I will be away from my office from Aug 20 to 27 and returning on Aug 28, 2003.
Please
contact Sharon Chan at 822-8007/[EMAIL PROTECTED] while I am away for co-op
inquiries.
.
Hello world,
I had been hoping that I wouldn't have to resort to adding a stick to
the various carrots, but evidently we have developers who aren't taking
care to measure twice before cutting once.
The 0-day NMU period has *not* started, and will not start until the 23rd.
People who abuse this pr
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 12:47:44PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Dateline!
> > [snip]
> So, where does dpkg 2.0 fit into this? I can commit to a 1 month finish
> date(from now), for implementing the features we desire for it.
If by "dpkg 2.0" you mean
Thank You for your inquiry regarding one of our Recreational Vehicles. We are
Currently processing your information request and will be responding shortly.
Thanks Again,
Dennis Charron
General Manager
Giant Recreation World
1-800-654-8475
http://www.grwrv.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:44:22PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> The negative effect for the users is that you can't upgrade python
> while wxgtk-python is installed so you can't try out the
> latest-and-greatest python in the meantime. This is the issue at
> hand.
Sure you can:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:16:03AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:38:10PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> >
> > If they get hit by a bus, reassigned by their job to Outer Mongolia, or
> > just plain get bored with doing it, we lose that benefit entirely, as
> > things stand
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s):
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator
to do so.
For your reference, here are th
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s):
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator
to do so.
For your reference, here are th
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s):
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator
to do so.
For your reference, here are th
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s):
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator
to do so.
For your reference, here are th
Hi Steve,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:02:44AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:40:26PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
>
> > If you, or anyone else, is interested shipping those overseas could be
> > arranged (with the caveat that glass might break in transit). I need to
> > kn
V I R U S A L E R T
Our viruschecker found the
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus(es) in your email to the following recipient(s):
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please check your system for viruses, or ask your system administrator
to do so.
For your reference, here are th
Quoting Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le mar 19/08/2003 à 23:33, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > Ok, let's google a bit, and shazaam !
> >
> http://www.linex.org/sources/linex/debian/linex/nvidia-glx_1.0.4349-1_i386.deb
> > Oh ! non-free software !
> >
> > Thanks Richard for keeping me la
Great, the debian-legal discussions moved to debian-devel.
Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Now consider that most or all of the FSF documentation for their GPL'ed
> software is released under the GFDL. The licenses are incompatible so
> someone who forks a project cannot cut a
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 08:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I'm all for aggressive goals, let's aim for sometime in December -- how
> about 2003-12-01 00:00:00 UTC?
Do you have some Official Opinion(tm)[1] as the RM about what KDE, gcc, X,
gnome versions will be in sarge?
greetings
-- vbi
[1] avoi
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:00:15PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>> Is there any way to find out who uploaded a given package?
[...]
> You need to find the .changes file. If the upload closes any bugs, you
> can extract it from the BTS,
[...]
> Failing tha
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just wondered if it would be possible for non-developper
> > contributors to Debian to get their GPG key in the Debian keyserver.
> [...]
> > This trust relationship would be eased if I could sign my mai
Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Regarding a future Date: field for each package in Packages files,
> * Should the field be called Date: or Time:?
> * Should it be like "Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:09:30 GMT" or "1061315862"?
> * Should it refer to the time the developer finished wrapping the
>
* Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-20 10:31]:
> > Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I just wondered if it would be possible for non-developper
> > > contributors to Debian to get their GPG key in the Debian keyserver.
>
> You can also apply as a NM for translation w
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Tuesday 19 August 2003 08:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> > I'm all for aggressive goals, let's aim for sometime in December -- how
> > about 2003-12-01 00:00:00 UTC?
>
> Do you have some Officia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-19 21:14, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 2003-08-17 09:02, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > As bad as it might be I would like to have a menu tree containing all
> > > packages that can be configured
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 10:13, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 August 2003 08:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > I'm all for aggressive goals, let's aim for sometime in December -- how
> > >
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 06:46:34PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-20 10:31]:
> > > Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I just wondered if it would be possible for non-developper
> > > > contributors to Debian to get their GPG key i
> "cobaco" == cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
cobaco> kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any
cobaco> chance we'll wait for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't
cobaco> apply again immediately after release?
