Olá,
Em 3 de março de 2010 15:13, EURO euri...@gmail.com escreveu:
Opa pessoal,
Segue os anexos dos erros com o update manager que nao havia postado.
Segundo [1], o repositório que você está usando está correto.
Aparentemente, está fora do ar no momento.
Você pode retirar estas entradas da
OK...acho que entendi.
Vc diz as preferencias do sources.list. Acredito que o update manager busca
as autalizacoes conforme as diretivas apontadas no arquivo sources.list. Nao
e isso?
Obrigadao pela atencao
Euro
2010/3/3 Gunther Furtado gunfurt...@gmail.com
Olá,
Em 3 de março de 2010
Em 3 de março de 2010 16:20, EURO euri...@gmail.com escreveu:
OK...acho que entendi.
Vc diz as preferencias do sources.list. Acredito que o update manager busca
as autalizacoes conforme as diretivas apontadas no arquivo sources.list. Nao
e isso?
Espero que sim!!!
Obrigadao pela atencao
Opa...
o meu sources.list traz:
*
#
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.3 _Lenny_ - Official amd64 NETINST
Binary-1 20090906-11:59]/ lenny main
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 5.0.3 _Lenny_ - Official amd64 NETINST
Binary-1 20090906-11:59]/ lenny main
Em 3 de março de 2010 16:25, EURO euri...@gmail.com escreveu:
Opa...
o meu sources.list traz:
[...]
Dê uma olhada em
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
Acho que muitas das suas dúvidas estão respondidas lá.
Abraço,
--
...agora, só nos sobrou o futuro..., visto em www.manuchao.net
Mais em:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-basico.pt-br.html
[...]
--
...agora, só nos sobrou o futuro..., visto em www.manuchao.net
Gunther Furtado
Curitiba - Paraná - Brasil
gunfurt...@gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-portuguese-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Dear List,
I am using debian/testing repository for installing texlive. The current
version of Texlive is texlive/testing uptodate 2009-7. But the package menager
program 'Tlmgr' doesn't show up in my system. I have used a source compiled
mpm package manager which is based on miktex. I
Sirs/Madam,
I attempted to download Ultimatix and now I am unable to use any of my
package managers to install programs. I have tried several apt-get commands
and receive the following error message: Could not open lock file
/var/lib/dpkg/lock -open 13 permission denied.
How might I
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 05:00:02PM +0300, Young, Loren R SGT NG NG NGB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
I attempted to download Ultimatix and now I am unable to use any of my
package managers to install programs. I have tried several apt-get commands
and receive the following error
Am 2007-06-25 11:50:13, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just installed Debian.? I'm wondering about the Synaptic Package
Manager.? As I've never used a GUI for Linux before, I will need to
get used to how things work.
I wanted to install a motherboard monitor.? I found one in the list,
xmbmon
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
On Jun 25, 11:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted to install a motherboard monitor.? I found one in the list, xmbmon,
and chose to install it.? It said installation complete.? However, I have no
idea how to find it and run it.? It's not showing up in the
I just installed Debian.? I'm wondering about the Synaptic Package Manager.? As
I've never used a GUI for Linux before, I will need to get used to how things
work.
I wanted to install a motherboard monitor.? I found one in the list, xmbmon,
and chose to install it.? It said installation
-get install xmbmon
and dpkg -L xmbmon
to see where are the package of files are installed in your os.
ok, normally every /bin/files are executable files that u can run
example: /bin/./df
So basically I'm curious about that package manager.? Once installed, are
icons created anywhere to run them
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just installed Debian. I'm wondering about the Synaptic Package Manager. As I've never
used a GUI for Linux before, I will need to get used to how things work.
[stuff deleted]
So basically I'm curious about that package manager. Once installed, are icons
On Jun 25, 11:00 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanted to install a motherboard monitor.? I found one in the list, xmbmon,
and chose to install it.? It said installation complete.? However, I have no
idea how to find it and run it.? It's not showing up in the applications list
anywhere.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just installed Debian. I'm wondering about the Synaptic Package Manager.
