Re: Spam on Debian lists

t; > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? >>> >>> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list >>> masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all of the almost 300 >>> Debian lists¹ with thousands of posts each

Re: Spam on Debian lists

Patrick Bartek <nemomm...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker <m...@well-adjusted.de> > wrote: > >> fc: >> > >> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? >> >> You have n

Re: Spam on Debian lists (was: Actually)

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Patrick Bartek <nemomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker <m...@well-adjusted.de> > wrote: > >> fc: >> > >> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? >

Re: Spam on Debian lists (was: Actually)

On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker <m...@well-adjusted.de> wrote: > fc: > > > > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? > > You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list > masters. But it's not that anyb

How to report Debian ML SPAM.

(thread broken on purpose). 1. Never reply to SPAM in the Debian MLs, just report it as SPAM using the web interface. 2. If you need to talk about spam, open a new thread (as that thread will not be spam, although it *might* be quite off-topic). Doing it this way makes it easier/neater

Re: Spam on Debian lists (was: Actually)

On 20 April 2017 at 21:40, Jochen Spieker <m...@well-adjusted.de> wrote: > fc: > > > > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? > > You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list > masters. But it's not that anybody

Spam on Debian lists (was: Actually)

fc: > > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all of the almost 300 Debian lists¹ with thousands of posts each day. > I see these types of th

Re: spam to aliases and system accounts

Maildir) > How did you know my environment? It is a nightmare actually. If any real and important mail is sent to those addresses then it is probably buried under all the spam, making those addresses pointless. That is why I suggested, rather than completely removing them, the possibility

Re: spam to aliases and system accounts

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:43:33AM +0100, Brian wrote: > You would have to sound out and convince the exim4 maintainers. I can > well imagine their enthusiasm for a change might be muted. I've reported this before, IIRC, and was ignored. There's also a potential DoS situation because the default

Re: spam to aliases and system accounts

On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 20:15:02 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > When people install Debian (or any distro), they usually get a bunch of > entries in /etc/aliases and various system accounts (/etc/passwd entries > with UID < 1000) created by the packages they install. > > I've noticed an increase in

spam to aliases and system accounts

When people install Debian (or any distro), they usually get a bunch of entries in /etc/aliases and various system accounts (/etc/passwd entries with UID < 1000) created by the packages they install. I've noticed an increase in spammers targeting some of the more common ones. Can the number of

Nettoyage du spam : Mars 2017

Bonjour, Comme nous sommes en Avril, il est désormais possible de traiter les archives du mois de mars 2017 des listes francophones. N'oubliez bien sûr pas d'ajouter votre nom à la liste des relecteurs pour que nous sachions où nous en sommes. Détails du processus de nettoyage du spam sur

Nettoyage du spam : février 2017

Bonjour, Comme nous sommes en mars, il est désormais possible de traiter les archives du mois de février 2017 des listes francophones. N'oubliez bien sûr pas d'ajouter votre nom à la liste des relecteurs pour que nous sachions où nous en sommes. Détails du processus de nettoyage du spam sur

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

Andre Müller wrote: > can't make a constitution. you don't have constitution but Grundgesetz, which is meant to function as a constitution. I tried to find out for couple of months , but there is only the 2+4 Vertrag and it is not conclusive. So it is not clear to me ... and not only to me. It

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > I don't think you want to go there (especially when the above mentioned > Reichsbürger have been caught hoarding weapons and when one of them has > already shot a cop dead. A common mistake is to deduce from one event or single person, which does not mean I agree with

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

I apologize for feeding the trolls, you may say I have a soft spot for strays. to...@tuxteam.de: > No. You don't define truth as "arithmetic means between realities", unless > you've convinced yourself the deviations follow a normal distribution. I liked this part better than any practical

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 09:26:47AM +0100, deloptes wrote: > Michael Lange wrote: > > > Oops, I guess I picked the wrong English word, I guess it should rather > > read "deny the legal existence..." > > You know Germany is still occupied by the USA

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

Good morning, I do not want to fire up a new discussion in a mailing list for a operating system. I want to clarify some things. So if you're not interested, then don't answer, don't read it. @deloptes, this is a good point. To have only on view, you never can say what is behind you. Germany is

