Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-28 Thread Ivan Kerekes
gt; just because it includes mc. > > Hoyt wrote: > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Tim & Val Litwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2000 10:36 AM > > Subject: Re: [Cooker] Rescue IS

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-28 Thread Roger
i too also d/l'd it but burnt a coaster @#$@# i gotta try it again sometime. On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, you wrote: > - Original Message - > From: webmedic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2000 7:00 PM >

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-27 Thread Hoyt
- Original Message - From: webmedic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2000 7:00 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? > actually I noticed and went and downloaded it. > Waht it needs are some scripts to build a DemoLinux CD fro

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-27 Thread webmedic
actually I noticed and went and downloaded it. Hoyt wrote: > well then, /usr/bin and other tools andfiles could be on the CD, with links > from the ramdisk filesystem to them. Loading the special utility programs > would be slow, but you only need to load and run them once to fix the > problem.

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-27 Thread Hoyt
- Original Message - From: Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2000 3:15 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? > David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If you have an ISO-rescue-image, there really isn't

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-27 Thread Pixel
David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you have an ISO-rescue-image, there really isn't any reason why it > would _have_ to be minimal other than to save potential download time. one reason is the ability to fit in ramdisk and free the cdrom drive... another reason for having it in ramdi

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-26 Thread webmedic
Saturday, February 26, 2000 10:41 PM > Subject: Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? > > > I agree here mc does just about everything. for getting around easy on > > command prompt based system. My current boot floppy is from peanut linux > > just because it includes mc. > > >

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-26 Thread Hoyt
- Original Message - From: webmedic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2000 10:41 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? > I agree here mc does just about everything. for getting around easy on > command prompt based system. My curr

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-26 Thread webmedic
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2000 10:36 AM > Subject: Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? > > > if you have problems with long line in pico use pico -w to turn of > automatic > > word wrap. > > I think pico is the perfect quick editor, but I would h

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-26 Thread Guy T. Rice
On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, David Hedbor wrote: > Tim & Val Litwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If you have problems with long line in pico use pico -w to turn of > > automatic word wrap. > > That doesn't solve all the problems actually. Lines longer than some > number of chars gets wrapped any

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-26 Thread David Hedbor
Tim & Val Litwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you have problems with long line in pico use pico -w to turn of > automatic word wrap. That doesn't solve all the problems actually. Lines longer than some number of chars gets wrapped anyway. :) > I think pico is the perfect quick editor, bu

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-26 Thread Hoyt
- Original Message - From: Tim & Val Litwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2000 10:36 AM Subject: Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? > if you have problems with long line in pico use pico -w to turn of automatic > word wrap.

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-26 Thread Tim & Val Litwiller
if you have problems with long line in pico use pico -w to turn of automatic word wrap. I think pico is the perfect quick editor, but I would hate to use it to write a whole web site or some such project. David Hedbor wrote: > "geoffrey lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > E...!! emacs!!

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-26 Thread David Hedbor
"geoffrey lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > E...!! emacs!! urgh... it's so big and kludged ! :-) It might be big, but I use Emacs for A LOT of things, like writing this email for example. What I like with emacs other than the editor-part is being able to use it for so many things. > I use

RE: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread Roger
PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Hedbor > > Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 4:36 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? > > > > > > > > Since I stopped using Slackware oh so many years ago, I haven'

RE: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread Roger
added my comment at the end: On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, you wrote: > hi, > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Hedbor > > Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2000 4:48 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread geoffrey lee
hi, > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Hedbor > Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2000 4:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? > > > Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread Roger
very interesting. think i'll looking into! btw: w/ the ide-floppy interface, load speeds are much improved so i'm not too worried about that. anyways, it's better than having no rescue disk! especially when messing with /etc! On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, you wrote: > On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, R

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread Roger
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, you wrote: > Good idea. By the way windows 2000 does something similar to this. > yippe. makes me wanna go out and spend $400 for it. > Pixel wrote: > > > > "geoffrey lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > hi, > > > > > > oh ok. :) i misunderstood your msg. so you

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread Hoyt
- Original Message - From: geoffrey lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 6:12 AM Subject: RE: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? > hi, > > oh ok. :) i misunderstood your msg. so you want a ISO image that can be > burned onto the C

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread David Hedbor
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Geoffrey lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > oh ok. :) i misunderstood your msg. so you want a ISO image that can be > > burned onto the CD-R for booting when you screw up something on your system? > > As for the rescue. 7.1 should have a goo

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread webmedic
Good idea. By the way windows 2000 does something similar to this. Pixel wrote: > > "geoffrey lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > hi, > > > > oh ok. :) i misunderstood your msg. so you want a ISO image that can be > > burned onto the CD-R for booting when you screw up something on your syste

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread Guy T. Rice
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Roger wrote: > I have an ls120 drive, of which, doesn't have full kernel support yet for a > rescue disk makingmi know i should have one as well. buying > another 3 1/2 disk drive takes another irq, so is'nt the solution to my > problem. (guess i hafta kernel patc

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread Pixel
"geoffrey lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hi, > > oh ok. :) i misunderstood your msg. so you want a ISO image that can be > burned onto the CD-R for booting when you screw up something on your system? as for the rescue. 7.1 should have a good one. the idea is to use a rescue_stage2.img inst

RE: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread geoffrey lee
Behalf Of David Hedbor > Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 5:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? > > > "geoffrey lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > If your system is too broken to even use sash (linux

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread Roger
i also think this would be extremely useful if a newbie get's into a "jam" and is being provided technical support via telephone. would make things much easier as too having essentially "any" needed tool "at your disposal". On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, you wrote: > Since I stopped using Slackware oh so

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread Roger
... i sort of like this idea. you know when floppy became a standard for backup media? well, i think the cdrom is well established as well and could be done the same way! most are bootable as well. i'm sure anyone that can boot the mandrake 7.0 cdrom would be able to use this. By the way,

Re: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread David Hedbor
"geoffrey lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > If your system is too broken to even use sash (linux 1 at the lilo boot > prompt.) why don't you check out tomsrtbt... Well, often when I need a rescue disk is if I screw up a kernel install. I normally do this now by booting the normal insta

RE: [Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread geoffrey lee
ECTED]]On Behalf Of David Hedbor > Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 4:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Cooker] Rescue ISO? > > > > Since I stopped using Slackware oh so many years ago, I haven't used > one distribution with a good rescue disk using standard tools

[Cooker] Rescue ISO?

2000-02-25 Thread David Hedbor
Since I stopped using Slackware oh so many years ago, I haven't used one distribution with a good rescue disk using standard tools. I have never checked out the Mandrake rescue disk either - mostly due to the requirement of actually using a floppy. What about providing a second iso-image that is