MySQL-Max-4.0.11a-2mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-26 05:26 ---
FYI. On MDK 9.1 RC1, tried to do the install to raid1 and mailed on mkraid.
modprobe md gave a pile of unresolved symboles, something is broken here.
--- You
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1916
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-23 10:43 ---
Well, Wim, if you call yourself Bugzilla, too, you are right to feel offended.
In the more probable case that you do not, understand that Warly was speaking
with the
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-22 22:20 ---
*** Bug 2151 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-23 11:29 ---
After seeing Bug 2151 being
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-21 06:26
---
Rather than close it, push it forward to 9.2. Too much work involved to get it done
before 9.1 but eventually a necessary step.
--- You are receiving this
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-15 01:41
---
Created an attachment (id=180)
-- (https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=180action=view)
Fix illegal memory access in mysql_check.c
Oh, of course, I tried
(scroll down to How to contribute some packages to Cooker?):
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/cookerdevel.php3
And did you read this before packaging the RPMs? It deals with
Mandrake-specific rules and methods for RPM packaging.
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/howtos/mdk-rpm/
In particular
OK, I've also uploaded the i586.rpm's:
http://Honza.Vicherek.com/sdd-1.31-1.i586.rpm
http://Honza.Vicherek.com/sdd-1.22-2.i586.rpm
John
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've made sdd SRPMs: one older, one newer. The newer seems pretty
stable, so it might be enough
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
* Sun Aug 26 2001 Lenny Cartier [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.1.6-1mdk
- updated to 0.1.6
Should be renamed to crimson-field, to not be confused with java xml parser
(even if not in Mandrake).
Good idea. I will.
lenny
--
Lenny Cartier | Iptoip
Hi,
Where is there an rsync server I could get the latest Mdk8.0+UPDATES off
of, so I can rsync to local machine and make an installationw/current
updates via NFS from my local maschine ?
Thx,
Jan
--
-- Gospel of Jesus is the saving power of God for all who believe --
On 6/1/01 3:54 PM, Andrej Borsenkow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
May be, Aurora development is not under Mandrake control, but packaging?
Maybe so, but doesn't anyone at Mandrakesoft *use* Aurora, at least during
the beta cycle? Particularly if such a problem was reported before?
Harry
On 6/4/01 12:40 PM, Paul Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I think that starting with 8.1, that they should go ahead
and go to 3 cd's for the core distribution.
Agreed, since the Standard Edition comes with 3 CDs, but the third is just
some varied Applications. Granted, it's a
On 5/28/01 11:19 PM, Yves Duret [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any idea why this is, or am I missing something?
look in contribs
So, then, it *is* missing from the standard distribution n the CDs, right?
Any particular reason why it was dropped over inclusion in 7.2?
Thanks for the response,
There appear to be some problems with Software Manager under 8.0.
Logged in as root:
* When changing sources (adding or deleting), and re-opening the 'sources'
dialog, none of the changes 'took'. No matter how many times it is being
re-entered, the changes never take hold.
* I should be able
LM 8.0 no longer appears to include the sympa mail list manager, that was
nevertheless included under LM 7.2 - why is that?
T is on an entirely freshly installed system, using ReiserFS, from a bought
copy of Mandrake 8.0 standard edition - selecting pretty much everything for
the installation.
Just had a weird issue with a user who bought and installed Linux Mandrake
7.2 PowerPack Deluxe. After installation, I tried to help him configure his
system, leading him to DrakConf - but apparently DrakConf was not installed
on his system at all.
What configuration or condition can lead to an
to answer my own question : nope, contents of Cooker-i586 20010418 12:13
and of Mandrake-8 are not the same. I just did an rsync from one of the
sites, and found out that the distros are not same. Attached is .bz2
output of :
# diff -qr current_cooker just_released8 | grep -v
On 4/13/01 9:39 AM, "Paul Cox" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
127.0.0.1localhost.localdomainlocalhost
Was that in there already and you had to add your specific information,
or was it empty? I'm curious because I have a dynamic ip address.