As
I've never used a GUI for Linux before, I will need to get used to how things
work.
If you already have experience in using the command line, nothing stops
you from keeping to use it. In many
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wanted to install a motherboard monitor. I found one in the list, xmbmon,
and chose to install it. It said installation complete. However, I have no
idea how to find it and run it. It's not showing up in the applications
list
anywhere.
You can see the
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:49:43AM -0800, Ken Irving wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wanted to install a motherboard monitor. I found one in the list,
xmbmon,
and chose to install it. It said installation complete. However, I have
no
idea how to find it and run it. It's not
On 3/18/07, Jeff Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most installed packages will mess $HOME more or less when compiled with
--prefix=$HOME. Though, keep the log of `make install' may be used as an
removing method if wanted latter.
Is there some package manager that can be used for normal user under
Wim De Smet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most installed packages will mess $HOME more or less when compiled with
--prefix=$HOME. Though, keep the log of `make install' may be used as an
removing method if wanted latter.
Is there some package manager that can be used for normal user under
Am 2007-03-19 07:51:28, schrieb Jeff Zhang:
dpkg/apt/aptitude are designed to install *system* packages.
If you want to install user-specific packages, build from source.
Yes, it is what I'm mean about things after building and installing.
You need to reverse engineer the debhelper, e.g.
Jeff Zhang wrote:
Most installed packages will mess $HOME more or less when compiled with
--prefix=$HOME. Though, keep the log of `make install' may be used as an
removing method if wanted latter.
Is there some package manager that can be used for normal user under their
home location
On 3/19/07, Adam Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Zhang wrote:
Most installed packages will mess $HOME more or less when compiled with
--prefix=$HOME. Though, keep the log of `make install' may be used as an
removing method if wanted latter.
Is there some package manager that can
Most installed packages will mess $HOME more or less when compiled with
--prefix=$HOME. Though, keep the log of `make install' may be used as an
removing method if wanted latter.
Is there some package manager that can be used for normal user under their
home location?
By which the software can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/18/07 10:48, Jeff Zhang wrote:
Most installed packages will mess $HOME more or less when compiled with
--prefix=$HOME. Though, keep the log of `make install' may be used as an
removing method if wanted latter.
Is there some package manager
method if wanted latter.
Is there some package manager that can be used for normal user under
their
home location?
By which the software can be cleanly purged and so on.
Or some extensions of checkinstall to make an simple one.
dpkg/apt/aptitude are designed to install *system* packages.
If you
or start Synaptic package Manager.
I think the issue is I'm not being asked for Administrator password,
access to Root Terminal does not get a response. Running :~$ apt-get
check in Terminal returns
E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (13 Permission denied)
E: Unable to lock
, which I didn't write down.
I now cannot open Update manager or start Synaptic package Manager.
I think the issue is I'm not being asked for Administrator password,
access to Root Terminal does not get a response.
Not sure about the above, but ...
Running :~$ apt-get
check in Terminal
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 14:20 +0100, Stephen Fahey wrote:
I now cannot open Update manager or start Synaptic package Manager.
I think the issue is I'm not being asked for Administrator password,
access to Root Terminal does not get a response. Running :~$ apt-get
check in Terminal returns
Robin Putters wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 14:20 +0100, Stephen Fahey wrote:
I now cannot open Update manager or start Synaptic package Manager.
I think the issue is I'm not being asked for Administrator password,
access to Root Terminal does not get a response. Running
happened in your case is that one of your
apt-get/synaptic/aptitude sessions were stopped abruptly. So the lock file
was not deleted. you can kill the corresponding apt-get/synaptic/aptitude
process by doing
pkill apt-get
as root. Substitude apt-get with your package manager. After
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 04:53:31PM +0100, Stephen Fahey wrote:
Robin Putters wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 14:20 +0100, Stephen Fahey wrote:
I now cannot open Update manager or start Synaptic package Manager.
