)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Patterson
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 3:22 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue
He likes his spam.
I am wide open to better ideas, other than teaching
20, 2004 6:09 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Issue
That is why whitelisting from or to an e-mail address is very touchy and
dangerous.
Why is anything for that user configured to be whitelisted?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
Hello all,
I need some other (better) minds with this question.
I host a domain (with email) that I have whitelisted both to from in the
global.cfg file.
The entries are:
WHITELIST TODOMAIN @domain.com
WHITELIST FROM @domain.com
I also have an IPBlacklist test as follows:
IPBlackList ipfile
Scott:
Is there anyway we
can whitelist a test?
With Declude we
can have combination tests and tests that give weight based on a combination of
test names.. now I wonder if we can whitelist a test name:
Whitelist
Testsfailed spamcop :)
If we can do this
it can help us with whitelisting
Is there anyway we can whitelist a test?
With Declude we can have combination tests and tests that give weight
based on a combination of test names.. now I wonder if we can whitelist a
test name:
Whitelist Testsfailedspamcop :)
If we can do this it can help us with whitelisting based on
I have a bunch of devices that e-mail me reports and the like. They
don't generate proper headers, helos etc. I want to WHITELIST the IPs.
What I really want to do is WHITELIST these IP addresses for my domain
only.
I have the command for the GLOBAL.CFG file
WHITELIST IP 1.2.3.4
Which will
What I really want to do is WHITELIST these IP addresses for my domain
only.
That isn't currently possible.
Per-user/per-domain whitelisting is available for the return address, but
there isn't yet a way to have IP whitelisting on a per-user/per-domain basis.
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting IP Addresses
What I really want to do is WHITELIST these IP addresses for my
domain
only.
That isn't currently possible.
Per-user/per-domain whitelisting is available for the return address,
but
there isn't yet a way to have IP
Can you whitelist IP addresses via a file in global.cfg or only inline?
You can currently only whitelist IPs in the global.cfg file (WHITELIST IP
192.0.2.25).
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
Hi;
I know this has
been discussed in the past but I am not sure if any solution is
available.
If one person has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in the address book it appears that
an email sent to this person and many others will be whitelisted for
all.
We have a
situation that a person receives a
on 4/16/04 8:39 AM, Kami Razvan wrote:
I know this has been discussed in the past but I am not sure if any solution
is available.
If one person has [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the address book it appears that an email
sent to this person and many others will be whitelisted for all.
We have a
If one person has mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] in the address book it
appears that an email sent to this person and many others will be
whitelisted for all.
Correct.
We have a situation that a person receives a lot of news emails and has
whitelisted his address. Now anything
Hi Scott,
Having added PREWHITELIST ON in my GLOBAL.CFG file, my server still
seems to be running the SPFFAIL test on 'local'/whitelisted IP
addresses. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Lyndon.
Email checked by UKsubnet anti-virus service
To prevent email
Having added PREWHITELIST ON in my GLOBAL.CFG file, my server still
seems to be running the SPFFAIL test on 'local'/whitelisted IP
addresses. Any ideas?
Are you running v1.70 or later? Do you also have a line PREWHITELIST OFF
(which could override the ON setting)? Where exactly is the
Sorry, I also have a WHITELIST AUTH.
Email checked by UKsubnet anti-virus service
To prevent email abuse block spam
contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +44(0)8712360301 Web: www.uksubnet.net
Fax: +44(0)8712360300
Powered by UKsubnet Internet Service
Hi Scott,
I'm running 1.78i28.
PREWHITELIST is only entered once in the global.cfg, so no overriding. I
have 7 whitelist lines in the global.cfg, three are IP ranges, three are
domains, and the 7th is an ANYWHERE whitelist. In the Global.cfg,
PREWHITELIST ON is above my WHITELISTs (if that makes
I'm running 1.78i28.
PREWHITELIST is only entered once in the global.cfg, so no overriding. I
have 7 whitelist lines in the global.cfg, three are IP ranges, three are
domains, and the 7th is an ANYWHERE whitelist. In the Global.cfg,
PREWHITELIST ON is above my WHITELISTs (if that makes any
Hello all,
I've recently added SPF records to all our domains and want to keep a
close eye on which users are not sending mail out through our server
(via my DNS server logs), and which emails we are receiving that are
failing SPF checks.
I'm getting a lot of fails in the SPF log from my own
I'm getting a lot of fails in the SPF log from my own clients sending
via my server, because I haven't added their dialup ranges into their
SPF records - the SPF records only contain my server range of addresses.