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

Michael Lange wrote: > Oops, I guess I picked the wrong English word, I guess it should rather > read "deny the legal existence..." You know Germany is still occupied by the USA as there is no legal document for the opposite. I am not sure who is living in the real world - you or they. IMO the

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 00:42:34 +0100 Michael Lange wrote: > referred to as "Reichsbürger", who, as a common base, neglect the legal > existence of the Federal Republic of Germany and declare their own Oops, I guess I picked the wrong English word, I guess it should rather

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 18:07:13 + Andre Müller wrote: > You can get more information on our page: > http://verfassunggebende-versammlung.org (of course it's in german) Hahaha, I wish you guys a lot of fun in your parallel universe! ;-) And a word to all non-german users

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

GiaThnYgeia: > Yes but do you want equality? You give me half of your Euros I'll give > you have of my Uruguayan pesetas. Then there will be no war, no reason > for war. If you want to be free but you want the army to enforce > maximum inequality go to Trump's land. It is the most freedom you

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

Andre Müller: > Our destination is, that all people can live their life in freedom without > supporting war against other countries. People never want to have war. Yes but do you want equality? You give me half of your Euros I'll give you have of my Uruguayan pesetas. Then there will be no war,

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

Lisi Reisz: > On Friday 17 February 2017 09:43:16 Stephen Powell wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 04:30, Andre Müller wrote: >>> I'm sick of it and many >>> people in whole >>> Europe also. >> >> And as for the United States, do we not have the best Congress money can >> buy? > > No. But you

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

Nicolas George schrieb am Fr., 17. Feb. 2017 um 13:24 Uhr: > Le nonidi 29 pluviôse, an CCXXV, Andre Müller a écrit : > > The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do our own > > constitution. > > And your own constitution will need politicians of its own to work.

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:25:41AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > That may be true, but I am driven to quote Benjamin Franklin here, > with "Democracy is a very bad form of government, but all the others are > so much worse." You're thinking of Winston Churchill: "Indeed, it has been said that

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

On Friday 17 February 2017 07:17:21 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Friday 17 February 2017 09:43:16 Stephen Powell wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 04:30, Andre Müller wrote: > > > The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do our > > > own constitution. > > > This is the only way to

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

What is this pseuds-corner spam fritter stuff? MF On 17 February 2017 at 12:05, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Le nonidi 29 pluviôse, an CCXXV, Andre Müller a écrit : > > The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do our own > > constitut

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

Le nonidi 29 pluviôse, an CCXXV, Andre Müller a écrit : > The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do our own > constitution. And your own constitution will need politicians of its own to work. And they too, after the first few decades, will be corrupt, because "power attracts the

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

On Friday 17 February 2017 09:43:16 Stephen Powell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 04:30, Andre Müller wrote: > > The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do our own > > constitution. > > This is the only way to change the whole system. I'm sick of it and many > > people in whole

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

Andre Müller 께서 쓰시길, 《記事 全文 에서》: > [...] > Fuck politicians, die in pain, burn in hell! I did send my letter with all my spiritual energy. If he(Munich Mayor) do not do rethink, i am willing to go

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, at 04:30, Andre Müller wrote: > > The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do our own > constitution. > This is the only way to change the whole system. I'm sick of it and many > people in whole > Europe also. And as for the United States, do we not have the

Re: Last spam: Let me know Munich Mayor's email address, please..

Greetings to South Korea, i think you can contact the Munich Mayor at buero...@muenchen.de They are corrupt and do not work for the people. They work for companies and this decision about Limux is not the only bad decision they made. The day comes closer, that we remove all politicians and do

Nettoyage du spam : janvier 2017

Bonjour, Comme nous sommes en février, il est désormais possible de traiter les archives du mois de janvier 2017 des listes francophones. N'oubliez bien sûr pas d'ajouter votre nom à la liste des relecteurs pour que nous sachions où nous en sommes. Détails du processus de nettoyage du spam sur

Re: sobre SPAM

Ok Terceiro. Obrigado pela info. Thiag Em Sex, 2017-01-27 às 13:56 -0200, Antonio Terceiro escreveu: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:10:49AM -0300, Thiago Canuto Ferreira wrote: > > Bom dia pessoal. > > > > Hoje voltei a receber spam com a seguinte mensagem: &g

