On 20010720 Chris Mumford wrote:
>> gcc3.0 is in contrib and wasn't ready when mdk8.0 got out of the box
>(needless
>> to says that using a new compiler means rebuilding all packages (3-4 days
>with
>> rpm-rebuilder) and _testing_)
>
>The only package that I know has problems with 2.96 is LAME. I
> gcc3.0 is in contrib and wasn't ready when mdk8.0 got out of the box
(needless
> to says that using a new compiler means rebuilding all packages (3-4 days
with
> rpm-rebuilder) and _testing_)
The only package that I know has problems with 2.96 is LAME. It builds, but
has runtime errors in the r
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 01:17:15PM +, Xavier Bertou wrote:
> > The reputation of being binary incompatible is mostly based on rumors: it
> > affects only dynamicly linked C++ code; and this same incompatibility
> > exists between egcs-1.1.2 and gcc-2.95, and will exist between gcc-2.95
> > and
Xavier Bertou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The reputation of being binary incompatible is mostly based on rumors: it
> > affects only dynamicly linked C++ code; and this same incompatibility
> > exists between egcs-1.1.2 and gcc-2.95, and will exist between gcc-2.95
> > and gcc-3.0.
>
> What
> The reputation of being binary incompatible is mostly based on rumors: it
> affects only dynamicly linked C++ code; and this same incompatibility
> exists between egcs-1.1.2 and gcc-2.95, and will exist between gcc-2.95
> and gcc-3.0.
What about gcc-2.96 -> 3.0 ? Did these $^@$%$!$ again change
"Chris Mumford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why is Mandrake distributing the 2.96 gcc compiler and not 3.0?
Actually gcc 2.96 is the most stable version of gcc currently. It fixes
many more bugs than it creates.
The assertion that it can't compile programs is false, since we did
recompile our
"Chris Mumford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why is Mandrake distributing the 2.96 gcc compiler and not 3.0?
gcc3.0 is in contrib and wasn't ready when mdk8.0 got out of the box (needless
to says that using a new compiler means rebuilding all packages (3-4 days with
rpm-rebuilder) and _testing_
Why is Mandrake distributing the 2.96 gcc compiler
and not 3.0?
Yeah, that's what I'd say too. Personally the only problems I've encounterd
in the last week since my install were rpmdrake, named putting it's pidfile
in the wrong dir /var/run/named.pid where user named doesn't have perms to
write, apache's init file with the \. that should just be .
Other
On Wednesday 18 July 2001 01:37, Jason Straight wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2001 17:40, you wrote:
> > http://www.pclinuxonline.com/article.php?sid=201&mode=thread&order=0&thol
> >d= 0
> >
> > Apparently lots of people have the FUBAR-ed rpm rpm.
> >
> > Can mandrake please put out a new, fixed, pa
Jason Straight wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2001 17:40, you wrote:
>
>>http://www.pclinuxonline.com/article.php?sid=201&mode=thread&order=0&thold=
>>0
>>
>>Apparently lots of people have the FUBAR-ed rpm rpm.
>>
>>Can mandrake please put out a new, fixed, package?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Mordy
>>PS
>>Yes,
On Tuesday 17 July 2001 17:40, you wrote:
> http://www.pclinuxonline.com/article.php?sid=201&mode=thread&order=0&thold=
>0
>
> Apparently lots of people have the FUBAR-ed rpm rpm.
>
> Can mandrake please put out a new, fixed, package?
>
> Thanks,
> Mordy
> PS
> Yes, I know Cooker is the unstable b
> > >
> > > Does (re)moving /var/lib/rpm/__db.00* help?
> >
Removed /var/lib/rpm/__db.00*, ran rpm --rebuilddb, got a succesful database
rebuild.seems to be working atmwe'll see.
Ryan
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Mordechai Ovits wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 July 2001 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > http://www.pclinuxonline.com/article.php?sid=201&mode=thread&order=0&thol
> > >d=0
> > >
> > > Apparently lots of people have the FUBAR-ed rpm rpm.
