ago.
Went to www.tqmcube.com and checked; came up clean.
Shayne
Original Message
From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:50 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is Tqmcube.com dead???
Interesting news
Don,
Depending on your situation you could simply filter the null sender
in a from file filter. I would not suggest this as a permanent solution
as NDR's are helpful in most cases.
About two weeks ago I had a user get hammered with probably 500-1000
NDR's per second from a spam campaign.
]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 4:00 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Barracuda Quarantine bypass
| Scott,
|
| Does the Barracuda system add any headers that we could trigger a filter
| to hit will reduce the weight so we can prevent it from being captured
Scott,
Does the Barracuda system add any headers that we could trigger a filter
to hit will reduce the weight so we can prevent it from being captured?
Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF.
I use a filter like the below. I'm a business so I have a bit
moreflexibility.
Basically if the bounce has a reference to one of my servers in the body, I
won't run the filter.
# Combo Test to punish those that come from a Postmaster and not bounces
from us?
SKIPIFWEIGHT365
# valid bounces
Easiest thing to do is turn off the declude service. Run the script. Then get
the source from the declude folder. This file will be exactly what is received
from smarter mail.
Then turn declude back on to process the mail waiting.
You can then post the source here. I would zip the source and
:o)
1 Meg of Ram is not much Mate.
Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
W: www.123marbella.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Dodell
Sent: 10 February 2008 19:10
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
David,
It really depends on several factors: how you have Declude configured
(tests, filters, etc), how many threads your running, volume.
It's not uncommon to see for me to see decludeproc on a dual proc xeon
2.4ghz using 75% of ram, but I am running ~50 threads at a volume of
200K+
Opps, I noticed I said using 75% of ram I meant to say 75% of cpu. On
the ram side I do have to restart decludeproc on a weekly basis
otherwise its virtual memory usage creeps the process to the 2GB mark
collapsing itself.
For my systems running invURIBL and Sniffer with the volume we deal
On Feb 10, 2008, at 1:42 PM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
David,
It really depends on several factors: how you have Declude
configured (tests, filters, etc), how many threads your running,
volume.
It's not uncommon to see for me to see decludeproc on a dual proc
xeon 2.4ghz
Bonno,
With emails that have multiple recipients its not uncommon to see last
actions multiple times for the same message. This will skew your results.
Your better off using a tool like DLAnalyzer to analyze your logs as it
takes all of this into account. Plus it can be scheduled to run
How so, can you show the X-Declude-Sender line that it did not work on ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck
Schick
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 3:50 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I filter
Of John
Shacklett
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 4:36 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I filter this...?
Isn't the mailfrom in this case [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not the vigara part? Chuck
is looking for a way to filter based on the name attached
PROTECTED])
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] counting mail
Bonno,
With emails that have multiple recipients its not uncommon to see last
actions multiple times for the same message. This will skew your results
8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:56 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I filter this...?
How so, can you show the X
Of David Barker
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:40 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I filter this...?
This is what Chuck requested.
Now the declude sender is [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I want to filter
the sender name
of vigara.
If you show me
David:
The first one does not work.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 12:25 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 1:56 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I filter this...?
How so, can you show the X-Declude-Sender line that it did not work on ?
-Original Message
: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I filter this...?
How so, can you show the X-Declude-Sender line that it did not work on ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck
Schick
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 3:50 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 4:15 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I filter this...?
There are 1,300,925,111,156,286,160,896 ways to spell Viagra (see the update
addresses do
have invalid words and names that may match the expression.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 5:06 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck
Schick
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 7:11 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I filter this...?
That may be but since I have a client that is seeing about 20 of these a day
all spelled
David:
Thanks. I will try that.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 5:18 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
The directive is AVAFTERJM
We can look at setting an option for DELETE only.
David B
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bonno
Bloksma
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:28 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] AFTERJM
Hi,
-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl
- Original Message -
From: David Barker
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AFTERJM
The directive is AVAFTERJM
Randy,
None that I am aware of. It's processing fine on all of my servers.
Also, version 1.x is very old (several years). We are now on version 3.1.1.
Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF.
Hi Randy;
We have seen that often, in fact what we do is swap that test in on
nights and weekends and out during weekdays (by just renaming the
declude conf files with a schedule). It is a nice tool but will bog
things down.
Herb
Randy Armbrecht wrote:
We're seeing a backup today on
Director
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
804-442-5300
http://globalweb.net
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Any Known issues Inv-URIBL today
PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Any Known issues Inv-URIBL today?
