Posted on
https://community.snowdrift.coop/t/feedback-wanted-re-pledge-suspension-auto-drop-etc/470
to migrate from this mailing list to using Discourse.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Design mailing list
Design@lists.snowdr
On 01/13/2017 03:02 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> One extra thought about this process:
>
> Although I'll aim to make audio that could stay as final, if the work on
> the visuals somehow calls for minor tweaks in the script, it's not
> absolutely set in stone. It's final now, and I hope to not change it,
On 12/01/2016 07:52 AM, mray wrote:
> On 30.11.2016 07:30, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> tentative 4a. "Our innovative platform empowers you to join with others
>> to fund the public goods /you/ care about."
>>
>> tentative 4b. "At Snowdrift.coop, you collaborate with others to build
>> greater support fo
On 11/25/2016 10:17 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>
>>> With the updated first line:
>>>
>>> SCRIPT2C/
>>>
>>> The snowdrift dilemma: Regardless of who clears the snow, we all
>>> benefit. So, who will do the work?
>>>
>>> This public goods problem can also apply to music, software, movies,
>>> news, re
On 11/24/2016 06:10 AM, Stephen Michel wrote:
>
>
I have feedback on the script and want to respond but probably can't
today since it's Thanksgiving. Hope to by sometime tomorrow.
___
Design mailing list
Design@lists.snowdrift.coop
https://lists.sno
ed for it in June, I did find
somebody had already used it, though with a different meaning:
On 06/10/2016 04:39 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
> In thinking about that, I thought of a possible word to use
> "crowdmatching" and wondered if Snowdrift has ever considered using
> th
On 11/05/2016 11:29 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> NEW SCRIPT AND AUDIO:
>
> http://snowdrift.sylphs.net/f/5619d755c8/?raw=1
> http://snowdrift.sylphs.net/f/48e7fb3416/?raw=1
>
> This only has a minor negative note contrasting against threshold
> campaigns and no reference to the deeper wonky stuff or to
On 10/19/2016 04:10 AM, mray wrote:
>
> On 17.10.2016 23:10, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>
>> On 10/17/2016 09:16 AM, mray wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> As I mentioned in the meeting today, I think a more story-oriented, less
>> academic approach woul
On 10/18/2016 04:56 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> Okay, the reply below is the unedited reply for now. I hope it's clear
> enough. I haven't had time to write the clear new thread I want to get
> to soon.
>
>
>> That seems like an effective concise way to refer to the snowdrift. I
>> think it also nee
On 10/18/2016 11:28 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 07:55 AM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>
>>> The problem I have with the story is that anything a little too
>>> far-fetched is hard to accept. People don't have the experience of
>>> living in a to
On 10/17/2016 08:12 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> While I really appreciate the insights and perspective from the story
> approach Michael presented, it feels far too contrived to me. I'd like
> to see if we can capture some feel of the story-style narrative without
> pushing the limits too hard.
>
>
On 10/17/2016 09:16 AM, mray wrote:
>
>
As I mentioned in the meeting today, I think a more story-oriented, less
academic approach would be preferable (though it would be good to have
rigorous academic-style explanations available somewhere for those who
want them, but probably text and images
On 08/31/2016 11:48 PM, Bryan Richter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:32:12AM -0600, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>
>> On 08/31/2016 05:57 AM, Bryan Richter wrote:
>>> There are three classes of information:
>>>
>>> 1. Current pledge information
On 08/31/2016 05:57 AM, Bryan Richter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:06:31AM +0200, Robert Martinez (mray)
> wrote:
>> On 29.08.2016 22:35, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>> I think two pages for "payment history" and "pledge history"
>>> should be considered. They each solve separate questions: (A)
>>
On 08/29/2016 02:35 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 08/29/2016 01:27 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>> On 08/29/2016 01:45 PM, mray wrote:
>>
>>> The last meeting made clear we need to settle on what we expect the page
>>> to do for a user.
