> Why doesn't Dreamweaver offer a way to set a min-width or min-height..
I don't have dreamweaver installed and I don't use it.
however I recall that there is a properties *link* somewhere possibly
in styles section when you activate styles in right panel.
just click on that and add the min-wid
On Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 00:23:09 Richard Grevers wrote:
> and the right column will start to vanish.
Actually this was the only reason made me to reply to your psot.
What do you mean by that? and why would you want right column
to vanish?
regards,
davoud
P.S: To contribute to my research pl
> However, this could be achieved using a server-side scripting lanuage (PHP,
> etc.) to dynamically write out a user-agent-specific style sheet LINK in
> the...
Rob,
To target IE one can use IE CC's and no need to use Serverside languages.
However I do not believe that you can alter a brow
On Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:48:51 -0500 Ren wrote
>So is there anyway to not display content using CSS based
>on not just user-agent, but on the setting of the user-agent?
I doubt that it is possible using CSS. So I would say no, AFAIK.
davoud
_
You are right Rob. Thanks for correcting my comment. And sorry
for the duplicates. No idea why it happened.
best
davoud
_
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://w
On Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:57:04 -0500 Ren Jonsin wrote:
> I had a reader send me an email yesterday complaining that when he uses the
> zoom feature in IE7 on my site, http://www.frontstretch.com the horizontal
> scroll it cr4eates keeps automatically centering on the the page.
This is no
On Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:57:04 -0500 Ren Jonsin wrote:
> I had a reader send me an email yesterday complaining that when he uses the
> zoom feature in IE7 on my site, http://www.frontstretch.com the horizontal
> scroll it cr4eates keeps automatically centering on the the page.
This is no
>George wrote:
>I think that is one of the few proper uses one can make of a doctype.
Yes that is ONLY one of the proper uses of a Doctype.
Thanks a lot for everybody who contributed to this thread.
Regards,
davoud
P.S.:To contribute to my research please visit:
http://cssfreelancer.awards
>on Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 Rob Wrote:
> David,
> The DOCTYPEs merely are the "language" specification for (X)HTML,
I believe i did reply to this the other day and not sure why
I have got this again today.
In short, i do agree with you Rob. However there are some points that
i did already tal
@George:
I understand your points very well.
> Again: doctypes and doctype-switching should *not* have anything to do
> with how CSS should be interpreted, but the fact that it does affect CSS
> is the only reason I'm responding on-list.
That is exactly what I am reffering to George. Doctype
>Rafel wrote:
> David, please configure your e-mail client...
well I am using hotmail and i am not sure How I can do that...lol
but I will look at the options to see what I can do there.
>The paragraph above looks like a possible answer to me...How about you?
But it is not to me. It is not
> on Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:29:14 Georg wrote:
> Because someone decided that it would break (a small part of) the web.
> So, they introduced the "almost standard" mode and used "Transitional"
> doctypes as switch.
>
> See: http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2008/01/24/almost-target/
> ...for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [css-d] Doctypes rendering comparision table (my 5c)
> DAVOUD TOHIDY wrote, On 27.01.2008 18:37:
> > Let me ask you a question.
> >
> > Suppose we use a strict doctype. Back to the image gap example.
> &g
on Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:06:53 Geoffrey Sneddon wrote:
> The DOCTYPE trigger a non-standardised switch, which affects both HTML
> and CSS (and, to a lesser extent, DOM). It is a de-facto standard
> implemented very, very, very similarly across all major browsers.
do you mean when we use th
27 Jan 2008 19:03:25 +0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [css-d] Doctypes rendering comparision table (my
> 5c)> > On 27/01/2008, DAVOUD TOHIDY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > I would
> like to know what happens that makes brows
o.k thanks a lot for everybody's contribution so far.
Let me ask you a question.
Suppose we use a strict doctype. Back to the image gap example.
Now browsers encounter the strict doctype:
I would like to know what happens that makes browsers
insert the gap in strict mode?
davoud
> > Are you suggesting that it is the browser which defines the standards?
> > Are you suggesting that it is the browser which decides to assign the
> > gap for the image not the strict dtd?
> Yes – go and look through the DTD, you will find nothing to do with
> rendering at all in it.
Are you
on Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:22:38 Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> 'The standards' (and the doctypes) were not written with differences
> in 'rendering' in mind.
is this what you know or you believe? is there anything documented
about this statement?
and how a standard can be written without
g for.
regards,
davoud
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:38:22 -0500From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: Re: [css-d] Doctypes rendering comparision tableYou mean something
like http://www.quirksmode.org/css/quirksmode.html#link6 ?Zach
On Jan 26, 2008 4:51 PM, DAVOUD TOHIDY <[EMAIL PROTECTED
greetings,
Looking for a comprehensive comparision table of rendering
different items, such as the gap under an image in strict mode,
based on using all available doctypes.
Is there anyhting documented on this?
thanks for your input
davoud
__
>I don't think you're going to find a CSS solution.
Although this is true in most cases because of the aspect ratio issue,
however in some cases there are work around in CSS.
