Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-17 Thread John Pearson
On Thu, Jun 17, 1999 at 01:07:51AM +1000, Shao Zhang wrote On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 10:35:52AM -0400, Kristopher Johnson wrote: I'm the guy that asked which package had the HOWTOs. I know it seemed like a dumb question, but I did try searching on HOWTO in both dselect and on the Debian web

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-17 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
I just did a quick search on the debian web site with the keyword HOWTO, this is what I got: Search Results Release Quality Package (size) stable100% doc-linux-es 1998.08-1 (739.8k)

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-16 Thread JW Park
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999 05:05:39 +, you wrote: On Tuesday, June 08, 1999 at 23:26:35 -0600, Craig McPherson wrote: Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BE MORE SIMPLE X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.02b14) X-UIDL: d2077d16c3127d4bf73a47a47027a8d9 As one Debian newbie

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-16 Thread Frankie
E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: Debian installation manual is not at all the worst one. It is quite good actually. But it definetely isn't easy to find on the website instructions how to get started... This is getting on my nerves... * go to www.debian.org * note the section `Getting

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-16 Thread Shao Zhang
a brick wall. - Kris -Original Message- From: Eric Gillespie, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 11, 1999 3:01 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: BE MORE SIMPLE On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 09:31:54AM +0200, Urban Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Contents file [was Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!]

1999-06-14 Thread Marc Mongeon
But certainly this was intended to be an automated feature, right? Is it a flag that you give to dpkg, or the compiled default in some later version (I'm running 1.4.0.34, and have no Contents), or just the result of a bunch of Debian users deciding it was a Good Idea to schedule a cron job to

Re: Contents file [was Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!]

1999-06-14 Thread Kirk Hogenson
Marc Mongeon wrote: But certainly this was intended to be an automated feature, right? Is it a flag that you give to dpkg, or the compiled default in some later version (I'm running 1.4.0.34, and have no Contents), or just the result of a bunch of Debian users deciding it was a Good Idea to

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-14 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Gertjan Klein wrote: On Fri, 11 Jun 1999 23:25:14 -0400, Kristopher Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My reaction was to the people who are glad that Linux isn't too easy, because they enjoy the challenge. Adversity builds character, I guess. Well said. In addition, the reverse also

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-14 Thread Ben Cranston
Keith G. Murphy wrote: Personally, I think that explains a lot of Y2K: managers have allowed themselves to abdicate responsibility for what goes on inside the glass room. Right now, there's even a bill before Congress to limit companies' liability for Y2K problems. As if they're acts of God

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-14 Thread Gertjan Klein
On Mon, 14 Jun 1999 09:54:01 -0500, Keith G. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would add that GUI does not equate to ease-of-use. Look at the oft-derided dselect: it's actually quite a good wizard (takes you through everything you need to do step by step). The bad parts of it are probably the

Re: Contents file [was Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!]

1999-06-14 Thread Ed Cogburn
Kirk Hogenson wrote: Marc Mongeon wrote: But certainly this was intended to be an automated feature, right? Is it a flag that you give to dpkg, or the compiled default in some later version (I'm running 1.4.0.34, and have no Contents), or just the result of a bunch of Debian users

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-14 Thread Lex Chive
On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 10:34:25AM +, Gertjan Klein wrote: The people who manage the creation of software-based products are typically either hostage to programmers because they are insufficiently technical, or they are all too sympathetic to programmers because they are programmers

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-12 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: BE MORE SIMPLE Date: Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 09:11:49AM -0700 In reply to:Clyde Wilson Quoting Clyde Wilson([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote: On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 09:31:54AM +0200, Urban Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-12 Thread ktb
I kind of hate to jump into a string like this but at the risk of sounding real stupid how can one create this /var/lib/dpkg/Contents-i386.gz file. I've searched for it on my Slink system and it just isn't there. I took a look at the dpkg man page and see no reference to the file. I see that

RE: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-12 Thread Kristopher Johnson
:35 PM To: Kirk Hogenson Cc: Kristopher Johnson; debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: BE MORE SIMPLE Kirk Hogenson wrote: [incredibly helpful explanation snipped] I hope this helps, and good luck getting your sound card working. And please ask here if you run into problems. You