> > >
> > > Can mandrake please put out
On Wednesday 18 July 2001 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > http://www.pclinuxonline.com/article.php?sid=201&mode=thread&order=0&thol
> >d=0
> >
> > Apparently lots of people have the FUBAR-ed rpm rpm.
> >
> > Can mandrake please put out a new, fixed, package?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mordy
> > PS
>
On Tuesday 17 July 2001 06:08, Jason Straight wrote:
> How will you install it?
>
> :)
I already wiped my system and reinstalled 8.0. I'd like to move back to
cooker to help with the testing , but can't if rpm is broken. It's just too
important of a package.
Mordy
> On Tuesday 17 July 2001
>
> http://www.pclinuxonline.com/article.php?sid=201&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
>
> Apparently lots of people have the FUBAR-ed rpm rpm.
>
> Can mandrake please put out a new, fixed, package?
>
> Thanks,
> Mordy
> PS
> Yes, I know Cooker is the unstable branch.
> --
> Mordy Ovits
> Network E
How will you install it?
:)
On Tuesday 17 July 2001 17:40, you wrote:
> http://www.pclinuxonline.com/article.php?sid=201&mode=thread&order=0&thold=
>0
>
> Apparently lots of people have the FUBAR-ed rpm rpm.
>
> Can mandrake please put out a new, fixed, package?
>
> Thanks,
> Mordy
> PS
> Yes, I
http://www.pclinuxonline.com/article.php?sid=201&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
Apparently lots of people have the FUBAR-ed rpm rpm.
Can mandrake please put out a new, fixed, package?
Thanks,
Mordy
PS
Yes, I know Cooker is the unstable branch.
--
Mordy Ovits
Network Engineer
Bloomberg L.P.
Whenever I try to upgrade a package using MandrakeUpdate it tells me the
packages are allready installedis there something I need to turn on
somewhere so that it will force an upgrade? Or do I have to go back to using
good ol RPM?
Mandrake 8.0
rpmdrake-1.3-55mdk
urpm-1.5-34mdk
grpmi-8.0-8mdk
From: "Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Why ?? -- Maybe because : ?? And a solution ??
> On 26 Apr 2001, Daouda LO wrote:
>
> > "John Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 26 Apr 2001, Daouda LO wrote:
> "John Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just an FYI, Mandrake does have a site for reporting bugs as well as
> > the cooker mailing list.
>
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com
>
>
You must be kidding. I got reponse that bug was assigned! in six months
after
On Thu Apr 26, 2001 at 04:52:45PM +0200, Daouda LO wrote:
> "John Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just an FYI, Mandrake does have a site for reporting bugs as well as
> > the cooker mailing list.
>
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com
You forget the most imp
On Wed Apr 25, 2001 at 10:02:36PM -0400, Jan Vicherek wrote:
[...]
> Not much can be done about 1., but 2. & 3. could potentially be
> eliminated if cooker testers (list readers and posters), were able to put
> their findings and even suggested fixes (patches) into an online bug
> tracking dat
On Wednesday, Apr 25, 2001, Jan Vicherek wrote:
> Not much can be done about 1., but 2. & 3. could potentially be
> eliminated if cooker testers (list readers and posters), were able to put
> their findings and even suggested fixes (patches) into an online bug
> tracking database. Then Mdk woul
"John Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just an FYI, Mandrake does have a site for reporting bugs as well as
> the cooker mailing list.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com
April 25, 2001 7:02 PM
Subject: [Cooker] Why ?? -- Maybe because : ?? And a solution ??
>
> Hi,
>
> I just read the "Why ?" thread.
>
> I suspect that the "because" is due to a couple of factors :
>
> 1.Time preasure - RedHat has released something
Hi,
I just read the "Why ?" thread.