Re: sobre SPAM

Ok Terceiro. Obrigado pela info. Thiago C. F. Em Sex, 2017-01-27 às 13:56 -0200, Antonio Terceiro escreveu: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:10:49AM -0300, Thiago Canuto Ferreira wrote: > > Bom dia pessoal. > > > > Hoje voltei a receber spam com a seguinte mensagem: &g

Re: sobre SPAM

Le ven. 27 janv. 2017 à 13:56, Antonio Terceiro a écrit : as listas no alioth (lists.alioth.debian.org) infelizmente não tem uma solução integrada de antispam, então não tem muito o que fazer. Por outro lado a página da debian-br-geral@l.a.d.o lista administradores, a

Re: sobre SPAM

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:10:49AM -0300, Thiago Canuto Ferreira wrote: > Bom dia pessoal. > > Hoje voltei a receber spam com a seguinte mensagem: > > Today's Topics: > >1. ? Estas pessoas est?o ? sua espera para conversar! (Twoo) > > Na lista debian-br-ge

Re: sobre SPAM

Bom dia pessoal. Hoje voltei a receber spam com a seguinte mensagem: Today's Topics: 1. ? Estas pessoas est?o ? sua espera para conversar! (Twoo) Na lista debian-br-ge...@lists.alioth.debian.org Entrei na pág. deste post: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-br-geral/2017

Nettoyage du spam :Décembre 2016

nous en sommes. Détails du processus de nettoyage du spam sur : https://wiki.debian.org/I18n/FrenchSpamClean slt bernard -- bernard schoenacker <bernard.schoenac...@free.fr>

spam complaint

Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On 2016年12月21日 下午11:54, Oleg Pykhalov wrote: deloptes writes: > I have an older notebook with ATI. (Actually I gave it to a friend) Recently > I updated to OS is ubuntu 16.04 from 12.x. > > glxgears looks

spam complaint

Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On 2016年12月23日 上午1:24, Xen wrote: I am trying to get a webserver to run under my regular user, or at least to have the website's files under control of my regular user, but the webserver runs as www-data. But it seems I cannot do

spam complaint

Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On 2016年12月22日 上午4:49, M.A. Perry wrote: Dear People, A simple question for which I have so far found no answer in the Debian documentation. My computer is a domestic, Debian 8.6 AMD-64 box that uses apt-get and aptitude for ugrades

spam complaint

Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On 2016年12月22日 上午4:13, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hi, I've just read the latest news and I was pleasantly surprised, please read it here http://pol.robimlaw.com/dedf Looking forward, Samuel Thibault From:

spam complaint

Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On 2016年12月22日 上午1:12, Pete Orrall wrote: On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:10 PM, deloptes wrote: > I have an older notebook with ATI. (Actually I gave it to a friend) Recently > I updated to OS is ubuntu 16.04 from

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

ut unfortunately many home ISP accounts now have > > > complementary A-PTR records, making spam detection much harder. > > > > Their users may need to send mail after all. > > Which they can do through their email provider, or more likely, through > webmail, wit

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

er is compliant and > in particular, won't truncate the list of IP addresses as > with: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834098 > > > This check used to be pretty much a guarantee of a business IP > > address, but unfortunately many home ISP accounts now

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

8 > This check used to be pretty much a guarantee of a business IP address, > but unfortunately many home ISP accounts now have complementary A-PTR > records, making spam detection much harder. Their users may need to send mail after all. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net>

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

On 12/16/2016 3:58 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: [snip] This has the potential to kill mail (which for the Big Ones might be a Good Thing: mail is too decentral and too hard to monetarize). 10 years ago, SPAM was told to kill eMail. Now it's the over-the-top anti-SPAM solutions doing the same

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

:32 + > > > > > > > > Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > You have over-cut. Here is what you cut, which is highly relevant: > > > > > > "On Friday 16 December 2016 09:58:36 to...@tux

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

.com> wrote: > > [...] > > > You have over-cut. Here is what you cut, which is highly relevant: > > > > "On Friday 16 December 2016 09:58:36 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > At least in the case of delivery to the SPAM box the mail has been > &g