My dialup IPs are all white listed in declude, so with this being the
case, should
Scott,
Is PREWHITELIST explained somewhere in more detail?
Thanks,
Andy
Thumpernet
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 7:43 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting SPF
I'm getting a lot of fails
To do that, you can add a line PREWHITELIST ON to the
\IMail\Declude\global.cfg file. With that line, Declude
JunkMail will
prevent tests from being run for many of the various types of
whitelists
(including the WHITELIST IP lines in the global.cfg file).
Ahh brilliant. Thanks for
Hello
I am having a problem receiving email from a certain school district.
However, when I whitelist them the mail comes through just fine. I know
that they are being filtered by Declude. When you whitelist a domain,
the Declude headers for failed tests do not show.
Is there a way to
- Original Message -
From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 11:26 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting/Filtering Question
Hello
I am having a problem receiving email from a certain school district.
However, when I whitelist them
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting/Filtering Question
Samantha -
If I am not mistaken, one of the first things that Declude does it to
check
to see if the sender is whitlisted and if they are then none of the test
are
run. The belief is that if a message is from
I received a message from a customer that was receiving SPAM. For some
reason, this message was whitelisted but we do not have any of theses
domains or IP addresses whitelisted. Am I missing something from this
message header or can someone add the whitelist line to the message
header.
The
I received a message from a customer that was receiving SPAM. For some
reason, this message was whitelisted but we do not have any of theses
domains or IP addresses whitelisted. Am I missing something from this
message header or can someone add the whitelist line to the message
header.
Have you
: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting and SPAM
I received a message from a customer that was receiving SPAM. For some
reason, this message was whitelisted but we do not have any of theses
domains or IP addresses whitelisted. Am I missing something from this
message header or can someone add
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting and SPAM
I received a message from a customer that was receiving SPAM
My question is if one of our customers is whitelisted, is everyone
receiving this message going to be receiving the whitelisted message?
Yes. The way that SMTP works, it is expected that an E-mail with multiple
recipients be delivered to everyone in the same way.
If so, is there a way to
Anyone know of a way to use an external file to perform a WHITELIST
TODOMAIN on more than 200 domains?
Probably the best answer here would be to use per-domain settings (possibly
with REDIRECT to make administration easier).
It would also be possible with the latest interim release, using
, February 07, 2004 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting more than 200 TODOMAINs
Anyone know of a way to use an external file to perform a WHITELIST
TODOMAIN on more than 200 domains?
Probably the best answer here would be to use per-domain settings (possibly
with REDIRECT to make
Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting more than 200 TODOMAINs
Hmmm... so 200+ copies of the $default$.junkmail...
The REDIRECT command in the \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail file lets you
avoid all
The REDIRECT command in the \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail file lets you
avoid all those files. :)
Hmmm...so you're suggesting creating N/200 files with different sets of 200
WHITELIST TODOMAIN lines in them? Good idea.
No. The WHITELIST command only works in the global.cfg file, and do not
Gotcha...thanks, Scott.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting more than 200 TODOMAINs
The REDIRECT command in the \IMail\Declude\$default
v1.66 added the WHITELISTFILE option. Although it only
allows the WHITELIST FROM currently, that's all that about
99% of our customers seem to need for the WHITELISTFILE option.
Hmmm in the next weeks we plan to send a mail to any primary mailbox for
every virt.Mailhost. The message will
I have a customer whose is subscribed to some ezine cooking
recipes. She is supposed to receive and email each day with a new recipe,
however, I believe that the Imail statistical filter is catching the emails.
Below is what the company sent here showing that our mail server was
receiving
I have a customer whose is subscribed to some ezine cooking
recipes. She is supposed to receive and email each day with a new recipe,
however, I believe that the Imail statistical filter is catching the
emails.
Below is what the company sent here showing that our mail server was
receiving
Scott,
It was also mentioned to a blank user file with the per user config which would allow
all tests to pass. Would this work also?
I just wanted more options. The negative weight works.
Jeff Kratka
--
**
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box
It was also mentioned to a blank user file with the per user config
which would allow all tests to pass. Would this work also?
I just wanted more options. The negative weight works.
The blank per-user file would work, just differently.
Using a whitelist will ensure that the E-mail is
At 05:31 AM 9/14/2003, you wrote:
It was also mentioned to a blank user file with the per user config
which would allow all tests to pass. Would this work also?
I just wanted more options. The negative weight works.
The blank per-user file would work, just differently.