I suspect that the "because" is due to a couple of factors :
1.Time preasure - RedHat has released something, and Mdk is a rival, so
it needs to follow.
2.Other events happening - there was some conference before the release or
something, and the right
i agree...sending out a distribution with ugly, and nearly unreadable fonts
is a major mistake for a company that puts out the otherwise best distro for
linux newbies...nor would it make sense for mandrake to respond that the
fonts can be easily set to look better by the user...if that the case
Hallo,
You have created some nice shots ;-) - The small distribution Gentoo
(www.gentoo.org) have all these aspects better configured. I wondered about
Mandrake. Mandrake want to sell the distributen more to home users, I think.
Your suggestions about Apache, PHP and so on are ok but if you wa
Hi!
I'd really like to know why MandrakeSoft never did anything about the fixed
font in KDE, nor the minimum font size in Konqueror.
Besides, did you consider that your default icon arrangement would look bad
on non-English desktops?
These are all *small* things that were easy to fix. Linux-Man
On 19 Apr 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > Then it's probably wise to issue a warning to these users then. (e.g.
> > specify it in known bug list when 8.0 is out)
>
> Yes, of course, thanks! :-)
>
> > Confirmed: the culprit is really the psaux keyboard waiting patch. After
> > removing the p
"R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 17 Apr 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> > > Please please please wait until you fix the ThinkPad mouse problem. I
> > > might have to leave 7.2 on my TP ( and I like 8 at least from Beta3)
> >
> > It looks like it's not highly probable we'l
"R.I.P. Deaddog" wrote:
>
> On 17 Apr 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> > > Please please please wait until you fix the ThinkPad mouse problem. I
> > > might have to leave 7.2 on my TP ( and I like 8 at least from Beta3)
> >
> > It looks like it's not highly probable we'll have a patch.
>
On 17 Apr 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > Please please please wait until you fix the ThinkPad mouse problem. I
> > might have to leave 7.2 on my TP ( and I like 8 at least from Beta3)
>
> It looks like it's not highly probable we'll have a patch.
Too sad. Then Thinkpad users should compi
Randy Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > this week? next week? depending on our speed.
>
> Please please please wait until you fix the ThinkPad mouse problem. I
> might have to leave 7.2 on my TP ( and I like 8 at least from Beta3)
It looks like it's not highly probable we'll have a
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> Elton Woo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > AFAIK, the last official version of Mandrake was 7.2,
> > will the next version be called
> > 8.0? (...since I see this on the beta 3 install screen..., wouldn't
>
> yes
>
> > this be misconstrued as "
The thing I'd like to know is if your running an ftp server, apache, mysql,
postfix, and three million other services. How do you check? at command
line:
services --status-all
If there are a bunch open, that's part of the problem. Your windows 95
system would expire on bootup if it was trying t
Elton Woo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFAIK, the last official version of Mandrake was 7.2,
> will the next version be called
> 8.0? (...since I see this on the beta 3 install screen..., wouldn't
yes
> this be misconstrued as "false
> advertising"? Also, will there be anothe
AFAIK, the last official version of Mandrake was 7.2,
will the next version be called
8.0? (...since I see this on the beta 3 install screen..., wouldn't
this be misconstrued as "false
advertising"? Also, will there be another beta before the official
release? ... and ideas about
Could some of this performance hit be due to the 1 to 1 heavyweight threading
model used by Linux ? Both IBM and all the Linux developers I have actually
met say this is no longer up to date with POSIX standards and a pain in the
butt, especially since it allows disconnected child processes to
The reason why konqi starts slower than ie may be related with the fact that
linux writes the time you last access a file. I don't think windows does
that. This may be why it takes longer. Seeing that harddisk is so increddible
fast:) (but you can set this to off)
On Monday 16 April 2001 09:4
Civileme,
I will take you up on this offer, and write to you again in a few days.