Technically, for a working configuration, what
On 4/12/01 1:15 AM, "John Allen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
php-common isn't in the hdlists so it ends up on the last CD, and you
have to
install it manually later.
That sounds like a fix that MUST be done before final release ships.
Harry
On 4/12/01 1:08 AM, "John Allen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No don't! it's muich too late you should have done this with beta 1-3 they
were made especially for those things. Changing strings so late will break
That would have been rather hard, seeing as these changes only appeared
on RC1!
On 4/12/01 5:38 AM, "Sergio P.Korlowsky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well finished installing RC1 and this what I got tring to start apache:
httpd
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Which is exactly what I had been getting with beta 3 - I'm glad that we're
only dealing with a minor app, like
On 4/12/01 6:45 AM, "Jason Straight" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So anyway - I checked /etc/hosts and the only entry was for 127.0.0.1, I
added in an entry for the eth0 interface address and it started apache ok.
A) This was never an issue with prior installations, so this should be
looked into.
B) First thing I did was update my hosts file, but I'll fuck around with it
some more.
By specifically and manually entering the information of the local box into
the hosts file, I was able to make apache behave and run properly (Thanks
"Jason Straight" [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
My suggestion,
I run MandrakeUpdate. I select one of the files I want updated. It loads the
'installer' sub-program, and it return an error.
Machine is hooked up to network, and can acccess the net. The error type is
NOT given.
Harry
On 4/13/01 5:16 AM, "Guillaume Cottenceau" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Nguyen Hung.Takeshi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi all!
I ve chosen full installation for Traktopel3 (install all packages), it took
about 3.5 hours ;)
Several reasons for this? Did you do an 'upgrade' of an 'install'?
On 4/13/01 9:38 AM, "Elton Woo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But where
are the beautiful Princess Narda, and Lothar? ;-))
Lothar's there - check the name of some of the packages/projects they worked
on.
Harry
Does anyone know if the installation of Apache has been fixed in 8.0 beta
yet? In Beta 3 installation, it would not work out of the gate.
Harry
Just to avoid a repeat of an earlier fiasco, I'd like to point out that the
present beta 3 seems to lack 'joe', the text editor.
Seeing as how there was inconsistent support for joe under the various
versions of 7.2, it would be very pleasant to see 'joe' returned to Mandrake
8.0 in all release
Virgin install of mandrake 8 beta ona dual Celeron BP6 board. Installation
by itself went off without too many problems:
* The text editor joe, as previously mentioned, is not part of the
installation.
* Apache/httpd does not work AT ALL after this install (the usual (defunct)
message during a
On 2/27/01 12:59 AM, "Thomas Mangin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No it is not that simple you must
- postuninstall : insert loop.o
- install the kernel
- postinstall : mkinitrd
- remove the loop.o
RedHat does it on its latest kernel if you want to get an easy spec file ..
Yeah, but
What is the version of Apache in cooker right now.
Simple question - just need a simple answer.
Harry
Has anyone tried mod_gzip (www.remotecommunications.com) under cooker's
httpd server to see if it works?
Harry
Mod_gzip is a content encoding module for Apache. When properly installed it
can provide some tremendous savings on bandwidth, and improvements in
performance.
Problem is, it doesn't properly install under LM (v7.2) - apapche errors out
at restart. This might be due to some of the existing
On 2/23/01 4:25 PM, "andre" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the headerfiles of your cooker emails are writen
This requires lamerz actually knowing how to read their headers - not the
most intuitive location for such information.
Harry
Has anyone else encountered this:
This is on a virgin, new install of a Mandrake 7.2 system. Every morning,
same time (4:02am) the system locks up and freezes hard, requiring a power
cycle.
Suspecting a cron job, I ran each manually in the cron.daily directory,
until the same lock-up happened
on 12/7/00 3:15 AM, Vadim Plessky at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Now I must be serious. Mandrake Comp. said that no final Kde-2.0.1 will
| be available for users of Mandrake 7.2.
How charming - have they given a reason as to why?