Using a whitelist will
Say I want to do this for [EMAIL PROTECTED] as I understand I have
to create a fament.com directory would it be enough to drop in a
postmaster.Junkmail in that directory and have the rest of the default
settings be picked up from the main default
\imail\declude\$default$.junkmail file ?
I want to
Say I want to do this for [EMAIL PROTECTED] as I understand I have
to create a fament.com directory would it be enough to drop in a
postmaster.Junkmail in that directory and have the rest of the default
settings be picked up from the main default
\imail\declude\$default$.junkmail file ?
Correct.
I have a couple of customers that want to be whitelisted completely so I
added WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the global config. The only thing is
that I have found out that if spam is sent to multiple recipients and this
person is listed it is allowed to come to everyone on the list since the
Kratka
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting
I have a couple of customers that want to be whitelisted completely so I
added WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the global config. The only thing is
that I have found out that if spam
I have a couple of customers that want to be whitelisted completely so I
added WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the global config. The only thing is
that I have found out that if spam is sent to multiple recipients and this
person is listed it is allowed to come to everyone on the list since
At 04:10 PM 9/13/2003, Jeff Kratka wrote:
I have a couple of customers that want to be whitelisted completely so I
added WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the global config. The only thing is
that I have found out that if spam is sent to multiple recipients and this
person is listed it is allowed
Jeff,
This is similar to the issue of whitelisting the postmaster account.
Spammer's got hip to the fact that most people whitelist the postmaster
account and would include as a recipient for the spam the postmaster.
We were getting burned by this due to the high amount of porn spam that
Thanks I'll try this out.
Jeff Kratka
-- Original Message --
From: DLAnalyzer Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:41:45 -0400
Jeff,
This is similar to the issue of whitelisting the postmaster account.
It seems some spammers are figuring out that postmaster is whitelisted.
Therefor they are making sure postmaster is in the CC or BCC field as in the
headers below. Then everyone gets the spam email!!!
Any ideas on how to keep this from happening?
Received: from Hyperion.tenforward.com
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting problems
It seems some spammers are figuring out
We quit whitelisting the postmaster for this reason several weeks ago.
Our (unstated policy): if you get no reply, try some other email program
that isn't known as a spammer (Hey, it works for AOL! -- and no, please
don't start on that again).
Mail that is legit seems to get thru ok, spam to the
We've set up ours so that postmaster gets the same tests as everyone
else. I've set up an email account with hotmail and in the body of the
bounce message tell the sender that if they are a real person they can
email me at the hotmail account. I then either help them fix the
problem (if it's
, June 24, 2003 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting problems
We've set up ours so that postmaster gets the same tests as everyone
else. I've set up an email account with hotmail and in the body of the
bounce message tell the sender that if they are a real
We just cam out with a policy to add our helpdesk phone number to the
headers telling them to ask for the mail administrator if they do not get
an
email response.
This is a good option, providing they know how to get to the headers...
The false positives we get are usually from the totally
Harper
Sent: Thursday, June
12, 2003 9:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelisting question
I've probably just missed the answer to this in the past.
As weight is added to a message going through Declude
Junkmail and you have your configuration set to add information
As weight is added to a message going through Declude Junkmail and you
have your configuration set to add information to the subject line ...
when does it get added? After ALL of the tests are run, or as they meet a
certain weight?
It gets added after all the tests are run, and after the
What you're seeing here is log file entries such as:
06/12/2003 07:19:04 Q6fa2120f012c5b19 Msg failed WEIGHT15-19s (Total
weight between 15 and 19.). Action=SUBJECT. 06/12/2003 07:19:04
Q6fa2120f012c5b19 Skipping E-mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED];
whitelisted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:19 AM
Subject: * [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting Discussion Groups?
We are having trouble white-listing a couple of YahooGroup Discussion
Groups.
The messages are not from the group, they are from the group members
We are having trouble white-listing a couple of YahooGroup Discussion
Groups.
The messages are not from the group, they are from the group members,
and they often fail our spam tests for various reasons.
How would one go about white-listing a specific YahooGroup (or other)
discussion group?
I have a problem with two customers where the user whitelist is allowing
other spam through, or at least I think it is. I've put the whitelist
statement at the top of the username.junkmail filter, formatted as
such...
Snip--
#
WHITELISTFILE C:\IMail\Declude\kendra.com\walleye-whitelist.txt
I've put the whitelist statement at the top of the username.junkmail
filter, formatted as
such...
WHITELISTFILE C:\IMail\Declude\kendra.com\walleye-whitelist.txt
That's good.
It's passing everything in the whitelist file without putting it through
Declude, but other Spam is passing too
The file contents are...
.freelotto.com
@freelotto.com
@bounce.freelotto.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The log file shows this when it happens..
01/19/2003 00:02:54 Q5bac124 OSSOFT:5 OSSRC:5 SNIFFER:10 LOCALHEADERS:40
BODYCHECKS:40 . Total weight = 100
01/19/2003 00:02:54 Q5bac124 Msg failed OSSOFT
/support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
425-397-7911
This Email was scanned for viruses
Junk Email filtered ISP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
The log file shows this when it happens..
01/19/2003 00:02:54 Q5bac124 OSSOFT:5 OSSRC:5 SNIFFER:10 LOCALHEADERS:40
BODYCHECKS:40 . Total weight = 100
01/19/2003 00:02:54 Q5bac124 Msg failed OSSOFT
(http://spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL4908). Action=IGNORE.
01/19/2003 00:02:54 Q5bac124
PROTECTED]
425-397-7911
This Email was scanned for viruses
Junk Email filtered ISP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting allowing
filtered ISP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting allowing other spam through
The log file shows this when it happens..
01
It's reading the correct .junkmail file...
This turns out to be an issue with the WHITELISTFILE option -- there is a
new interim release at http://www.declude.com/release/166i/declude.exe that
takes care of this.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
, January 19, 2003 11:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting allowing other
spam through
It's reading the correct .junkmail file...
This turns out to be an issue with the WHITELISTFILE option
-- there is a
new interim release at
http
01/19/2003 13:34:23 Q19db14e From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's throwing the Email address into the spambox instead of whitelisting it...
The problem here is a limitation of the per-user whitelisting. Currently,
it will only match exact E-mail addresses ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
Hello,
I know this has been talked about in the past, I am just wondering where we
stand on the wish list of having a per domain whitelist?
I am not sure if has been mentioned but maybe to accomplish we would setup a
file like whitelist.cfg in the /declude/mail.example.com/ folder. If the
file
I know this has been talked about in the past, I am just wondering where we
stand on the wish list of having a per domain whitelist?
It will be available in the next beta, due out sometime this week. :)
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
I have been using Declude for almost a year now and I thinks its the best
software ever made... I have tweak the settings and weights but I have run
into problem with the whitelisting for existing customers.
With WHITELISTING, I know there is a limit of 200 domains. Will this limit
ever be
Adam,
Thursday, November 21, 2002 you wrote:
AH With WHITELISTING, I know there is a limit of 200 domains. Will
AH this limit ever be increased? Or maybe be made into a separate
AH test like the FROMFILE where ALL domains listed in that would be
AH allowed???
AH The only other option I can
With WHITELISTING, I know there is a limit of 200 domains. Will this limit
ever be increased? Or maybe be made into a separate test like the FROMFILE
where ALL domains listed in that would be allowed???
That's something that quite a few people have requested, and we do plan to
handle
The only other option I can think of is once you hit the
whitelist limit of
200, you create a test using the FROMFILE and use a negative
weight of like
100. This would kind of do the same thing of the whitelisting,
just a little
hokey
That is kind of the way I do it. I use the
In the meantime, that would work (although it would only apply to the
weighting system, so it would prevent an E-mail from being held if you had
SPAMCOP HOLD, for example).
I think you mean it will not prevent a mail from being held with that rule,
correct?
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT
In the meantime, that would work (although it would only apply to the
weighting system, so it would prevent an E-mail from being held if you had
SPAMCOP HOLD, for example).
I think you mean it will not prevent a mail from being held with that rule,
correct?
You are correct.
I think I'm
I share your pain! We've been live with Declude and HOLD actions for about
a week, and I've been beavering away at building our whitelist for 2 weeks.
In a nutshell, I'm building the whitelist because I want to keep my SPAMCOP
HOLD action (and a few others). I've established with our team that
I would suggest using a weight system and create a negative
weight for your whitelist so those on the whitelist will
not be able to get away with too much.
For example:
if you have @123.com whitelisted and someone sends spam,
it will not fail, however, if you gave them a -15
and the massage
Andrew,
Thursday, November 21, 2002 you wrote:
CA I want to keep my SPAMCOP HOLD action (and a few others). I've
CA established with our team that going to a pure weighted system is
CA probably in our future.
I have a rule that fires from a custom external filter program
that uses
One thing I am considering is using a greylist, where known solid domains
that need it will go on a weighted whitelist of say -100 and the weighted
greylist will get say -15, and I would put those domains they needed the
help but not wanting to actually whitelist.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT
One thing I am considering is using a greylist, where known solid domains
that need it will go on a weighted whitelist of say -100 and the weighted
greylist will get say -15, and I would put those domains they needed the
help but not wanting to actually whitelist.
I actually use multiple
Reply to: John Tolmachoff
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting on Thursday 5:02:56 PM
I'd like to do this. Will negative weights work for this list?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
J One thing I am considering is using
I'd like to do this. Will negative weights work for this list?
I don't see why not, it's working for us. You would probably
want to calculate out the total failed weight and use that
for your negative weight.
For example:
Spamcop = 15
OSSCR = 15
OTHERS = 20
Hold weight is 30
Delete
Having Declude Standard, I can only
WHITELIST TO abuse or postmaster,
correct?
That is correct.
Would it be to much to ask for another possible
address that could be whitelisted to the list, such
as refused@? This is an address that is used to
delete any mail that is sent to it.
A clarification on this post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail;declude.com/msg04189.html
Having Declude Standard, I can only WHITELIST TO abuse or postmaster,
correct?
Is there another way to whitelist a to address?
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
A clarification on this post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail;declude.com/msg04189.html
Having Declude Standard, I can only WHITELIST TO abuse or postmaster,
correct?
That is correct.
Is there another way to whitelist a to address?
Yes -- by upgrading to Declude JunkMail
Ok, I need to whitelist a sender within our domain 2khiway, how do I do
this? I looked at the manual, but it shows NO after the line that mentions
it, it's not allowed?
What I was going to do, in global.cfg, in outgoing section or does it
matter?
WHITELIST FROM[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is this
Ok, I need to whitelist a sender within our domain 2khiway, how do I do
this? I looked at the manual, but it shows NO after the line that mentions
it, it's not allowed?
Hmm... do you mean NOTE:?
What I was going to do, in global.cfg, in outgoing section or does it
matter?
WHITELIST FROM
Hmm... do you mean NOTE:?
just no. The section Whitelist/Blacklist Reference, the last portion points
to ALLOWED. So it's yes or no.
That is correct (it can go anywhere in the global.cfg file).
ok.
This will also allow quite a bit of spam to be delivered to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], since many
just no. The section Whitelist/Blacklist Reference, the last portion points
to ALLOWED. So it's yes or no.
Ah, that's the Comments Allowed column. That just means that you can't
have comments on that whitelist line.
This will also allow quite a bit of spam to be delivered to
[EMAIL
This will also allow quite a bit of spam to be delivered to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], since many spammers now use the recipient's address as
the sender's address.
So, does can Declude filter based on X-Declude sender? or does it just
recognise the From sender? for when the from changes but the X
So, does can Declude filter based on X-Declude sender?
The X-Declude-Sender: header lists the return address of the E-mail, which
you can filter on (either with a fromfile test type (sender blacklist),
or with a filter). Both work based on the return address, not the From:
header.
In my bounce messages I entered a little note saying if you feel this
message has been bounced in error, please contact
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] . Is there a way
with the standard version of Declude to make mail go to that address
regardless of it s intent; spam or valid?
In my bounce messages I entered a little note saying if you feel this
message has been bounced in error, please contact
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] . Is there a way
with the standard version of Declude to make mail go to that address
regardless of it s intent; spam or valid?
In my bounce messages I entered a little
note saying if you feel this message has been bounced in error, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. But those people who fail the open
relay tests will not be able to get mail through to that address. Is there a way with the standard
version of
Also, another question. We get a lot of government mail that is being
trapped. Usually they re addresses like
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
. What I did was WHITELIST FROM @.mil to let all mail from .mil to come
through unchallenged. But they re still getting trapped. Did I
Instead of whitelisting, you could use a wordfilter to add a negative weighting like
this:
MAILFROM-50 ENDSWITH.mil
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Mike Goetz
Sent: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:50:25 -0400
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting one address
In my bounce
In this case, only mail in the format username@.mil would get
whitelisted. Unfortunately, I don't believe there is a way to whitelist
all *.mil domains.
Wouldn't the correct syntax be:
WHITELIST FROM .mil
and not:
WHITELIST FROM @.mil ?
Sheldon
Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partner
In this case, only mail in the format username@.mil would get
whitelisted. Unfortunately, I don't believe there is a way to whitelist
all *.mil domains.
Wouldn't the correct syntax be:
WHITELIST FROM .mil
and not:
WHITELIST FROM @.mil ?
You are correct -- WHITELIST FROM .mil would
101 - 200 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
