-status-menu) and this should be much
> better.
User-theme might also be a good candidate, since it's unintrusive and
gnome-tweak-tool already expects to find it.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-r
inconsistency)
If no pkg-gnome maintainer objects, I could upload it in the coming week.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On 13/08/11 15:03, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> But vnstat is already present:
But it's maintained by the QA team, so maybe an adoption would be in order?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists
least - for all but the
most pathological cases) you're always relying on something you probably
don't understand completely and making rules files more explicit, while
still using wrappers and helpers, has no direct effect on this. It only
makes for more text to parse.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/iv9oln$1k5$1...@dough.gmane.org
ally save a significant amount of time by not
using dh/cdbs/whatever during package builds (and by significant I mean
more than just a couple of seconds per build).
Cheers
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_Invented_Here
[1] http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/4e176b0d.8060...@debian.org
--
Le
lists.d.o page.
>
> Update the IRC channel topic.
>
> Search the website for the old link and update all the links.
I'd consider doing these after the wiki version gathers at least a bit
of support. My point was just taking a bit of the responsibility off of
Mathew's b
ry end.
Mathew had answered saying I was free to do so, I just hadn't realized
his reply was private and not on-list. I interpreted this answer as
permission, but perhaps an explicit (and public) one would be better.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
-
Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
>> In addition, the FAQ for this list:
>> http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html might answer some
>> of your questions.
>
> As a side note, wouldn't the wiki be the perfect place
t just seems like a
bit of a waste of potential help, having it in a different place.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ntually
a DD, right? So you need the practice!
I just wanna have a hand in it. Practically just a psychological thing! :)
If you still wanna maintain it, incorporate the mentioned fixes and I'll
upload it!
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNS
ld have
thought of that... :)
Still, probably wouldn't cause build issues, but it sure is ugly!
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
r.gz.
I don't think I'm seeing the issue here. Care to elaborate a bit more?
Isn't that the whole idea behind patching and running autoreconf in the
first place? If we wanted the changed files produced by autoreconf in
the debian.tar.gz we wouldn't need to run it, right? What a
Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
>> Was 0.3 already released somewhere? I can find no traces of it either on
>> the homepage, the maemo.org project page or SVN.
>
> No and yes. There are no 0.3 binary releases but I found this [1]: 7
> wee
an.net/debian/pool/main/n/numptyphysics/numptyphysics_0.3-1.dsc
>
> I would be glad if someone reviewed and uploaded this package for me.
I'll take a look at it ASAP and get back to you.
Cheers
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/496586
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty ret
ld time: they're arch-indep and
could be generated just as well before each new release.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
proximity) I'd gladly advocate his DM status,
should he want to apply for it.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
problem with it, then I've unknowingly been
making this mistake for years... :)
Cheers
[0]http://changelog.complete.org/archives/910-how-to-think-about-compression
[1]http://changelog.complete.org/archives/931-how-to-think-about-compression-part-2
--
Leo "costela" Antun
t format is perfectly in order in this case and
the name of the base source directory doesn't really matter much.
Or did I misunderstand your question?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
t more informative about what the program can do.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nt to intrude into anything you guys might have
already talked about, but it seemed like a nice step to integrate it
with the team.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ackage really interesting, if you ever need a
co-maint, let me know! :-)
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rator? But I don't really know if uscan even recognizes it...
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
#x27;, as pointed out by others! :-)
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
pplication, without having
to read the technical fine print to figure it out (it sounds like cheap
advertising: "it's graphical! ... but technically, it's not" ;-) ).
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
header, I found them
via a dirty 'licensecheck -r ./ | grep UNKNOWN | cut -d: -f1 | while
read file; do grep -L "General Public Licence" $file; done'
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Felipe Sateler wrote:
> This can be triggered with the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage
Live and learn. Never noticed that one before! :-)
Uploading.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rom
doing this, but I'd personally say you don't need to bump versions
before the package actually gets into the archive, so you could just
stick with '-1' for a Debian version, so merging the changelog entries
should do the trick.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antu
quick check with debc, aside from lintian is
always a good idea, but the package seems good.