First I will add the FastVram option to my XConfig file, check my hard
drive parameters (and specifications) on both machines, and make a list
of the daemons running on both machines, and gather the other data you
On Sunday 15 April 2001 06:30, you wrote:
> Bruce F. Press wrote:
> > Yes, yes, we've heard this before. It is not a satisfactory answer,
> > clearly the "idle" loop in kapm-idled could use a nice sleep(15) or
> > something!!
>
> What would be a satisfactory answer?
>
> Are you concerned because
ems' BIOS as the
> arbiter and executor of power savings - rather than
> the kernel doing it
> directly.
>
> Hope this helps...
> Gio
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bruce F. Press" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Se
Bruce F. Press wrote:
> Yes, yes, we've heard this before. It is not a satisfactory answer,
> clearly the "idle" loop in kapm-idled could use a nice sleep(15) or
> something!!
What would be a satisfactory answer?
Are you concerned because top shows the system being far busier than it
really i
the systems' BIOS as thearbiter and
executor of power savings - rather than the kernel doing
itdirectly.Hope this helps...Gio- Original Message
-From: "Bruce F. Press" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 7:52
AMSubject: Re: [Cooker
Yes, yes, we've heard this before. It is not a satisfactory answer,
clearly the "idle" loop in kapm-idled could use a nice sleep(15) or
something!!
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
> SI Reasoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There are good stretches of the day where my CPU spins
> > at around 5
SI Reasoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are good stretches of the day where my CPU spins
> at around 50% or more and the process spinning is
> kapm-idled. This is not a problem in 7.2.
--=-=-=
http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s14-1:
1.Why is kapmd using so much CPU time?
(REG) Don't w
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, SI Reasoning wrote:
> There are good stretches of the day where my CPU spins
> at around 50% or more and the process spinning is
> kapm-idled. This is not a problem in 7.2.
Go to www.mail-archive.com/cooker%40linux-mandrake.com/ and search for
"kapm-idled" ; you'll see milli
There are good stretches of the day where my CPU spins
at around 50% or more and the process spinning is
kapm-idled. This is not a problem in 7.2.
=
SI Reasoning
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnupg/pgp key id 035213BC
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your o
I have discovered an odd thing that is a bit
frustrating. I like to use the meta keys to create
program shortcuts in sawfish. I have discovered that
for some unknown reason in cooker... gnome panel can
use meta-L but not meta-R and vice-versa in sawfish.
Why? Is this a bug or intended? If intentio
I think xfstt should be put into X and forget about xfs !!! :-)
Owen
On Thursday 05 April 2001 12:42 am, you wrote:
> Happened to me too, with Beta 3 install of LM 8. I don't know anything
> about fonts, or about xfstt vs. xfs. I'd like to hear a step by step
> solution also. Not just a 'turn o
OS wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have always used xfstt. Not being to sure what the current state of play
> with anti aliased fonts were I decided to switch it off and use xfs.
>
> (Could someone tell me if it matters which font server you use as to whether
> you will see anti aliasing ?)
>
> Boy, w
Happened to me too, with Beta 3 install of LM 8. I don't know anything about
fonts, or about xfstt vs. xfs. I'd like to hear a step by step solution
also. Not just a 'turn off widget-33-2-1234.cc and recompile this other
widget.'
Also, aRts in KDE 2.1 is not working for me. I can pull up XMMS
Hello,
I have always used xfstt. Not being to sure what the current state of play
with anti aliased fonts were I decided to switch it off and use xfs.
(Could someone tell me if it matters which font server you use as to whether
you will see anti aliasing ?)
Boy, was I in for a shock ! I must
Why will the darkx (in beta 1) create a reiserfs partition with the old
3.5.x format. I think we use kernel 2.4-series and can do it with the new
disc format.
sebastian ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Michael Brown wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> > > I'm using mandrake distribution since quite a time now, and I'm especially
> > > happy to see the activity on the Cooker which allow to keep up to date
> > > with the latest release.
