No. This...
body {
background-image: url('my300pximage.jpg');
}
@media and (min-width: 700px) {
body {
background-image: url('my700pximage.jpg');
}
}
...is not Sass, but it does what you described.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph:
Yes, knowing that SaSS is the solution ;-)
Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Chris Rockwell
> wrote:
>
>>
>> If I understand you correctly, no.
>>
>> You can do:
>> body {
>> background-image: url('my300pximage.jpg');
>> }
>> @media and
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Chris Rockwell
wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, no.
>
> You can do:
> body {
> background-image: url('my300pximage.jpg');
> }
> @media and (min-width: 700px) {
> body {
> background-image: url('my700pximage.jpg');
> }
> }
Note that it still compiles to the first example.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:18 PM Crest Christopher
wrote:
> I knew probably SaSS could do it although I don't use SaSS atleast I was
> right ;-)
>
> Chris Rockwell wrote:
>
>
> If I understand you correctly, no.
>
> You
I knew probably SaSS could do it although I don't use SaSS atleast I was
right ;-)
Chris Rockwell wrote:
>
> If I understand you correctly, no.
>
> You can do:
> body {
> background-image: url('my300pximage.jpg');
> }
> @media and (min-width: 700px) {
> body {
> background-image:
If I understand you correctly, no.
You can do:
body {
background-image: url('my300pximage.jpg');
}
@media and (min-width: 700px) {
body {
background-image: url('my700pximage.jpg');
}
}
With sass you can do this:
body {
background-image: url('my300pximage.jpg');
@media and
Is it possible to do conditions within a rule for an element; similar to
MQ. For example, you may have a break point that if the screen is 300px
and 700px then a background image of 300px width or close will be
displayed, otherwise a background image of a 700px width will be
displayed ?
On Jan 11, 2015, at 2:02 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
2015-01-11, 9:48, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
I would suggest a little trip to WC3.
I wonder what that means.
it means study time
See here:
http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_background.asp
The w3schools site,
2015-01-11, 9:48, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
I would suggest a little trip to WC3.
I wonder what that means.
See here:
http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_background.asp
The w3schools site, unreliable and with rather low information/noise
ratio, intentionally wants to be confused with the Word
Tom Livingston wrote:
For someone at the OPs level, I'd not recommend a site with such a bad
reputation. He won't know if what he is reading is correct. While that site
may be improved as of late, why start learning at such a poorly regarded
source. There are much more reputable places to
I'm amazed it took this long for a link to the W3 validator to creep into
the conversation. Maybe if we keep at it the list archives will trump
w3schools in search results?
Regards,
Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com
+44 7429 177278
barneycarroll.com
On 11 January 2015 at 16:22, Tom
For someone at the OPs level, I'd not recommend a site with such a bad
reputation. He won't know if what he is reading is correct. While that site
may be improved as of late, why start learning at such a poorly regarded
source. There are much more reputable places to learn the basics.
w3school is at the top for so many searches.
It would be great if they would just clean up their site.
--
Registered Linux User: #480675
Registered Linux Machine: #408606
Linux since June 2005
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm amazed it took
Schoolboy errors, which indicate (to my mind) the level of care (or lack
thereof) that went into the preparation of the material :
Error Line 453, Column 88: did not start a character reference. (
probably should have been escaped as amp;.)
Tom Livingston wrote:
In a URL string like that, I personally would not look down on the dev for that.
We could debate this forever, Tom, and I suspect would never reach
agreement. My position (with which you may well disagree) is that I
look on it as being similar to a developer who
It appears that the errors are for things that are not yet part of the spec
the validator is based on. I would not call that bad code.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:17 AM Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
For someone at the OPs level, I'd not recommend a site with
Tom Livingston wrote:
It appears that the errors are for things that are not yet part of the
spec the validator is based on. I would not call that bad code.
Schoolboy errors, which indicate (to my mind) the level of care (or lack
thereof) that went into the preparation of the material :
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
In a URL string like that, I personally would not look down on the dev for
that.