But does the first few paragraphs of RM's o
Am 20.08.03 um 11:08:28 schrieb cobaco:
> kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any chance we'll
> wait
> for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't apply again immediately after
> release?
It's not KDE 4, so it doesn't really matter that much. And it probably
won't be GN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 11:47, Isaac To wrote:
> > "cobaco" == cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> cobaco> kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any
> cobaco> chance we'll wait for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't
>
Recipient of the infected attachment: Bradley, Leisa\Inbox
Subject of the message: Re: Wicked screensaver
One or more attachments were quarantined.
Attachment movie0045.pif was Quarantined for the following reasons:
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was found.
<>
> "cobaco" == cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
cobaco> Basically, it's the difference between having a sysadmin
cobaco> spending fifteen minutes every day or week tweaking your server
cobaco> to keep it running, or having a sysadmin come in for a week once
cobaco> a year to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 12:10, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Am 20.08.03 um 11:08:28 schrieb cobaco:
> > kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any chance we'll
> > wait for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't apply again
> > immediately after
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:10:18PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
| Am 20.08.03 um 11:08:28 schrieb cobaco:
| > kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any chance we'll
wait
| > for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't apply again immediately
after
| > release?
|
| It's no
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 12:19:03PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Hi.
(...)
>
> So, how to make the init scripts localized?
>
> What do you think?
>
/etc/default/language? I believe this has been discussed previously, see
for example [1] and debian-boot [2].
From briefly looking at redhat's re
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:08:28AM +0200, cobaco wrote:
> On 2003-08-20 10:13, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 19 August 2003 08:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > I'm all for aggressive goals, let's aim for sometime in Decem
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 03:16:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I had been hoping that I wouldn't have to resort to adding a stick to
> the various carrots, but evidently we have developers who aren't taking
> care to measure twice before cutting once.
>
> The 0-day NMU period has *not* started,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 12:36, Isaac To wrote:
> > "cobaco" == cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why KDE cannot be used on servers (how about a X terminal server? You
> don't have to set it up?)
not what I meant: off course it can be used on a server,
> Package: spip
> Version: 1.6.0-2
> Severity: normal
>
> The prerm script blindly deletes the following directories and all
> subdirectories:
>
>/var/cache/spip
>/usr/share/spip/ecrire/upload
>/usr/share/spip/ecrire/data
>
> There is no guarantee that the files in these directories
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 12:43, Colin Watson wrote:
> There's a big difference between being out of date by a major version
> and by a minor version.
agreed, though IMHO kde 3.1.2 -> 3.1.3 is a minor version upgrade and
3.1 -> 3.2 is a major version upgrade
>
I realise that running unstable I'm kind of sailing close to the wind,
and don't want to put anyones back up, but kpackage really seems to be
somewhat challenged when trying to install the latest KDE updates that
are in unstable... Perhaps unstable should extend to 'it may
beinstallable or not'
I am currently out of the office.
Please visit our web site:
www.patchworkbydesign.com
WHOLESALE PRICE LIST:
Accessories:
Crib Sheet: $19.00
Toile Crib Sheet:$34.00
3pc Sheet Set: $29.95
Diaper Stacker: $49.00
Valance: $25.00
Toile Valanc
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
> If by "dpkg 2.0" you mean "rewritten dpkg and dpkg-dev", it doesn't. There
> is no chance that a package management system that hasn't seen the light
> of day, let alone reached beta test, will be ready for release in four
> months, let alone one.
Just
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 20:48, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> There were pretty major changes between KDE 3 and KDE 3.1. As a Debian
Anyone who wants to can establish their own repository for back-ported KDE
packages. KDE has a good history of having people do that, at times there
have been 3 or more ba
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:48:28PM +0100, Hamish Marson wrote:
> Anyone know where I can get an apt blessed version of libvorbis0? Or
> am I just missing a package URL in apt?
As far as Sid is concerned I believe it's already libvorbis0a. There is
no more libvorbis0 there. Perhaps the KDE packages
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 01:40:53PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
>
> > We're never going to manage to release just
> > after high-profile releases of all our major components, so let's not
> > delay for this one unless we have to.