I think the issue is I'm not being asked for Administrator password,
access
in an error message, which I didn't write down.
I now cannot open Update manager or start Synaptic package Manager.
I think the issue is I'm not being asked for Administrator password,
access to Root Terminal does not get a response. Running :~$
apt-get check in Terminal returns
E: Could
There is talk about the smart package manager. It claims it will handle package managing better than APT. Is this true or propaganda? If it is true, will there be a future switch from APT to this SMART? Could it be a potential etch +1 goal? Just wondering.
Joseph Smidt
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:20:43PM -0600 or thereabouts, Joseph Smidt wrote:
There is talk about the smart package manager. It claims it will handle
package managing better than APT. Is this true or propaganda? If it is
true, will there be a future switch from APT to this SMART? Could
There is talk about the smart package manager. It claims it will handle
package managing better than APT. Is this true or propaganda? If it is
true, will there be a future switch from APT to this SMART? Could it be a
potential etch +1 goal? Just wondering.
Are you referring to Aptitude
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:30:34 -0400, Stephen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:20:43PM -0600 or thereabouts, Joseph Smidt wrote:
There is talk about the smart package manager. It claims it will handle
package managing better than APT. Is this true or propaganda? If it is
true
Merhaba,
Debian grubunda bu boyutta bir proje için vakit ayırabilecek arkadaş var mı?
-- Yönlendirilmiş İleti --
Subject: Debian Package Manager wanted
Date: Pts 22 May 2006 21:28
From: Karsten Hilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian-Med debian-med@lists.debian.org
Hi all,
we
I use gnome2.14. and I install gnopernicus. after install it. I want to
remove it. but I can't remove it. Synaptic is close itself each time I
press apply button. This is happen to all module when I want to remove.
I can't press apply button because It will close
How to correct this problem?
Kan
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:19:01PM +0700, Surachai Locharoen wrote:
I use gnome2.14. and I install gnopernicus. after install it. I want to
remove it. but I can't remove it. Synaptic is close itself each time I
press apply button. This is happen to all module when I want to remove.
I can't
The same problem as me
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.bugs.general/88419
On พฤ., 2006-05-11 at 08:17 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:19:01PM +0700, Surachai Locharoen wrote:
I use gnome2.14. and I install gnopernicus. after install it. I want
Ok, I'll do that.Thanks.
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:09:59 +
Fabiana Jorge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I'll do that.
Thanks.
And don't forget to install some xfonts.
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert
Einstein)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hello, I've been reading some stuff about apt, dpkg and I wonder if it is possible to have more control on package's dependencies. Is there other package managers for debian that are able to support it? I've found this at
www.debian.org
As you can see in the above example, APT also takes care
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 21:24:31 +
Fabiana Jorge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've been reading some stuff about apt, dpkg and I wonder if it is
possible to have more control on package's dependencies. Is there other
package managers for debian that are able to support it?
force this with dpkg, but
this can instantly break your entire system. You have been warned.
What you really need is aptitude, the most powerful package manager on
Earth. Once you learn it, you will wonder how you have ever lived
without it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Fabiana Jorge wrote:
Hello,
I've been reading some stuff about apt, dpkg and I wonder if it is
possible to have more control on package's dependencies. Is there other
package managers for debian that are able to support it?
I've found this at www.debian.org
As you can see
hmm... I see. So for example, I wanted to install x-window-system, and as I don't have a printer I wouldn't need
xlibprint and
xlibprint-common (something like that). If it's not safe to remove those packages after the installation, is there a way not to install them?Thank you all for your time.