Check the DNS server InvURIBL is using to see if it is responding in a timely
manner to all the queries your config is using. There may be a DNS time out
issue.
Kevin Bilbee
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Any Known issues Inv-URIBL today?
Randy,
None that I am aware of. It's processing fine on all of my servers. Also,
version 1.x is very old (several years). We are now on version 3.1.1.
Darrell
In addition to what Pete suggests with Weightgate (which I also use on
some servers with older hardware). You will want to set inside your
invuribl.exe.config file values for max and min skipweights to skip any
unnecessary processing of messages.
Darrell
--
, Inc.
804-442-5300
http://globalweb.net
- Original Message -
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Any Known issues Inv-URIBL today?
In addition to what Pete suggests
Will you morons please remove me from your spam list?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 10:33 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have
permission to post to the
Cute.
Insulting people gets things done and makes you look very important.
Right!
Harry Vanderzand
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
Klinge
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 2:08 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] re
Hi Rick,
Having a bad day?
-Nick
Rick Klinge wrote:
Will you morons please remove me from your spam list?
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Monday, February 04, 2008 10:33 PM
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com
*Subject:* [Declude.JunkMail] re:
Rick,
I don't know why Declude hasn't fixed this bug yet.but
these are being sent to the entire listserv and not just you. I noted
that you keep responding to them thinking they are directed at you, but
they are just auto-replies from their support ticketing system which
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
*Nick Hayer
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 05, 2008 1:23 PM
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not
have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list
: declude.junkmail@declude.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 3:10 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail Digest]
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:59:39 -0500
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do
Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 4:18 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have
permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list
At the bottom of the message the morons posted the proper way
no
Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
SJ.Stanaitis
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 8:33 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject:
Looks like they're partially back up now... nm
SJ.Stanaitis - Network Administrator
Decorative Product Source, Inc
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
SJ.Stanaitis
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 8:33 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject:
Maybe Microsoft is trying to buy them out!
Assimilation !!!
:P
MH
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
SJ.Stanaitis
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 7:33 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go?
I can't seem to get
There is a 10 gig connection out between 2 data centers in Chicago,
traffic is rerouted now, but that was probably the issue as a pretty big
time peering hub is not well connected and had real problems early this
morning.
Herb
Michael Hardrick wrote:
Maybe Microsoft is trying to buy them
Or they are affected by cut cables to India? G
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
Hardrick
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:19 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go?
Maybe Microsoft is trying to buy them
resolved
Thanks to all
- Original Message -
From: SJ.Stanaitis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 8:52 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Virus pb
Sounds like a rootkit maybe, try rootkitreveal. Also try scanning the
drives externally
Ok ;)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS -
Network Systems Eng (B Cole)
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:37 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail
Barton Cole
Systems
Serge,
Frisk licensing for mail server use is not the same as consumer or general
business use. Pricing for mail server use is prohibitive.
Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-683-6718
1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
I know about pricing
But was just wondering about technical aspect
did anyone test it ?
Regards
- Original Message -
From: Michael Thomas - Mathbox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 9:00 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fprot 6
2 years ago, I would have had a dozen replies by now and even possible a
nice discussion going on.
Where is everybody?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
(lists)
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 1:05 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject:
Out of the box, not that I am aware of. It is recorded in the Imail SMTP
log. This however would be a good feature request for Declude.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 5:05 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an
authenticated whitelisted
2 years ago, I would have had a dozen replies by now and even possible a
nice discussion going on.
Where is everybody?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 11:35 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated
whitelisted
2 years ago, I would have had a dozen replies by now and even possible a nice
discussion going on.
Where is everybody?
John T
From
, 2008 11:37 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message authenticator
Out of the box, not that I am aware of. It is recorded in the Imail SMTP
log. This however would be a good feature request for Declude.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
John,
It's hard to say depending on how the message was whitelisted dictates
which tests are ran. I never seen an official list on what tests get
run based on the level of whitelisting but I believe user authenticated
skips all tests. Can anyone confirm that?
Darrell
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated
whitelisted
2 years ago, I would have had a dozen replies by now and even possible a nice
discussion going on.
Where is everybody?
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
David
Can you please add this on the requested features list
Regards
- Original Message -
From: David Barker
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message authenticator
It is recorded in the Q file
I have not initiated any support issues.
Rick
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:00 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [244-0F1D628C-258E] You do not have
permission to post to the
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard
Smith (N.O.R.A.D.)
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:59 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server Settings
ISS no longer supports blackice and it is no longer in production
The first thing to do is check and make sure you do not have a ton of
files in your proc folder. This would indicate a queue backup. The
next thing if your not having a ton of files in your proc is to kick the
logs into debug mode and send a test message. Look through the debug
log and find
If you run sniffer, then try updating its rule file. I saw this
problem with a corrupted sniffer rule file.
On Jan 5, 2008, at 11:42 AM, David Dodell wrote:
I'm trying to track down a problem, which I think might be in
Declude.
Here is the scenerio ... I'm noticing mail is taking 10 to
On Jan 5, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Richard Lyon wrote:
If you run sniffer, then try updating its rule file. I saw this
problem with a corrupted sniffer rule file.
I do automatically as soon as they come in which seems to be
several times a day
---
This E-mail came from the
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Dodell
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 10:08 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude ??? Long Delay Processing?
On Jan 5, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Richard Lyon wrote:
If you run sniffer, then try updating its rule
On Jan 5, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Kevin Bilbee wrote:
We have had this in the past. Look at your DNS server being used by
declude.
It can take a long time to process the DSN based tests if your DNS
server is
timing out. Debug mode should tell you if this is what is happening.
The problem is
ISS no longer supports blackice and it is no longer in production , what
are users replacing it with ?
Howard Smith
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Beckstrom
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 5:58 PM
To:
In relation to spam or in relation to security?
My answers would be Alligate (on a separate server) and a firewall,
respectively.
Matt
Howard Smith (N.O.R.A.D.) wrote:
ISS no longer supports blackice and it is no longer in production , what
are users replacing it with ?
Howard Smith
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 2:25 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server Settings
In relation to spam or in relation to security?
My answers would be Alligate
] by email and destroy all copies of the original
message.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 2:25 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server Settings
In relation
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server EndOfLife -
need replacement
To replace blackice functions as to load on a server and
monitor and block
what applications sends out on individual ports . I have an
offending app or
task that trying to send out on random ports , I am trying
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:21 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server EndOfLife - need
replacement
I'm sure that there are many opinions around here, but I don't think
that servers should
] On Behalf Of Jon
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 3:47 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server EndOfLife - need replacement
The best part of Black Ice is it's easy to read interface to see what
hitting the server. I will continue to use it just
, December 28, 2007 2:29 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3.46
Right, immediately after you only get U.S. pennies to their EURO G
Ooops...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent
Thanks Darrell,
That was what I was afraid of. How are others dealing with per user
black lists? Are they using IMail rules to accomplish this? Right now
I manage all domain configurations for my clients and typically do not
allow per user options. However, I would like to build-out a web based
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per-User Blacklist
Thanks Darrell,
That was what I was afraid of. How are others dealing with per user
black lists? Are they using IMail rules to accomplish this? Right now
I manage all domain configurations for my clients
Personally, I do not do per user blacklists. However, as one off
requests we have done this. In general if we are blacklisting something
its typically a global blacklist. Which may not be ideal in all cases
in an ISP type environment.
Darrell
Dean Lawrence wrote:
Thanks Darrell,
That
Thanks Darrell and Darin,
This is pretty much my belief as well, but I was just trying to see if
it was a feasable option to offer it on a per user basis. I agree that
it would be a nightmare to try and manage all those tests.
Dean
On Jan 2, 2008 11:50 AM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL
Dean,
What you read in the manual is correct. The only way to do this would
be to setup junkmail via per user and have a test for each user as their
own blacklist. For a *small* group of users this could be done, but on
any level of scale it would be impractical not only from a management
, December 27, 2007 6:23 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Cc: David Barker
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3.46
Happy Holidays, David!
How about a shiny new all_list.dat to ring in the New Year?
Andrew.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
Happy Holidays, David!
How about a shiny new all_list.dat to ring in the New Year?
Andrew.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at
WEIGHT10 does delete outbound since it is defined, but I never defined
WEIGHT40 so that was ignored.I needed to add a line that now says
WEIGHT10 DELETE
WEIGHT40 DELETE
for the outbound in global.cfg
Yes, that is absolutely correct.
After enabling that if its still not working post a
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hardware Upgrade
I mostly concur with Andrew here, but let me add some specifics.
1) Memory - for the 5000 series of chips using FB-DIMMs you need 4 total
sticks to max out the memory bandwidth. 4 gets you twice the memory bandwidth
of 2, though you can use just
Hello, Serge.
I'm happy to chime in here, but let me start off with saying that you
will get divergent opinions here, and that nobody will be absolutely
right, as our answers are coloured by own experiences, and each
implementation is unique.
I'll also start off with asking you for your current
I mostly concur with Andrew here, but let me add some specifics.
1) *Memory* - for the 5000 series of chips using FB-DIMMs you need 4
total sticks to max out the memory bandwidth. 4 gets you twice the
memory bandwidth of 2, though you can use just 2. The real-world
benchmarks show maybe a
Are you sure your scanning outbound mail? Their is a directive that
needs to be turned on for it to work. By default its off.
JM ADD Spam checking for inbound/outbound scanning can be
turned on/off. Located as a directive in the global.cfg file, below are
the default settings.
Your weight ranges are set fine. There is nothing wrong with the syntax
of those. To be certain you only have weight ranges defined once right?
Can you throw your logs into debug and send a test outbound message
through. We will be able to help you better seeing this output.
Darrell
From looking at this the st07.edmsa.net server is running MSSMTP and
sending it back to you. Are they using MSSMTP as a gateway to relay it
internally to themself's? If so in the settings do they have it set to
use a smarthost instead of use DNS to deliver?
Darrell
A little off topic but i was wondering if anyone can help me find a
tutorial on how to set up my IIS server running Imail 8.15 and
Declude to use the MS IIS SMTP server as a gateway.
[I am assuming that you will still be using your IMail box as MX and
using IIS only for outbound.]
Craig,
I currently use MS SMTP as a gateway for several customers. Shoot me a
note off list and I can help you get going.
Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue
Hi,
Just got through doing the upgrade, a few things you should do/know.
1) cleanup imail email boxes before you run the migration utilityit takes a lot longer if you don't.
2) smartermail requires using the full email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) for logging in (pop3). By default, it's
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] upgrade/migrate from Imail 8.15 to
Smartermail
Hi,
Just got through doing the upgrade, a few things you should do/know.
1) cleanup imail email boxes before you run the migration utilityit
takes a lot longer if you don't.
2) smartermail requires using
PROTECTED]
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* 11 December 2007 13:46
*To:* Craig Edmonds
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] upgrade/migrate from Imail 8.15 to
Smartermail
Hi,
Just got through doing the upgrade, a few things you
Don,
That's interesting. That line is actually an Akamai cache key that is
being used to reference the image directly from Akamai's cache. Based
on the cache key I suspect this showed up in a phish. For folks that
utilize Akamai's caching services would never reference content via that
This appears to be an IMail behavior and not caused by Declude. There
are double IMail headers in there, and they have different spool names too.
This may be due to domains being configured for different IP's in
IMail. This might require some registry hacking to straighten out. You
should
Wouldn't you want to send the support request to the developers of
incredimail? They are the ones who are generating the invalid header.
Declude is only warning you about it.
Dean
On Dec 3, 2007 7:47 AM, Mon Mariola - Rubén [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The program incredimail generates subjects, in
Lawrence
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook 'Blank Folding' Vulnerability
Wouldn't you want to send the support request to the developers of
incredimail? They are the ones who are generating the invalid header.
Declude
no virus
has used this technique yet is not a good reason to continue to leave the
door open.
- Original Message -
From: Mon Mariola - Rubén [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook 'Blank Folding
a section in RFC specifying that is not
allowed.
Thank you.
Ruben Marti.
Mon Mariola, S.L.
- Original Message -
From: Mike N.
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook 'Blank Folding' Vulnerability
The 'Blank
You seem to have failed to ask the actual question here.
If you create the domain locally, you must create all records on the
public domain for full DNS functionality to be maintained. Just
creating one record will result in lookup failures for all other records
on that domain.
Matt
Rob,
As far as DNS goes, the best way to do this is to use Simple DNS Plus
with a server in a second location. Simple DNS does full server
replication instead of individual secondaries, and if you have a lot of
domains, it is nice to just manage one installation. If you have a
smaller
Forgot to add the most important part regarding Simple DNS. They have
an add-on monitoring piece that will switch DNS records automatically,
and this can be used to automatically switch over to the backup.
Matt
Matt wrote:
Rob,
As far as DNS goes, the best way to do this is to use
Try this ...
(?i:\b(?!dick?)(m(\W?|_){0,3}e(\W?|_){0,3}g(\W?|_){0,[EMAIL
PROTECTED])?(\W?|_){0,3}d(\
W?|_){0,3}[|li1í!](\W?|_){0,3}[ck]{1,2}\b)
Will match on obfuscated dick (ie. D!ck) but NOT dick, can include mega
obfuscated.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1001 - 1100 of 21924 matches
Mail list logo