We could debate this forever, Tom, and I suspect would never reach
agreement. My position (with which you may
Try making the background color the last item in the list.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
The background image should sit on-top of the background color, instead
the background color is overriding my background image ?
The background image should sit on-top of the background color,
instead the background color is overriding my background image ?
background-color:#343630;/*#b7b7b7;*/
background:url(/wdp/wip/overlay_bg.png);
background-position:top;
background-blend-mode: overlay;
2015-01-11, 6:59, Crest Christopher wrote:
The background image should sit on-top of the background color,
Yes, if both are specified.
instead the background color is overriding my background image ?
background-color:#343630;/*#b7b7b7;*/
background:url(/wdp/wip/overlay_bg.png);
I would suggest a little trip to WC3.
You have posted this a lot. it should be
background-image:
if your just setting the url attribute to your background image.
background:
if your setting the url, position, size, origin, color, etc as the shorthand
notation.
See here:
I've been playing around with a few menu design ideas, and mocked up a site to try them out. The
menus are OK as far as they go, but I'm having trouble with a background image.
I have been trying to set up a background image in the body (or in body class='plain'), but
when I do so it appears
Hi - I think you have to give it a position and include a z-index
instruction to tell it to put the image at the back, eg
background-attachment: fixed;
background-position: 50% 60px;
margin: 30px 0px 0px 0px;
z-index: 1;
}
That, above, is taken from a very old style sheet;
oThis has never come up for me, so I can't explain (yet) why this happens,
but it appears, at least in Chrome, that some style attributes don't honor
widths, margins, [and other things I don't know of] of the body element.
The reason this has never come up for me, is that I would always use a
Interesting Chris. I'v always styled the body with margins, positioning,
sometimes padding...etc and it always has an effect.
Rachel, Tim will need to give his element a position of absolute, relative (and
maybe fixed but I'm sure about that one) for z-index to kick in.
Eric
On February 9,
Interesting Chris. I'v always styled the body with margins,
positioning, sometimes padding...etc and it always has an effect.
But have you applied colors, images to that? This pen shows what I'm
referring to (and I've never experienced because of my mark-up
conventions):
Thanks Chris, and others.
I'd agree about the 'wrapper'. It just happens I was rather throwing a page together for my menu
tests, and slipped the background image onto the body. I've moved it now (in my local version
only) to my 'wrapper', which is div#outer, and that works too, and looks much
On 2/9/14, 12:11 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
Interesting Chris. I'v always styled the body with margins,
positioning, sometimes padding...etc and it always has an effect. But have
you applied colors, images to that? This pen shows what I'm referring to (and
I've never experienced because of my
That did it, so is this reverse cascading :)?
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:53 PM, David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/9/14, 12:11 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
Interesting Chris. I'v always styled the body with margins,
positioning, sometimes padding...etc and it always has an effect.
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 3:53 PM, David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that's because backgrounds on body propagate to the viewport -
that's the root (html) element. Unless, that is, you have a background
specified for html.
Backgrounds on root elements are special :)
Backgrounds on root elements are special :)
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#special-backgrounds
Perfect - thanks for the link Jon!
--
Chris Rockwell
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
On 09/02/2014 20:53, David Hucklesby wrote:
On 2/9/14, 12:11 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
Interesting Chris. I'v always styled the body with margins,
positioning, sometimes padding...etc and it always has an effect. But have
you applied colors, images to that? This pen shows what I'm referring to
Thanks Chris,
I know what you're talking about. What I did was I have an image that's
partially transparent, and then I set a bg color which shows behind it. The
js that I assume you speak of was setting an initial bgcolor. Subsequently,
the bgcolor is changed as you mouseover the menu items. I
Just grasping at straws here, but I wonder if Safari is getting confused
by setting an image, and then later changing the color (which overrides
the inherent transparent of the background)?? Maybe if you tested
making that JS code that specifies the changing color also respecify the
image spec
On Jan 11, 2014, at 5:42 PM, nom nom nom snackdetec...@gmail.com wrote:
http://bit.ly/1dcFzaf
My page background shows up in chrome safari on my computer, also works
in android. Doesn't load in safari or the Perfect Browser in iOS 5 or 7.
Can anyone help me understand why?
Thanks in
Thanks, that did it!
Josh
On Jan 15, 2014, at 5:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
On Jan 11, 2014, at 5:42 PM, nom nom nom snackdetec...@gmail.com wrote:
http://bit.ly/1dcFzaf
My page background shows up in chrome safari on my computer, also works
in android.
Good Deal. Glad I could help.
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Jan 15, 2014, at 7:54 PM, +josh+ snackdetec...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, that did it!
Josh
On Jan 15, 2014, at 5:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
On Jan 11, 2014, at
FWIW, I don't see it on my safari on OSX either.
One of your many JS files is adding an element style on the body tag that
has a background-color that overrides everything else specified there.
Haven't had time to figure out which one. Try playing around in Firebug
(or some such) and see which
http://bit.ly/1dcFzaf
My page background shows up in chrome safari on my computer, also works
in android. Doesn't load in safari or the Perfect Browser in iOS 5 or 7.
Can anyone help me understand why?
Thanks in advance for your eyes!
josh
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:58 AM, COM j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Jun 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM, David Laakso laakso.davi...@gmail.com wrote:
Anything is possible. Scalable Vector Graphics [svg images], CSS rgba
transparency, and CSS linear-gradients --among other contemporary
methods ...
On Jun 19, 2013, at 8:37 AM, David Laakso laakso.davi...@gmail.com wrote:
For those among us who dwell in the visual world, one picture is worth
a thousand words... a click able link to your coded page would help.
A link to the page in question is here:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:51 AM, COM j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Jun 19, 2013, at 8:37 AM, David Laakso laakso.davi...@gmail.com wrote:
For those among us who dwell in the visual world, one picture is worth
a thousand words... a click able link to your coded page would help.
A link to
Tested on safari 6.0.5...
background-color: rgba(240,0,0,0.4);
althought it looks like rgba(240,0,0,0.2) might be better suited. :)
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Jun 19, 2013, at 12:17 PM, David Laakso wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:51 AM, COM
On Jun 19, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
Tested on safari 6.0.5...
background-color: rgba(240,0,0,0.4);
althought it looks like rgba(240,0,0,0.2) might be better suited. :)
weird…no change for me at all, tho when I refresh, I do see the reduced-opacity
You won't get PhotoShop multiply layer effects exactly, but using a 24bit png
for your image with areas of alpha transparency to allow the bg color to come
through is as close as u can get I believe.
HTH
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:54 AM, COM
On Jun 19, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
You won't get PhotoShop multiply layer effects exactly, but using a 24bit
png for your image with areas of alpha transparency to allow the bg color to
come through is as close as u can get I believe.
confirmed…here's
] On Behalf Of Tom Livingston
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 10:36 AM
To: COM
Cc: CSS-Discuss
Subject: Re: [css-d] background image AND background color?
You won't get PhotoShop multiply layer effects exactly, but using a 24bit png
for your image with areas of alpha transparency to allow the bg
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:46 PM, COM j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
confirmed…here's what worked for me./..
To make my png partially opaque in my image editor (Pixelmator)…I set it to
50% just for grins and NOW the influence of that red is taking effect on the
PNG texture occupying the same
On Jun 19, 2013, at 11:43 AM, David Laakso laakso.davi...@gmail.com wrote:
The red-like color is opaque: no texture whatsoever seen in Windows 7
any browser.
well that blows a hole right through that technique..thank you for telling me
that, David.
John
You have to set up a special alpha CSS for IE.
Also you may need PNG fix for it to work in IE older browsers, but it can be
done.
just search for transparency in IE
and
PNG fix for IE
HTH,
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Jun 19, 2013, at 12:46 PM, COM wrote:
Fiddling with trying to combine a background image with background color
applied to the same element and hoping to vary either one or both opacity.
Is this possible to do…I guess what I'm looking for is to do with CSS, images
and color what you can do with Photoshop layers.
Thank you!
John
Background: #cco url('image.png') 0 0 no-repeat;
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:22 PM, COM j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
Fiddling with trying to combine a background image with background color
applied to the same element and hoping to vary either one or both opacity.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:22 PM, COM j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
Fiddling with trying to combine a background image with background color
applied to the same element and hoping to vary either one or both opacity.
Is this possible to do…I guess what I'm looking for is to do with CSS, images
http://ricochet.org/evolutionery.com/index.html
stupidly simple, a background image with 2 links… only the links show (not bg
imgs)
styles in the head of doc.
thanks in advance
ron
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
Looks like index.jpg isn't in that folder.
404 not found for me anyways.
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Jun 12, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Ron Zisman wrote:
http://ricochet.org/evolutionery.com/index.html
stupidly simple, a background image with 2 links… only the
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Ron Zisman ronzis...@me.com wrote:
http://ricochet.org/evolutionery.com/index.html
stupidly simple, a background image with 2 links… only the links show (not bg
imgs)
styles in the head of doc.
thanks in advance
ron
The path to the images that do show up:
:17 PM
To: CSS List
Subject: [css-d] background displays locally, but not remotely
http://ricochet.org/evolutionery.com/index.html
stupidly simple, a background image with 2 links... only the links show (not bg
imgs) styles in the head of doc.
thanks in advance
ron
Hi everyone,
I am trying to solve a css puzzle and thought I'd see if I could find
help.
I am building a navigation that is composed of three ul elements,
each with a background image. I would like for the background image to
change when the user hovers over anywhere within the ul element,
Wait..so…you're saying that the .css document is making the call for the
background image and NOT the HTML page?
so, if the styles were in the html document head, THEN it would be one up?
No, what he is saying is the code you have got is dependent on where exactly
your CSS file is
given the code below and that my bricktile.jpg is 1 level up from my
index.html in a folder named image can anyone tell me why my background-image
refuses to appear?
I've been looking at it for half hour and I am baffled. thank you for any clues.
John
body{
font-size:100%;
COM wrote:
given the code below and that my bricktile.jpg is 1 level up from
my index.html in a folder named image can anyone tell me why my
background-image refuses to appear?
Because it is one level up, not one level down.
Philip Taylor
I've been looking at it for half hour
Howdy,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:50 PM, COM j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
given the code below and that my bricktile.jpg is 1 level up from my
index.html in a folder named image can anyone tell me why my
background-image refuses to appear?
Have you tried:
On Apr 26, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Micky Hulse mickyhulse.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried:
background-image:url(../image/bricktile.jpg);
That works, but I don't get it because for the css, THIS works:
css/hwthreestyles.css
where css is the folder where the .css file lives. why the
Background images are relative to the CSS not the HTML
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:12 PM, COM j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Apr 26, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Micky Hulse mickyhulse.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried:
background-image:url(../image/bricktile.jpg);
On Apr 26, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Background images are relative to the CSS not the HTML
I get that but here's a screen grab showing that the image is 1 folder up and
that the .css file is, too 1 folder up
ergo, the same relationship from html file to css
On Apr 26, 2013, at 4:26 PM, COM j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
Background images are relative to the CSS not the HTML
Wait..so…you're saying that the .css document is making the call for the
background image and NOT the HTML page?
so, if the styles were in the html document head, THEN it
On Apr 26, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Right so you have to back out of the CSS dir then go into the image dir to
get your background image, where as the HTML just had to go into the CSS dir
to get the sheet.
OK..alright…this is a key bit of learning for
Correct
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 7:29 PM, COM j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Apr 26, 2013, at 4:26 PM, COM j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
Background images are relative to the CSS not the HTML
Wait..so…you're saying that the .css document is making the call for
Santos unboun...@gmail.com
To: Elli Vizcaino elli...@yahoo.com
Cc: CSS Discuss css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Background Image Not Showing in IE7/IE8
Hi Elli,
I cannot find the conditional comment on your code, not on the ie developer
Am 15.11.2012 15:27 schrieb Elli Vizcaino:
Here is my conditional comment in case you were wondering:
!--[if lt IE 9]
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=?php bloginfo('template_directory');
?/css/ie.css /
![endif]--
At the page that you link to, I see this:
!--[if lt IE 9]
link
...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Background Image Not Showing in IE7/IE8
Am 15.11.2012 15:27 schrieb Elli Vizcaino:
Here is my conditional comment in case you were wondering:
!--[if lt IE 9]
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css
href=?php bloginfo
On 11/15/2012 9:43 AM, Markus Ernst wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 15:27 schrieb Elli Vizcaino:
Here is my conditional comment in case you were wondering:
!--[if lt IE 9]
link rel=stylesheet type=text/css href=?php
bloginfo('template_directory'); ?/css/ie.css /
![endif]--
At the page that you link
- Original Message -
From: HMW Sales sa...@hallmarcwebsites.com
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Background Image Not Showing in IE7/IE8
On 11/15/2012 9:43 AM, Markus Ernst wrote:
Am 15.11.2012 15:27 schrieb
-discuss.org
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Background Image Not Showing in IE7/IE8
- Original Message -
From: HMW Sales sa...@hallmarcwebsites.com
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d
On 11/15/2012 10:14 AM, Elli Vizcaino wrote:
- Original Message -
From: HMW Sales sa...@hallmarcwebsites.com
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Background Image Not Showing in IE7/IE8
On 11/15/2012 9:43 AM, Markus Ernst
Am 15.11.2012 16:14 schrieb Elli Vizcaino:
- Original Message -
From: HMW Sales sa...@hallmarcwebsites.com
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Background Image Not Showing in IE7/IE8
On 11/15/2012 9:43 AM, Markus Ernst
Hello CSS Discuss,
I'm using conditional statement to target an ie specific stylesheet to browsers
IE7 8 since neither of them support CSS3 multiple backgrounds. While IE7 8
are both picking up the stylesheet's bacgkround color property it's not loading
the background image. I'm not sure
Hi Elli,
I cannot find the conditional comment on your code, not on the ie developer
tools, nor on firebug, (I gess it has to do with a onload js script) so I'm
not sure I'm seeing the right css files, but you do not really need a
conditional code for the multiple backgrounds if you write the
(It seams I keep doing the same mistake:
Clicking on reply instead of reply to all,
so I'll repeat my previous answer to Philippe at the end of this one.)
Alan,
Philippe was right, and his suggestion is handy and makes a lot of sense.
Yet
:)
ok Alan,
quoting
Philippe has already provided reasons why this is and a possible solution
but this could also be solved by creating a SVG with no intrinsic size or
ratio. Like so.
http://css-class.com/test/svg/ellipse/intrinsic-none.svg
/quoting
I'm not sure about my sintax, its a lot easier
Hi all,
I seem to have come accross a strange problem in gecko and webkit browsers,
and I cannot find info on this anywhere, so I'm turning to your infinit
wisdom :)
I'm using an svg on a background, and providing a fallback png element for
older browsers.
(I'm treating ie versions lower then 9
Le 17 juin 2012 à 08:32, Isabel Santos a écrit :
#minuto {background:url(img/bgtopnavPlanoMedio.svg) top right / 100% 100%;}
That is the correct way of writing css3 background-shorthand
Ie9 and Opera 11.64 both get it pretty right,
Yes.
but Google Chrome 0.3.1, Safari 5.1.7
and most
On 17/06/2012 9:32 AM, Isabel Santos wrote:
so if I do:
#minuto {background:url(img/bgtopnavPlanoMedio.svg) top right / 100% 100%;}
Ie9 and Opera 11.64 both get it pretty right,
but Google Chrome 0.3.1, Safari 5.1.7
and most notably Firefox 12 all give me the background:#bab9a9;
Philippe
Hi all,
I have a three-column layout, all three of which have a white background.
The page background is black and I need the div containing the three
columns to expand with its white background down the page. I need the
longest of the three columns (2 or 3) to determine how high the containing
I have a three-column layout, all three of which have a white background.
The page background is black and I need the div containing the three
columns to expand with its white background down the page. I need the
longest of the three columns (2 or 3) to determine how high the containing
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, J.C. Berry jcharlesbe...@gmail.com wrote:
I need the
longest of the three columns (2 or 3) to determine how high the containing
div is.
J.C. Berry, M.A.
---
There are a number of ways to do that. One is a CSS Table [looks like
a table but its not].
Please
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 20:56 -0800, David Hucklesby wrote:
On 3/1/12 11:36 AM, Erica Cavin wrote:
On this page: http://www.risingstarquilters.org/join_update.html
the small arrow that should appear next to Back to questions
displays far to the left in Chrome and Safari. It displays
On this page: http://www.risingstarquilters.org/join_update.html
the small arrow that should appear next to Back to questions displays
far to the left in Chrome and Safari. It displays properly in Firefox
and IE. Any thoughts as to why?
CSS here:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Erica Cavin ecav...@verizon.net wrote:
On this page: http://www.risingstarquilters.org/join_update.html
the small arrow that should appear next to Back to questions displays
far to the left in Chrome and Safari. It displays properly in Firefox
and IE. Any
On 3/1/12 11:36 AM, Erica Cavin wrote:
On this page: http://www.risingstarquilters.org/join_update.html
the small arrow that should appear next to Back to questions
displays far to the left in Chrome and Safari. It displays properly
in Firefox and IE. Any thoughts as to why?
I think that
This bug was reported in January 2000:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25291
After twelve years and only 13 comments, I'd guess that no one cares
enough to fix it :(
--
Vince Aggrippino
Ghodmode Development
http://www.ghodmode.com
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Ghodmode
I can't track this down!
My blog is here: http://evamoon.net/blog/
It's fine except that when someone leaves a comment on a post, the background
of the whole post area goes white. I can't figure out where this is coming from!
Here's an example: http://evamoon.net/blog/2011/09/04/clamhenge/
I tracked it down to a plug in. Thanks anyway!
Eva
On Dec 8, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Eva Moon wrote:
I can't track this down!
My blog is here: http://evamoon.net/blog/
It's fine except that when someone leaves a comment on a post, the background
of the whole post area goes white. I can't
On Nov 3, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Ed Goodson wrote:
I am working up a site that has different backgrounds/color per
section. I have a background here that runs short. What am I
missing to get the color to fill the rest? Do I have to put the
container in another container? Check here:
Hi all.
I am working up a site that has different backgrounds/color per
section. I have a background here that runs short. What am I missing
to get the color to fill the rest? Do I have to put the container in
another container?
Check here:
I am working up a site that has different backgrounds/color per
section. I have a background here that runs short. What am I missing
to get the color to fill the rest? Do I have to put the container in
another container?
Check here:
I am working up a site that has different backgrounds/color per section.
I have a background here that runs short. What am I missing to get the
color to fill the rest? Do I have to put the container in another
container? Check here:
Hello,
I have a page that requires a background image to display when there is no
content in the div. I have cobbled a transparent gif into the div in order to
force the image to display. If the transparent gif is not there, the background
image is cropped at the top of the div. I want to lose
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Norman Fournier
nor...@normanfournier.comwrote:
Hello,
I have a page that requires a background image to display when there is no
content in the div. I have cobbled a transparent gif into the div in order
to force the image to display. If the transparent gif
1 - 100 of 915 matches
Mail list logo