After you take a look at these issues (or just justify them) I can
sponsor you, if no one with more expertise in this sort of package pops
up until - let's say - monday.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela&
evocation certificate in safe, offline places, in case of emergency.
Do some research on the topic. Wikipedia is your friend (even if it's
not always particularly right about everything). It might ease your life
if you intend on becoming a Debian Maintainer or Developer.
Cheers and
Russ Allbery wrote:
> lintian.debian.org only checks i386.
Oh, now that makes sense!
Guess the obvious sometimes slips by unnoticed :-)
But anyway, I have an amd64 server and a package with the same problem
which chrpath solved, so my argument stands.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" An
you're NOT rebuilding the
configure script.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Anibal Avelar wrote:
> On 12/5/07, Leo costela Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> - And, of course, using 'chrpath' on debian/rules
>
> No, it doesn't work for AMD. I tried to use chrpath directly to
> binaries files, but it didn't work.
Ar
Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
>
> The way I see it the options for dealing with RPATH are:
>
- And, of course, using 'chrpath' on debian/rules
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
d-time
- Patch the configure script on build-time
Any other ideas?
I'll probably update the wiki[0] with these suggestions and give it a
little cleanup, while I'm at it! :-)
Cheers
[0] http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ain, I will send you the
> whole stuff. Thanky for this !
That doesn't sound very optimistic.
But even if you do "fail" (by your standards) there's no need to send me
the packages. I can get them from the original website.
Cheers and good luck
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reading them in a different place? Just the work of the
person writing you an answer (in this case: me).
At any rate, if you're not interested in making an effort with this
package, I might take it over and package it myself. It seems
interesting, but I'll need to take a better look before commi
ed the rules file to a file named '\' on the
base source code dir.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Paul Wise wrote:
> Obviously that is a hack/workaround for upstream's buggy build system,
> be sure to send a patch upstream that fixes it.
Yup, agreed.
This shouldn't be too hard since upstream is (was?) a DD (hadess).
The package has been uploaded with the workaround for now.
>
Precisely, this did the trick. Just add 'chrpath' to the build-deps too.
Update it in the SVN and I'll upload it.
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
use chrpath to clean it after the build
and advise upstream to cleanup the configure script.
What do you think?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ian.org/debian-devel/2007/11/msg00722.html
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Mike O'Connor wrote:
> src/gconf-bridge.* and most of the files in the telepathy directory
> have copyright holders not mentioned in debian/copyright.
Francesco, will you take a look at these, before I sponsor the package?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[inser
Francesco Namuri wrote:
> I'm looking for a temporary sponsor for gnome-phone-manager 0.40-3,
Still need this? Can I check it out from svn.d.o, or do you have any
uncommited changes somewhere?
Cheers
--
Leo "costela" Antunes
[insert a witty retort here]
signature.asc
De
ld be appreciated.
Files: http://www.ivanwong.info/gaim-hotkeys/
Cheers,
Ivan.
GPG: 1024D/4A9A664A 2004-10-04
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a her
gree, but I don't think this should be put in a
separate package. Sounds very kludgy.
The "none" option could be included with X itself, this way you'd be
able to use the alternatives system without the need for a hack and the
setting would persist.
This could be a wishlist bug fo
ersonal[1] threshold for entry into the archive.
I am trying to recompile Gaim and create a dev package, if I succeed
I'll poke Robert McQueen about uploading it, if he agreed.
That should solve all our problems (in an ideal world, as you pointed
out).
Cheers
[1] To stress it out: that'
ersonal[1] threshold for entry into the archive.
I am trying to recompile Gaim and create a dev package, if I succeed
I'll poke Robert McQueen about uploading it, if he agreed.
That should solve all our problems (in an ideal world, as you pointed
out).
Cheers
[1] To stress it out: that'
like your plan, but
you're free to try to convince me, prove me wrong, or just ignore me and
upload it anyway.
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
like your plan, but
you're free to try to convince me, prove me wrong, or just ignore me and
upload it anyway.
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
version?
Yes, both -1 and -2 versions were built with the exact same file. The
.dsc's both have the same md5sum.
But thanks anyway.
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the for
Hi all
What can I do about the forwarded problem?
I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the
same problem.
Any pointers?
Cheers and thanks
-Forwarded Message-
> From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED
version?
Yes, both -1 and -2 versions were built with the exact same file. The
.dsc's both have the same md5sum.
But thanks anyway.
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the for
Hi all
What can I do about the forwarded problem?
I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the
same problem.
Any pointers?
Cheers and thanks
-Forwarded Message-
> From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED
, so, does it need
to stay in contrib?
Maybe it's still time to contact the archive admins and change the
section before the first version hits unstable (during security
scrutiny).
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
, so, does it need
to stay in contrib?
Maybe it's still time to contact the archive admins and change the
section before the first version hits unstable (during security
scrutiny).
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ish manually the new
database
3) do not delete the old one without asking explicitly, with a high
debconf priority (IMHO that's the best threshold between user
interaction and space bloat)
Remember to have a sensible enough preinst to detect the need for
migration.
Cheers
--
Leo Cost
ish manually the new
database
3) do not delete the old one without asking explicitly, with a high
debconf priority (IMHO that's the best threshold between user
interaction and space bloat)
Remember to have a sensible enough preinst to detect the need for
migration.
Cheers
--
Leo Cost
load anything.
Good luck
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
thing.
Good luck
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ontrib free
My sources.list has:
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Change "unstable" for the distribution you use.
Why the hell did you put "free" in there? That's redundant! =]
Hope this works out for you.
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
ontrib free
My sources.list has:
deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
Change "unstable" for the distribution you use.
Why the hell did you put "free" in there? That's redundant! =]
Hope this works out for you.
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
y.
I'm not sure about the gzip direct usage though (but assume It's OK).
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6 CDFF 6535 192F B5B6 5921 2262 D36F 7ADF 9466
"you must cut down
y.
I'm not sure about the gzip direct usage though (but assume It's OK).
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6 CDFF 6535 192F B5B6 5921 2262 D36F 7ADF 9466
"you must cut down
not in
> Debian, although I don't know if this is is the reason. Anybody
> familiar with this terrain feel like commenting?
For your second problem, I think debian-legal is a better place to ask,
though I assume you will encounter resistance in your path...
Worst case scenario: packa
not in
> Debian, although I don't know if this is is the reason. Anybody
> familiar with this terrain feel like commenting?
For your second problem, I think debian-legal is a better place to ask,
though I assume you will encounter resistance in your path...
Worst case scenario: packa
t;
> Should I release the doc html and txt version with my package?
> Make doc-linux-html a dependency doesn't seems good to me due the size.
>
> Best cheers,
>
> --
> --
> Michelle Ribeiro
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | &
t;
> Should I release the doc html and txt version with my package?
> Make doc-linux-html a dependency doesn't seems good to me due the size.
>
> Best cheers,
>
> --
> --
> Michelle Ribeiro
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | &
ions are not open and archives are not available.
>
> Can anyone tell me if I might qualify for access to these machines for
> debugging packaging portability problem purposes, and if how, how to
> get it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike Schacht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Leo Coste
ions are not open and archives are not available.
>
> Can anyone tell me if I might qualify for access to these machines for
> debugging packaging portability problem purposes, and if how, how to
> get it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike Schacht
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Leo Coste
r to do this I need to do different things for
> each of the browsers in postinst and postrm. Basicaly what I'd like to
> know is if theres a nicer way to test if a package is installed than
> just testing the existance of files that the package would create if it
> was instal
y.
> I have put packagename-version.orig.tar.gz in the parent directory, per the
> manual pages/howto/.. [can't remember now]
The file should be called packagename_version.orig.tar.gz. Mind the
underscore, that's a subtle and common mistake.
Also be sure to use the right version notati
me time, and had the possibility of many sonames in the 2.2 branch and
many others in the 2.3 branch, for example (like libgtk1.2 and libgtk2.0
I guess).
All of this is better explained in policy and maybe I'm wrong with some
assumptions, so do your reading =]
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PRO
ngerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644
> fab7 |
> ++
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6CDF
emoved on
the same run.
Hope I've been helpful
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6CDFF6535192FB5B659212262D36F7ADF9466
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herrin
ns out that the problem is sourceforge itself, we
> could host the project on alioth, no?
It really doesn't look like a SF issue, IMHO
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6CDFF6535192FB5B659
y to store
pkg-config output. Is there a way to tell Make to append to the CFLAGS
variable?
Thanks for the attention
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key Fingerprint: 8AE6CDFF6535192FB5B659212262D36F7ADF9466
"you mu
nging the sources to something
> suitable.
File a RFP on your own program, wait for a suitable Debian Developer (or
wannabe Developer) to become interested.
IMO, it's easier that way! =]
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nging the sources to something
> suitable.
File a RFP on your own program, wait for a suitable Debian Developer (or
wannabe Developer) to become interested.
IMO, it's easier that way! =]
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
apps
running, or is it the plan to force gnome1.2 apps into gnome2?
THIRD and last: should I bump the changelog's urgency about this bugs?
(the next upload will also be recompiled against libsigc++c102/gcc3.2)
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL P
apps
running, or is it the plan to force gnome1.2 apps into gnome2?
THIRD and last: should I bump the changelog's urgency about this bugs?
(the next upload will also be recompiled against libsigc++c102/gcc3.2)
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL P
have to go
> through each page to print it.
apt-get install debian-policy
=]
cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the
have to go
> through each page to print it.
apt-get install debian-policy
=]
cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the
this:
CFLAGS = "-O2 -Wall"
if
CFLAGS += "-mieee"
endif
I'm not sure this is the Best Way(tm), but it should work...
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.a
LAGS = "-O2 -Wall"
if
CFLAGS += "-mieee"
endif
I'm not sure this is the Best Way(tm), but it should work...
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc
&quo
arch-indep package on the
control file.
I think that's it, but what do I know? I'm on the AM queue for 6 months
=]
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc
"you mu
arch-indep package on the
control file.
I think that's it, but what do I know? I'm on the AM queue for 6 months
=]
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc
"you mu
ion to stable could - if the
internal changes were really so big - bring a whole series of unforeseen
compatibility issues.
I'd advise the user to upgrade manually or use another way to do his
thing, record your reasons in the bug's log and tag it wontfix.
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
&
ion to stable could - if the
internal changes were really so big - bring a whole series of unforeseen
compatibility issues.
I'd advise the user to upgrade manually or use another way to do his
thing, record your reasons in the bug's log and tag it wontfix.
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
&
to the archive)?
Sorry if I missed something
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to the archive)?
Sorry if I missed something
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
vious one and some additional binary packages.
> Which is the good(TM) procedure to perform such a changes?
Did any of the binary package names change? If so, maybe it would be
good to leave the old package name there to provide easy upgrade,
turning it into a virtual-package.
--
Leo Coste
vious one and some additional binary packages.
> Which is the good(TM) procedure to perform such a changes?
Did any of the binary package names change? If so, maybe it would be
good to leave the old package name there to provide easy upgrade,
turning it into a virtual-package.
--
Leo Coste
ts
uppon, maybe it helps...
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a
herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ts
uppon, maybe it helps...
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc
"you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a
herring!"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
're
not using it right.
debian/rules should have something like this:
make install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp
Hope I was of any help =]
--
Leo Costela
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc
"you must cut down the mightiest
're
not using it right.
debian/rules should have something like this:
make install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp
Hope I was of any help =]
--
Leo Costela
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc
"you must cut
optimisation, but dpkg's architecture list does not
support sub-archs, therefor you must change the name of you package
manualy to something like -i686 to specify what you want.
Leave the Arch field in debian/control as i386, that's the best dpkg can
do for you right now.
Hope I w
specific optimisation, but dpkg's architecture list does not
support sub-archs, therefor you must change the name of you package
manualy to something like -i686 to specify what you want.
Leave the Arch field in debian/control as i386, that's the best dpkg can
do for you right now.
Hope I w
ities?
I'm not really sure I understand your situation, but if your packages
are in a directory you could use
dpkg -i $(ls )
The --force-downgrade option of dpkg is on by default, so you shouldn't
need to set it.
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ities?
I'm not really sure I understand your situation, but if your packages
are in a directory you could use
dpkg -i $(ls )
The --force-downgrade option of dpkg is on by default, so you shouldn't
need to set it.
Cheers
--
Leo Costela
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