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

ver-cut. Here is what you cut, which is highly relevant: > > "On Friday 16 December 2016 09:58:36 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > At least in the case of delivery to the SPAM box the mail has been > > > actually delivered to the user. > > > > "Technica

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

On Friday 16 December 2016 21:19:45 Joe wrote: > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 20:55:32 + > > Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The fact that some people do not know > > enough to use Spam folders differently from deleted mail is not a > > reason why the

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 20:55:32 + Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > The fact that some people do not know > enough to use Spam folders differently from deleted mail is not a > reason why the rest of us should have our email dropped. > The reason why your

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

On Friday 16 December 2016 09:58:36 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > At least in the case of delivery to the SPAM box the mail has been > > actually delivered to the user. > > "Technically", yes. No, not just technically. Actually. The recipient then has t

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

s IP address, but unfortunately many home ISP accounts now have complementary A-PTR records, making spam detection much harder. But even today, this DNS check is my second most useful anti-spam measure, the first being to accept email only to named account holders. -- Joe

gefixt (was: (wellicht al gefixt) Re: spamassassin spam drempel gehaald, maar X-Spam-Status: No)

>>> Ben ik weer :-) >>> >>> Het Bayes filter lijkt te werken, de hoeveelheid spam die in de INBOXen >>> terecht komt wordt minder. >>> >>> Gisteren besloten de drempelwaarde voor Spam te verlagen van 5.0 (de >>> default waarde)

Re: (wellicht al gefixt) Re: spamassassin spam drempel gehaald, maar X-Spam-Status: No

Gijs Hillenius <g...@hillenius.net> writes: > Gijs Hillenius <g...@hillenius.net> writes: > >> Ben ik weer :-) >> >> Het Bayes filter lijkt te werken, de hoeveelheid spam die in de INBOXen >> terecht komt wordt minder. >> >> Gisteren beslo

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2016-12-15 10:41:58 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Next is a check if the sending IP resolves correctly and the hostname >> resolves back to this IP. > > I wonder whether this rule should really be used. A hostname may >

(wellicht al gefixt) Re: spamassassin spam drempel gehaald, maar X-Spam-Status: No

Gijs Hillenius <g...@hillenius.net> writes: > Ben ik weer :-) > > Het Bayes filter lijkt te werken, de hoeveelheid spam die in de INBOXen > terecht komt wordt minder. > > Gisteren besloten de drempelwaarde voor Spam te verlagen van 5.0 (de > default waarde) naar 3

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

On 2016-12-15 10:41:58 +0100, Sven Hartge wrote: > Next is a check if the sending IP resolves correctly and the hostname > resolves back to this IP. I wonder whether this rule should really be used. A hostname may resolve to multiple IP's, and for some reasons, the

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

get a > >> reasonable explanation? I've heard there are spam filters who give a > >> "user doesn't exist" error which is somewhat disrespectful to genuine > >> senders. [...] > > > I wish this were so [...] > > Thus mail gets not delivere

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 07:51:45AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> - does the sender know their mail was not delivered and do they get a >> reasonable explanation? I've heard there are spam filters who give a >> "user doesn't exist" error

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

lanation? I've heard there are spam filters who give a > "user doesn't exist" error which is somewhat disrespectful to genuine > senders. I can understand the reason for this: Don't give the spammers any indication if an address is valid. But I have yet to see any solid evide

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 07:51:45AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: [...] > - does the sender know their mail was not delivered and do they get a > reasonable explanation? I've heard there are spam filters who give a > "user doesn't exis

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

versity) it is very important for us (and our users) to >>> have more control over which email is rejected, trying to minimize false >>> positives as much as possible while also trying to detect as much SPAM >>> as possible. A very fine balance, to say the least. > &

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 09:18:11 +0100 Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.pro> wrote: > > > Over time, I've noticed that the quantity of spam getting through my > Debian mail server has been increasing. > > What steps are people taking to minimize the spam problem, especially &

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

so I'm very aware of bandwidth usage and speed). In the early days of our setup we where in the opposite situation: Network bandwidth was not a problem but local compute resources (for Spamassassin and the Virus scanners) where. This is why we put all the CPU-inexpensive networking checks up at the front

