RE: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

Hi guys, I was unaware this was going to all the list. I will look into it now. Thanks Moron From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 2:32 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

Rick, I don't know why Declude hasn't fixed this bug yet.but these are being sent to the entire listserv and not just you. I noted that you keep responding to them thinking they are directed at you, but they are just auto-replies from their support ticketing system which seem

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

Cute. Insulting people gets things done and makes you look very important. Right! Harry Vanderzand From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Klinge Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 2:08 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] re

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

Hi Rick, Having a bad day? -Nick Rick Klinge wrote: Will you morons please remove me from your spam list? *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, February 04, 2008 10:33 PM *To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com *Subject:* [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-9

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

Will you morons please remove me from your spam list? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 10:33 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@de

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go?

There is a 10 gig connection out between 2 data centers in Chicago, traffic is rerouted now, but that was probably the issue as a pretty big time peering hub is not well connected and had real problems early this morning. Herb Michael Hardrick wrote: Maybe Microsoft is trying to buy them ou

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go?

Or they are affected by cut cables to India? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Hardrick Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:19 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go? Maybe Microsoft is trying to buy

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go?

Maybe Microsoft is trying to buy them out! Assimilation !!! :P MH From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SJ.Stanaitis Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 7:33 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go? I can't seem to get t

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go?

I am fine Have you tried an nslookup?   could be a DNS problem Also could be a infrastructure problem on your ISP or an upstream provider. SJ.Stanaitis wrote: I can't seem to get to www.dell.com from my network here or 2 other non-related external networks either...anyone el

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go?

no Harry Vanderzand NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008 Intown Internet 117 Ruskview Road Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1 519-741-1222 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SJ.Stanaitis Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 8:33 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [De

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go?

Looks like they're partially back up now... nm SJ.Stanaitis - Network Administrator Decorative Product Source, Inc _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SJ.Stanaitis Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 8:33 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.J

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail

Ok ;) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Network Systems Eng (B Cole) Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:37 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail Barton Cole Systems En

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Virus pb

resolved Thanks to all - Original Message - From: "SJ.Stanaitis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 8:52 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Virus pb Sounds like a rootkit maybe, try rootkitreveal. Also try scanning the drives externally fro

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Virus pb

Thinking along the lines of another scanner may find the virus 0 Have you tried http://housecall.trendmicro.com/ -Nick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 3:00 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sub

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Virus pb

Sounds like a rootkit maybe, try rootkitreveal. Also try scanning the drives externally from a clean system. --SJ SJ.Stanaitis - Network Administrator Decorative Product Source, Inc -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge Sent: Monday, Ja

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fprot 6

27, 2008 11:50 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fprot 6 > > > I know about pricing > But was just wondering about technical aspect did anyone test it ? > Regards > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Michae

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam message didn't get properly processed

Going by the headers is not the best method to evaluate this. Some tests are hidden from the headers depending on your configuration. Check your Declude logs and post those to the list for that message and we will be better able to figure out what happened. Darrell --

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fprot 6

I know about pricing But was just wondering about technical aspect did anyone test it ? Regards - Original Message - From: "Michael Thomas - Mathbox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 9:00 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fprot 6 Serge, Fri

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fprot 6

Serge, Frisk licensing for mail server use is not the same as consumer or general business use. Pricing for mail server use is prohibitive. Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behal

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message authenticator

David Can you please add this on the requested features list Regards - Original Message - From: David Barker To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 4:54 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message authenticator It is recorded in the Q file for

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted

Hmmm... well, if externals do run, then a message rewriter (to insert the header line) could be launched an a Declude test. Darin. - Original Message - From: "John T (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 12:58 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.Ju

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted

> If the user authenticates then all tests are bypassed if WHITELIST AUTH is > set ON in the global.cfg Not quite true. This is only true if "PREWHITELIST ON" is set in the global.cfg file. Otherwise, externals do run, but no action is taken by Declude. > Since Declude's whitelisting bypasses a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted

I hear you. Looking to do a release by the end of the month. David B From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 12:24 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted

: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted 2 years ago, I would have had a dozen replies by now and even possible a nice discussion going on. Where is everybody? John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted

@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted John, It's hard to say depending on how the message was whitelisted dictates which tests are ran. I never seen an official list on what tests get run based on the level of whitelisting but I be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted

John, It's hard to say depending on how the message was whitelisted dictates which tests are ran. I never seen an official list on what tests get run based on the level of whitelisting but I believe user authenticated skips all tests. Can anyone confirm that? Darrell --

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message authenticator

, 2008 11:37 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message authenticator Out of the box, not that I am aware of. It is recorded in the Imail SMTP log. This however would be a good feature request for Declude. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted

eclude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 11:35 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted 2 years ago, I would have had a dozen replies by now and even possible a nice discussion going on. Where is everybody?

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted

To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted 2 years ago, I would have had a dozen replies by now and even possible a nice discussion going on. Where is everybody? John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message authenicator

I appologize to he list, I mistankanly had return receipt on i my previous message, not sure why and how - Original Message - From: Serge To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:05 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Message authenicator Is there a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message authenticator

Out of the box, not that I am aware of. It is recorded in the Imail SMTP log. This however would be a good feature request for Declude. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Serge Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 5:05 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subj

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Indicate msg size in header on an authenticated whitelisted

2 years ago, I would have had a dozen replies by now and even possible a nice discussion going on. Where is everybody? John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 1:05 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [D

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] link to documentation

Use http://tools.declude.com >From the EVA manual A vulnerability is a method that people can use to bypass virus scanning. Clearly, this is something that hackers and virus writers like to do. An E-mail that takes advantage of vulnerability may or may not actually contain a virus. By defau

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [244-0F1D628C-258E] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

I have not initiated any support issues. Rick From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 12:00 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [244-0F1D628C-258E] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.co

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude ??? Long Delay Processing?

On Jan 5, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Kevin Bilbee wrote: We have had this in the past. Look at your DNS server being used by declude. It can take a long time to process the DSN based tests if your DNS server is timing out. Debug mode should tell you if this is what is happening. The problem is i

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude ??? Long Delay Processing?

TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > David Dodell > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 10:08 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude ??? Long Delay Processing? > > > On Jan 5, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Richard Lyon wrote: > > > I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude ??? Long Delay Processing?

On Jan 5, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Richard Lyon wrote: If you run sniffer, then try updating its rule file. I saw this problem with a corrupted sniffer rule file. I do automatically as soon as they come in which seems to be several times a day --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMa

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude ??? Long Delay Processing?

If you run sniffer, then try updating its rule file. I saw this problem with a corrupted sniffer rule file. On Jan 5, 2008, at 11:42 AM, David Dodell wrote: I'm trying to track down a problem, which I "think" might be in Declude. Here is the scenerio ... I'm noticing mail is taking 10 to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude ??? Long Delay Processing?

The first thing to do is check and make sure you do not have a ton of files in your proc folder. This would indicate a queue backup. The next thing if your not having a ton of files in your proc is to kick the logs into debug mode and send a test message. Look through the debug log and find

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server Settings

--- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard > Smith (N.O.R.A.D.) > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:59 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server Settings > > ISS no longer

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server EndOfLife - need replacement

Behalf Of Jon Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 3:47 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server EndOfLife - need replacement The best part of Black Ice is it's easy to read interface to see what hitting the server. I will continue to use it just for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server EndOfLife - need replacement

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:21 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server EndOfLife - need replacement I'm sure that there are many opinions around here, but I don't think that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server EndOfLife - need replacement

L PROTECTED] by email and destroy all copies of the original message. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 2:25 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server Settings

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server EndOfLife - need replacement

eclude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server EndOfLife - > need replacement > > To replace blackice functions as to load on a server and > monitor and block > what applications sends out on individual ports . I have an > offending app or > task

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server EndOfLife - need replacement

. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 2:25 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server Settings In relation to spam or in relation to security? My answers would be Alligate (on a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server Settings

In relation to spam or in relation to security? My answers would be Alligate (on a separate server) and a firewall, respectively. Matt Howard Smith (N.O.R.A.D.) wrote: ISS no longer supports blackice and it is no longer in production , what are users replacing it with ? Howard Smith

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice Server Settings

ISS no longer supports blackice and it is no longer in production , what are users replacing it with ? Howard Smith . -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 5:58 PM To: declude.junkmail@

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per-User Blacklist

Thanks Darrell and Darin, This is pretty much my belief as well, but I was just trying to see if it was a feasable option to offer it on a per user basis. I agree that it would be a nightmare to try and manage all those tests. Dean On Jan 2, 2008 11:50 AM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per-User Blacklist

Personally, I do not do per user blacklists. However, as one off requests we have done this. In general if we are blacklisting something its typically a global blacklist. Which may not be ideal in all cases in an ISP type environment. Darrell Dean Lawrence wrote: Thanks Darrell, That wa

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per-User Blacklist

dnesday, January 02, 2008 9:55 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per-User Blacklist Thanks Darrell, That was what I was afraid of. How are others dealing with per user black lists? Are they using IMail rules to accomplish this? Right now I manage all domain configurations for my clients and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per-User Blacklist

Thanks Darrell, That was what I was afraid of. How are others dealing with per user black lists? Are they using IMail rules to accomplish this? Right now I manage all domain configurations for my clients and typically do not allow per user options. However, I would like to build-out a web based us

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3.46

, December 28, 2007 2:29 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3.46 Right, immediately after you only get U.S. pennies to their EURO Ooops... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Friday

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per-User Blacklist

Dean, What you read in the manual is correct. The only way to do this would be to setup junkmail via per user and have a test for each user as their own blacklist. For a *small* group of users this could be done, but on any level of scale it would be impractical not only from a management a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3.46

Right, immediately after you only get U.S. pennies to their EURO Ooops... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 1:08 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3.46

ay, December 27, 2007 6:23 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Cc: David Barker Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3.46 Happy Holidays, David! How about a shiny new all_list.dat to ring in the New Year? Andrew. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscrib

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3.46

e.junkmail@declude.com Cc: David Barker Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3.46 Happy Holidays, David! How about a shiny new all_list.dat to ring in the New Year? Andrew. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3.46

Happy Holidays, David! How about a shiny new all_list.dat to ring in the New Year? Andrew. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at h

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hardware Upgrade

Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hardware Upgrade I mostly concur with Andrew here, but let me add some specifics. 1) Memory - for the 5000 series of chips using FB-DIMMs you need 4 total sticks to max out the memory bandwidth. 4 gets you twice the memory bandwidth of 2, though you can use just

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re: Outbound weight

WEIGHT10 does delete outbound since it is defined, but I never defined WEIGHT40 so that was ignored.I needed to add a line that now says WEIGHT10 DELETE WEIGHT40 DELETE for the outbound in global.cfg Yes, that is absolutely correct. After enabling that if its still not working post a com

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re: Outbound weight

Your weight ranges are set fine. There is nothing wrong with the syntax of those. To be certain you only have weight ranges defined once right? Correct, inbound scanning has been working fine for years ... it is outbound scanning that seems to take the weight and mark the message IGNO

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Re: Outbound weight

Your weight ranges are set fine. There is nothing wrong with the syntax of those. To be certain you only have weight ranges defined once right? Can you throw your logs into debug and send a test outbound message through. We will be able to help you better seeing this output. Darrell -

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outbound weight

Are you sure your scanning outbound mail? Their is a directive that needs to be turned on for it to work. By default its off. JM ADD Spam checking for inbound/outbound scanning can be turned on/off. Located as a directive in the global.cfg file, below are the default settings. OUT

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hardware Upgrade

I mostly concur with Andrew here, but let me add some specifics. 1) *Memory* - for the 5000 series of chips using FB-DIMMs you need 4 total sticks to max out the memory bandwidth. 4 gets you twice the memory bandwidth of 2, though you can use just 2. The real-world benchmarks show maybe a 5%

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hardware Upgrade

Processing email is more CPU and memory and storage driven than seen with databases. Yes, there is a lot of I/O, but that is fairly small footprints (unless you have a lot of IMAP or webmail users with lots of very large mail boxes) which is easily handled by modern hard drive, speed depending upon

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hardware Upgrade

Hello, Serge. I'm happy to chime in here, but let me start off with saying that you will get divergent opinions here, and that nobody will be absolutely right, as our answers are coloured by own experiences, and each implementation is unique. I'll also start off with asking you for your current a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Loop

From looking at this the st07.edmsa.net server is running MSSMTP and sending it back to you. Are they using MSSMTP as a gateway to relay it internally to themself's? If so in the settings do they have it set to use a smarthost instead of use DNS to deliver? Darrell --

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Use MS IIS SMTP server as a gateway

Craig, I currently use MS SMTP as a gateway for several customers. Shoot me a note off list and I can help you get going. Darrell -- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Mo

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Use MS IIS SMTP server as a gateway

> A little off topic but i was wondering if anyone can help me find a > tutorial on how to set up my IIS server running Imail 8.15 and > Declude to use the MS IIS SMTP server as a gateway. [I am assuming that you will still be using your IMail box as MX and using IIS only for outbound.]

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] akamai.net Redirect/obfuscation

Don, That's interesting. That line is actually an Akamai "cache key" that is being used to reference the image directly from Akamai's cache. Based on the cache key I suspect this showed up in a phish. For folks that utilize Akamai's caching services would never reference content via that w

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] upgrade/migrate from Imail 8.15 to Smartermail

obbin Pen Publishing Interactive - http://www.penpublishing.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 11:44 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] upgrade/migrate from Imail 8.15 to Smartermail And

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] upgrade/migrate from Imail 8.15 to Smartermail

la.com <http://www.123marbella.com> E : [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* 11 December 2007 13:46 *To:* Craig Edmonds *Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] upgrade/migrate from Imail 8.15 to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] upgrade/migrate from Imail 8.15 to Smartermail

Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] upgrade/migrate from Imail 8.15 to Smartermail Hi, Just got through doing the upgrade, a few things you should do/know. 1) cleanup imail email boxes before you run the migration utilityit takes a lot longer if you don't. 2) smartermail requires usin

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] upgrade/migrate from Imail 8.15 to Smartermail

Hi, Just got through doing the upgrade, a few things you should do/know. 1) cleanup imail email boxes before you run the migration utilityit takes a lot longer if you don't. 2) smartermail requires using the full email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) for logging in (pop3).  By default, it's t

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] COPYTO Oddity

This appears to be an IMail behavior and not caused by Declude. There are double IMail headers in there, and they have different spool names too. This may be due to domains being configured for different IP's in IMail. This might require some registry hacking to straighten out. You should c

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Failover advice

Forgot to add the most important part regarding Simple DNS. They have an add-on monitoring piece that will switch DNS records automatically, and this can be used to automatically switch over to the backup. Matt Matt wrote: Rob, As far as DNS goes, the best way to do this is to use Simple

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: DNS Failover advice

Rob, As far as DNS goes, the best way to do this is to use Simple DNS Plus with a server in a second location. Simple DNS does full server replication instead of individual secondaries, and if you have a lot of domains, it is nice to just manage one installation. If you have a smaller numbe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Adding a non-authoritative DNS A record and associated PTR record

You seem to have failed to ask the actual question here. If you create the domain locally, you must create all records on the public domain for full DNS functionality to be maintained. Just creating one record will result in lookup failures for all other records on that domain. Matt Mich

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook 'Blank Folding' Vulnerability

section in RFC specifying that is not allowed. Thank you. Ruben Marti. Mon Mariola, S.L. - Original Message - From: Mike N. To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 4:00 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook 'Blank Folding' Vulnerability

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook 'Blank Folding' Vulnerability

.Just because no virus has used this technique yet is not a good reason to continue to leave the door open. - Original Message - From: "Mon Mariola - Rubén" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 9:40 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook &#x

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook 'Blank Folding' Vulnerability

From: Dean Lawrence To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook 'Blank Folding' Vulnerability Wouldn't you want to send the support request to the developers of incredimail? They are the ones who are generating th

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Outlook 'Blank Folding' Vulnerability

Wouldn't you want to send the support request to the developers of incredimail? They are the ones who are generating the invalid header. Declude is only warning you about it. Dean On Dec 3, 2007 7:47 AM, Mon Mariola - Rubén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The program "incredimail" generates subjects

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ED Spam Expression

Try this ... (?i:\b(?!dick?)(m(\W?|_){0,3}e(\W?|_){0,3}g(\W?|_){0,[EMAIL PROTECTED])?(\W?|_){0,3}d(\ W?|_){0,3}[|li1í!](\W?|_){0,3}[ck]{1,2}\b) Will match on obfuscated dick (ie. D!ck) but NOT dick, can include mega obfuscated. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ED Spam Expression

This is from the 8/21 message from David: Try this ... (?i:\b(?!dick?)(m(\W?|_){0,3}e(\W?|_){0,3}g(\W?|_){0,[EMAIL PROTECTED])?(\W?|_){0,3}d(\ W?|_){0,3}[|li1í!](\W?|_){0,3}[ck]{1,2}\b) Steve - Original Message - From: "John E. Richardson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, Nove

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] filters

You could use the minweighttofail option FILTER-VRIEND filter C:\IMail\Declude\Filters\Vriend.txt x 15 0 vriend.txt: MINWEIGHTTOFAIL 3 SUBJECT 1 IS zoek een vaste vriend BODY 1 CONTAINS http://geocities.com/ BODY 1 CONTAINS Ik zoek een vriend / seks-partner

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] filters

Bonno, you can do this, but probably not in a single filter file. A couple of key points for advanced filter file usage: You can define weights per tests in a filter file, and you can assign weight to a whole filter file, and these weights are cumulative. You can trigger a filter file even wh

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] CommTouch FP reporting

Currently the best way is to email me the Ref-Id's and then I report them directly to CT. David From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 2:19 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] CommTouch FP rep

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] my DNS tests

Scott, Darell and Gary, thank you all for the input - Original Message - From: "Gary Steiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 8:15 PM Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] my DNS tests VISI has been down for a while. http://www.dnsbl.com/2

re: [Declude.JunkMail] my DNS tests

VISI has been down for a while. http://www.dnsbl.com/2007/02/status-of-relaysvisicom-dead.html Original Message > From: "Serge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 8:17 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] my DNS tests > > T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need some Custom "Filters"

OK. I'm no regex expert, but I'll take a shot in the dark at the blank subject. How about his: SUBJECT 0 PCRE(^$) Or this which could allow optional spaces or tabs SUBJECT 0 PCRE(^[ \t]?$) Maybe this will at least spark a discussion. And get some better regex

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] my DNS tests

Here some thoughs: AHBL has more result codes , generally low volume but they don't require another DNS call: AHBL-RELAYS ip4rdnsbl.ahbl.org 127.0.0.2 0 0 AHBL-PROXIESip4rdnsbl.ahbl.org 127.0.0.3 0 0 AHBL-SOURCESip4r

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] my DNS tests

FWIW - I pulled CSMA-SBL ip4r sbl.csma.biz 127.0.0.2 5 0 earlier this week as it was timing out for us. Darrell -- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/SmarterMail/Declude Queue Monitoring, SURBL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need some Custom "Filters"

?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Stillwell Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:32 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Need some Custom "Filters" 1) Need to setup a "BannedSender" Filter (which needs

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reinstall of Declude prompts for activation code

OK. Thanks. I guess I need to place a call to Declude. -- Original Message -- From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 17:52:32 -0400 >The older versions of Declude the host name is tied to the k

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reinstall of Declude prompts for activation code

The older versions of Declude the host name is tied to the key. If you change your host name you need a new key. David From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy D. Hilton Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 5:46 PM To: Declude Junkmail Forum Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages

lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 12:33 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages Check that you don't have PREWHITELIST ON turned on, or rather set it to OFF. This will cause oth

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages

Cruz BBS e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.scbbs.net -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 9:53 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option fo

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages

Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages Any news about this David? I tried with the latest interim (4.3.64) with the same result: any WHITELIST disables the CATCHALLMAILS test or any other test and it's defined action. Best, Adolfo Justiniano Santa

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages

ssage- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 9:53 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test or filtering option for authenticated messages I thought we had added this I will check with our engineer

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate

Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 10:46 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate > > You can but I think the limit is three. > > Don't forget ATT/SBC is in bed with Yahoo so their email can come thr

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate

kmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMDOMAINS update for the att conglomerate John, Can you list multiple REVDNS on a single line when using spamdomains? For example @bellsouth.net .bellsouth. isp.att. Thanks, Keith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

<    7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   >