> > > Therefore, there's stg that I
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> > I'm using mandrake distribution since quite a time now, and I'm especially
> > happy to see the activity on the Cooker which allow to keep up to date
> > with the latest release.
> > Therefore, there's stg that I find a little puzzling : why is i
On 25 Mar 2001 14:41:19 +0200, Nicolas Pomarede wrote:
> All in all, I find it very annoying to be forced to upgrade the whole
> system to install only a few recent packages (not that I don't like
> upgrading to the latest MDK distrib, it's just I'd like to do it 'step by
> step' before resintalli
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Vadim Plessky wrote:
> On Sunday 25 March 2001 12:56, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> | Nicolas,
> |
> | > Therefore, there's stg that I find a little puzzling : why is it that
> | > every time a new release (ie MDK 8) is showing, all the RPM packages
> | > suddendly req
On Sunday 25 March 2001 12:56, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
| Nicolas,
|
| > Therefore, there's stg that I find a little puzzling : why is it that
| > every time a new release (ie MDK 8) is showing, all the RPM packages
| > suddendly requires dependencies that weren't needed with the latest
Nicolas,
> I'm using mandrake distribution since quite a time now, and I'm especially
> happy to see the activity on the Cooker which allow to keep up to date
> with the latest release.
> Therefore, there's stg that I find a little puzzling : why is it that
> every time a new release (ie MDK 8)
Hello,
I'm using mandrake distribution since quite a time now, and I'm especially
happy to see the activity on the Cooker which allow to keep up to date
with the latest release.
Therefore, there's stg that I find a little puzzling : why is it that
every time a new release (ie MDK 8) is showing
The packager. Usually the original packager specifies the 'Group' and
it almost never gets changed.
E.g., gtm, the dld mgr for Galeon and front end for wget was in
X11/Utilities group by author and, hence, did not get put into
Networking/FileTransfer with the rest of the dld mgrs. MDK changed i
I've always been confused about the placement of the some of the items
in the menu. Previously latte, now Glimmer, is in with the development
environment stuff. I guess that is okay but I can do the same things
with nedit and it is in with the editors.
As well why is gturing in with the amusmen
Evan Edwards écrivit :
> On Saturday 03 March 2001 05:52 pm, you wrote:
> > So sprach Ray am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 09:14:03AM +:
> > > What is the best way to upgrade 7.2 to KDE 2.1?
> > > which oreder to install the packages?
> >
> > All at once, I'd say: rpm -Uvh *
>
>Better question: a
>
> >
> > File /usr/lib/libimap.so in kdepim-2.1-1mdk conflicts with file from
> > imap-4.7c2-4mdk.
>
I confirm. I had to remove UoW imap.
> Well, can you tell us if the imap support in Kmail ever worked? If
> not, this
> one can be resolved easily.
>
First, it has nothing to do with working
On Saturday 03 March 2001 21:03, you wrote:
> Warly wrote:
> > You can thanks the MandrakeSoft KDE team (daouda, david faure, laurent
> > montel) and give a special standing ovation to Dadou for his hard
> > work on the 7.2 rebuild.
>
> Alas, not yet ...
>
> Where is koffice?
No change since 2.0.
On Saturday 03 March 2001 01:24 pm, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Saturday 03 March 2001 11:52, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > So sprach Ray am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 09:14:03AM +:
> > > What is the best way to upgrade 7.2 to KDE 2.1?
> > > which oreder to install the packages?
> >
> > All at once, I'd say:
On Saturday 03 March 2001 20:24, you wrote:
> On Saturday 03 March 2001 11:52, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > So sprach Ray am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 09:14:03AM +:
> > > What is the best way to upgrade 7.2 to KDE 2.1?
> > > which oreder to install the packages?
> >
> > All at once, I'd say: rpm -Uvh
On Saturday 03 March 2001 05:52 pm, you wrote:
> So sprach Ray am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 09:14:03AM +:
> > What is the best way to upgrade 7.2 to KDE 2.1?