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:05:50AM +, Fabiana Jorge wrote:
hmm... I see. So for example, I wanted to install x-window-system, and as
I don't have a printer I wouldn't need xlibprint and xlibprint-common
(something like that). If it's not safe to remove those packages after
the
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:05:50 +
Fabiana Jorge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm... I see. So for example, I wanted to install x-window-system, and as I
don't have a printer I wouldn't need xlibprint and xlibprint-common
(something like that). If it's not safe to remove those packages after the
I was attempting to work with the repository list in
Synaptic. After disabling the two Sarge DVD entries
(contrib main), re-enabling them, and reloading the
deb list, I keep getting an error message that won't
go away. If I recheck the two entries on, it still
produces the same message, which is:
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 17:00 -0700, J Merritt wrote:
I was attempting to work with the repository list in
Synaptic. After disabling the two Sarge DVD entries
(contrib main), re-enabling them, and reloading the
deb list, I keep getting an error message that won't
go away. If I recheck the two
J Merritt wrote:
I was attempting to work with the repository list in
Synaptic. After disabling the two Sarge DVD entries
(contrib main), re-enabling them, and reloading the
deb list, I keep getting an error message that won't
go away. If I recheck the two entries on, it still
produces the
I started using Debian in the past 2 months after using another Linux distro for a long time. The other distro relies on RPM for its package management, with the consequence of the user having to go through "dependency hell" on a regular basis. I have been amazed at the size of the Synaptic
--- Jeremy Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What makes Synaptic different from RPM in concept?
The question you're really asking is:
What makes .deb different from .rpm in concept.
... because Synaptic is just a GUI-frontend. The tools behind it
(dpkg, and friends) do all the real work.
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 05:39:43PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
--- Jeremy Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What makes Synaptic different from RPM in concept?
The question you're really asking is:
What makes .deb different from .rpm in concept.
... because Synaptic is just a GUI-frontend.
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:35:37AM -0700, Jeremy Merritt wrote:
I started using Debian in the past 2 months after using another
Linux distro for a long time. The other distro relies on RPM for its
package management, with the consequence of the user having to go
through dependency hell on a
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:35:37AM -0700, Jeremy Merritt wrote:
I started using Debian in the past 2 months after using another Linux distro
for a long time. The other distro relies on RPM for its package management,
with the consequence of the user having to go through dependency hell on a
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 09:35 -0700, Jeremy Merritt wrote:
What makes Synaptic different from RPM in concept?
Like they said, it's the difference between .rpm's and .deb's, and the
package managers. They both contain the install location(s) and a list
of dependencies. The big difference is that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ariel Herrera wrote:
Hola listeros tengo un problemilla que no logro resolver.
Estoy detras un proxy y no puedo llegar a un repositorio x al cual se
puedo llegar delante de dicho proxy.
El problema creo esté en la configuración del apt, no tenía
Hola listeros tengo un problemilla que no logro resolver.
Estoy detras un proxy y no puedo llegar a un repositorio x al cual se
puedo llegar delante de dicho proxy.
El problema creo esté en la configuración del apt, no tenía el file
apt.config, luego lo creé coloqué allí
Adquaire::http::Proxy
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 21:42, Elmer E. Dow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm leaning toward using apt (and maybe occasionally using Synaptic)
rather then Aptitude.
ITYM: apt-get. apt-get (and its cohorts), Synaptic, and aptitude are all
based on the Advanced Package Tool,
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 21:42 -0600, Elmer E. Dow wrote:
After having used Red Hat 9 and Knoppix (hard disk install), I installed
Sarge
a while ago and plan to stick with it.
All support to you.
Now I need to select a package manager
to use that fits my needs. My laptop is used for office
Elmer E. Dow wrote:
After having used Red Hat 9 and Knoppix (hard disk install), I installed Sarge
a while ago and plan to stick with it. Now I need to select a package manager
to use that fits my needs. My laptop is used for office applications
(creating documents, some graphics
After having used Red Hat 9 and Knoppix (hard disk install), I installed Sarge
a while ago and plan to stick with it. Now I need to select a package manager
to use that fits my needs. My laptop is used for office applications
(creating documents, some graphics, presentation, browsing, e-mail
that. :-) If you're going to install things from source,
do it in a place not controlled by the package manager, such as
/usr/local or $HOME. In some cases you can leave the Debian version
installed but just not use it; in other cases (MTAs come to mind) you
can use the equivs package to create an empty
Just wondering, what happens to the system when you remove an installed
package or component of a package and replace/update with a tar.gz compiled
from source application? Can this break the system -- leading to dependancy
issues?
