Unfortunately I don't have support for IIS, if you know of a PHP
alternative I would be extremely grateful.
Thank you again Philip for the code and the help !
Christopher
Philip Taylor mailto:p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk
Friday, November 07, 2014 5:42 PM
Crest Christopher wrote:
I've always wanted
Sorry, can't help Christopher. No experience with PHP (or Apache, or
anything vaguely Unix/Linux-oriented) at all.
Philip Taylor
Crest Christopher wrote:
Unfortunately I don't have support for IIS, if you know of a PHP
alternative I would be extremely grateful.
Thank you again
My example was PHP Crest.
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Nov 12, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Unfortunately I don't have support for IIS, if you know of a PHP alternative
I would be extremely grateful.
Thank you again
You won't do any changes to the code, your leaving it as is, correct ?
Any changes would have to come from someone other then yourself.
Christopher
Karl DeSaulniers mailto:k...@designdrumm.com
Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:56 PM
My example was PHP Crest.
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
nov 7 2014 23:32 Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com:
which is faster IIS or PHP ?
IIS is a server, PHP is a language that can run on servers. You're trying to
compare apples to baskets.
I haven’t looked at the Watermark code, but likely this is something in
ASP.NET? If so that of
Crest Christopher wrote:
Question is, how many resolutions, one, three,five... ?
Why not scale on-the-fly ? Visit :
http://photos.for-charity.org/
click on any album thumbnail, then any image thumbnail, and notice that
the resulting URL is of the form :
Howdy Philip,
~~~
Friday, November 7, 2014, 3:56:34 AM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'),
you wrote the message that appears below.
My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message.
~~~
The watermarking is added dynamically at the same time.
Philip Taylor
Are you certain
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 6, 2014, at 9:34 PM, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
@media is what you recommend for changing images based on browser size,
correct ?
Christpher ?
Background images, yes.
For images coded in the markup, see the polyfill I gave a link
nov 7 2014 00:38 Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com:
Why do you recommend building mobile first ?
The main reason as I see it, is that mobile first methodology forces you to
take a hard look at your content and prioritize it after what the users
actually need to see first, second
Mobile first to me is mos logical because simply, it's easier to add
then to take away !
Christopher
MiB mailto:digital.disc...@gmail.com
Friday, November 07, 2014 8:28 AM
The main reason as I see it, is that mobile first methodology forces
you to take a hard look at your content and
What is the technology behind this scaling on the fly ? It's fluid
compared to image replacement.
Christopher
Philip Taylor mailto:p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk
Friday, November 07, 2014 3:56 AM
Crest Christopher wrote:
Why not scale on-the-fly ? Visit :
http://photos.for-charity.org/
click
nov 7 2014 14:28 MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com:
When you do this, you typically will realize that content, its structure and
presentation is a design problem. Depending on your clients it may also
involve teaching your them about their content.
Talking about fluff, that ”your” wasn’t
GJim wrote:
Are you certain that the watermarks are added dynamically?
Completely certain; it is my web site.
If so, I would like to see the code that accomplishes that feature.
It would solve some issues for me, and also for some others on
another discussion list.
I will send under
On Nov 7, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Completely certain; it is my web site.
Philip Taylor
Hey Philip,
Have you thought of pointer-events: none; and pointer-events: auto for your
images?
Noticed you have -webkit-user-select: none. That doesn't work for the
Hallo Karl --
Have you thought of pointer-events: none; and pointer-events: auto for your
images?
The site is /very/ old, and has not been updated for some considerable
time. I am not familiar with pointer-events : could you briefly
explain what they accomplish and the effects of the two
On Nov 7, 2014, at 7:50 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Hallo Karl --
Have you thought of pointer-events: none; and pointer-events: auto for your
images?
The site is /very/ old, and has not been updated for some considerable time.
I am not familiar with pointer-events :
Crest Christopher wrote:
What is faster for page request from the server, ASP.Net code or image
swapping ? I found the ASP.Net code fast, then again my connection may
just be fluid, I can't assume all will be like this, unless the ASP.Net
code is effective. :-)
Bear in mind that that
The only issue is the images hug the border of the browser, but that is
a style issue ;-)
How do you set this up using this Asp.Net code ? I like it better then
image replacements as I don't notice the flicker when the image changes
size.
Christopher
Philip Taylor
Crest Christopher wrote:
The only issue is the images hug the border of the browser, but that is
a style issue ;-)
How do you set this up using this Asp.Net code ? I like it better then
image replacements as I don't notice the flicker when the image changes
size.
Well, your server needs to
Yes php is one. There are tuts on this all over and example scripts.
Best to have an Apache server for this, not Windows from my experience.
Depending on your server there may be some php.ini directives that you will
need to set,
but these tuts usually go over this part with you.
Some search
On Nov 7, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
Yes php is one. There are tuts on this all over and example scripts.
Best to have an Apache server for this, not Windows from my experience.
Depending on your server there may be some php.ini directives that you will
On Nov 7, 2014, at 8:32 AM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
On Nov 7, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
Yes php is one. There are tuts on this all over and example scripts.
Best to have an Apache server for this, not Windows from my experience.
Howdy Karl,
~~~
Friday, November 7, 2014, 9:44:17 AM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'),
you wrote the message that appears below.
My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message.
~~~
http://designdrumm.com/upload_images_test.zip
This was used to place a copyright on
On Nov 7, 2014, at 9:08 AM, GJim jarne...@wyomerc.com wrote:
Howdy Karl,
Nice utility to automate adding a copyright to an image.
However, that's not a dynamic solution such as Philip mentioned.
Also, I notice that your code allows for a maximum image size of 516K - is
there
a
Howdy Karl,
~~~
Friday, November 7, 2014, 10:38:31 AM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'),
you wrote the message that appears below.
My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message.
~~~
Actually it is dynamic.
$yearstamp = date( Y);
...
$copyright = Copyright Design
On Nov 7, 2014, at 9:50 AM, GJim jarne...@wyomerc.com wrote:
Howdy Karl,
~~~
Friday, November 7, 2014, 10:38:31 AM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'),
you wrote the message that appears below.
My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message.
~~~
Actually it is
-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Crest Christopher
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 6:35 PM
To: Tom Livingston
Cc: Karl DeSaulniers; CSS-Discuss
Subject: Re: [css-d] Responsive Images
@media is what you recommend for changing images based on browser size, correct
Christopher
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 6:35 PM
To: Tom Livingston
Cc: Karl DeSaulniers; CSS-Discuss
Subject: Re: [css-d] Responsive Images
@media is what you recommend for changing images based on browser size,
correct ?
Christpher ?
Crest Christopher mailto:crestchristop
Crest Christopher wrote:
I've always wanted to add a watermark to images automatically when
uploaded to the server for display on the page. Can you customize the
watermark ?
Of course : see the code fragment below.
My only problem is I have to check if I can support IIS,
which is
I've been using a polyfill called picturefill. It will serve the necessary
image based on media query. Very few people, if any, change browser viewport
sizes while browsing like devs do in testing. Only the appropriate image gets
served. No crazy amounts of server requests.
Sent from my
Swapping bg images is easy enough with media queries, however, many mobile
device browsers will download images within other mqs. There is an easy way to
stop this in most cases.
For example, my base mobile styles (because you build pages mobile-first,
right?) have a bg img. I'll use that img
I'd like to read the article, when you find the link.
There is only one issue, if I'm doing my own custom design with a
smorgasbord of images etc. I have to find the largest, suppose a 5K
image, then do my design magic in Photoshop, then scale the design at
different resolutions. Question
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to read the article, when you find the link.
There is only one issue, if I'm doing my own custom design with a
smorgasbord of images etc. I have to find the largest, suppose a 5K image,
then do my
On 11/5/14, 9:22 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Crest Christopher composed on 2014-11-05 23:45 (UTC-0500):
If I want to use images on a responsive site, the images should be in
the largest size possible then set the style to {max-width:100%} ? If
they are not the largest size possible and the page
David Hucklesby composed on 2014-11-06 08:42 (UTC-0800):
Itâs not unlikely I am wet behind the ears, but I thought max-width simply
prevented the image from expanding to its natural size in smaller containers.
AFAIK the image will not stretch.
It may depend on how astutely it's used. I can
Why do you recommend building mobile first ?
There is a pro and a con with swapping images, the pro, you can use
bitmap images, the con, you have to have, as I mentioned earlier, maybe
up to six different resolutions for your images. The CSS may be the
easiest to do, the hardest will be
That's right David. If you have:
img {max-width: 100%;
The image will not exceed the width of its parent.
Eric
On November 6, 2014 at 11:42 AM David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/5/14, 9:22 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Crest Christopher composed on 2014-11-05 23:45 (UTC-0500):
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:38 PM, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why do you recommend building mobile first ?
Aside from being best practice, it is much harder and requires more code to
achieve a mobile layout from a desktop first build because it requires
That does make sense to build simpler first then go desktop after, I
just may follow this logic !
Not necessarily. Most of the time I can use just three images. Each
image can span more than one breakpoint. My base (mobile/phone) images
usually get me up to my 600px breakpoint, for example.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
That does make sense to build simpler first then go desktop after, I just
may follow this logic !
Not necessarily. Most of the time I can use just three images. Each image
can span more than one breakpoint.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
That does make sense to build simpler first then go desktop after, I just
may follow this logic !
Not necessarily. Most of the time I can use just three images. Each image
can span more than one
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:38 PM, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why do you recommend building mobile first ?
Aside from being best practice [trmmed]..
I hope that you mean it
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:42 PM, David Laakso laakso.davi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 6, 2014, at 6:38 PM, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why do you recommend building mobile first
I think this works better if...
#imghldr { width: 40rem;
#myimage { width: 100%;
That way you only have to change the size of #imghldr to change the size of
#myimage
Much easier in a @media IMO.
body
div id=photo_container style=text-align:center;
div id=imghldr
Basically the web is becoming a billboard, if I want to design for 5K
I'd need a 5K image, from there I scale it down, or up because I'll be
designing for mobile first, then I adjust the page and graphics
accordingly for desktop.
Christopher
Tom Livingston mailto:tom...@gmail.com
Thursday,
@media is what you recommend for changing images based on browser size,
correct ?
Christpher ?
Crest Christopher mailto:crestchristop...@gmail.com
Thursday, November 06, 2014 9:11 PM
Basically the web is becoming a billboard, if I want to design for 5K
I'd need a 5K image, from there I scale
If I want to use images on a responsive site, the images should be in
the largest size possible then set the style to {max-width:100%} ? If
they are not the largest size possible and the page is viewed at 1700px
by 1450px (fictional resolution, I didn't verify if it is a logical
resolution)
Crest Christopher composed on 2014-11-05 23:45 (UTC-0500):
If I want to use images on a responsive site, the images should be in
the largest size possible then set the style to {max-width:100%} ? If
they are not the largest size possible and the page is viewed at 1700px
by 1450px
Hello,
No, the idea is to swap out higher resolution images for the higher resolution
screens so that no visitor ever has to see distorted, pixellated images.
Norman
On 2014-11-05, at 9:45 PM, Crest Christopher wrote:
If I want to use images on a responsive site, the images should be in the
+1
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Nov 5, 2014, at 11:24 PM, Norman Fournier nor...@normanfournier.com wrote:
No, the idea is to swap out higher resolution images for the higher
resolution screens so that no visitor ever has to see distorted, pixellated
images.
Swapping will require more page requests from the server. The other
solution mentioned requires by default a 5K image if you go by the
highest screen possible, just so you can scale down appropriately
without blurred images.
I suppose gone are the days I could find an image at 800x600 do
Well, you could build your images to the middle resolution (whatever that is at
the time) and let it be what it is on all other screens. I think this is the
most common scenario, but I could be corrected.
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Nov 5, 2014, at 11:48
Real chokepoint on a 2400 baud modem.
On 2014-11-05, at 10:48 PM, Crest Christopher wrote:
Swapping will require more page requests from the server. The other solution
mentioned requires by default a 5K image if you go by the highest screen
possible, just so you can scale down
Most of the internet, if not all would choke a 2400 baud modem. I
remember when I got my 28.8 !
Christopher
Norman Fournier mailto:nor...@normanfournier.com
Thursday, November 06, 2014 1:35 AM
Real chokepoint on a 2400 baud modem.
Karl DeSaulniers mailto:k...@designdrumm.com
Thursday,
On Jul 15, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Gates, Jeff gat...@si.edu wrote:
Two images on a page don't seem to be resizing as they should when I reduce
the viewport. The page in question is
http://www.outtacontext.com/wp2/about/past7/
-nip-
Can someone tell me why the images aren't scaling down?
Two images on a page don't seem to be resizing as they should when I reduce the
viewport. The page in question is http://www.outtacontext.com/wp2/about/past7/
I have a three column layout on this page with images in the left div and the
right div. Text is in the middle div. I have a
On 15.07.2012 23:45, Gates, Jeff wrote:
Can someone tell me why the images aren't scaling down? Thanks.
Images scale fine - never wider than 100% of their containers, but with
only 22% width left for the center column the layout doesn't force
image scaling until page is so narrow that
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org]
On Behalf Of Georg [gunla...@c2i.net]
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 6:38 PM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Responsive images not scaling down
On 16.07.2012 00:51, Gates, Jeff wrote:
Thanks Georg. I can see what you're saying. And I started to play around with
increasing the side div percentages. However, what I'd like to maintain is a
somewhat narrow middle column for the text (I'd like the text to be more
vertical than horizontal
59 matches
Mail list logo