Harry
on 12/7/00 2:41 PM, Christopher Molnar at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys, please give them a few more days! They are working on it, I've been
told by my manager. The packagers on the project have not worked with kde2
that often before (remember I was doing the packaging) and it is taking a
Has anyone else encountered this:
This is on a virgin, new install of a Mandrake 7.2 system. Every morning,
same time (4:02am) the system locks up and freezes hard, requiring a power
cycle.
Suspecting a cron job, I ran each manually in the cron.daily directory,
until the same lock-up happened
on 11/28/00 7:09 AM, Charles R. Hurley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even after I installed all the many updates I'm still having problems with
this OS. For example, I cannot connect to my http://localhost, and any
other app that tries to connect to port 80 can't either. I installed the
on 11/27/00 11:28 AM, stephen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
should i be glad or dismayed ??
As 'nice' as it is for MacMillan to distribute Mandrake products, with all
the recent snafus (most of them deliberate decisions by marketing) I think
it's about time that MacMillan be abandonned as a
on 11/27/00 3:14 PM, Vincent Danen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what Ron mistakenly called the "real 7.2" and is in
fact 7.2 (what you have)
Well, considering there are at least *3* versions out there, as of last
count, all labeled '7.2' and all different, I think refering to something as
7.2
on 11/27/00 3:12 PM, Vincent Danen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please let's not start this whole thread over again... Macmillan never
released a "pre-release" 7.2 and that is that.
Uhm... yes, I guess WalMart notwithstanding...
...or MacMillan's Linux-Mandrake 7.2 'complete'
on 11/27/00 9:16 PM, Ron Stodden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Í'm sorry, but you are misinformed.
No he's not, Ron. He works for Mandrake. His word is law. His word distorts
reality. His word is the truth. Heretics like you must be silenced.
(Sarcasm intended)
Harry
on 11/28/00 5:28 PM, Vincent Danen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to seem rude, but I am no longer replying to any messages
in this or any similar threads. I no longer have time for this debate.
Understood, and I can see why - as long as MandrakeSoft has time to address
the issues
on 11/28/00 7:09 AM, Charles R. Hurley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A pray: Let's keep Mandrake the best Linux OS ever. Let's support these
great Linux and Mandrake programmers, and let's sell the truth.
Agreed on all of that, but bear in mind, that the last part refers to
marketing, and I
Does the latest Mandrake (7.2, cooker) include lm_sensors, lm_sensors
support, or is it at least 'ready' for lm_sensors?
If not, are there any plans to support that?
Harry
on 11/23/00 5:02 AM, Matthew Brealey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
followed by Netscape 6,
Why does Netscape 6 even feature in any list of 'best' browsers.
It's a piece of total crap.
Harry
on 11/24/00 2:44 PM, Brian J. Murrell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WELL I GOT NEWS FOR YA!! I lost about another dozen mail messages again
today becuase IT IS NOT FIXED!!
It's just their gentle way of trying to convince you to switch to Posrfix...
Harry
on 11/22/00 9:08 AM, Charles R. Hurley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it true that Macmillan packaged a pre-release copy of 7.2?
Yes, but they didn't do it alone.
Harry
Do you get all working ?
I think that now we could forget the arrogance problem .
the problem need to be the center of the discution
Agreed, thank you.
I'm waiting for a functional 4-disk set to be sent to me, once I have those,
I will attempt a reinstall.
so there was problem with
on 11/19/00 9:09 PM, Ron Stodden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harry, how big is the partition you are installing to?
Oh, about 10 gigabytes.
If it is too small, the installer gives you a percent representing
all that it can install in that space. Did you see this?
Nope, all I saw was
on 11/19/00 9:28 PM, Alexander Skwar at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can't stand the responses, GET LOST!
Hmmm, do you work for Mandrake?
I doubt that the marketing will even response when YOU ARE always so
arrogant! That's right! The person being arrogant in the first place is
*YOU*!
on 11/19/00 9:25 PM, Ron Stodden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In your situation, I would take it back and get your $32 back. Then
download or buy the REAL Mandrake 7.2
Well, I certainly will try to return it, albeit the issue with returning
opened software boxes is a tricky one... Either
Think about this, I didn't tell you to look through the CD
Well, seeing as how I was specifically talking about the CD, that
miscommunication is understandable.
it's still
available for downlaod and yes I admit the marketing is probably bad,
and I can understand why you must be frustrated
So, I have been using joe since day-one of using Linux.
So, every version of Mandrake (not to mention every other distro) includes
joe.
So, I installed Mandrake 7.2 (the complete, 4-cd version). I actually bought
it to see what the new version's all about.
So, I do an installation with 'ALL',
on 11/19/00 9:28 AM, Zeljko Vukman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So appologize to Mandrakes, they deserve it.
Let me get this straight: I'm supposed to 'apologize' to Mandrake because
they replied:
It's gone because you're too lazy to install it:
Oh, yeah, I certainly should be grateful as
on 11/19/00 8:49 AM, Geoffrey Lee at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's gone because you're too lazy to install it:
Obviously we must be talking about some strange language/translation
idiosyncrasy.
In English, a language that apparently is quite complex and difficult to
understand, the word 'ALL'
on 11/19/00 10:58 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do you want i get you in contact with a marketing guy to inflate your
egocentric ?
Sure, if you feel that it will do any good...
The fact remains:
I installed mandrake on a virin system, as a straightforward installation. I
on 11/19/00 1:31 PM, Alexander Skwar at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that's just because YOU started to fight. I actually think that Chris's
response was apropriate, and it even was gentle IMO. And when you get an
answer *HERE* *ON* *THIS* *LIST*, it's just because the Mandrake people feal
on 11/19/00 8:49 AM, Geoffrey Lee at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's gone because you're too lazy to install it:
[snailtalk@ke RPMS]$ ls joe*
joe-2.8-21mdk.i586.rpm
Hmmm Interesting, after I initially thought that I was wrong, and I'm
going to need to apologize to you, I did a search of
on 11/19/00 11:14 AM, Pixel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Complete doesn't mean 'All', it's much more subjective.
Understood, with that I have no problem at all. But when one selects 'ALL',
at least it should install what one expects.
As it turns out, the installation *WAS* correctly installing
on 11/19/00 11:25 AM, Pascal Grossé at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you chose to install in 800 Mb, the installer
automatically removed some packages, using an order of importance defined
by the developpers for each package. I bet joe is not of the highest
priority in that list..
I
on 11/19/00 3:39 PM, Pixel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
see http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/72faq.php3
Pixel,
THANK YOU very much. This is a valid and good explanation of the
differences, and I appreciate that.
Now, to avoid such issues in the future, may I suggest you tell your
marketing
on 11/19/00 4:48 PM, Meir Faraj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what did u said here I've the 7.2 and joe is installed the very complete
installation of two cd only take me 3G!!! not 800M
it is in the first CD I think..
Well, as we are all discovering right now, that is because there are
on 11/1/00 7:36 PM, Chmouel Boudjnah at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
funny thing, you took us as amatory, and you have no clue of what the
words 'operating-system development' mean...
Note I didn't use the word 'amatur', and regarding the troubling and complex
task of operating system
on 10/31/00 11:07 PM, Randy Welch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also installed it on my dual at work without no incident.
With 7.1:
Install made my dual BP6 run extremely slow, and freeze several times.
Install with RedHat has no problems at all, and zipped along.
Overall, it required far
on 10/31/00 9:13 PM, Franck Martin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least this is a real company, with real people, no automatic cleanatised
answering machines.
I'll give you that.
Harry
on 11/1/00 3:48 AM, Pixel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- name the updated-7.2 7.2.1, but marketing people don't accept this.
Granted, the problem most likely lies with the mktg people, and not the
developers - and apparently the idea of a different nukbering scheme didn't
fly with marketing
on 10/31/00 9:43 PM, Vincent Danen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is disgusting. Think about what you're saying here. We're
comparing a small company of just over 100 employees to a software
monopoly. If anyone can afford to ignore marketing time tables for
stable products, it should be
94 matches
Mail list logo