> true enough, still releasing a week before a high-profile release of KDE i
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:49:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Also make sure to include some leg room if you depend on packages that
> have a tendency to be buggy (glibc, for example).
The new glibc has already stalled the progress into testing of a large
number of packages, and the number of
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 01:26:17PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
> > and why on stable you do not expect a stable KDE?
> kde 3.2. will be the stable kde release come 8 december
The reality is that if KDE 3.2 is stable in KDE, and it entered
testing on December 8th, it would probably delay the release of
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:24:25PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:
>
> > How about requiring the debian directory to have an appropriately
> > named parent (as determined by debian/changelog and debian/control,
> > which should probably also have to a
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:38:57PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
> On 2003-08-20 12:10, Michael Piefel wrote:
> > Am 20.08.03 um 11:08:28 schrieb cobaco:
> > > kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is there any chance we'll
> > > wait for it, just so the outdated kde label doesn't apply again
> >
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:11:20PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
> Note that the RM was talking about servers there, while kde is end-user
> software, big difference IMHO. Taking into account that kde isn't
> server-software and that kde won't do release if there are major bugs left I
> don't think stabi
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-18
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: DeFX
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Franco Catrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://defx.sourceforge.net/
* License : (GPL.)
Description : Multi-effects process
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:48:28PM +0100, Hamish Marson wrote:
> I realise that running unstable I'm kind of sailing close to the wind,
> and don't want to put anyones back up, but kpackage really seems to be
> somewhat challenged when trying to install the latest KDE updates that
> are in unsta
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-20
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: DeFX
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Franco Catrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://defx.sourceforge.net
* License : (GPL.)
Description : Multi-effects processo
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:49:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> > Also make sure to include some leg room if you depend on packages that
> > have a tendency to be buggy (glibc, for example).
>
> The new glibc has already stalled the progress into tes
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:11:20PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
> Basically, it's the difference between having a sysadmin
> spending fifteen minutes every day or week tweaking your server to keep
> it running, or having a sysadmin come in for a week once a year to do a
> major upgrade.
> Note that the RM
Le mer 20/08/2003 à 13:48, Hamish Marson a écrit :
> Perhaps unstable should extend to 'it may
> beinstallable or not' as well as the stability of the software (Although
> I don't find many really big problems in it usually).
That's exactly what unstable is meant to be.
> However... trying to i
Уважаемые коллеги!
Уникальная возможность всего за неделю узнать все технологии, необходимые для
эффективной работы
директора по маркетингу!
Сотрудниками нашего Учебного Центра был проведен опрос руководителей
маркетинговых служб, компаний,
работающих как на корпоративном рынке В2В, так и на п
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 15:33, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:11:20PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
> > Note that the RM was talking about servers there, while kde is end-user
> > software, big difference IMHO. Taking into account that kde isn't
> > ser
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003, Gaetan Ryckeboer wrote:
> >/var/cache/spip
> >/usr/share/spip/ecrire/upload
> >/usr/share/spip/ecrire/data
>
> All right. I understand the problem. But the directories removed by the
> postrm/purge are normaly only used :
> - by user, to upload datas related to h
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:25:01PM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:48:28PM +0100, Hamish Marson wrote:
> > Anyone know where I can get an apt blessed version of libvorbis0? Or am
> > I just missing a package URL in apt?
>
> As far as Sid is concerned I believe it's
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:48:15PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:02:44AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:40:26PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
> >
> > > If you, or anyone else, is interested shipping those overseas could be
> > > arra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 15:27, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:38:57PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
> > On 2003-08-20 12:10, Michael Piefel wrote:
> > > Am 20.08.03 um 11:08:28 schrieb cobaco:
> > > > kde 3.2 release is slated for 8th december[1], is
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 13:30, Russell Coker wrote:
> KDE 1.x was quite usable, while many of the beta releases in the 2.x and
> early 3.x series weren't...
That's why they're called betas :)
I don't think this whole discussion fits in here, for 2 reasons:
- the KDE conference (which will pro
Op wo 20-08-2003, om 13:26 schreef cobaco:
> On 2003-08-20 12:36, Isaac To wrote:
> > > "cobaco" == cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Why KDE cannot be used on servers (how about a X terminal server? You
> > don't have to set it up?)
> not what I meant: off course it can be used on a
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 03:52:42PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:49:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Also make sure to include some leg room if you depend on packages that
> > > have a tendency to be buggy (glibc, for
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I really like this idea, thank you! I will accept directory names
Thanks. :-)
> matching the regexp /^$package(-.*)?$/ - does that seem reasonable?
Yep, though I might change the * to a +.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debi
* Martin Quinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> $ LC_ALL=C gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --recv-keys E145F334
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: Total number processed: 0
>
> This is the ID of my key, available from www.keyserver.net and signed by 2
> DD. Did I mess something up ?
key
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:49:33AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:49:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Also make sure to include some leg room if you depend on packages that
> > have a tendency to be buggy (glibc, for example).
> The new glibc has already stalled the p
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 06:48:51PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> There were pretty major changes between KDE 3 and KDE 3.1. As a Debian
> user, I'd be rather miffed if a new version of KDE came out within a
> week of sarge being released ... on the other hand, if sarge is to be
> frozen in a cou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-08-20 15:17, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> You're trying to say that it's impossible for an organization to install
> some thousands of X terminals that all run KDE (which, of course, is
> installed on the server)?
not what I'm trying to say
>Or
Recipient of the infected attachment: DC3, UniteU\Mailbox Store (DC3), Paige
Obrien/Inbox
Subject of the message: Re: Details
One or more attachments were intercepted and deleted
Attachment document_9446.pif was Deleted for the following reasons:
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] was found.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 01:45:09PM +0200, Gaetan Ryckeboer wrote:
> > Package: spip
> > Version: 1.6.0-2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > The prerm script blindly deletes the following directories and all
> > subdirectories:
> >
> >/var/cache/spip
> >/usr/share/spip/ecrire/upload
> >/usr/
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Brian May wrote:
> When Jaldhar takes about dependancies, I assume he means normal
> "Depends", not "Build-Depends"???
>
Correct.
[...]
> Source package has the following files (note: this is called a "source
> package" not a "binary package"):
>
> webmin_1.100.orig.tar.gz
i've had cable
connectivity with charter.net for more than 1 year. until yesterday i've never
had need of an email acct there. i planned on using the address at charter when
the spam at my top-10 acct became unbearable. when i finally got my log-in info
for the charter acct. i logged in and
Le Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:26:14AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins a écrit :
> > All right. I understand the problem. But the directories removed by
> > the postrm/purge are normaly only used :
> > - by user, to upload datas related to his spip installation,
> Is this uploaded data recorded anywhere? In t
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:32:03PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> I don't see why it would be idiotic to fork the package.
> If you can package this application better than the
> current maintainer then go ahead and do so.
Forking packages outside of Debian might or might not achieve the goals
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:23:47AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 06:46:34PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-20 10:31]:
> > > > Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I just wondered if it would be possible
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yep. And given that upstream offers webmin as an all-in-one solution to
> web-based management needs, I don't really see any reason why they
> shouldn't be kept lock-step with one another.
As Debian developers our goal is to make an integrated OS whic
Greetings,
Installing a new kernel package can be a bit of a pain, especially for
newbies, what with hand-editing lilo.conf or config files for other
bootloaders, from grub to yaboot/quik, aboot, palo, you name it. Yes,
the kernel-image postinst runs lilo, but lilo.conf is invariably out of
date,
Hello,
The package barrendero is a candidate for removal from testing. It has
two RC bugs, no response from the maintainer, and the upstream website
seems to have vanished (the maintainer is also upstream). It seems like
a useful tool:
Description: Deletes messages on the spool dir depending on
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 08:35, JÃrÃme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Le mar 19/08/2003 Ã 23:33, Mike Hommey a Ãcrit :
> > > Ok, let's google a bit, and shazaam !
> > >
> > http://www.linex.org/sources/linex/debian/linex/nvidia-glx_1.0.4349-1_i386.deb
> > > O
[ Moved to debian-devel, I don't think this is relevant to private as
the GNU crack is well publicised ]
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 14:58, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 12:35:44PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:51, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > What do you s
Quoting Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > No he wouldn't. FDL is about free documentation. :-)
> >
> Except it isn't :-)
According to you :-)
--
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:16:10 -0400 (EDT), Jaldhar H Vyas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Then the source should be split in a way that the normal
>> debian/rules files work and common files (like headers) stuffed
>> into a -dev package you can buil
Hi, Steve Langasek wrote:
> KDE3.2 doesn't miss the deadline by 7 days, it misses the deadline by
> almost two months:
>
Uh, you've got that turned around. October is not _missing_ the deadline,
that's _beating_ it.
> * October 15th
>Final, last-minute, low-risk bug fixes only
.. which means
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok. Lets leave aside for a moment the .debs which would go into contrib
> or non-free so would have to be built seperately. What happens if
> webmin-squid has an RC bug? As Goswin said, all the webmin-* packages
> will be held back from testing.
Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 06:46:34PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-20 10:31]:
> > > > Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I just wondered if it would be possible for non-developper
>
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 03:52:42PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Will we some day consider seriously the idea of autobuilders compiling
> > against testing those packages which do not need libraries from
> > unstable to be built?
>
> Do you foresee an
On approximately Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:06:15AM -0400, David Smith wrote:
> i've had cable connectivity with charter.net for more than 1 year. until
> yesterday i've never had need of an email acct there. i planned on using the
> address at charter when the spam at my top-10 acct became unbearable
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, cobaco wrote:
> I'd agree if there had been a rewrite of kdelibs or something, but kde 3.1 ->
> 3.2 is evolutionary without big changes to what was already there.
It does not take a big change to break software...
e.g., openssh changed a message and the sftp kioslave broke
htt
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:24:25PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron M. Ucko) writes:
> >
> > > How about requiring the debian directory to have an appropriately
> > > named parent (as determined by debian/changelog and deb
Hi, I'm Troy McClure - you may remeber me from such threads as "How do we
get Debian to have a useful release timeframe", and... *er, wait*.
Okay, that sillyness aside...
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:51:16AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> Better to have a hard freeze schedule, and then try to tur
Hi, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> If its hoop-jumping then it must be intentional. Point is it happens.
>
> Who cares? We cannot build an automated system here that will be able
> to stop people doing things like that.
Why not? Just block binary uploads completely, and let everything get
built by th
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:38:42PM +0200, Gaetan Ryckeboer wrote:
> Le Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:26:14AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins a ?crit :
> >
> > Is this uploaded data recorded anywhere? In the MySQL database
> > perhaps? If so, the file names can be retrieved from there for
> > removal on purge.
David Smith writes:
> my first assumption is that charter sells their users email addresses.
> does anyone on this list know how an unused email address that has never
> been used can have spam without the ip giving the address out?
Did you use 'dsmith' as the user name for the charter.net account
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-20
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gaim-encryption
Version : 2.06
Upstream Author : Bill Tompkins
* URL : http://gaim-encryption.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : Gaim plugin that provide
Hi,
I've wrote initial draft of debian ruby policy
http://pkg-ruby.alioth.debian.org/ruby-policy.html/index.html
Comments are welcome.
First, I'll intent to package ruby-defaults soon, which provides ruby and
libruby packages in which this ruby policy documents is included, and
rename current ru
Le Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:34:40AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins a écrit :
> > Mmm... yes and no. Some of them could be. But a user may upload files
> > without using them in the application. So, the files are available,
> > but unused, and unreferenced.
>
> That would appear to be a deficiency of the
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ruby-defaults
Version : 1.6.8
Upstream Author : Fumitoshi UKAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Akira Yamada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Akira Tagoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:33:12PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 August 2003 22:12, Martin Schulze wrote:
[...]
> > [2]Libranet 2.8, which is based on Debian. Richard Stallman [3]said
> > he now prefers the [4]GNU/LinEx distribution over Debian because of
> > non-free software on our
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:40:02AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Martin Quinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > $ LC_ALL=C gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --recv-keys E145F334
> > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > gpg: Total number processed: 0
> >
> > This is the ID of my key, available
cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2003-08-19 21:14, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On 2003-08-17 09:02, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > > As bad as it might be I would like to have a menu tree containing all
> > > > packages that can be configured
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:04:40 -0400 (EDT), Jaldhar H Vyas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Ok. Lets leave aside for a moment the .debs which would go into
> contrib or non-free so would have to be built seperately. What
Whoa there. Are you telling me that webmin's orig.tar.gz that
is in ma
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