I'm asking because I had to install module-init-tools,
system's consistency.
Now the package manager database does not match actual contents of your
system. So expect different failures while trying to use package management
tools.
If you really really need to install software in non-deb format, consider
making a deb package youself. It is not difficult
So much for the topic at hand... in general: fear not.
It's part of the Linux learning process that one learns where to pick up
information. man, info, /usr/share/doc/, www... google is your friend,
but google is not the be-all and end-all of everything.
Especially if you what you're looking
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 12:14, Joe Rhett wrote:
So much for the topic at hand... in general: fear not.
It's part of the Linux learning process that one learns where to pick up
information. man, info, /usr/share/doc/, www... google is your friend,
but google is not the be-all and end-all of
Since this post has no technical merits, I separated it out.
I've been using Linux since 0.7x kernels, so you can skip the patronizing.
Last time I checked, some of my patches were still in the driver sources
for various adapters.
Though I must say I'm extremely curious how you managed to
The point I was making is that most of us have better things to do than
search more than 5 pages of google hits. If the 'right places' to get
Debian applications were listed on the debian homepages, this wouldn't be
necessary. (more on this below)
All of the right places already ARE
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:24:25 -0800,
Joe Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The point I was making is that most of us have better things to do
than search more than 5 pages of google hits. If the 'right
places' to get Debian applications were listed on the
Please, stop complaining, and do your research
Actually, your comments here are demonstrating just how inadequate the
apt-get documentation is. Because I read through it a dozen times -- and
was already making notes to suggest cleaning it up -- and I never saw
anything about the 'policy'
is probably a good thing for kernels.
Use a real package manager (not apt-get) which shows you new packages.
The really funny thing about this whole topic is that we've now come full
circle. Read the subject line.
I am asking what package manager I should use, because apt-get doesn't
seem to handle
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 03:56, Joe Rhett wrote:
Use a real package manager (not apt-get) which shows you new packages.
The really funny thing about this whole topic is that we've now come full
circle. Read the subject line.
Well, apt-get simply is no package manager. At least
Try adding this line to your /etc/apt/apt.conf file and see if you get
better results with your 'apt-get update':
APT::Default-Release testing;
That's unnecessary if you only have one release listed in
/etc/apt/sources.list (which is the configuration I'd strongly
recommend) and may
You seem to have a fairly big misconception here: Adding testing to the
sources.list and doing an apt-get update and upgrade will _not_ reflect
how many packages are in testing. Not by any stretch.
First off, apt-get upgrade and apt-get dist-upgrade are very different:
upgrade will install
Ah, that would explain your confusion. 'apt-get upgrade' isn't what you
want, since as documented in the apt-get(8) man page it will not install
new packages. In particular, if you attempt to use 'apt-get upgrade' to
upgrade from stable to testing, it will refuse to upgrade libc6 because
of
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:46:30AM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
HOWEVER, both of these commands are starting from the goal of upgrading
to newer versions of packages you _already_ have installed. It gives
you no idea what _else_ might be included in sarge.
That's exactly what I want.
Can
automatically, which is probably a good thing for kernels.
Use a real package manager (not apt-get) which shows you new packages.
Stuff that has been safe and stable within Sid for over a year now
(according to the package pages) still isn't appearing in testing.
Examples, please? I'd
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:19:47AM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:41:50PM -0600, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
Try adding this line to your /etc/apt/apt.conf file and see if you get
better results with your 'apt-get update':
APT::Default-Release
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:41:50PM -0600, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
From: Joe Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let me rephrase. Either the US mirrors are screwed, or there is
less than a dozen packages in testing. Because adding testing to
the sources list and doing an apt-get update
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 00:47:54 +
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually use Debian testing as a desktop, eight hours a day, five days
a week. It works great.
