On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:38:51PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:05:41PM +1000, Geoff Crompton wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Ref http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14793
> >
> > The kernel team is aware of this issue, and fixes are in the kernel
>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:05:41PM +1000, Geoff Crompton wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Severity: important
>
> Ref http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14793
>
> The kernel team is aware of this issue, and fixes are in the kernel
> teams svn at svn.debian.org.
>
> I created this report so as I could
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:25:57PM +1000, Geoff Crompton wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
> Version: 2.6.8-16
> Severity: important
>
> In http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14790 a memory leak is reported in
> the linux kernel.
>
> They reference
> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/gi
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:29:29AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
> [snip]
> > I think I'll just try building out of the linux-2.6 Debian source package.
> >
> > Where is the svn for Debian's linux-2.6 kernel tree?
>
> http://svn.debian.org/ , Project "kernel".
>
> > I'
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:29:29AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
> [snip]
> > I think I'll just try building out of the linux-2.6 Debian source package.
> >
> > Where is the svn for Debian's linux-2.6 kernel tree?
>
> http://svn.debian.org/ , Project "kernel".
>
> > I'
reassign 323183 ftp.debian.org
thanks
As requested, here is an updated list of kernel and related packages
to be removed at this time. This does not include 2.6.8 and related
packages. Its probably best to handle them in a separate bug
once d-i no longer needs them.
kernel-source-2.4.24
kernel-so
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:50:26AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:19:37AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:35:47AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > (...)
> > Thanks, hopefully we can get to the bottom of this sooner rather
> > than later
Hi,
I noticed two potential problems while trying to manipulate
the kernel configs to consistently turn USB_BANDWIDTH on or off.
1) split-config does not seem to work with architecures such as
amd64 and powerpc where the architecture name the kernel
uses differes from the name that debian u
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
Ref http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14793
The kernel team is aware of this issue, and fixes are in the kernel
teams svn at svn.debian.org.
I created this report so as I couldn't find this issue mentioned in the
BTS. Please tag it with security and sarge.
Package: kernel
Version: 2.6.12-6
I upgraded from 2.6.10 kernel to 2.6.12 and my
Thinkpad T20 (a) fails to load speedstep.
I downgraded to 2.6.10 kernel and it works fine again.
My T23 had NO similar problem.
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editor
Geoff Crompton wrote:
> Just FYI, this has been assigned CAN-2005-2802.
>
Oops. Just noticed that this has actually been assigned CAN-2005-2872,
which is the one that is actually referenced in all the debian kernel
svn logs. Sorry!
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-2802
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:29:13PM +0200, Daniel Svensson wrote:
> Hi
>
> CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH is enabled by default in the debian kernel. Could
> this be changed? According to the alsa developer who helped me debug the
> problem with my usb soundcard CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH should be disabled.
> Th
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:19:37AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:35:47AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > (...)
> Thanks, hopefully we can get to the bottom of this sooner rather
> than later
I hope so too :)
> With regards to pcmcia-modules-2.4.26-i386.
> I notice tha
Just FYI, this has been assigned CAN-2005-2802.
--
Geoff Crompton
Debian System Administrator
Strategic Data
+61 3 9340 9000
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: important
In http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14790 a memory leak is reported in
the linux kernel.
They reference
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=729d70f5dfd663b44bca68a4479c96bde7e535d6
w
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:35:47AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
[snip]
> > I suggest that we just track this as 323183, rather than mucking around
> > with opening and merging existing bugs. Please let me know if you would
> > prefer a different approach.
>
> No, that is fine. Having just
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:48:46PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 12:41 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Andres mentioned we should get 2.6.12-7 out ASAP, so i am not entirely sure
> > about this. I would vote for this too, and maybe wait for 2.6.13 until we
> > get
> > the init*
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Thinking again about this: an hotplug udeb is not be strictly needed,
> because current versions of udev already provide the hotplug multiplexer.
>
> The hotplug package currently provides:
> - a firmware loader hotplug agent
> - support for hotplug of network devices
> - col
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 11:18 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:51:18PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/
> > >
> > > I have done a second build, with the following changes, as
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:27:32PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:54:04AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:01:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I write this email to ask, now that linux-2.6 2.6.12-6 is in testing,
> > > there
In linux.debian.kernel Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>there already is support for udev in d-i; what's currently missing is a
>udeb for hotplug.
Thinking again about this: an hotplug udeb is not be strictly needed,
because current versions of udev already provide the hotplug multiplexer.
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 11:18 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:51:18PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/
> > >
> > > I have done a second build, with the following changes, as
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 12:41 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Andres mentioned we should get 2.6.12-7 out ASAP, so i am not entirely sure
> about this. I would vote for this too, and maybe wait for 2.6.13 until we get
> the init* issue sorted out.
I just committed a fix to .12 & .13 that repairs a probl
A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
[snip]
> I think I'll just try building out of the linux-2.6 Debian source package.
>
> Where is the svn for Debian's linux-2.6 kernel tree?
http://svn.debian.org/ , Project "kernel".
> I'd like to run
> svn blame to see where the changelog line came from:
>
>- re
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:50:19PM -0400, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
> Sven Luther writes:
>- readdition of tg3 driver, as firmware license has been fixed.
>
> Maybe that wasn't quite right. I think that your interpretation of the
> fix in firmware license is that it improves the situation fro
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:45:54PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Currently the modules are grouped per hand in .udebs, partly artificially,
> > partly because they belong to some wide group, and the dependencies are
> > handled by hand.
>
> THe above statement is incorrect. Rea
Sven Luther writes:
> > # CONFIG_TIGON3 is not set
> >
> > :( - since this Xserve G5 needs that to network.
>
> Waht can i say ? Don't use hardware which needs non-free drivers.
>
> Now, if they are not freed, we have some non-free modules, including tg3 i
> think, which needs to be buil
Sven Luther wrote:
> Which was a missing .udeb indeed
No it wasn't:
| Added nls_utf8 to fs-common-modules (Closes: #327891).
> introduced by a change in the hfsplus module, or by a change in d-i. That
> said, this is orthogonal to the issues discussed here. Also notice that if we
> had one-modu
Sven Luther wrote:
> Currently the modules are grouped per hand in .udebs, partly artificially,
> partly because they belong to some wide group, and the dependencies are
> handled by hand.
THe above statement is incorrect. Read
/usr/share/kernel-wedge/commands/copy-modules or even the documentati
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:56:39PM -0400, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
> Version: 2.6.12-6
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Upon reading "Announcing powerpc backport 2.6.12-6 kernel package for sarge",
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/09/msg00135.html ,
Package: ftp.debian.org
Support for 2.4 kernels on ia64 will be dropped for etch. I've already
removed ia64/2.4 support from d-i:
ok, I see it
I think we can remove the 2.4 udebs for ia64
joeyh: great - i'll file the f.d.o. bugs then
So, please remove the following packages from sid:
- kern
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: wishlist
Upon reading "Announcing powerpc backport 2.6.12-6 kernel package for sarge",
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/09/msg00135.html ,
I figured I would give that a try on an Xserve G5.
I notice that
/usr/share/do
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:45:25PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Which was a missing .udeb indeed, and quite bothersome. Not sure if it was
> introduced by a change in the hfsplus module, or by a change in d-i. That
> said, this is orthogonal to the issues discussed here. Also notice that if we
> had
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:39:56PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:45:25PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Which was a missing .udeb indeed, and quite bothersome. Not sure if it was
> > introduced by a change in the hfsplus module, or by a change in d-i. That
> > said, thi
Hi,
since kernel 2.6.13 has not appeared in Debian yet (hint, hint !), I had
a chance to reboot my system, so here is the requested info:
# dmsetup ls
hda1(253, 0)
hdb1(253, 1)
# dmsetup info hda1
Name: hda1
State: ACTIVE
Tables present:LIVE
Open count:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:56:38PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Nope, but i don't think there is a real problem in making d-i kernel
> > .udebs working for d-i, if said kernels already worked outside of d-i.
>
> It's odd that you say this when you have just finished tracking do
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 325070 + pending
Bug#325070: XFS - invalid module format
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
tags 325070 + pending
thanks
Peter's patch does the trick, so I've included it in svn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sven Luther wrote:
> Nope, but i don't think there is a real problem in making d-i kernel
> .udebs working for d-i, if said kernels already worked outside of d-i.
It's odd that you say this when you have just finished tracking down
#327891, which is a perfect example of the kind of issue that can
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:09:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Mmm, why is this tripple need of holding udeb state necessary ?
>
> Well, look at the code to main-menu, anna, and udpkg..
Hehe, will do in Oldenbourg.
> > Would not solving this go a great way for diminishing g
Sven Luther wrote:
> Mmm, why is this tripple need of holding udeb state necessary ?
Well, look at the code to main-menu, anna, and udpkg..
> Would not solving this go a great way for diminishing general memory
> usage anyway ?
No, this is not the current high water mark for memory usage in d-i
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:04:27AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lib/debian/unstable>for d in *2.6.12*; do dpkg --contents
> $d; done |grep \.ko |wc -l
> 340
Does that include the missing modules like sata-uli, ahci, etc? Well at
least they were missing from the udeb building pac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> reassign 328242 linux-2.6
Bug#328242: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64: This kernel does not boot on Mac
G5s (7, 2 and 7, 3). It does not get past the first screen.
Bug reassigned from
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:45:12AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:04:27AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > > Well doing a list of the modules in the current linux-image-2.6.12 on
> > > > i386, and then deleting from the list so
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:28:10PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> severity 328242 important
> merge 328242 319986
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:54:49PM +0200, Michal wrote:
> > Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page.
> > I have not copied the msgs by h
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:04:27AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > Well doing a list of the modules in the current linux-image-2.6.12 on
> > > i386, and then deleting from the list sound, and netfilter and anything
> > > else obviously not needed and p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328242 important
Bug#328242: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64: This kernel does not boot on Mac
G5s (7, 2 and 7, 3). It does not get past the first screen.
Severity set to `important'.
> merge 328242 319986
Bug#319986: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powe
severity 328242 important
merge 328242 319986
thanks
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:54:49PM +0200, Michal wrote:
> Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page. I
> have not copied the msgs by hand, but can do so if necessary.
Read the old bugreports. This is a known pr
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:53:30AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Is this not the moment to modify the way our kernel .udeb packages are
> > built,
>
> It's not a prerequisite for getting a working release of d-i for etch. I
> think our users are more interested in being able to
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:04:27AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > Well doing a list of the modules in the current linux-image-2.6.12 on
> > i386, and then deleting from the list sound, and netfilter and anything
> > else obviously not needed and probably a few things that wou
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:46:04PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 07:43:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Not a good idea. Why clut
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 07:43:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Not a good idea. Why clutter the namespace of versions in order to adapt
> > > to
> > > non-debian
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Well doing a list of the modules in the current linux-image-2.6.12 on
> i386, and then deleting from the list sound, and netfilter and anything
> else obviously not needed and probably a few things that would be
> needed, I got down to just under 400 modules. Probably mos
Sven Luther wrote:
> Is this not the moment to modify the way our kernel .udeb packages are built,
It's not a prerequisite for getting a working release of d-i for etch. I
think our users are more interested in being able to install using the
new kernel.
> Also, i propose that we rename the kern
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:56:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> We would only package those needed for the installer, we can list those in the
> .udebs actually, there should be around a 100 or so. multiplied by around 50
> flavours (maybe less) this brings us around 5000 packages.
>
> Well, we may
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:26:55AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:56:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > We would only package those needed for the installer, we can list those in
> > the
> > .udebs actually, there should be around a 100 or so. multiplied by around 50
>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:28:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> not sure i fully understand what you mean here. I guess you are saying you can
> kind of fix the b-i/kernel rules to install either linux-image or
> kernel-image, but that would be counter productive, now that we have some nice
> unifie
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:46:32AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:28:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > not sure i fully understand what you mean here. I guess you are saying you
> > can
> > kind of fix the b-i/kernel rules to install either linux-image or
> > kernel-i
Hi
CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH is enabled by default in the debian kernel. Could
this be changed? According to the alsa developer who helped me debug the
problem with my usb soundcard CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH should be disabled.
The original email is forwarded here:
- Forwarded message from Clemens Lad
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:19:16AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Is this not the moment to modify the way our kernel .udeb packages are built,
> and either use a single package building all .udebs or at least some common
> infrastructure for building them all if there is still problems in the
> archi
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:18:55AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:19:16AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > The next point would be for base-installer/kernel. I have thought about it
> > some, but me talking about that on irc faced only a huge wall of silence,
> > so i
> >
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: important
I have a machine running Sarge, with 2.4 kernel. Motherboard (A8V
Deluxe) includes an IDE controller, an IDE RAID, a SATA, a SATA RAID.
I also have an adaptec SCSI controller.
The system setup uses MD and LVM. Some group inclu
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:54:49PM +0200, Michal wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
> Version: 2.6.12-6
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page. I
> have not copied the msgs by hand,
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page. I
have not copied the msgs by hand, but can do so if necessary.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: t
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:27:32PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:54:04AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:01:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I write this email to ask, now that linux-2.6 2.6.12-6 is in testing,
> > > there
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:30:50PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:15:33AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:05:38PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:59:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > > > Any chance to get those in
> > > > > > for
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:15:33AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:05:38PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:59:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > > Any chance to get those in
> > > > > for 2.6.12-7 ? Do you need any help or something ? Will you be in
>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:12:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> first up you should know that we are currently trying really
> hard to kill mkinitrd in sid/etch. But initrd-tools is
> in Sarge, so I guess that means fixes are still important.
I guess a fix for this would be out of scope for sarge.
> If
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 07:43:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Not a good idea. Why clutter the namespace of versions in order to adapt to
> > non-debian needs. ? What is it you intent to do anyway ?
Thanks to Bastian Blank, cod
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:05:38PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:59:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Any chance to get those in
> > > > for 2.6.12-7 ? Do you need any help or something ? Will you be in
> > > > Oldenbourg
> > > > this year ?
>
> I was under the impression
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:59:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > (Herbert did the same in woody-p-u with 2.4 backports, they had to be
> > > > removed before sarge at the price of some user confus
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328143 normal
Bug#328143: [powerpc] d-i dies on apple hardware with a HFS+ kernel OOPS,
freezing base-installer
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
severity 328143 normal
thanks
We traced this problem to hfsplus needing nls_utf8 as module, which d-i did
not include, so downgrading the severity. waldi said he would provide a patch
for a more graceful handling on this, so i leave htis bug open until then.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUB
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> [snip]
> > > (Herbert did the same in woody-p-u with 2.4 backports, they had to be
> > > removed before sarge at the price of some user confusion who had t-p-u
> > > in their sources.list.)
> >
> > Well. The pack
Sven Luther wrote:
[snip]
> > (Herbert did the same in woody-p-u with 2.4 backports, they had to be
> > removed before sarge at the price of some user confusion who had t-p-u
> > in their sources.list.)
>
> Well. The packages have smaller version than the sid ones, so there should be
> no such con
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:25:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Bad idea, actually, because sarge-p-u is supposed to hold potential
> sarge updates and a backport doesn't meet the criteria for that.
Well, this is something that could be open for discussion, don't you think,
but in any case, we ne
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:25:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:35:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:14AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 13,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:54:04AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:01:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I write this email to ask, now that linux-2.6 2.6.12-6 is in testing, there
> > isn't any reason to keep those 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 kernels around, A q
Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:35:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:14AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:51:18PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > > > http://packages.vergen
79 matches
Mail list logo