> > which oreder to install the packages?
>
> All at once, I'd say: rpm -Uvh *
Better question: are the packages out yet? In the kde mor
Warly wrote:
> You can thanks the MandrakeSoft KDE team (daouda, david faure, laurent
> montel) and give a special standing ovation to Dadou for his hard
> work on the 7.2 rebuild.
Alas, not yet ...
Where is koffice?
Where is quanta?
Where is kdeaddutils?
File /usr/lib/libimap.so in kdepim-2.
On Saturday 03 March 2001 11:52, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach Ray am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 09:14:03AM +:
> > What is the best way to upgrade 7.2 to KDE 2.1?
> > which oreder to install the packages?
>
> All at once, I'd say: rpm -Uvh *
No. You'll get all the other languages installed th
Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> So sprach Ray am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 09:14:03AM +:
> > What is the best way to upgrade 7.2 to KDE 2.1?
> > which oreder to install the packages?
>
> All at once, I'd say: rpm -Uvh *
>
Or rpm -Fvh *
Bye.
Giuseppe.
So sprach Ray am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 09:14:03AM +:
> What is the best way to upgrade 7.2 to KDE 2.1?
> which oreder to install the packages?
All at once, I'd say: rpm -Uvh *
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http:
What is the best way to upgrade 7.2 to KDE 2.1?
which oreder to install the packages?
On Saturday 03 March 2001 14:34, you wrote:
> Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Alan Shoemaker wrote:
> > > The KDE packages for Linux-Mandrake 7.2 are still under
> > > preparation
> > > and testing.
Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alan Shoemaker wrote:
> >
> > The KDE packages for Linux-Mandrake 7.2 are still under
> > preparation
> > and testing. They should be available by Wednesday 07-March.
> > Sorry for the delay - we do want them well-working and
> > well-tested :)
>
> KDE
Alan Shoemaker wrote:
>
> The KDE packages for Linux-Mandrake 7.2 are still under
> preparation
> and testing. They should be available by Wednesday 07-March.
> Sorry for the delay - we do want them well-working and
> well-tested :)
KDE 2.1 final binary RPMs for Mandrake 7.2 are now in the
mandr
Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On the KDE site there are packages for RH6.2, 7.0, as well
> as for Suze and the other distributions, but nothing for
> Mandrake. If Mandrake is no longer supporting KDE for 7.2
> please let me know and I'll find a distro that does support
> current and previous versions
Pe
On the KDE site there are packages for RH6.2, 7.0, as well as for Suze and
the other distributions, but nothing for Mandrake. If Mandrake is no longer
supporting KDE please let me know and I'll find a distro that does.
--
On the KDE site there are packages for RH6.2, 7.0, as well as for Suze and
the other distributions, but nothing for Mandrake. If Mandrake is no longer
supporting KDE for 7.2 please let me know and I'll find a distro that does
support current and previous versions
--
--
On 2/27/01 12:59 AM, "Thomas Mangin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No it is not that simple you must
> - postuninstall : insert loop.o
> - install the kernel
> - postinstall : mkinitrd
> - remove the loop.o
>
> RedHat does it on its latest kernel if you want to get an easy spec file ..
Yeah, bu
So sprach Thomas Mangin am Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:59:44AM -:
>
> No it is not that simple you must
> - postuninstall : insert loop.o
Well, I don't upgrade, for certain reasons :] But yes, you are right - but
that's not big a deal, is it?
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.t
So sprach Andrej Borsenkow am Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 09:11:15AM +0300:
> Hmm ... does not that happen when you install kernel-2.4.1-xxx RPM? I do not
No, it does not. For sure a initrd is not built after a rpm -ivh
kernel-2.4.2-xxmdk.i586.rpm, I don't know if it were built after a rpm
-Uvh, but I
| Hi all!
|
| I've noticed that since, uhmm, kernel-2.4.0-xx no initrd is automatically
| built when updating the kernel package. (Hmm, thinking of it, has it ever
| been built automatically?)
| Well, why is this? IMO it would be better if the initrd were built. As I
| imagine (without looking
Behalf Of Alexander Skwar
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:54 AM
> To: Mandrake Cooker Mailing List
> Subject: [Cooker] Why don't recent kernels build initrd?