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

more control over which email is rejected, trying to minimize false >> positives as much as possible while also trying to detect as much SPAM >> as possible. A very fine balance, to say the least. > It is (as you say) complicated but > 1. Why is it important for *your university

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

ize false > positives as much as possible while also trying to detect as much SPAM > as possible. A very fine balance, to say the least. It is (as you say) complicated but 1. Why is it important for *your university*? 2. Why is it important for your users? The two are are not the same. For a st

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

What Sven suggested is pretty good. But I'd do all the local checks first, then hit the RBLs on the 'Net -- it reduces the load on the RBLs and on the local 'Net, and a CPU is faster than a 'Net connection (I'm on a T1, so I'm very aware of bandwidth usage and speed). Iptables is also useful. You

Re: best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.pro> wrote: > Could anybody provide updates to those pages? What would professional > mail server admins consider best practice today? Problem is: the more (drastic) anti-SPAM measures everyone take, the more broken e-mail as a whole becomes. I noticed

best practices for fighting spam with Debian?

Over time, I've noticed that the quantity of spam getting through my Debian mail server has been increasing. What steps are people taking to minimize the spam problem, especially if you are using Debian as both mail server and desktop? The wiki contains details about SpamAssassin[1

Re: spam filtering question?

gt; >> shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is > >> using Ubuntu. > >> For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no > >> longer filtering at the level it did previously. > >> Has something happened to th

Re: spam filtering question?

On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:27:50PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote: > shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is > using Ubuntu. > For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer > filtering at the level it did previously. >

Re: spam filtering question?

> Has something happened to the program ? There has nothing happend to the program. The type of spam you are receiving has changed. I don't know much about your mail setup but spam has to fight on different levels when processing mails. > Is there a better spam filtering option for shell servers

Re: spam filtering question?

The only thing I can think to do is to filter on Messag_id: field contents and run all incoming email through formail to force what comes in to be in proper format before any spam filters get it. Ken did tell me awhile back that overseas undesireables wanted to use shellworld.net for criminal

Re: spam filtering question?

On 2016-12-11, Henning Follmann wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 04:46:19PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote: >> What favored Ubuntu help list? >> I stated at the outset that I use a service. I do not administrate that >> service. >> >> > > Never mind her, she's a fear

Re: spam filtering question?

Hi there, Yes I am running sa-learn and indeed is no longer being effective. Part of the spam I believe is tied to a couple of hacks of major sites, when Linkedin was hacked and when yahoo groups had problems. I can simply dump the ones that are fake orders or documents or tickets, the ones

Re: spam filtering question?

hat kind of support? I still think focusing on spamassassin is not helpful. Mail setup and spam control is a concerted effort. If I setup a mail service spamassassin is only the final sieve. By the time mail is handed to spamassassin already 90% of spam is weeded out. But this step is usually the one

Re: spam filtering question?

here I do most of my internet work is >>> using Ubuntu. >>> For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer >>> filtering at the level it did previously. >>> Has something happened to the program ? >>> Is there a better spam filtering

Re: spam filtering question?

rg> Subject: Re: spam filtering question? Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:47:05 + (UTC) Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org What favored Ubuntu help list? I stated at the outset that I use a service. I do not administrate that service. On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:

Re: spam filtering question?

of my internet work is using Ubuntu. For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer filtering at the level it did previously. Has something happened to the program ? Is there a better spam filtering option for shell servers that I might suggest to our administrator? The

Re: spam filtering question?

On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:27:50PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote: > Greetings folks, > shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is > using Ubuntu. > For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer > filtering at the level it

Re: spam filtering question?

On 12/9/16, Karen Lewellen <klewel...@shellworld.net> wrote: > Greetings folks, > shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is > using Ubuntu. > For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer > filtering at the level it

Re: spam filtering question?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:27:50PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote: > Greetings folks, > shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work > is using Ubuntu. > For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well

spam filtering question?