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-12 Thread Ed Cogburn
Kristopher Johnson wrote: Yes, this was a great explanation. Thanks! And my apologies to Eric: my response was intended to be good-natured, but in re-reading it, I guess it actually looks pretty hostile. Unfortunately, I didn't really make my point clear. I didn't mean to try to defend

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-12 Thread Gertjan Klein
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999 23:25:14 -0400, Kristopher Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My reaction was to the people who are glad that Linux isn't too easy, because they enjoy the challenge. Adversity builds character, I guess. Well said. In addition, the reverse also seems to apply; point-and-click

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-12 Thread Michael Talbot-Wilson
On Sat, 12 Jun 1999, Gertjan Klein wrote: point-and-click interfaces suck, because they are too easy. Windows could learn a lot from Linux in terms of performance, power and stability, but Linux doesn't even come close to the ease of installation and use you'll find with Windows. This is not

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-12 Thread Gertjan Klein
On Sat, 12 Jun 1999 21:04:56 +0930 (CST), Michael Talbot-Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A few phrases of your mail: Contemptible complaints and demands, self-important and self-serving claim, laughable, a shithead, completely bogus, intolerant and demanding, a lame and inefficient user. I

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-12 Thread Michael Talbot-Wilson
On Sat, 12 Jun 1999, Gertjan Klein wrote: On Sat, 12 Jun 1999 21:04:56 +0930 (CST), Michael Talbot-Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A few phrases of your mail: Contemptible complaints and demands, self-important and self-serving claim, laughable, a shithead, completely bogus, intolerant

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-12 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 10:35:52AM -0400, Kristopher Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm the guy that asked which package had the HOWTOs. I know it seemed like a dumb question, but I did try searching on HOWTO in both dselect and on the Debian web site, and came up with nothing. And I

Contents file [was Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!]

1999-06-12 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
On Fri, Jun 11, 1999 at 10:08:04PM -0500, ktb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I kind of hate to jump into a string like this but at the risk of sounding real stupid how can one create this /var/lib/dpkg/Contents-i386.gz file. I've searched for it on my Slink system and it just isn't there. I took a

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-11 Thread virtanen
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Urban Gabor wrote: The moral from the original rather rash message can serve very good the whole Linux/Debian community. It is indeed very hard to convince people to use Linux when the starting informaiton is filled with jargon. I agree quite completely. The users

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-11 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.
On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 09:31:54AM +0200, Urban Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no disrespect, but M$ makes you forget thinking. (Cf the subscription! :-) ) I would suggest an other install description with step-by-step texts of what to do. And redesinging Debian web site can help a lot.

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-11 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
Debian installation manual is not at all the worst one. It is quite good actually. But it definetely isn't easy to find on the website instructions how to get started... This is getting on my nerves... * go to www.debian.org * note the section `Getting Started', which is the second below

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-11 Thread virtanen
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: Debian installation manual is not at all the worst one. It is quite good actually. But it definetely isn't easy to find on the website instructions how to get started... This is getting on my nerves... So just forget it. Everything can

RE: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-11 Thread Kristopher Johnson
, 1999 3:01 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: BE MORE SIMPLE On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 09:31:54AM +0200, Urban Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no disrespect, but M$ makes you forget thinking. (Cf the subscription! :-) ) I would suggest an other install description with step-by-step

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-11 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
I'm the guy that asked which package had the HOWTOs. I know it seemed like a dumb question, but I did try searching on HOWTO in both dselect and on the Debian web site, and came up with nothing. And I started paging through the 2700+ packages shown in dselect, but gave up after an hour or

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-11 Thread Kirk Hogenson
Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote: For example, someone asked if there was a package containing the Howtos. Instead of telling him the name of the package, he should have been told how to grep the Contents file, that way he can find things on his own instead of asking the list every time.

Re: be more simple

1999-06-11 Thread virtanen
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: People are often lazy. A lot of things might be improved about the debian website, but if people argue things like `it is hard to find the installation manual on the web site', they just didn't try. Most of the mails on this list tend to be

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-11 Thread Christopher J. Morrone
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: Debian installation manual is not at all the worst one. It is quite good actually. But it definetely isn't easy to find on the website instructions how to get started... This is getting on my nerves... * go to www.debian.org * note

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-11 Thread Clyde Wilson
On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote: On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 09:31:54AM +0200, Urban Gabor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no disrespect, but M$ makes you forget thinking. (Cf the subscription! :-) ) It is not Wintendo that makes people forget how to think, it is something We

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-11 Thread The Doctor What
Another place to find that elusive package is by searching through the available package database in /var/lib/dpkg/available with something like less -i I use that a lot. You may have to tweak your string a bit or show patience when searching, because some words are used a lot. Ciao! -- Harp

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-11 Thread Kent West
Kirk Hogenson wrote: snip Anyway, let me describe what Eric was talking about. The file /var/lib/dpkg/Contents-i386.gz contains information about which package contains what. If you want to find the HOWTO's, for example, try something like: zgrep HOWTO /var/lib/dpkg/Contents-i386.gz

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-11 Thread add|ct|on
Sent: Friday, June 11, 1999 4:07 AM Subject: Re: BE MORE SIMPLE Debian installation manual is not at all the worst one. It is quite good actually. But it definetely isn't easy to find on the website instructions how to get started... This is getting on my nerves... * go

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-10 Thread add|ct|on
- Original Message - From: debian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Shao Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Craig McPherson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org; John Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 1:25 AM Subject: Re: BE MORE SIMPLE I agree

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-10 Thread Urban Gabor
I do not want to continue the line, but I could not withold some comments: The moral from the original rather rash message can serve very good the whole Linux/Debian community. It is indeed very hard to convince people to use Linux when the starting informaiton is filled with jargon. The users

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-10 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 09:31:54 +0200, Urban Gabor wrote: I would suggest an other install description with step-by-step texts of what to do. And redesinging Debian web site can help a lot. There's a Dutch saying de beste stuurlui staan aan wal which amounts to the best drivers are standing on

BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread John Hall
Webmaster at Debian, How in the world do I download Debian? I've been at your site for 30 MINUTES and have gone to every distribution link on it, but there's no singular link that actually downloads ALL 2250 files of Debian, and WHO in the world is going to down load TWO THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Robert Rati
Try reading the install documentation. It tells you all you need to know about installing the base system. From there, you download packages.gz files that have lists of packages and you select which ones you want. This is all taken care of in the installation process so all you need to do is

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Havoc Pennington
First of all, calm down. Debian is produced by volunteers, on their own time. It's not a company and no one is being paid. So if you aren't willing to work on the web site, at least be polite! On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, John Hall wrote: Webmaster at Debian, How in the world do I download Debian?

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Craig McPherson
On 8 Jun 99, at 20:57, John Hall wrote: How in the world do I download Debian? I've been at your site for 30 MINUTES and have gone to every distribution link on it, but there's no singular link that actually downloads ALL 2250 files of Debian, and WHO in the world is going to down load TWO

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Kent West
John Hall wrote: Webmaster at Debian, How in the world do I download Debian? I've been at your site for 30 MINUTES and have gone to every distribution link on it, but there's no singular link that actually downloads ALL 2250 files of Debian, and WHO in the world is going to down load

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Kent West
John Hall wrote: Webmaster at Debian, How in the world do I download Debian? I've been at your site for 30 PS: When you go to the Installion Instructions page, then you'll need to select the installation instructions for the architecture of your machine (probably Intel x86); that link

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Kent West
Robert Rati wrote: You are obviously frustrated, but you can get more flies with honey than vinegar. But he wants more files, not flies. Sorry. ;-)

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Pollywog
On 09-Jun-99 Craig McPherson wrote: 5. Don't get frustrated! For me, figuring out which files I had to download to get a base system up running was much harder than the installation itself! :) (well, except for rescuing my partition table from the brink of oblivion, that was kinda

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Shao Zhang
On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 11:26:35PM -0600, Craig McPherson wrote: On 8 Jun 99, at 20:57, John Hall wrote: How in the world do I download Debian? I've been at your site for 30 MINUTES and have gone to every distribution link on it, but there's no singular link that actually downloads ALL

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Lazarus Long
On Tuesday, June 08, 1999 at 23:26:35 -0600, Craig McPherson wrote: Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BE MORE SIMPLE X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.02b14) X-UIDL: d2077d16c3127d4bf73a47a47027a8d9 As one Debian newbie to another, As a non-newbie ... Thirty minutes

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread gla2
If you really want linux-in-a-file... I believe Slackware has a ZipSlack distribution... Slackware in one big ( 30something megs? ) Zip file you stick on your M$ partition unzip, and loadlin into... for this and lots of other Linux goodies try: ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux Sorry to

RE: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Andrew J Fortune
, and as you achieve each small goal, you will find it to be rewarding and well worth while. So hang in there ! regards, Andrew -Original Message- From: John Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 1:58 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: BE MORE

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread debian
I agree George.. I went from Slackware (used it for 4 years) to using Debian just 7 days ago.. Debian and apt-get rocks. Sorry to advertize another distro on the Debian list : ) but this might not be a bad option if one is just trying out linux and doesn't want to repartition, and personally...

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Mark Wagnon
Pollywog wrote: On 09-Jun-99 Craig McPherson wrote: 5. Don't get frustrated! For me, figuring out which files I had to download to get a base system up running was much harder than the installation itself! :) (well, except for rescuing my partition table from the brink of oblivion,

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Mark Wagnon
debian wrote: I agree George.. I went from Slackware (used it for 4 years) to using Debian just 7 days ago.. Debian and apt-get rocks. Amen! I installed SuSE and RedHat on my other computer, and then realized that I couldn't upgrade quite as easily. Needless to say, I scrubbed its drives

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Judith Bush
Well, I'm not a linux newbie, and I've been using debian for almost a year. First, praise: I installed slackware from scratch in '95. I installed debian from scratch in '98. If M$ could make a ease-of-use jump that large in 3 years i wouldn't care if they took over the world. They can't. We

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Paulo J. da Silva e Silva
Pollywog writes: Is there a place where I can get a bootable CD to install from so that I don't need the base floppies? CheapBytes disks seem to have problems in this regard (some versions). -- Andrew I have already installed four home systems booting from cheapbytes cds.

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Kenneth Scharf
Hmmm, I got my discs from cheapbytes and they boot fine. In fact all of my cheapbytes discs boot okay. Actually that's a bit misleading since I only have three sets ;) Cheap bytes had got a bad rap when they blew the dependancies and simlinks on debian 2.0 and included a bad upgrad script. (even

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Pollywog
On 09-Jun-99 Kenneth Scharf wrote: Hmmm, I got my discs from cheapbytes and they boot fine. In fact all of my cheapbytes discs boot okay. Actually that's a bit misleading since I only have three sets ;) Cheap bytes had got a bad rap when they blew the dependancies and simlinks on debian 2.0

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Pollywog
On 09-Jun-99 Paulo J. da Silva e Silva wrote: Pollywog writes: Is there a place where I can get a bootable CD to install from so that I don't need the base floppies? CheapBytes disks seem to have problems in this regard (some versions). -- Andrew I have already

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Kenneth Scharf
I cannot install Debian from my Cheapbytes Slink CD without the base floppies, but I believe I can do it from the Hamm CD, also from Cheapbytes. With the Slink CD, the installation stops because of an error with the ncurses package. Hmmm I did not have this problem installing on my other computer

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Pollywog
On 09-Jun-99 Kenneth Scharf wrote: I cannot install Debian from my Cheapbytes Slink CD without the base floppies, but I believe I can do it from the Hamm CD, also from Cheapbytes. With the Slink CD, the installation stops because of an error with the ncurses package. Hmmm I did not have this

Re: BE MORE SIMPLE!!!!

1999-06-09 Thread Kent West
Judith Bush wrote: My experience yesterday helps me sympathize with the original poster. My personal installation last year went beautifully as i ran from a bootable cd. On the other hand, I run debian at work, where i'm developing a kiosk system. I've a handful of thin clients -- NONE WITH