Re: [css-d] min-width, width, max-width

Are yo using iframe or obj tag? See it works Ok here w/o those http://webdesignerwall.com/demo/elastic-videos/html5-video.html Check this out, it may help to solve your problem http://webdesignerwall.com/tutorials/css-elastic-videos Hakan Kirkan IT Manager http://miamirealestateinc.com Miami / F

Re: [css-d] min-width, width, max-width

I had a problem with the video aspect ratio that make me doubt of css and html. The problem however was within the aspect ratio and NOT html and css. To cut the story short: height: auto; max-width: 100%; do the job perfectly. I will pushing myself severely. Regards, mem

Re: [css-d] min-width, width, max-width

> > i don't really understand. Are you constraining the height somewhere else ? > I believe not. But perhaps that is what I should do ? > > This works perfectly fine in my test: > div { border: 2px solid red; max-width: 85%; } > video { max-width: 100%; height: auto; width: 100%; } > > The

Re: [css-d] min-width, width, max-width

Le 18 oct. 2012 à 21:06, mem a écrit : > Is there a way that you may know about, so that we can archive something like > this > > video { > max-width: 100%; > height: auto; > } > > BUT avoiding the scroll bar to appear, without using overflow:hidden; ? i don't really understand. Are you cons

Re: [css-d] min-width, width, max-width

On Oct 18, 2012, at 13:06 , mem wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm trying to make a certain video responsive. > width: 100% or max-width:100% and height: auto; will do. > > Now, the problem is, in order to maintain the aspect ratio, if the screen is > to wide, the height is so height that we will hav

Re: [css-d] min-width and min-height ignored on resizable elements

> But then you specify the resize property. I'm not sure what should > happen in this case. Gecko 2.0+ allow resizing downwards, > until the minimum size is reached. Webkit doesn't allow resizing. I have just tried Firefox 4 and indeed it works as expected there. So this seems to be Webkit-specifi

Re: [css-d] min-width and min-height ignored on resizable elements

On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Jarek Foksa wrote: > > > #box { > resize: both; > overflow: auto; > background: #ccc; > width: 500px; > height: 500px; > min-width: 100px; > min-height: 100px; > } > > It turns out that specified min-height and min-width values are > completely ignored and i

Re: [css-d] Min-Width Question

> Under what circumstances might a container that has min-width set not > grow beyond the size of min-width? If the container doesn't need to grow beyond min-width. To put that answer in the context of your previous question, browsers would rather expand down than out. If an item can wrap, it w

Re: [css-d] Min-Width Question

On 12/08/2009, at 6:59 AM, Christopher Barth wrote: > Under what circumstances might a container that has min-width set not > grow beyond the size of min-width? I'm not sure exactly what you mean by this question. Do you mean - what are some possible reasons as to why an element that you belie

Re: [css-d] min-width: reasonable value?

John wrote: > in a effort to make sure that my top banner is endless, no matter how > big the monitor, I've set a min-width value of 4000 pixels. > > is that considered bad coding? Strange, at least :-) Sounds like that banner will create a horizontal scrollbar even on my 3840 wide monitors. >

Re: [css-d] min-width: reasonable value?

John wrote: > in a effort to make sure that my top banner is endless, no matter how > big the monitor, I've set a min-width value of 4000 pixels. > > is that considered bad coding? what do other people do? > > thanks! > > > John > Is there a reason that "width: 100%" wouldn't work? It seems

Re: [css-d] min-width in IE 6 on inline/block element?

Sophie Dennis wrote: > In fact, isn't this the same as height/min-height? It isn't that > height in IE6 is *the same as* min-height. It's that IE will expand a > box to fit its content, regardless of height/width specified. So in > IE6 "height: 500px" won't give the same effect as "height: 100%;

Re: [css-d] min-width in IE 6 on inline/block element?

Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote: > Sophie Dennis wrote: > >> IE6 treats "width" as "min-width" >> > > No it doesn't. This is a common myth. IE treats height like min-height, > but not width like min-width. Case in point: make a page with a div with > a red background. Give it min-width 500px. Ob

Re: [css-d] min-width in IE 6 on inline/block element?

Sophie Dennis wrote: > IE6 treats "width" as "min-width" No it doesn't. This is a common myth. IE treats height like min-height, but not width like min-width. Case in point: make a page with a div with a red background. Give it min-width 500px. Observe that in Firefox the div will grow to fill

Re: [css-d] min-width in IE 6 on inline/block element?

Magenta Placenta wrote: > If you save out the following code and view locally, you'll see in > Firefox a min-width (red border) on certain > bullets. This is what I'm after. If you open in IE 6, that min-width > is not recognized. > > Is there a way to have min-width in IE 6 without resorting

Re: [css-d] min-width/masx-width and IE

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote: > >> I have never in my whole life been able to get those IE expressions >> to work, strangely. So I recommend just using JavaScript. >> > > Properly written and implemented IE expressions work every time at my end. > Good for you. :-)

Re: [css-d] min-width/masx-width and IE

I'm sorry - I always forget that on this list, you have to "reply ALL" to get it out to the list. I need to stamp this on my forehead or something. Thanks for the advice - Georg's conditional comment/expression thing worked like a charm. Zoe - I was having the same problem - the expression w

Re: [css-d] min-width/masx-width and IE

Zoe M. Gillenwater wrote: > I have never in my whole life been able to get those IE expressions > to work, strangely. So I recommend just using JavaScript. Properly written and implemented IE expressions work every time at my end. IE expressions are based on javascript, but "disguised" as CSS. U

Re: [css-d] min-width/masx-width and IE

Shelly wrote: > Hey all - > > I'm in need of some help here. I'm working on a site that I need to > have a minimum width of 960px, and a max-width of 1280px - centered > horizontally on the screen and with 3 columns. (If I can also > accomplish a "sticky footer", that's be awesome, as well - n

Re: [css-d] min-width/masx-width and IE

Can you post an example so we can gt a look at your page? -- Jono Young Designer | Developer | Illustrator Charleston Web Solutions "Bringing Higher Standards to the Lowcountry" http://www.charlestonwebsolutions.com/ __ css-d

Re: [css-d] min-width/masx-width and IE

Shelly wrote: > Would anyone have a tutorial or example or something that could point me > in the right direction for this? Think so :-) regards Georg -- http://www.gunlaug.no

Re: [css-d] min-width and IE

On 6/22/06, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Livingston wrote: > >> Your expression is still triggered by a "fixed" pixel-width, and doesn't > >> pick up and recalculate the trigger-point based on the browser's default > >> font-size. > >> > >> Try this... > >> > >> #wrapper { width:

Re: [css-d] min-width and IE

Tom Livingston wrote: > I am using this for min-width in IE: > > #wrapper{width:expression(document.body.clientWidth < 800 ? "799px" : > "100%" );} > > If I use ems (50ems) in place of the 799px, IE has a heart attack if > I scale the text up at the min-width. I'm not surprised :-) Pixels and

Re: [css-d] min-width

Guillaume wrote: >Does *min-width* behave the same way as min-height in standard friendly >browsers and in Ie, meaning: >min-width = min-width in standard friendly browsers >min-width = width in Ie. > > No. You can test this yourself by creating a test page and playing with it in FF, Opera,

Re: [css-d] Min-width/Max-width: IE PC/IE Mac too?

From: "Gunlaug Sørtun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Al Sparber wrote: >> As a point of information, we've had this page floating around a >> long >> time: http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/testing/minmax/cssp5.htm > > I've ran some of your solutions earlier, and found them a bit slow > and > "jerky".

Re: [css-d] Min-width/Max-width: IE PC/IE Mac too?

Al Sparber wrote: > As a point of information, we've had this page floating around a long > time: http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/testing/minmax/cssp5.htm I've ran some of your solutions earlier, and found them a bit slow and "jerky". No such problems with this one though - it worked really sm

Re: [css-d] Min-width/Max-width: IE PC/IE Mac too?

.com/pviiwebdev/ CSS Newsgroup: news://forums.projectseven.com/css/ RSS/XML Feeds: http://www.projectseven.com/xml/ - Original Message - From: "Gunlaug Sørtun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Michael Hulse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "css discuss" Sent: F

Re: [css-d] Min-width/Max-width: IE PC/IE Mac too?

Michael Hulse wrote: > Oh, I also just found this: > > (Gunlaug's IE-expressions in CSS) > http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_02_01.html#item3 Unless you prefer to put IE6 in quirks mode (like I do most of the time) then you may be better of with a version that works in both Strict and quirks

Re: [css-d] Min-width/Max-width: IE PC/IE Mac too?

On Dec 1, 2005, at 11:37 PM, Christian Montoya wrote: > I think you are the best judge of that. > Thanks for the response Christian, I really appreciate your time. :) I probably should not worry about IE/Mac, but I do (I am a Mac guy, and I also like the feeling of having my CSS look good in tha

Re: [css-d] Min-width/Max-width: IE PC/IE Mac too?

On 12/1/05, Michael Hulse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2. Should I be worried about the above expression breaking in IE7? If you are, use a conditional comment, [if lte IE 6] > > 3. How would I get min-width and max-width to work in IE/Mac? The > above expression appears to have

Re: [css-d] min-width/width setting with inputs

CJ Larson wrote: > I'm trying to create 3 divs that sit next to each other if there's > room and who move to the next line if there's not. I originally set > a "width: 31%" on them which worked great until I put a file upload > input inside. The text and headings still obey the width, but of > co

Re: [css-d] min-width

Thanks everyone. Jazz is freedom. - T. Monk www.panix.com/~cassidy __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- ht

Re: [css-d] min-width

From: "Al Sparber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It's not going to work on the body element. Wrap your entire layout in a DIV - or use this page as an example: http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/testing/minmax/flubber.htm Or if you want to get cute, you can really "flubberize" a page: http://www.proje

Re: [css-d] min-width

Michael Cassidy wrote: I've been trying to get a minimum width on my page. I'm having a problem with IE MAC & Windows; what I thought would work on IE Windows doesn't seem to be working [I know what I wrote is giving me a fixed window; its just to help to see if the coding is working]. Jaz

Re: [css-d] min-width

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:13:51 -0400, Michael Cassidy wrote: > I've been trying to get a minimum width on my page. > I'm having a problem with IE MAC & Windows; what I thought would > work on IE Windows doesn't seem to be working [I know what I wrote > is giving me a fixed window; its just to help t

Re: [css-d] min-width

From: "Michael Cassidy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I've been trying to get a minimum width on my page. I'm having a problem with IE MAC & Windows; IE Mac does not understand CSS expressions. You would need a full-blown script, but it would be a lot of code and work for a very small user base to fi