>
>
> Hi all!
>
> I've noticed that since, uhmm, kernel-2.4.0-xx no initrd is automatically
> built when u
Hi all!
I've noticed that since, uhmm, kernel-2.4.0-xx no initrd is automatically
built when updating the kernel package. (Hmm, thinking of it, has it ever
been built automatically?)
Well, why is this? IMO it would be better if the initrd were built. As I
imagine (without looking at the .spec)
I am trying to get the newest galeon but it would seem that the
contrib portion (I didn't really check any other portions) of the
mirrors are about 5-6 days out of date.
Why is this?
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell
On Tuesday 16 January 2001 02:49, you wrote:
> On Monday 15 January 2001 09:50, Claudio wrote:
> > Hello
> > I have a little problem to solve...
> > Well this is the point: I have to run a fortran program (a Montercarlo,
> > used for simulations) that since the first moment takes about the 99% of
Hello
I have a little problem to solve...
Well this is the point: I have to run a fortran program (a Montercarlo, used
for simulations) that since the first moment takes about the 99% of the CPU
(Athlon 1000). All the times it stops after about 15 minutes, and into the
logfile generated by the
Thanks very much for this reply as well. Three usefull bits of
information. I will try these out ASAP.
Owen
On 14 Jan 2001 01:40:09 +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote:
>
>
> On 2001.01.13 OS wrote:
> > Please tell me how ulimit controls core dumping.
> >
>
> With 'ulimit' bash internal command y
Nice one. I'll look at our systems at work and increase the ulimit size.
Hopefully this will result in more core files for our delictation !
Thanks,
OWen
On 13 Jan 2001 22:53:50 +0100, andre wrote:
>
> >
> > Please tell me how ulimit controls core dumping.
> >
> > Sometimes even when th
On 2001.01.13 OS wrote:
> Please tell me how ulimit controls core dumping.
>
With 'ulimit' bash internal command you can limit the size of any core file
dumped by the shell (and children, the commands you launch).
ulmit -c size: limit the size of core files.
man bash, do a serach (/) for ulimi
>
> Please tell me how ulimit controls core dumping.
>
> Sometimes even when there is output stating that core was dumped nothing
> is.
>
> Sometimes different crashes in the same program may or may not produce a
> core dump. Is there an 'r' in the month, did I have eggs for breakfast ?
>
> O
Please tell me how ulimit controls core dumping.
Sometimes even when there is output stating that core was dumped nothing
is.
Sometimes different crashes in the same program may or may not produce a
core dump. Is there an 'r' in the month, did I have eggs for breakfast ?
Owen
On 13 Jan 2001 0
>
>
> On 2001.01.12 OS wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > A colleague at work was bemoaning the fact that when an application
> > crashes on Solaris you always get a core file dumped but with Linux it
> > appears to completely hit and miss. A program that was core dumping
> > before a very minor change
On 2001.01.12 OS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A colleague at work was bemoaning the fact that when an application
> crashes on Solaris you always get a core file dumped but with Linux it
> appears to completely hit and miss. A program that was core dumping
> before a very minor change will just stop core
Hello,
A colleague at work was bemoaning the fact that when an application
crashes on Solaris you always get a core file dumped but with Linux it
appears to completely hit and miss. A program that was core dumping
before a very minor change will just stop core dumping. I said I would
ask around a
Done,
Till
Khawar Zia wrote:
>
> hey,
> Why hasn't cups been updated to version 1.15 in cooker?
>
> Thank You
> --Khawar "quitedown" Zia
>
401 - 500 of 632 matches
Mail list logo
