Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-21 Thread Leon Brooks
On Monday 21 January 2002 08:33, Sergio Korlowsky wrote: This time I would dare to say... EVERYTHING means... eveything, (Pixel?) with the exception of: conflicting packages or those with known dependancy problems. Since there are only a handful of these (albeit some of them involving

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-21 Thread Sergio Korlowsky
On Monday 21 January 2002 08:34, you wrote: - On Monday 21 January 2002 08:33, Sergio Korlowsky wrote: - This time I would dare to say... EVERYTHING means... eveything, (Pixel?) - with the exception of: conflicting packages or those with known dependancy - problems. - - Since there are only

[Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Dan Mack
I've been running cooker on 3 of my systems for a few months now and I find myself missing an option that Redhat has had for a while and that is the 'install everything' checkbox in the install tool. Even after checking every single box on the select software scrren of Mandrake, things like

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Rolf Pedersen
Dan Mack wrote: Even after checking every single box on the select software scrren of Mandrake, things like 'unzip' aren't even installed. Thoughts, comments? Zip/unzip not installed is the source of a significant number of trouble posts by newcomers @

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Onur Kucuk
Mandrake seems to be only major distro that does not have an install everything option. Honestly, I hate it. To deal with it, first install the system with the tree view package selection system of the installation. Then I open up software manager and try to figure out which packages

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Dan Mack
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Onur Kucuk wrote: Mandrake seems to be only major distro that does not have an install everything option. Honestly, I hate it. To deal with it, first install the system with the tree view package selection system of the installation. Then I open up software

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Dan Mack
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Rolf Pedersen wrote: Dan Mack wrote: Even after checking every single box on the select software scrren of Mandrake, things like 'unzip' aren't even installed. Thoughts, comments? Zip/unzip not installed is the source of a

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread tester
Dan Mack wrote: I've been running cooker on 3 of my systems for a few months now and I find myself missing an option that Redhat has had for a while and that is the 'install everything' checkbox in the install tool. Even after checking every single box on the select software scrren of

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Onur Kucuk
t First of all, MAndrake has many more packages than RH. Second, some t packages conflict with each other and cannot be installed side-by side t (Glide libraries and Zope servers, for example). t And please don't tell Mandrake to pick. You know no matter what they t pick, it will be

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Dan Mack
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, tester wrote: Dan Mack wrote: I've been running cooker on 3 of my systems for a few months now and I find myself missing an option that Redhat has had for a while and that is the 'install everything' checkbox in the install tool. Even after checking every single

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Pixel
Onur Kucuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Xmms plugins (not talking about untrustable ones), some good games, that I never could understood why not installed and cannot be selected in the tree view. if you have packages that are not installed when selecting all the groups, tell which one you

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
On 20 Jan 2002, Pixel wrote: Mandrake seems to be only major distro that does not have an install everything option. does SuSE has it? has for RedHat they *much* less packages, so install everything is much less dangerous for them. Is redhat powertools taken into account? I did

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Pixel
R.I.P. Deaddog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 20 Jan 2002, Pixel wrote: Mandrake seems to be only major distro that does not have an install everything option. does SuSE has it? has for RedHat they *much* less packages, so install everything is much less dangerous for them.

Re[2]: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Onur Kucuk
Xmms plugins (not talking about untrustable ones), some good games, that I never could understood why not installed and cannot be selected in the tree view. P if you have packages that are not installed when selecting all the groups, P tell which one you think are missing. Most packages

Re: Re[2]: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Pixel
Onur Kucuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] - MDK , with my full install auto_inst.cfg, took 82 minutes. All 3 cds of mandrake download edition. If I dont use mine, but select all the programs in the tree list, it is about 70 minutes. - Suse 7.3 professional, which is 7 CDs. Last 2 are

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Leon Brooks
On Monday 21 January 2002 00:07, Dan Mack wrote: I've been running cooker on 3 of my systems for a few months now and I find myself missing an option that Redhat has had for a while and that is the 'install everything' checkbox in the install tool. It would have to be ``install most things''

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Onur Kucuk
P one weird thing i know about SuSE is they are using some kind of P rpm --nodeps --force --noscripts foreach rpms. P It seems to be the fastest way of installing. But maybe in that case P rpm2cpio | cpio -id would be even faster. P We have not been able to understand the way they handled

[Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Sergio Korlowsky
Well... many of us have asked for the same thing, before any final release in the past and the answer has always been the same, we need to get a 'definition' of what 'everything' means... ;-) This time I would dare to say... EVERYTHING means... eveything, (Pixel?) with the exception of:

Re: [Cooker] why no 'install everything' option?

2002-01-20 Thread Roger
On Sun, 2002-01-20 at 19:33, Sergio Korlowsky wrote: ditto. i hate having to manually install -devel packages even after specifing that i'm running a developer platform. ...just a thought tho, i would imagine this email is just an echo. ;-) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally