Re: [css-d] CSS prototypes

On 11/22/10 6:36 AM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: Hi. Maybe I'm reinventing the wheel but I noticed that many development teams still follow the HTML and CSS plus graphics approach. I found out that this approach is a mess. I've been there myself: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/11/css-prototype

Re: [css-d] CSS Frameworks

On 12/15/10 11:50 PM, Joseba Roldan wrote: Hi all, I've just discovered the amazing world of CSS frameworks. I've been using 960Grid so far and I think is pretty good. Anyway, do you know any other recommendable CSS framework? Rather than relying on one particular framework, I suggest studying

Re: [css-d] CSS Frameworks

On Thursday, December 16, 2010, David Hucklesby wrote: > On 12/15/10 11:50 PM, Joseba Roldan wrote: > > Hi all, I've just discovered the amazing world of CSS frameworks. > I've been using 960Grid so far and I think is pretty good. Anyway, do > you know any other recommendable CSS framework? > > >

Re: [css-d] CSS validators

Isn't that : More options / Profile / CSS level 3 ? Philip Taylor Nancy Seeger wrote: Hi All, Maybe I'm being premature here but I really enjoy using some of the CSS3 techniques, of course making sure things degrade gracefully. Mostly using RGBA with a backup hex, shadow boxes, bord

Re: [css-d] CSS validators

On 1/25/11 5:59 PM, Nancy Seeger wrote: Hi All, Maybe I'm being premature here but I really enjoy using some of the CSS3 techniques, of course making sure things degrade gracefully. Mostly using RGBA with a backup hex, shadow boxes, border radius, font face and others that are rather low impa

Re: [css-d] CSS validators

Philip and David, If it were a snake... fantastic, I didn't know that had been added. So in checking this out - what limits does it have? Are vendor prefixes supported like Webkit etc? Thanks, Nancy On Jan 25, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: > Isn't that : > > More

Re: [css-d] CSS validators

On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Nancy Seeger wrote: > If it were a snake... fantastic, I didn't know that had been added. > > So in checking this out - what limits does it have? Are vendor prefixes > supported like Webkit etc? No vendor prefixed properties are not 'supported' - those are not par

Re: [css-d] CSS QA

Arthur Cundy wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've just completed this website using divs and I wanted to run it by you > guys to see if you can spot any issues. This is my second attempt at a > table-less design and my first attempt at using shtml includes. The website > is http://www.cafe-

Re: [css-d] CSS QA

Arthur Cundy wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've just completed this website using divs and I wanted to run it by > you guys to see if you can spot any issues. This is my second attempt > at a table-less design and my first attempt at using shtml includes. > The website is http://www.cafe-list.com >

Re: [css-d] CSS QA

Arthur Cundy wrote: > The website is http://www.cafe-list.com > > Let me know what you think! Well, I thought it was completely broken at first glance, but it is just a lot of text and divs overlapping because you have used fixed height on containers. Not a good idea if you want anyone with less

Re: [css-d] CSS QA

Arthur Cundy wrote: >Hello everyone, > > I've just completed this website using divs and I wanted to run it by you > guys to see if you can spot any issues. This is my second attempt at a > table-less design and my first attempt at using shtml includes. The website > is http://www.cafe-li

Re: [css-d] CSS check

On 12/9/05, Carol F. Swinehart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have 2000 operating systems with mozilla and on a 800X600 screen both of > your sites scroll to the right. Yes, but the content is still viewable without scrolling so I'm letting that one go. Too little planning in the graphic design,

Re: [css-d] css speed

> I've heard talk about how much faster css is at rendering pages than > table layouts, but I've never seen the proof (actual statistics). I > was wondering if anyone knew of a study on this. Not that I know of, but the main difference is that CSS layouts tend to be a lot slicker than oldschool ta

Re: [css-d] css speed

kenny heaton wrote: >I've heard talk about how much faster css is at rendering pages than >table layouts, but I've never seen the proof (actual statistics). I >was wondering if anyone knew of a study on this. I don't think a general study is possible, since the rendering time depends largely on e

Re: [css-d] css speed

On 16 Dec 2005, at 12:06 am, Adam Kuehn wrote: >> My second questions is related to that, dose anyone know of any >> resources on writing more optimised css. For example I was just >> reading on this list in the talk comparing class to id and there was >> mention there was performance difference

Re: [css-d] css speed

2005/12/14, kenny heaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I've heard talk about how much faster css is at rendering pages than > table layouts, but I've never seen the proof (actual statistics). I > was wondering if anyone knew of a study on this. I think the major difference is that tables are usually not

Re: [css-d] CSS Showcases

> csszengarden.com > http://thesis.veracon.net/ (thought this is brilliant!) Check http://dontmeetyourheroes.com/ there is a dropdown on the right called "CSS inspiration" which lists almost all of them. You can also tell them to add others you find. This has been discussed here a lot, so please

Re: [css-d] CSS Showcases

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm in need of some CSS driven websites as inspirations in helping my > gather ideas for my up an coming website,... > I already have some, which are as follows... > > csszengarden.com > http://thesis.veracon.net/ (thought this is brilliant!) > > Any other

Re: [css-d] CSS Showcases

http://cssvault.com/ is a v nice site - Original Message - From: "Christian Heilmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 3:51 PM Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS Showcases >> csszengarden.com >> http://th

Re: [css-d] CSS Showcases

Bob Easton wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>I'm in need of some CSS driven websites as inspirations in helping my >>gather ideas for my up an coming website,... >> >> >Suggestion: Take what you collect here and add it to our CSS-D Wiki so >others can benefit in the future. It's eas

Re: [css-d] css & fonts

http://typetester.maratz.com/ Quoting jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hey -- a while ago I found (and I thought I Furled) some site that showed > like > paragraphs of type in different web-safe fonts -- you could change the size, > font, spacing, line-height, everything. There were three columns so

Re: [css-d] css & fonts

jeremy wrote: > Hey -- a while ago I found (and I thought I Furled) some site that showed like > paragraphs of type in different web-safe fonts -- you could change the size, > font, spacing, line-height, everything. There were three columns so you > could compare... > > Does this ring a bell? anyo

Re: [css-d] css & fonts

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://typetester.maratz.com/ That could be the coolest thing I have seen this year. (*ahem*) But why does 1em Verdana look so small? Surely it's totally misleading? Looks like it's based on setting the default size really small in the first place - somewhere not in t

Re: [css-d] css & fonts

Ian said: > But why does 1em Verdana look so small? The 1em is relative to 10px. -Nigel __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ S

Re: [css-d] css & fonts

On 05.01.2006 23:54, Duckworth, Nigel wrote: > Ian said: > >>But why does 1em Verdana look so small? I don't know. If you really want to know it, you need to ask the author of the site. > > The 1em is relative to 10px. > This is widely misunderstood. The em unit isn't relative to pixels at

Re: [css-d] css & fonts

> On 05.01.2006 23:54, Duckworth, Nigel wrote: >> Ian said: >> >>>But why does 1em Verdana look so small? > > I don't know. If you really want to know it, you need to ask the author > of the site. > >> >> The 1em is relative to 10px. >> > > This is widely misunderstood. > The em unit isn't relative

Re: [css-d] css & fonts

Nick Fitzsimons wrote Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:29:22 - (GMT): > On 05.01.2006 23:54, Duckworth, Nigel wrote: > > Since MSIE/PC is working internally in points, > > it's default font size is always 12pt. > Actually, all modern browsers (Firefox, IE, Opera, Safari, Konqueror) > start with a "facto

Re: [css-d] css & fonts

Nic said: > I think what was meant is that the creator of the site has specified 1em to be equivalent to 10px. Exactly, the 1em is *relative* to 10px. -Nigel __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailm

Re: [css-d] css & fonts

Duh! enough already. Ian IY e-Solutions -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.14/222 - Release Date: 05/01/2006 __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] ht

Re: [css-d] CSS 3

Just read an interesting bit about CSS3 written in 2004!! So when will it be implemented. seems to me that it is likely to make life so much easier for drop shadows, rounded corners etc. Hope this is not deemed "off-topic" Ian IY e-Solutions

Re: [css-d] CSS 3

Ian Young wrote: > Just read an interesting bit about CSS3 written in 2004!! So when > will it be implemented. seems to me that it is likely to make life so > much easier for drop shadows, rounded corners etc. Parts of CSS3 are already implemented in a number of browsers. The rest might be avail

Re: [css-d] css & fonts

On 06.01.2006 14:43, Felix Miata wrote: > Nick Fitzsimons wrote Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:29:22 - (GMT): > > >>On 05.01.2006 23:54, Duckworth, Nigel wrote: > I myself, wrote: >>>Since MSIE/PC is working internally in points, >>>it's default font size is always 12pt. > >>Actually, all modern

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 10:52:01AM -0500, Jim Ryan wrote: > can I use the wildcard > .dynamic_rightnav-* li{border:1px dotted red;} This comes up often: http://www.hixie.ch/specs/css/wwwstyle/#selectors Sadly, the answer is no. I suppose you could build a layer atop CSS -- say, a program that pa

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

On 25/01/06, Jim Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How flexible are wildcards in CSS? CSS doesn't have wild cards. The * character is a universal selector, which matches any element, it isn't a wild card. > suppose if I have a series of dynamically created rightnav list items styled > like so: >

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

Jim Ryan wrote: >How flexible are wildcards in CSS? > > CSS is not a programming language, so it doesn't have variables in it. You define set classes and ids that appear in your source somewhere. >suppose if I have a series of dynamically created rightnav list items styled >like so: > >.dyna

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

I suppose you could build a layer atop CSS -- say, a program that parses a "CSS+Regexen" sheet, looks at the HTML to which it's being applied, finds the elements in the HTML that match the regex, and generates a stylesheet containing those elements. But it's not part of CSS. Regular expressions

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:19:42AM -0500, Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote: > CSS is not a programming language, so it doesn't have variables in it. > You define set classes and ids that appear in your source somewhere. Just to be clear, it's a totally reasonable thing to expect from CSS. It would be ni

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

Jim Ryan wrote: >Regular expressions in a stylesheet definition would be a tremendous help in >defining multiple duplicate styles. Let's hope something like this is in the >works. > > I doubt it. It gets brought up on www-style periodically and brought back down. :-) If you need regular expr

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

Stephen R Laniel wrote: >On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:19:42AM -0500, Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote: > > >>CSS is not a programming language, so it doesn't have variables in it. >>You define set classes and ids that appear in your source somewhere. >> >> > >Just to be clear, it's a totally reasona

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

>How flexible are wildcards in CSS? >suppose if I have a series of dynamically created rightnav list items styled >like so: > >.dynamic_rightnav-1 li{border:1px dotted red;} >.dynamic_rightnav-2 li{border:1px dotted red;} >...and so forth > >can I use the wildcard >.dynamic_rightnav-* li{border:1px

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

> > CSS is not a programming language, so it doesn't have variables in it. > > You define set classes and ids that appear in your source somewhere. > > Just to be clear, it's a totally reasonable thing to expect > from CSS. It would be nice to be able to define > > h[0-9] { > font-family: V

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

> >or is there another way to do this to accomodate elements being created on > >the fly? > See: > > http://www.sperling.com/examples/pcss/ This kills every color coding your IDE might have, fails when someone uses " for any reason in the CSS and it means the CSS will not be cached. All CSS parse

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

tedd wrote: >>How flexible are wildcards in CSS? >> >> > >http://www.sperling.com/examples/pcss/ > > > Tedd, Please add this link to this page in the wiki: http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ConstantsInCSS And everyone, we can just point people here whenever this FAQ comes up (seems to

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

I am continually scripting CSS, because for one of the main sites I work on the images are coming out of a CMS, so I need to write a references asp.net whenever I want a background-image. Colours are also dynamic in some parts of the site. However, over two years of hardcore CSS work, I have found

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

Chris: Not meaning to be argumentative, but: > > >or is there another way to do this to accomodate elements being created on >> >the fly? >> See: >> > > http://www.sperling.com/examples/pcss/ > >This kills every color coding your IDE might have, fails when someone >uses " for any reason in th

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

Zoe: >Tedd, > >Please add this link to this page in the wiki: >http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ConstantsInCSS Sure, what do you want me to call it? >And everyone, we can just point people here whenever this FAQ comes up >(seems to be coming up a lot more frequently lately...). Hmmm... coul

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

Ok, this is actually OFF-Topic, just a quick note: I didn't say Tedd's solution was intrinsicly bad and I think it is great that he answered so quickly to a problem somebody asked here. However, it is important to point out flaws of solutions. I expect that from anyone here, as this is the only wa

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

tedd wrote: > >http://www.sperling.com/examples/pcss/ Tedd, the particular PHP syntactical technique you've used in your pcss article will trip over its own shoelaces as soon as the first {background: url("xxx")} is encountered. Instead of enclosing the whole stylesheet in double-quotes as yo

Re: [css-d] Css menu

Abyss Information wrote: > > Here is a neat CSS menu - if anyone is looking for one > > http://koivi.com/css-menus/ You will do us all a big favor by adding this to our css-d WIKI. The information will be more persistent than a passing post. Find the WIKI link at the bottom of every posting.

Re: [css-d] CSS validators?

Cecil, On Feb 17, 2006, at 6:21 AM, Cecil Ward wrote: > I'm interested in either getting hold of a standalone tool that > validates > CSS files, or in building my own. > > I'd like to automate CSS validation as part of a build process, so I'm > not > interested in interactive or IDE-type tools,

Re: [css-d] CSS Media

Chuck Harmston wrote: > Quick question for you all: > > When a browser is loading a page (ie. where media="screen"), > does a browser load/cache alternate stylesheets that are > additionally declared in the page like so? > > media="print" /> Just tried it on WinXP, and both Firefox, Opera and IE6

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

At 08:30 AM 1/25/2006, Stephen R Laniel wrote: >Just to be clear, it's a totally reasonable thing to expect >from CSS. It would be nice to be able to define > >h[0-9] { > font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; >} > >instead of the ungainly > >h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, h7, h8, h9 { > font-f

Re: [css-d] CSS wildcards

On 2/18/06, Paul Novitski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would you really want to be able to write CSS rules like this? > > d(iv|l)(.|#)cont(act|ent) (p(re){0,1}|dt) > { > border(-.+){0,1}: 1px solid #000; > } Do you know how much slower CSS would get if w

Re: [css-d] CSS Media

> > When a browser is loading a page (ie. where media="screen"), does a > browser load/cache alternate stylesheets that are additionally > declared in the page like so? > > /> Good question, browser wouldn't know when you will need/call the print style so, loads it all up. Cem Meric Kalkadoo

Re: [css-d] CSS editor?

css editor... ¿? gedit?? vim?? my editors for everything. On 21/04/06, SystemAdmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what do you guys (and gals) recommend as a CSS editor? > __ > css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.css-discuss.

Re: [css-d] CSS editor?

BBEdit http://barebones.com/products/bbedit/index.shtml On 4/21/06, SystemAdmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what do you guys (and gals) recommend as a CSS editor? > __ > css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.css-discuss.org

Re: [css-d] CSS editor?

Personally I use PSPad for editing everything. Dreamweaver 8 has some good css editing tools but it's not a sole reason to obtain Dreamweaver. Michael Botsko Web Developer 503.227.2571 x230 AIM: botskonet TechTracker, Inc www.techtracker.com -Original Message- what do you guys (and ga

Re: [css-d] CSS editor?

Quoting SystemAdmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > what do you guys (and gals) recommend as a CSS editor? did you check the wiki? Crimson Editor is nice, simple and free :-) Brian ___

Re: [css-d] CSS editor?

At 10:42 AM 04/21/2006 SystemAdmin wrote: >> what do you guys (and gals) recommend as a CSS editor? I like TopStyle and/or Stylemaster. The CSS editor in Dreamweaver 8 is pretty good. And of course, good old Notepad. Take a look at others in the Wiki (http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=CssEdito

Re: [css-d] CSS editor?

If you're using a Mac, I really like this one. http://macrabbit.com/cssedit/ I was just using a text editor before and it's so nice to have a CSS editor! > what do you guys (and gals) recommend as a CSS editor? __ css-discu

Re: [css-d] CSS editor?

;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:07 AM Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS editor? | Quoting SystemAdmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: | | > what do you guys (and gals) recommend as a CSS editor? | | did you check the wiki? | <http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=CssEditors&g

Re: [css-d] CSS editor?

> what do you guys (and gals) recommend as a CSS editor? Personally, I use Vim for everything. Although it has somewhat of a learning curve, you become VERY efficient once you get used to it. Versions for almost any OS are available at http://www.vim.org/download.php Ricky __

Re: [css-d] CSS editor?

`Notepad2` is the simply the best editor for various programming, I use it for html and css as well as for javascript and php. Check it out: http://www.flos-freeware.ch/notepad2.html ~~ S. F. Alim __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [css-d] Css help

Angus at InfoForce Services wrote: On a web page I am using two different .gifs. One .gif for my header and the other as a background from the top left where My heder ends to the bootom right. Can any one please help? Second I am trying to get the .gif in the header to end with the bottom of t

Re: [css-d] Css help]

Angus, I'm not seeing any actual text in the tag. So, that's probably why it isn't showing up. Only your image is inside the tags. Barb Angus at InfoForce Services wrote: I am also lost why the h1 tag will not show. HTML: http://infoforce-services.com/personal/mackinnon_namehistory.ht

Re: [css-d] Css help

Angus - Here's what we're seeing directly from the source. There is no text there -- only an image tag. Angus at InfoForce Services wrote: Barbara Thank you for the reply. The text is in my HTML file between . HTML: http://infoforce-services.com/personal/mackinnon_namehistory.ht

Re: [css-d] Css help

Angus at InfoForce Services wrote: Matthew What I am trying to do Is: 1. get the "mackinnondress.gif" to extend from the left margin to the right margin, 2. Get the font in the "h1 {" to display, and 3. Move the document text to beneath the flag. Angus, 1. If you make the following

RE: [css-d] Css help

I assume that you are wanting "MacKinnon Name history" to be the . If my assumption is correct then you need to place that text inside the tag. Currently you have it placed inside a separate tag. As far as getting the to line up with the bottom of your flag image, try something like this: M

RE: [css-d] Css help

I am sorry, instead of text-align:text-bottom it should be vertical-align:text-bottom. Sorry about that. Steven Costello __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http:/

Re: [css-d] Css help

On Tue, 31 May 2005 14:26:32 -0400, Angus at InfoForce Services <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On a web page I am using two different .gifs. One .gif for my header and the other as a background from the top left where My heder ends to the bootom right. Can any one please help? Second I am trying

Re: [css-d] CSS glitch

1. can you post a url? 2. does the error occur on the same pc after you have closed all instances of IE? 3. have to tried removing element by element, starting from the 'inside' to try and locate the buggy elements? On 6/6/05, Daniel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However I'm getting a weird g

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

Alexander Khost wrote: I recently found a CSS expression hack for IE's lack of min-width support. Does anyone know if there is currently or are future plans for starting a cross-browser version of CSS expressions? Otherwise can anyone explain why expressions are a bad thing and should be avoide

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

Alexander Khost wrote: I recently found a CSS expression hack for IE's lack of min-width support. Welcome to the club... ...and IE-expressions can do a lot more than simulate min-width. Does anyone know if there is currently or are future

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:37:05 -0400, Kelly Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You CAN use expressions to dodge around some of IE's support problems. I thought there was some discussion about adding expressions to CSS, and note that if the user has Javascript disabled or security at a certain

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

From: "David Laakso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bingo! From the site you linked: "As it is now, these expressions can only be made to work in IE5.0+/win, and only in quirks mode. This at least give us a mean to overcome some of IE/win's shor

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

Al Sparber wrote: From the site you linked: "As it is now, these expressions can only be made to work in IE5.0+/win, and only in quirks mode. This at least give us a mean to overcome some of IE/win's shortcomings with regard to W3C's CSS standards as they are." This is wrong. I would quest

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

From: "Gunlaug Sørtun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Al Sparber wrote: From the site you linked: "As it is now, these expressions can only be made to work in IE5.0+/win, and only in quirks mode. This at least give us a mean to overcome some of IE/win's shortcomings with regard to W3C's CSS standards

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

Al Sparber wrote: I won't debate your personal preference versus mine - they both can achieve good results if handled properly. CSS expressions as advertised sometimes on this list lead to slutions that are not clear about quirks mode versus standards mode and can easily cause a recursive l

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

On 6/14/05, Don Hinshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Al Sparber wrote: > > > > > I won't debate your personal preference versus mine - they both can > > achieve good results if handled properly. CSS expressions as > > advertised sometimes on this list lead to slutions that are not clear > > about

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

If you put ANYTHING before the Doctype, IE6 will shift to quirks mode (page authors complain to Microsoft about this because the XML prolog, which is SUPPOSED to be first in XHTML, will put IE6 in quirks mode). Don Hinshaw wrote: Al Sparber wrote: I won't debate your personal preference ve

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

From: "Don Hinshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have a question about this: if using a DOCTYPE of: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> Is there any way to put IE into quirks mode such that CSS expressions can safely be used? Is it even necessary? I am trying to implement a solution using them a

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:14:13 -0400, Don Hinshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:[...] I have a question about this: if using a DOCTYPE of: "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> Is there any way to put IE into quirks mode such that CSS expressions can safely be used? Putting an XML declaration(

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:28:43 -0400, Alexander Khost wrote: > I recently found a CSS expression hack for IE's lack of min-width > support. > Alexander, There's also this CSS-only solution to min-width from Stu Nicholls: Be sure to read his (s

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

David Hucklesby schrieb: That's a clever idea. Thanks for linking. Ingo __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

Yes, thanks for that link, David! On 6/14/05, Ingo Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Hucklesby schrieb: > > > > > That's a clever idea. > Thanks for linking. > Ingo > __

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

David Hucklesby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's also this CSS-only solution to min-width from Stu Nicholls: > > By a strange coincidence, Mike Purvis also came up with this idea at about the same time, but with an added wrapper to all

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

Question about the Doctype needing to be on line 1 in the source.. With ASP, it is standard practice to set your @Language directive at the top of the page. I believe this causes an empty line to be written in the source. Since that is the first thing I usually do in a page, will that still affect

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

David Marr wrote: > Question about the Doctype needing to be on line 1 in the source.. > With ASP, it is standard practice to set your @Language directive at > the top of the page. I believe this causes an empty line to be written > in the source. Since that is the first thing I usually do in a pag

Re: [css-d] CSS Expressions

At 09:10 PM 6/17/2005, David Marr wrote: Question about the Doctype needing to be on line 1 in the source.. With ASP, it is standard practice to set your @Language directive at the top of the page. I believe this causes an empty line to be written in the source. Since that is the first thing I us

Re: [css-d] CSS Editor

At 01:52 -0400 7/7/05, Mendizabal wrote: Can anyone recommend a good cheap(free) CSS editor? I like the way Dreamweaver has auto-complete/hint but I don't like firing it up just for that. http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=CssEditors [putting on moderator hat] Seeing that this is a) holy

Re: [css-d] CSS Editor

Mendizabal wrote: Can anyone recommend a good cheap(free) CSS editor? I like the way Dreamweaver has auto-complete/hint but I don't like firing it up just for that. TIA __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss

Re: [css-d] CSS Editor

for PC i use PSPad For Mac i use BBEdit (which is not free) or NVU which is free. I dontknow if this is what you are looking for. Best. -jeremy Peggy Bart wrote: Mendizabal wrote: Can anyone recommend a good cheap(free) CSS editor? I like the way Dreamweaver has auto-complete/hint but I do

RE: [css-d] CSS help

> From: Angus > > 1. Center the text "You are located in" > 2. Get my USA flag to appear above the France flag with no > text on the left margin and the text "USA" centered on the right > 3. The text centered below the eye pictures. > HTML: http://choroideremia.org/index.php > CSS: http://choroid

Re: [css-d] css calendar

thank you. i will do that On 8/28/2005 5:57:53 PM, Mark Mckee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: hi all on my page here -- http://sixfoottwo.gotdns.com/~sixfoottwo/blog_.html in the top right i have a tabled calendar. i am new to css and am trying to eventually remove all tables from my sites. i hav

Re: [css-d] CSS input

> Hiya all > Greetings from Downunder. > Is there anyway to control how to style an input? > what I mean by this is > tell the difference between a button input and a textbox input? CSS 2 attribute selectors help, but are not supported by MSIE http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/selector.html#q10 input[ty

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

Vicki Stebbins wrote: Can someone tell me have they changed the validator? Vicki Vicki, There have been numerous posts and replies regarding the questions you've asked over the past 14days. Presumptuous of me, I know, but check this months archives. ~dL -- David Laakso http://www.dlaakso.

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

Vicki Stebbins wrote: At 11:37 AM 25/10/2005, David Laakso wrote: Vicki Stebbins wrote: Can someone tell me have they changed the validator? Vicki Vicki, There have been numerous posts and replies regarding the questions you've asked over the past 14days. Presumptuous of me, I know, but

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

At 11:37 AM 25/10/2005, David Laakso wrote: Vicki Stebbins wrote: Can someone tell me have they changed the validator? Vicki Vicki, There have been numerous posts and replies regarding the questions you've asked over the past 14days. Presumptuous of me, I know, but check this months archiv

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

> The answer to put a background color into everything doesn't quite work for > me, when I get the error: > 'You have no background-color with your color : p ' > Vicki, that's not an error, it's a warning. And warnings do not mean that your page doesn't validate. To be more specific, that particu

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

Many thanks Christian, It's certainly off-putting when the pages showed without the warnings and then suddenly, boom! David sent a link to a previous post which I hadn't received explaining the warnings. Now I've gone through them and yes you are quite right, about the warnings and my CSS

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >