On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:35:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:14AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:51:18PM +0900, Horms wrote:
http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:50:58PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Well, 2.6.12 has finally made it into testing. I must confess I thought
this would happen over one month before now, but now that it is, we have
no excuse to not get a d-i beta out soon.
There's still some work to do to switch d-i
Horms wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:35:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:14AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:51:18PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:54:04AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:01:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi,
I write this email to ask, now that linux-2.6 2.6.12-6 is in testing, there
isn't any reason to keep those 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 kernels around, A quick
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:25:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Horms wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:35:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:14AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:25:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Bad idea, actually, because sarge-p-u is supposed to hold potential
sarge updates and a backport doesn't meet the criteria for that.
Well, this is something that could be open for discussion, don't you think,
but in any case, we
Sven Luther wrote:
[snip]
(Herbert did the same in woody-p-u with 2.4 backports, they had to be
removed before sarge at the price of some user confusion who had t-p-u
in their sources.list.)
Well. The packages have smaller version than the sid ones, so there should be
no such confusion.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
[snip]
(Herbert did the same in woody-p-u with 2.4 backports, they had to be
removed before sarge at the price of some user confusion who had t-p-u
in their sources.list.)
Well. The packages have
severity 328143 normal
thanks
We traced this problem to hfsplus needing nls_utf8 as module, which d-i did
not include, so downgrading the severity. waldi said he would provide a patch
for a more graceful handling on this, so i leave htis bug open until then.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 328143 normal
Bug#328143: [powerpc] d-i dies on apple hardware with a HFS+ kernel OOPS,
freezing base-installer
Severity set to `normal'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:59:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
[snip]
(Herbert did the same in woody-p-u with 2.4 backports, they had to be
removed before sarge at the price of some user confusion who had
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:05:38PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:59:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Any chance to get those in
for 2.6.12-7 ? Do you need any help or something ? Will you be in
Oldenbourg
this year ?
I was under the impression that 2.6.13-1 is
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 07:43:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Not a good idea. Why clutter the namespace of versions in order to adapt to
non-debian needs. ? What is it you intent to do anyway ?
Thanks to Bastian Blank, code
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 01:12:15PM +0900, Horms wrote:
first up you should know that we are currently trying really
hard to kill mkinitrd in sid/etch. But initrd-tools is
in Sarge, so I guess that means fixes are still important.
I guess a fix for this would be out of scope for sarge.
If
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:15:33AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:05:38PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:59:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Any chance to get those in
for 2.6.12-7 ? Do you need any help or something ? Will you be in
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:30:50PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:15:33AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:05:38PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:59:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Any chance to get those in
for 2.6.12-7 ? Do you
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:27:32PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:54:04AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:01:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi,
I write this email to ask, now that linux-2.6 2.6.12-6 is in testing,
there
isn't any
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page. I
have not copied the msgs by hand, but can do so if necessary.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:54:49PM +0200, Michal wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page. I
have not copied the msgs by hand, but
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: important
I have a machine running Sarge, with 2.4 kernel. Motherboard (A8V
Deluxe) includes an IDE controller, an IDE RAID, a SATA, a SATA RAID.
I also have an adaptec SCSI controller.
The system setup uses MD and LVM. Some group
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:18:55AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:19:16AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
The next point would be for base-installer/kernel. I have thought about it
some, but me talking about that on irc faced only a huge wall of silence,
so i
make
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:19:16AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Is this not the moment to modify the way our kernel .udeb packages are built,
and either use a single package building all .udebs or at least some common
infrastructure for building them all if there is still problems in the
archive,
Hi
CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH is enabled by default in the debian kernel. Could
this be changed? According to the alsa developer who helped me debug the
problem with my usb soundcard CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH should be disabled.
The original email is forwarded here:
- Forwarded message from Clemens
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 09:46:32AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:28:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
not sure i fully understand what you mean here. I guess you are saying you
can
kind of fix the b-i/kernel rules to install either linux-image or
kernel-image,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:28:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
not sure i fully understand what you mean here. I guess you are saying you can
kind of fix the b-i/kernel rules to install either linux-image or
kernel-image, but that would be counter productive, now that we have some nice
unified
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:26:55AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:56:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
We would only package those needed for the installer, we can list those in
the
.udebs actually, there should be around a 100 or so. multiplied by around 50
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:56:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
We would only package those needed for the installer, we can list those in the
.udebs actually, there should be around a 100 or so. multiplied by around 50
flavours (maybe less) this brings us around 5000 packages.
Well, we may
Sven Luther wrote:
Is this not the moment to modify the way our kernel .udeb packages are built,
It's not a prerequisite for getting a working release of d-i for etch. I
think our users are more interested in being able to install using the
new kernel.
Also, i propose that we rename the
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Well doing a list of the modules in the current linux-image-2.6.12 on
i386, and then deleting from the list sound, and netfilter and anything
else obviously not needed and probably a few things that would be
needed, I got down to just under 400 modules. Probably most
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 07:43:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Not a good idea. Why clutter the namespace of versions in order to adapt
to
non-debian needs. ?
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:46:04PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 07:43:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Not a good idea. Why clutter the
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:04:27AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Well doing a list of the modules in the current linux-image-2.6.12 on
i386, and then deleting from the list sound, and netfilter and anything
else obviously not needed and probably a few things that would be
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:53:30AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Is this not the moment to modify the way our kernel .udeb packages are
built,
It's not a prerequisite for getting a working release of d-i for etch. I
think our users are more interested in being able to
severity 328242 important
merge 328242 319986
thanks
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:54:49PM +0200, Michal wrote:
Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page. I
have not copied the msgs by hand, but can do so if necessary.
Read the old bugreports. This is a known
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 328242 important
Bug#328242: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64: This kernel does not boot on Mac
G5s (7, 2 and 7, 3). It does not get past the first screen.
Severity set to `important'.
merge 328242 319986
Bug#319986:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:04:27AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Well doing a list of the modules in the current linux-image-2.6.12 on
i386, and then deleting from the list sound, and netfilter and anything
else obviously not needed and probably a
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:28:10PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
severity 328242 important
merge 328242 319986
thanks
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:54:49PM +0200, Michal wrote:
Both on 7,2 and 7,3 powermacs, these kernels just hang past the first page.
I have not copied the msgs by hand, but
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:45:12AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:04:27AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Well doing a list of the modules in the current linux-image-2.6.12 on
i386, and then deleting from the list sound, and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
reassign 328242 linux-2.6
Bug#328242: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64: This kernel does not boot on Mac
G5s (7, 2 and 7, 3). It does not get past the first screen.
Bug reassigned from
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:04:27AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/lib/debian/unstablefor d in *2.6.12*; do dpkg --contents
$d; done |grep \.ko |wc -l
340
Does that include the missing modules like sata-uli, ahci, etc? Well at
least they were missing from the udeb building
Sven Luther wrote:
Mmm, why is this tripple need of holding udeb state necessary ?
Well, look at the code to main-menu, anna, and udpkg..
Would not solving this go a great way for diminishing general memory
usage anyway ?
No, this is not the current high water mark for memory usage in d-i.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:09:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Mmm, why is this tripple need of holding udeb state necessary ?
Well, look at the code to main-menu, anna, and udpkg..
Hehe, will do in Oldenbourg.
Would not solving this go a great way for diminishing general
Sven Luther wrote:
Nope, but i don't think there is a real problem in making d-i kernel
.udebs working for d-i, if said kernels already worked outside of d-i.
It's odd that you say this when you have just finished tracking down
#327891, which is a perfect example of the kind of issue that can
tags 325070 + pending
thanks
Peter's patch does the trick, so I've included it in svn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 325070 + pending
Bug#325070: XFS - invalid module format
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:56:38PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Nope, but i don't think there is a real problem in making d-i kernel
.udebs working for d-i, if said kernels already worked outside of d-i.
It's odd that you say this when you have just finished tracking down
Hi,
since kernel 2.6.13 has not appeared in Debian yet (hint, hint !), I had
a chance to reboot my system, so here is the requested info:
# dmsetup ls
hda1(253, 0)
hdb1(253, 1)
# dmsetup info hda1
Name: hda1
State: ACTIVE
Tables present:LIVE
Open count:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:39:56PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:45:25PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Which was a missing .udeb indeed, and quite bothersome. Not sure if it was
introduced by a change in the hfsplus module, or by a change in d-i. That
said, this is
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 07:45:25PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Which was a missing .udeb indeed, and quite bothersome. Not sure if it was
introduced by a change in the hfsplus module, or by a change in d-i. That
said, this is orthogonal to the issues discussed here. Also notice that if we
had
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: wishlist
Upon reading Announcing powerpc backport 2.6.12-6 kernel package for sarge,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/09/msg00135.html ,
I figured I would give that a try on an Xserve G5.
I notice that
Package: ftp.debian.org
Support for 2.4 kernels on ia64 will be dropped for etch. I've already
removed ia64/2.4 support from d-i:
joeyh ok, I see it
joeyh I think we can remove the 2.4 udebs for ia64
dannf joeyh: great - i'll file the f.d.o. bugs then
So, please remove the following packages
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:56:39PM -0400, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64
Version: 2.6.12-6
Severity: wishlist
Upon reading Announcing powerpc backport 2.6.12-6 kernel package for sarge,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/09/msg00135.html ,
I
Sven Luther wrote:
Currently the modules are grouped per hand in .udebs, partly artificially,
partly because they belong to some wide group, and the dependencies are
handled by hand.
THe above statement is incorrect. Read
/usr/share/kernel-wedge/commands/copy-modules or even the documentation
Sven Luther wrote:
Which was a missing .udeb indeed
No it wasn't:
| Added nls_utf8 to fs-common-modules (Closes: #327891).
introduced by a change in the hfsplus module, or by a change in d-i. That
said, this is orthogonal to the issues discussed here. Also notice that if we
had
Sven Luther writes:
# CONFIG_TIGON3 is not set
:( - since this Xserve G5 needs that to network.
Waht can i say ? Don't use hardware which needs non-free drivers.
Now, if they are not freed, we have some non-free modules, including tg3 i
think, which needs to be built, this
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:45:54PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Currently the modules are grouped per hand in .udebs, partly artificially,
partly because they belong to some wide group, and the dependencies are
handled by hand.
THe above statement is incorrect. Read
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:50:19PM -0400, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
Sven Luther writes:
- readdition of tg3 driver, as firmware license has been fixed.
Maybe that wasn't quite right. I think that your interpretation of the
fix in firmware license is that it improves the situation from
A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
[snip]
I think I'll just try building out of the linux-2.6 Debian source package.
Where is the svn for Debian's linux-2.6 kernel tree?
http://svn.debian.org/ , Project kernel.
I'd like to run
svn blame to see where the changelog line came from:
- readdition
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 12:41 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Andres mentioned we should get 2.6.12-7 out ASAP, so i am not entirely sure
about this. I would vote for this too, and maybe wait for 2.6.13 until we get
the init* issue sorted out.
I just committed a fix to .12 .13 that repairs a problem
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 11:18 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:51:18PM +0900, Horms wrote:
http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/
I have done a second build, with the following changes, as
In linux.debian.kernel Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there already is support for udev in d-i; what's currently missing is a
udeb for hotplug.
Thinking again about this: an hotplug udeb is not be strictly needed,
because current versions of udev already provide the hotplug multiplexer.
The
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:27:32PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:54:04AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:01:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hi,
I write this email to ask, now that linux-2.6 2.6.12-6 is in testing,
there
isn't any
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 11:18 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:51:18PM +0900, Horms wrote:
http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/
I have done a second build, with the following changes, as
Marco d'Itri wrote:
Thinking again about this: an hotplug udeb is not be strictly needed,
because current versions of udev already provide the hotplug multiplexer.
The hotplug package currently provides:
- a firmware loader hotplug agent
- support for hotplug of network devices
- coldplug
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:48:46PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 12:41 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Andres mentioned we should get 2.6.12-7 out ASAP, so i am not entirely sure
about this. I would vote for this too, and maybe wait for 2.6.13 until we
get
the init* issue
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:35:47AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
[snip]
I suggest that we just track this as 323183, rather than mucking around
with opening and merging existing bugs. Please let me know if you would
prefer a different approach.
No, that is fine. Having just one
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: important
In http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14790 a memory leak is reported in
the linux kernel.
They reference
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=729d70f5dfd663b44bca68a4479c96bde7e535d6
Just FYI, this has been assigned CAN-2005-2802.
--
Geoff Crompton
Debian System Administrator
Strategic Data
+61 3 9340 9000
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:19:37AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:35:47AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
(...)
Thanks, hopefully we can get to the bottom of this sooner rather
than later
I hope so too :)
With regards to pcmcia-modules-2.4.26-i386.
I notice that
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:29:13PM +0200, Daniel Svensson wrote:
Hi
CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH is enabled by default in the debian kernel. Could
this be changed? According to the alsa developer who helped me debug the
problem with my usb soundcard CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH should be disabled.
The
Geoff Crompton wrote:
Just FYI, this has been assigned CAN-2005-2802.
Oops. Just noticed that this has actually been assigned CAN-2005-2872,
which is the one that is actually referenced in all the debian kernel
svn logs. Sorry!
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-2802
Package: kernel
Version: 2.6.12-6
I upgraded from 2.6.10 kernel to 2.6.12 and my
Thinkpad T20 (a) fails to load speedstep.
I downgraded to 2.6.10 kernel and it works fine again.
My T23 had NO similar problem.
__
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: important
Ref http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14793
The kernel team is aware of this issue, and fixes are in the kernel
teams svn at svn.debian.org.
I created this report so as I couldn't find this issue mentioned in the
BTS. Please tag it with security and sarge.
Hi,
I noticed two potential problems while trying to manipulate
the kernel configs to consistently turn USB_BANDWIDTH on or off.
1) split-config does not seem to work with architecures such as
amd64 and powerpc where the architecture name the kernel
uses differes from the name that debian
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:50:26AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:19:37AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:35:47AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
(...)
Thanks, hopefully we can get to the bottom of this sooner rather
than later
I hope
75 matches
Mail list logo