For example if you have a picture and have applied gradient on it so that
on the far right/bottom of the image you have
>Anyone have any suggestions?
>http://inkpixelspaper.com/clients/rbmstaticsite/
Jen,
add the following to your css:
* + html dl dt a { display:inline-block}
I like to use IE conditional comments to seperate the styles for IE
and this is not the way I usually work myself. However that will
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 7:42 AM, j s wrote:> > > If using IE7, and then Zoom In,
> the checkbox on the page linked below> > overlaps the text next to it. I've
> tried putting margins around the> > checkbox, padding, using display
> properties, but nothing seems to> > help. Anyone have any suggest
on Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:50:48 -0500 Tessa Wrote:> What is the best way to
control the positioning of image bullets
>in IE6 and 7? They are rendered higher and further to the right than
>they should be...
That is something that I would have expected.
Here it is the solution which worked f
On Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:58:47 -0500 Michael wrote:
>Browser tests would be greatly appreciated.
> http://www.basalweb.com/test/dltest3.html
Michael,
I thought you have fixed the br tags and that your page
validates but please double check your page.
It does not validate. Fix all br ta
> Close David, thanks. I found more of what I was looking for here:
> http://www.brunildo.org/test/shrink-to-fit.html
Michael,
May I open the thread again please? Sorry about that. And do you
mind if we ask everybody to provide feeback on this using different
browsers and platforms?
What you
David, I understand your concern and I agree with your point of
view. However I believe George did answer your question very
well when I was dreaming in my bed :).
Thanks a lot George for such a descriptive reply. I might not
have been able to explain it as good as you if i wanted to.
Regards,
#x27;t not #featurecontainer
that I'm trying to keep centered, it's the floated divs inside. If I remove any
number of those floated divs, they will no longer be centered unless I adjust
the width for .featureMerch. I'm trying to do it without having to adjust that
width. Michael
On Jan
> Sorry. I don't see how putting a proprietary CSS declaration in a
> separate style sheet makes it valid?
It will at least let the main CSS file to validate. The
other css file for IE still will not validate :) that was what I meant.
regards
davoud
Michael,
I guess you have forgotten to add margin:0 auto to
#featurecontainer in your css.
> constant. There will be anywhere from 1-6.
I don't think CSS can do anything in this regard.
Interested in hearing about that myself.
davoud
Anything inside * html will be ignored by other browsers. IE Expressions will
not validate. You will need to take that out and put in a seperate style sheet.
see this too:
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=StarHtmlHack
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org> Date:
on Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 05:32:11 -0800 Jim Wrote:
>There is a good discussion of font sizing here:
>http://www.alistapart.com/articles/howtosizetextincss
Thanks for that wonderful link Jim. Even though it is
a really nice experiment however Richard's conclusion
at the end of his article onl
Hi,
Senarios:
1-body {font-size:X%} and no any other font-size
declaration for any elements.
2-body {font-size:X%} and font-size:Yem for other elements.
Where X and Y are variables.
If everything else is the same, which one is better choice for
a cross browser /platform solution ?
Pro
on Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 22:00:31 -0600 mds wrote:
> I am having problems with list-item markers..
see "other design consideration" section of my portfolio
at http://cssfreelancer.awardspace.com .
best
davoud
_
Discover new way
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:07:59 -0800, corey deep wrote:
> > I have a test file which utilizes png w/ transparencies
You may also try a png behaviour which is an htc file to fix
it for ie.
Just put it in google.
best
davoud
_
Exe
on Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 19:05:15 -0800 daniela froehlich Wrote:
Dear AllOn my site I am using Tanfa's CSS menu...
Take out your css for ie from the header and put it
in a seperate file in your css folder.
Then try this, exactly as it appears(providing that you
have named the css for ie6 as
on Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 20:55:44 +0100 George wrote:
> One type of building - mostly rigid ones, yes...
Well it seems now you are talking about an environment
that I know :) .
But no you are absolutely wrong. It does not matter If a
building is flexible or rigid, it will have a structure cr
I hope this time will work :)
goerge wrote:
> > I think someone is defining "site stability" on the wrong premises
Well if you are refering it to me, First of all I never did define "site
stability".I did define "Layout stability" though. Now let me give you an
example tomake it clear wh
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 06:58:55 -0800, Jon Hughes wrote:
> Link:
> http://www.phazm.com/notes/browser-compatibility/firefox-3-web-developers/
> I would love feedback, as this is my first extensive post - is it
> informative? Easy to
> read? Useful?
Just had a quick look. informative. Nice and clea
Greetings,
I am looking for a php multiple style switcher which can handle
switching more than two style sheets for my portfolio
located at http://cssfreelancer.awardspace.com .
Would appreciate your comments.
Best
davoud
_
Have
Hi there,
I would like to invite coders and designers to consider coding for "layout
stability" to increase the readability and usability of web content.
Please visit my portfolio at http://cssfreelancer.awardspace.com .
I am wondering what your opinion is about it. Would you please p
41 matches
Mail list logo