>>>
>>>
On 08/13/2016 08:13 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
>
>
> On August 13, 2016 12:18:48 PM EDT, Michael Siepmann
> wrote:
>> Great idea, incorporated into
>> http://snowdrift.sylphs.net/f/a87dd65116/?raw=1
>>
>> Not shown in the mockup is what it would say in the s
On 08/13/2016 08:09 AM, Stephen Michel wrote:
> On August 13, 2016 12:57:41 AM EDT, Michael Siepmann
> wrote:
>> On 08/12/2016 09:37 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>> Your concern makes sense to me. I think if we can get an adequate
>> solution
On 08/12/2016 09:37 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 08/12/2016 08:04 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>
> Let me try to make my view clearer. I think that it is more
> understandable to think this:
>
> "Oh, when things were really low, no charges happened, it just added up
&
On 08/12/2016 08:02 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 08/12/2016 06:58 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I think that this scenario is really hard to parse. It could also result in
>> a display where you have a carryover from may and a carryover from June
>> displayed in July, and that gets really
On 08/12/2016 04:08 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
> On 08/12/2016 03:59 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>
>
> Here's what I had in mind, from the "How the limit works" thread:
>
> On 08/03/2016 06:34 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> On 08/03/2016 05:19 PM, Aaron Wo
On 08/12/2016 03:59 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
> On 08/12/2016 03:32 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> On 08/12/2016 02:28 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>>> On 08/12/2016 01:58 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>
On 08/12/2016 03:32 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 08/12/2016 02:28 PM, Stephen Michel wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>> On 08/12/2016 01:58 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>>> Here's a rough-around-the-edges modification of m
Here's a rough-around-the-edges modification of mray's mockup with the
kind of information and structure I'm arguing for:
http://snowdrift.sylphs.net/f/7949e02830/?raw=1
It's rough-around-the-edges because I have very little experience with
Inkscape and could not easily figure out how to do certa
On 08/10/2016 03:13 PM, mray wrote:
>
> To me the simplest answer to "What did I pay last months - and why?" is:
> "Nothing, because it got carried over." It is just not necessary to add
> more information here in order to make sense in the type "2." (simple)
> representation.
Lack of information
On 08/10/2016 09:36 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 08/10/2016 05:59 AM, Bryan Richter wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:35:03PM +0200, Robert Martinez (mray) wrote:
>>>
>>> I think there need to be two distinct representations of your
>>> activity on snowdrift.
>>>
>>> 1. A *complete* log of all a
On 08/09/2016 07:23 AM, Stephen Michel wrote:
>
> I agree with Michael here, but there is a limit. Imagine a user who pledges
> to many projects which are then suspended as they grow, but who is also lazy
> and leaves the pledges suspended rather than dropping them. Their history
> could beco
On 08/02/2016 05:55 PM, mray wrote:
> On 01.08.2016 23:30, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>> We discussed this in today's meeting. Here's a revised mockup, also
>> attached in
>> .ods format. This shows payment processing fees, two successive months of
>> carry-ov
We discussed this in today's meeting. Here's a revised mockup, also
attached in .ods format. This shows payment processing fees, two
successive months of carry-over, and an example where a pledge was
suspended:
History mockup 2.ods
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet
In last week's meeting we discussed the need for some kind of account
history, and also a way to represent the situation of no Stripe
transaction happening because it would be too small to be worth the
fees. Here's a mockup showing one approach to this, with the example of
a $2 minimum Stripe tran
ake a difference to the
patron's decision to unpledge.
Best,
Michael
--
Michael Siepmann, Ph.D.
*The Tech Design Psychologist*™
/Shaping technology to help people flourish/™
303-835-0501 TechDesignPsych.com
<http://www.TechDesignPsych.com?id=esig> OpenPGP: 6D65A4F7
<http://pool
This message pulls in mray's comments from several emails into one to
respond to, and snips out most of the what led up to the comment, which
is available if needed in mray's 6/20/2016 emails.