Moi aussi.
But there are some kde-related packages that just won't install - e.g.
quanta, which I wanted to have a look at.
--- Joe Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, this
is probably a bonehead user question but
I'm just getting used
to Debian. Not normally a bonehead :-(
I would like/prefer to run 'stable'. Debian/Woody
installed on my laptop
perfectly fine. Wireless/WEP, IPsec, X all up and
running
Joe wrote:
So I am writing here in hopes I'm overlooking
something. Please, tell me
how one can update just one package and its
dependancies, without doing a
full-on conversion from Woody to unstable? If a
single package forces one
to upgrade completely to unstable branch, then
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 02:35, Joe Rhett wrote:
--snip--
1. Set the unstable archives to a higher preference in /etc/apt/preferences
2. apt-get upgrade to update the entire lot?
... or am I missing a step?
That's about it. Simple really. :)
I find it kindof sad that testing really
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 02:35, Joe Rhett wrote:
I find it kindof sad that testing really doesn't appear to have any
function any longer. One would like to run from testing and leave unstable
for the well, unstable stuff. But I haven't really found much in testing,
which means one must be
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:00:14AM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 03:23:48AM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote:
Well, in my experience, testing is most useful immediately following a
new stable release, and least useful immediately preceding a new stable
release. If you were to
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:21:44 +
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not true. KDE 3 went in just a few days ago (albeit somewhat
broken for now)
Indeed.
What would be really helpful would be if there was some easy-to-find
running guidance on what testing users should do - like
breakage then somebody usually
posts to mailing lists about it; if it's just package conflicts and
things, then, well, you should pay attention to what the package manager
says it's going to remove and say no if it looks mad.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED
the package manager
says it's going to remove and say no if it looks mad.
OK. Thanks.
This may be a stupid question, but has consideration been given to having
a 'holding area' between testing and stable to which stuff gets moved only
when there are no breakages?
- Richard.
--
Richard Kimber
http
to mailing lists about it; if it's just package conflicts and
things, then, well, you should pay attention to what the package manager
says it's going to remove and say no if it looks mad.
OK. Thanks.
This may be a stupid question, but has consideration been given to having
a 'holding area
If testing is what is supposed to be the next release, then it seems
pointless to even bother. Testing still has Mozilla 1.0. That's what,
2 years old?
We're working on it, but the mozilla package is buggy, which makes it
difficult to make the testing management scripts happy with it.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alex Malinovich
Subject: Re: What's the best package manager for
single-package upgrades?
Let me rephrase. Either the US mirrors are screwed
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:51:45PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
If testing is what is supposed to be the next release, then it seems
pointless to even bother. Testing still has Mozilla 1.0. That's what,
2 years old?
We're working on it, but the mozilla package is buggy, which makes it
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:51:45PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
Joe Rhett wrote:
If testing is what is supposed to be the next release, then it seems
pointless to even bother. Testing still has Mozilla 1.0. That's what,
2 years old?
We're working on it, but the
Okay, this is probably a bonehead user question but I'm just getting used
to Debian. Not normally a bonehead :-(
I would like/prefer to run 'stable'. Debian/Woody installed on my laptop
perfectly fine. Wireless/WEP, IPsec, X all up and running SWEET.
Unfortunately, the stable browser is
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Estou rodando a R3 do Debian e o meu package manager não está abrindo
Clico em cima dele e ele fica como se estive compilando e nada. Não
consigo instalar pacotes.. Gostaria de saber se tem como resolver esse
problema..
Grato,
Rafael
Dear All,
I can't open the package manager on Linux Under Kde I click on Package
Manager Link but nothing appears.. So how can I fix this problem. I
try to log with Gnome but the problem persist.
I need help !
Tks,
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
101 - 200 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
