-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/17/99 11:57:24 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< This survey, if true, speaks volumes regarding education, mind control and
indoctrination - not to mention stupidity. Scary stuff. >>
You're on the right list, girl. Prudy
DECLARATION
CTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] PJ lied under oath?
> Date: Sunday, January 17, 1999 7:34 PM
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> In a message dated 1/16/99 6:18:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << What I read was that the guy was f
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
><< What I read was that the guy was fired not for publishing the study, but
> deliberately pushing up it's scheduled publication date to coincide with
> the impeachment hearings...apparantly it was originally scheduled to
> appear in
-Caveat Lector-
At 10:02 PM 1/17/99 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>In a message dated 1/17/99 10:03:57 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
><< We believe in 'such conspiracies', but we also know that Klinton has
> absolutely NO self-control, and is the sole cause of hi
-Caveat Lector-
[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
>In a message dated 1/17/99 10:03:57 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
><< We believe in 'such conspiracies', but we also know that Klinton has
> absolutely NO self-control, and is the sole cause of his own loss of
> 'credib
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/17/99 10:03:57 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< We believe in 'such conspiracies', but we also know that Klinton has
absolutely NO self-control, and is the sole cause of his own loss of
'credibility and reputation'. We also know that
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/16/99 6:18:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< What I read was that the guy was fired not for publishing the study, but
deliberately pushing up it's scheduled publication date to coincide with
the impeachment hearings...apparantly it
-Caveat Lector-
Linda: I am interested and appreciate your posts on the subject from
various sources.
Barb
At 09:59 AM 1/17/99 -0600, Linda Minor wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Barb Witt wrote:
>>Since you seem very convinced, and recite your story as if factual, it
>>would be helpful to me if y
-Caveat Lector-
At 09:41 AM 1/16/99 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>In a message dated 1/15/99 8:19:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
><< Sex, period. Not 'sexual relations', not 'sex act'...it's all parsing
> words, anyways, cuz anyone with half a brain knows sex
-Caveat Lector-
from:
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/bushclin.htm
Bush Gang Suspected In New Assault on the Presidency
by Edward Spannaus and Jeffrey Steinberg
Printed in The Executive Intelligence Review, February 6, 1998.
-Caveat Lector-
from:
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/britolig.htm
The British Oligarchy Moves To Oust President Clinton
by Jeffrey Steinberg
Printed in The Executive Intelligence Review, February 6, 1998.
The British monarchy, in league with elements of a vast Anglophile apparat
-Caveat Lector-
from:
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/clintime.htm
Timeline:
The Assault on the Presidency
by Edward Spannaus and Jeffrey Steinberg
Printed in The Executive Intelligence Review, February 6, 1998.
--
April 1991: Linda Tripp goes to work for the Bush White House as
-Caveat Lector-
Barb Witt wrote:
>Since you seem very convinced, and recite your story as if factual, it
>would be helpful to me if you could provide at least one or two specific
>details, eg, who are the members of this cabal, how do they choose their
>victims, are they all the victims of this
-Caveat Lector-
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Linda Minor wrote:
>suspicious. (Who would have ever thought 35 years later people like some of
>us on this list are still determined to find out who did it.) So the next
>best option is to destroy the credibility and reputation of the individual.
>If you d
-Caveat Lector-
At 06:02 PM 1/16/99 -0600, LM wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Assuming, arguendo, that your imaginary scenario is true, it proves nothing
>other than Clinton is lacking in self-control and easily manipulated. The
>rest is entertaining, but clearly irrelevant.
>
>Barb
>
>
>On
-Caveat Lector-
Assuming, arguendo, that your imaginary scenario is true, it proves nothing
other than Clinton is lacking in self-control and easily manipulated. The
rest is entertaining, but clearly irrelevant.
Barb
On the contrary. It indicates a well-orchestrated cabal planned a
-Caveat Lector-
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>It's interesting as a matter of discussion, but for some it's a matter of
>getting fired. According to the AP writer, Brenda Coleman (reported in my
>morning paper), one Dr. George D. Lundberg, editor of The Journal of the
>American
-Caveat Lector-
At 12:17 PM 1/15/99 -0600, Linda Minor wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Carlene M. Wojahn wrote:
>>>
>>> Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't the only thing Clinton admitted
>to
>>> lying about the fact that he had sex with Monica Lewinsky?
>>
>>Ahhh...but he hasn't admitte
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/15/99 8:19:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Sex, period. Not 'sexual relations', not 'sex act'...it's all parsing
words, anyways, cuz anyone with half a brain knows sex = sex act = sexual
relations >>
It's interesting as a ma
-Caveat Lector-
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I have to agree with him. He wasn't having sexual relations and neither was
>she. There was a sex act. I'm sorry, but sexual relations, it's not. Prudy
I remember Klinton wagging his finger to the camera, telling the American
pu
-Caveat Lector-
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Linda Minor wrote:
>The point so many people seem to be missing
No, most of us aren't 'missing' it, we recognize that it's not relevant.
>is that this whole scandal
>started with a lawsuit brought by a woman whose credibility is severely in
>question, at a
-Caveat Lector-
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Agent Smiley wrote:
>Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't the only thing Clinton admitted to
>lying about the fact that he had sex with Monica Lewinsky?
It doesn't matter WHAT he lied about, what matters is that he gave
perjured testimony to the Paula Jon
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/15/99 9:37:38 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Ahhh...but he hasn't admitted that..you see they didn't have sexual
relations...he wasn't having any with her, she was having relations with him.
>>
I have to agree with him. He
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/14/99 11:28:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< Book says Paula's timeline was way off
One thing that should be clear four years after Paula Jones filed her
case against President Clinton is when the incident allegedly
happened. But
-Caveat Lector-
Carlene M. Wojahn wrote:
>>
>> Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't the only thing Clinton admitted
to
>> lying about the fact that he had sex with Monica Lewinsky?
>
>Ahhh...but he hasn't admitted that..you see they didn't have sexual
>relations...he wasn't having any
-Caveat Lector-
>
> Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't the only thing Clinton admitted to
> lying about the fact that he had sex with Monica Lewinsky?
Ahhh...but he hasn't admitted that..you see they didn't have sexual
relations...he wasn't having any with her, she was having relat
-Caveat Lector-
>
> >Ah, facts, how nice. Pity this sort doesn't make the soundbytes. :-)
>
> I didn't read any 'facts', just some more allegations, albeit from the
> perspective of Klinton supporters...
>
> If the timetable is indeed such a 'bombshell' which the Klintonistas
> planned to '
-Caveat Lector-
>Ah, facts, how nice. Pity this sort doesn't make the soundbytes. :-)
I didn't read any 'facts', just some more allegations, albeit from the
perspective of Klinton supporters...
If the timetable is indeed such a 'bombshell' which the Klintonistas
planned to 'drop at the trial',
28 matches
Mail list logo