On 06/20/2016 04:20 PM, mray wrote:
> On 06.06.2016 20:33, Michael Siepmann wrote:
&
On 06/20/2016 05:46 PM, mray wrote:
>
> On 09.06.2016 22:21, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>> I've put some revised mockups at
>> http://techdesignpsych.com/Temporary/snowdrift/ based on recent thoughts
>> and conversations. Two new things they include are (a) a
>> re
<http://pool.sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?search=0x6D65A4F7&fingerprint=on&hash=on&op=vindex>
On 06/13/2016 09:32 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 06/13/2016 07:37 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>> On 06/10/2016 09:19 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>> On 06/10/2016 04:39
On 06/10/2016 09:19 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 04:39 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>> On 06/09/2016 06:36 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>> On 06/09/2016 01:21 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>>> I've put some revised mockups at
>>>> http://techdesig
On 06/09/2016 06:36 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 01:21 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>> I've put some revised mockups at
>> http://techdesignpsych.com/Temporary/snowdrift/ based on recent thoughts
>> and conversations. Two new things they include are (a) a
>
oject whether
you're a patron or not.
Looking forward to further discussion.
Best,
Michael
Michael Siepmann, Ph.D.
*The Tech Design Psychologist*™
/Shaping technology to help people flourish/™
303-835-0501 TechDesignPsych.com
<http://www.TechDesignPsych.com?id=esig> OpenPGP
On 06/04/2016 03:18 AM, mray wrote:
> On 04.06.2016 01:02, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>
>>
>> Keeping project pages focused on project-specific info makes sense to
>> me. However, I think it would be good to have a green-yellow-red
>> "account health"
On 06/02/2016 10:28 AM, Stephen Michel wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:25 AM, mray wrote:
>> On 24.05.2016 19:42, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>> I've put slightly revised versions of the interaction design mockups
>>> some of us looked at via Jitsi Meet yesterda
On 05/24/2016 04:13 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 05/24/2016 02:47 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>
>
>> I like "Please consider increasing your maximum". On reflection, and
>> after experimenting, I'm thinking perhaps that's all we need. I've
>> up
On 05/24/2016 01:43 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 05/24/2016 12:32 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>> I've added a pair of dashboards along those lines:
>>
>> http://techdesignpsych.com/Temporary/snowdrift/
>>
> Looks good, looking forward to feedback from others or
sign mockups
>> some of us looked at via Jitsi Meet yesterday in both the design Seafile
>> server (snowdrift.sylphs.net) and in browsable form at:
>>
>> http://techdesignpsych.com/Temporary/snowdrift/
>>
>> There may be a better way to share them
uture, perhaps via git, but
for now I just wanted to make them available for discussion etc.
Best,
Michael
--
Michael Siepmann, Ph.D.
*The Tech Design Psychologist*™
/Shaping technology to help people flourish/™
303-835-0501 TechDesignPsych.com
<http://www.TechDesignPsych.com?id=esig>
learning how to use a FLO alternative.
(By the way, I unfortunately have a conflict on Monday and won't be able
to be at our regular meeting.)
Best,
Michael
Michael Siepmann, Ph.D.
*The Tech Design Psychologist*™
/Shaping technology to help people flourish/™
303-835-0501 TechDesignPsych.com
&
://tree.taiga.io/project/snowdrift/us/67).
mray: I think you have mockups of these which we could revisit as a
starting point? Anything else we should look at or think about before
actually meeting?
Michael
--
Michael Siepmann, Ph.D.
*The Tech Design Psychologist*™
/Shaping technology to help
Generally yes. I think some of the info in some of the excluded pages
(e.g. the sub-pages of /how-it-works/ and /about/ ) might need to be
incorporated into the higher-level pages (e.g., /how-it-works ), perhaps
partly via in-page tooltip-like things, but in general I'm in favor of
reducing the nu
On 03/12/2016 06:10 PM, Iko wrote:
> On 12/03/16 01:05 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>> I'm attaching a report on the intro messaging feedback from SCaLE
>> 14x. I'd be happy to discuss it in Monday's meeting if there's room
>> in the agenda. Comment
han a will also not be implemented
until we recreate this in CiviCRM.
Best,
Michael
Michael Siepmann, Ph.D.
*The Tech Design Psychologist*™
/Shaping technology to help people flourish/™
303-835-0501 TechDesignPsych.com
<http://www.TechDesignPsych.com?id=esig> OpenPGP: 6D65A4F7
<h
On 02/01/2016 01:19 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>
> On 01/29/2016 07:35 AM, Stephen Michel wrote:
>
>> On January 28, 2016 11:02:18 PM EST, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>>> In the midst of all the SCaLE stuff, this thread got lost. Following up
>>> finally.
>>>
&g
ing up
>> finally.
>>
>> On 01/08/2016 08:04 AM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>
>>
>>> here are a few variations that occur to me:
>>>
>>> * Catalyze the commons.
>>> * The commons catalyst.
>>> * Catalyst for the commo
I previously mentioned that I planned to draft a short guide for hosts /
interviewers. I'm attaching a draft of that. Look forward to any
feedback on it.
Best,
Michael
Michael Siepmann, Ph.D.
*The Tech Design Psychologist*^TM
/Shaping technology to help people flourish/^TM
303-835
Aaron asked me to provide feedback on the volunteer form. I also looked
at how the How to Help page links to it.*
Re https://snowdrift.coop/p/snowdrift/w/en/how-to-help :*
"Register as a Volunteer" is more a way of finding out about ways to
help than a way to help in itself. As such, I found it
On 01/08/2016 04:02 PM, mray wrote:
>
> Yes and no. I think the distinction is clear I guess I'm just curious if
> you have some hints on how to professionally make things look
> unprofessional. Since good usability *is* an important aspect of a
> "professional" or "high quality" it narrows the op
On 01/05/2016 10:57 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 01/05/2016 09:25 AM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>
>> - I'd stop using the phrase "Let's clear the path to a better world"
>> because it confuses things. Based on your explanation, the clear public
>> road it
On 01/05/2016 10:57 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 01/05/2016 09:25 AM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>
>> - I'd stop using the phrase "Let's clear the path to a better world"
>> because it confuses things. Based on your explanation, the clear public
>> road it
On 01/05/2016 10:57 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 01/05/2016 09:25 AM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>
>> - I'd stop using the phrase "Let's clear the path to a better world"
>> because it confuses things. Based on your explanation, the clear public
>> road it
On 01/07/2016 03:02 AM, mray wrote:
> On 05.01.2016 21:42, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>>
> Awesome!
> This looks like something I would fill out without feeling nagged.
>
> You mentioned that making these handouts look not too professional is a
> good idea. This makes se
On 01/05/2016 02:09 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>
> Looking over the screen-shots already, and in light of discussion about
> metaphors, I propose we clean up the wording (which wasn't carefully
> thought through yet) first.
>
> * how about "Join us!" instead of "Join us in setting…" ?
> * maybe for now
o convey
the meaning you explained as effectively as I hope is possible. The
issue is that the commons is under-resourced, not that it's not free,
correct?
Best,
Michael
Michael Siepmann, Ph.D.
The Tech Design Psychologist™
Shaping technology to
On 12/31/2015 11:40 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 12/31/2015 06:42 AM, mray wrote:
>> Thanks for your thoughts on this!
>>
>> I now realize that changing the order isn't going to be of much benefit.
>> Based on Michaels observations and ideas I got a better picture of what
>> might turn out to be more
On 12/30/2015 03:45 PM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 12/30/2015 12:47 PM, Michael Siepmann wrote:
>> Good to meet several of you via Jitsi Meet on Monday. Here is an
>> initial draft idea for a way to get feedback on introductory messaging
>> from people who visit the Snowdrift.coo
[space to write ]
- Thank you! Now please discuss your feedback and questions with one of
us hosting the booth.
- Name & contact info (optional):
===
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Siepmann, Ph.D.
The Tech Design Psychologist™
Shaping technology to help people flourish™
ate to for people unfamiliar
with it, and can easily come across as ideological if they don't quickly
grasp how it benefits them. Re "1. What is the issue? FLO is great
public good for everyone but it faces the snowdrift dilemma and
struggles!" the really challenging part is to make the
62 matches
Mail list logo