Greetings folks, shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is using Ubuntu. For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer filtering at the level it did previously. Has something happened to the program ? Is there a better spam filtering

Nettoyage du spam : Novembre 2016

processus de nettoyage du spam sur : https://wiki.debian.org/I18n/FrenchSpamClean slt bernard -- bernard schoenacker <bernard.schoenac...@free.fr>

Nettoyage du spam : octobre 2016

Bonjour, Comme nous sommes en novembre, il est désormais possible de traiter les archives du mois d'octobre 2016 des listes francophones. N'oubliez bien sûr pas d'ajouter votre nom à la liste des relecteurs pour que nous sachions où nous en sommes. Détails du processus de nettoyage du spam sur

Nettoyage du spam : septembre 2016

Bonjour, Comme nous sommes en octobre, il est désormais possible de traiter les archives du mois de septembre 2016 des listes francophones. N'oubliez bien sûr pas d'ajouter votre nom à la liste des relecteurs pour que nous sachions où nous en sommes. Détails du processus de nettoyage du spam sur

Re: Spam 101 on Debian-User (was: Upgrade Your Mailbox Quota!!!)

On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:21:50 -0500 limpia <lim...@openmailbox.org> wrote: > On 2016-08-15 12:31, Account-services wrote: > > Avoid [debian-user@lists.debian.org] suspension > > > Text cut, but I am sure every one has seen it, Of course not. Those of us who use real e-mai

Re: sobre SPAM

t;terce...@debian.org> escreveu: >> >> toda mensagem da lista tem um cabeçalho List-Archive, que dá o endereço >> onde ela é publicada no arquivo de lista. você vai nesse endereço, e >> clica "Report as spam" (em cima à direita). eu configuro o meu progra

Re: sobre SPAM

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 06:30:26PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > toda mensagem da lista tem um cabeçalho List-Archive, que dá o endereço > onde ela é publicada no arquivo de lista. você vai nesse endereço, e > clica "Report as spam" (em cima à direita). eu configuro o meu

Re: sobre SPAM

nuto Ferreira wrote: > > Olá amigos. > > > > O que fazer com este emails de spams? Tem alguma maneira de bloqueá-los? > > o primeiro passo é não responder spam, e em especial, não com cópia para > o spammer. ;-) > > toda mensagem da lista tem um cabeçalho List-Archive, qu

sobre SPAM

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 03:19:17PM -0400, Thiago Canuto Ferreira wrote: > Olá amigos. > > O que fazer com este emails de spams? Tem alguma maneira de bloqueá-los? o primeiro passo é não responder spam, e em especial, não com cópia para o spammer. ;-) toda mensagem da lista tem um cabeç

nettoyage du spam juillet 2016

Bonjour, Comme nous sommes en août, il est désormais possible de traiter les archives du mois de juillet 2016 des listes francophones. N'oubliez bien sûr pas d'ajouter votre nom à la liste des relecteurs pour que nous sachions où nous en sommes. Détails du processus de nettoyage du spam sur

Re: Servidor de correo no instalado envia SPAM

e-mail de los proveedores del VPS que me dicen que un > sitio de mi servidor está generando SPAM > > ¿Es posible que esto suceda? Sí, claro, más aún si no sabes siquiera si tienes instalado un servidor de correo. > Tengo instalado Joomla ¿Es posible que a través de Joomla se genere

Re: Servidor de correo no instalado envia SPAM

recibio un e-mail de los proveedores del VPS que me dicen que un > > sitio de mi servidor está generando SPAM > > > > ¿Es posible que esto suceda? > > > > Tengo instalado Joomla ¿Es posible que a través de Joomla se genere > > el SPAM? > > > > G

Re: Servidor de correo no instalado envia SPAM

> mi servidor está generando SPAM > > ¿Es posible que esto suceda? > > Tengo instalado Joomla ¿Es posible que a través de Joomla se genere el SPAM? > > Gracias anticipadas por las respuestas. > > Atte. > RVCC Si es posible, seguramente te esta usando la funcion m

Re: Servidor de correo no instalado envia SPAM

On 2016-07-25 17:20, Debian Linux wrote: Estimados amigos Tengo un servidor con Debian 7 en un VPS alquilado, en el cual no instalé el servidor de correo. He recibio un e-mail de los proveedores del VPS que me dicen que un sitio de mi servidor está generando SPAM ¿Es posible que esto suceda

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >