[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 1.8.0-rc1

Hi All, I have put together a release of activemq-nms-openwire, please check it and vote accordingly. This release brings .NET Standard 2.0 support. The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-openwire/1.8.0-rc1/ Regards, Krzysztof

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 1.8.0-rc1

ting to the vote. There were some > release-related source changes made in the source repo after the > archives were added to dist dev area, though I think those were in the > archive? They'd need to be if required to recreate the release bits. A > tag should exist for whats in it eith

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 1.8.0-rc1

of 1.7.x to NetStd. Looking forward to switch back to the newly refactored > official version once it's stabilized and ready to test. > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 8:26 AM Havret wrote: > > > Thanks, Robbie. I'm canceling the vote then. > > > > On Mon, Aug 17

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 1.8.0-rc1

st Linux related packaging / file permissions + some > issues in the text of the LICENSE and NOTICE files? If that's all it is, > I'm thinking perhaps I will get the jump on this by building from source > and testing already. > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 2:20 PM Havret wrot

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 1.8.0-rc2

Hi All, This is the second attempt to release activemq-nms-openwire. I think I've made all the changes requested by Robbie: 1) Used updated version of cmdlet to create zip archive (it helped the last time) and created zips with subdirectories 2) Updated LICENCE and NOTICE files 3) Pushed 1.8.0-r

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 1.8.0-rc2

who contributed and took the time to review the release candidates and vote. I'll move forward with getting the release out. Regards Krzysztof On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 2020/12/20 22:16:48, Hav

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NMS ActiveMQ 1.8.0 Released

I am pleased to announce the release of Apache NMS ActiveMQ 1.8.0 Downloads are now available at: *https://activemq.apache.org/components/nms/providers/activemq/downloads/apachenmsactivemq-v180 * Or v

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimal JDK on ActiveMQ Artemis...

Finally! +1 On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:52 PM Francesco Nigro wrote: > +1 !! > > Il giorno gio 14 gen 2021 alle ore 20:33 Christopher Shannon < > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > +1 from me, JDK 11 has been around a couple years now so I think it's > fine. > > > > It would be ni

Unofficial ActiveMQ Artemis .NET Client

icle: https://havret.io/activemq-artemis-net-core repository: https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client extensions: https://github.com/Havret/activemq-artemis-extensions docs: https://havret.github.io/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/ Thanks, Krzysztof

Re: Unofficial ActiveMQ Artemis .NET Client

quite a lot of tedious boilerplate code. For instance, in order to create a connection, you would need to write sth along these lines: https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/blob/0c7a165c77744ff1d0042511e6d5afc44a3e38e2/src/ActiveMQ.Artemis.Client/Builders/ConnectionBuilder.cs#L10

Re: Unofficial ActiveMQ Artemis .NET Client

t keen on supporting this/bringing this > under the Apache ActiveMQ sub banner, i dont have the time, id rather if > people feel something is missing in existing solutions, that they > contribute there. > > > On 4 February 2021 at 20:38, Havret wrote: > > Hi Justin, > >

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-api 2.0.0-rc1

Hi All, I have put together a release of activemq-nms-api, please check it and vote accordingly. This release brings NMS 2.0 support. The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-api/2.0.0-rc1 Regards, KP

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-api 2.0.0-rc1

nding) > > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 1:09 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Regards > > > JB > > > > > > > Le 16 févr. 2021 à 22:12, Havret a écrit : > >

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

Any update on this? I've just seen that Victor Romero archived his unofficial docker image. :( On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 4:57 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > I'm following up on that JIRA ticket. > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:57 AM Clebert Suconic > wrote: > > > > Thanks Matt, I thought you already

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NMS API 2.0.0 Released

I am pleased to announce the release of Apache NMS API 2.0.0 Downloads are now available at: https://activemq.apache.org/components/nms/nms-api-downloads Or via NuGet: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS/ Many thanks to all of the contributors to this release. KP

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

nic < > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Do you have a Jenkins job already aligned to build it ? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:19 PM Matt Pavlovich > > wrote: > > > > > >> I’m

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2-rc1

Hi All, I have put together a release of activemq-nms-amqp, please check it and vote accordingly. This is a maintenance release for version 1.8.x that contains one worth noting fix (AMQNET-718) which required some changes in the underlying amqpnetlite. The files can be grabbed from: https://dis

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2-rc1

typical format, not sure why the change? > > Robbie > > On Sun, 20 Jun 2021 at 22:01, Havret wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I have put together a release of activemq-nms-amqp, please check it and > vote > > accordingly. > > > > This is a mainte

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2-rc1

rote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >>> Le 20 juin 2021 à 23:00, Havret a écrit : > >>> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> I have put together a release of activemq-nms-amqp

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2-rc2

Hi, This is the second run for activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2. I've added the missing headers, updated the license files, and generated SHA512 using powershell not gpg, so it should be more in line with what you guys are used to. The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/act

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2-rc2

don't have to manually go through every single file? Maybe this kind of check should be included in the CI pipeline? Thanks, KP On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 5:30 PM Timothy Bish wrote: > On 6/27/21 4:49 PM, Havret wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is the second run for activemq-nms-amq

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2-rc2

ply the basic > checksum alone which can at least be eyeballed against a similar value > generated by most things (though again, quite awkward with the gpg > grid format one). > > Robbie > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 12:06, Havret wrote: > > > > Hi Tim, > > > >

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2-rc3

. Regards, Havret

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2-rc3

Hi, I think I have all the votes I needed. Thanks for your votes and your feedback. I will complete the release when I'm back from vacation. :) Havret On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 6:49 PM Jeff Genender wrote: > +1 > > Jeff > > > > On Aug 4, 2021, at 2:4

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2-rc3

review the release candidates and vote. I'll move forward with getting the release out. Regards Havret On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 7:48 AM Havret wrote: > Hi, > > I think I have all the votes I needed. Thanks for your votes and your > feedback. > > I will complete the rel

Re: Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

mage enables more complex >use-cases without having to clean-up / undo more advanced > > Hope this helps. > > Art > > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 1:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As I’m preparing ActiveMQ 5.17.0 with lo

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

Does it apply to Artemis as well, or only to Classic? On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:29 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote: > Hello Havret- > > Yes, I am still planning a PR for the Docker image shortly. A number of > prerequisite fixes went in recently as part of the 5.16.3 release (maven >

Re: Official Docker Image for ActiveMQ

It's the official name, isn't it? :) What about this initiative? --> https://artemiscloud.io/ It seems promising. On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 7:09 PM JB Onofré wrote: > ActiveMQ (I still don’t like « classic » name ;)) not Artemis. > > > Le 17 août 2021 à 19:00, Havret a

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2-rc3

files were not officially published and > so are neither mirrored or archived yet, and the website wasnt updated > or a release announcement made. I see the package did make it to nuget > 8 days ago though. > > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 at 10:49, Havret wrote: > > > > Re

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2-rc3

Can any of the PMC members move the artifacts from the dev area? :) On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 1:08 AM Robbie Gemmell wrote: > It's not something I can do, needs to be a PMC member. > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 20:01, Havret wrote: > > > > Robbie, could you move the artif

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 1.8.2-rc3

Thanks Tim, I will take it from here. On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:09 PM Timothy Bish wrote: > On 8/30/21 3:47 PM, Havret wrote: > > Can any of the PMC members move the artifacts from the dev area? :) > > > I've moved the artifacts to the release folder, I'll leav

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 2.0.0-rc1

Hi All, I have put together a release of activemq-nms-amqp, please check it and vote accordingly. This release brings NMS 2.0 implementation. The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/2.0.0-rc1/ Regards, Havret

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 2.0.0-rc2

Hi, This is the second attempt to release activemq-nms-amqp 2.0.0. The missing headers were added. The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/2.0.0-rc2 Please check it and vote accordingly. Regards, Havret

[RESULT] [VOTE]

took the time to review the release candidates and vote. I'll move forward with getting the release out. Regards Havret

Re: [ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.19.0 Released

Hi, I'm trying to update the test suite of ArtemisNetClient to use this version, but one of the tests starts failing on 2.19.0: *Should_delete_queue_alongside_with_auto_created_address *--> https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/pull/300/checks?check_run_id=3943848841

Re: [ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.19.0 Released

I tried to adjust the test: - I set *address-queue-scan-period* to 100 - I wait up to 5 seconds until the address is removed But the test still is failing. My broker configuration is as follows: https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/blob/fc256b2a3784447fa4feadea58b62f58d1fcabfd

ActiveMQ Artemis 2.19.0 - Management API remove the queue alongside with the address issue

Hi, I'm trying to update the test suite of ArtemisNetClient to use ActiveMQ Artemis 2.19.0, but one of the tests starts failing on 2.19.0: Should_delete_queue_alongside_with_auto_created_address --> https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/pull/300/checks?check_run_id=39

Re: ActiveMQ Artemis 2.19.0 - Management API remove the queue alongside with the address issue

Hi Clebert, I had the same broker configuration for 2.18.0 and the test passed just fine, so I don't think that the matter of new defaults. The queue is removed just fine ( https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/blob/6cee91547c18194330062a48c3b02c7c385457ff

Re: ActiveMQ Artemis 2.19.0 - Management API remove the queue alongside with the address issue

e configuration you are > showing. > > We also had another change related to not delete queues defined on > broker.xml. Perhaps that’s the problem ? > > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 9:38 AM Havret wrote: > > > Hi Clebert, > > > > I had the same broker co

Re: ActiveMQ Artemis 2.19.0 - Management API remove the queue alongside with the address issue

> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 4:56 PM Havret wrote: > > > > This particular queue is not defined in broker.xml. I'm not sure if 2.19 > is > > semantically correct, as having the same configuration I'm getting > > different results than with 2.18 and pr

Re: ActiveMQ Artemis 2.19.0 - Management API remove the queue alongside with the address issue

Yes, that's the issue, I mentioned it at least a few times in this thread and the previous one. For reference, the test looks as follows: https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/blob/af9085dbea8dc467ede565dda9312610cc8b42b7/test/ArtemisNetClient.Integration

[ANNOUNCE] Apache NMS AMQP 2.0.0 Released

I am pleased to announce the release of Apache NMS AMQP 2.0.0 Downloads are now available at: https://activemq.apache.org/components/nms/providers/amqp/downloads/ Or via NuGet: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS.AMQP/ Many thanks to all of the contributors to this release. Havret

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20.0

+1 (non-binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient --> https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/pull/317 It's all green, including the regression I reported regarding the management API destroy queue feature. To make the testing easier, I've created a

Re: Unofficial ActiveMQ Artemis .NET Client

arly all languages, > many/most actually developed outside the Apache Kafka project, and even in > some cases for the same language there are a couple of clients on offer. > But the Apache Kafka project does not list or promote those. > > Best > M > > > > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.19.1

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 5:01 PM Timothy Bish wrote: > On 1/26/22 15:08, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.19.1 release. > > > > > > This is a maintenance release on top of 2.19.0 that includes a few bug > fixes. > > > > The release n

Re: [NuGet Gallery] Message for owners of the package 'Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ'

Hi, I don’t think we can amend the existing package but we could release 1.8.1 version with restricted dependency to NMS.API. I hope this helps. Best regards, Havret On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 14:35 NuGet Gallery wrote: > User straizer <hubert.roman...@gmail.com> sends the following

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.21.0

+1 (non-binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient --> https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/pull/338 It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it run your tests

Re: nms-amqp repo default branch rename

Sure, do you have the link to the previous ticket so I can clone it? Thanks, Havret On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 5:19 PM Robbie Gemmell wrote: > About a year ago we requested that Infra rename the default branches > to 'main' for the various git repositories. I have just noticed

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-api 1.8.1-rc1

Hi all, I have put together a release of activemq-nms-api, please check it and vote accordingly. This release contains a single bugfix[1] by Iuliia Fatkullina! Thank you! The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-api/1.8.1-rc1/ Regards, Krzyszt

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.22.0

+1 I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1]. It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests. Cheers, Krzysztof [1] https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-cli

Re: [VOTE] Terminology to replace master/slave in ActiveMQ

[+1] Leader/Follower [-1] Primary/Backup - it doesn't sound right to me, as it doesn't imply that there might be a role switch. Krzysztof On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 8:26 AM Tetreault, Lucas wrote: > Hey folks, > > I don’t know if I’m actually allowed to call for a vote given I’m not a > committer

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-api 1.8.1-rc1

f25b9ce8dfab6c28b73fba193 > > Note it’s important to git cherry pick the original commits, rather than > making new change / commits in 1.8 branch > > Best > Mike > > Sent from my iPad > > > On 27 Apr 2022, at 17:41, Timothy Bish wrote: > > > > On

Re: [DISCUSS] Old releases docs on artemis...

Yep, every single time I google sth artemis related I end up in the old docs. On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 6:54 PM Justin Bertram wrote: > One reason to remove old docs is that folks who don't know better > invariably read old docs rather than the latest and greatest. This is > usually caused by searc

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-api 1.8.1-rc1

git checkout main > >> > >> cd .. > >> git clone https://github.com/rh-messaging/jira-git-report.git > >> cd jira-git-report > >> mvn compile assembly:single > >> cd .. > >> java -jar > jira-git-report/target/jira-git-0.1.SNAPSHOT-j

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-api 1.8.1-rc2

Hi all, I have put together a release of activemq-nms-api, please check it and vote accordingly. This release contains a single bugfix[1] by Iuliia Fatkullina! Thank you! Besides that I cherry-picked notice and license updates from the master branch[2]. The files can be grabbed from: https://di

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-api 1.8.1-rc2

nding) > > > > Checked the notice and other files for correct year > > Checked this API bundle with OpenWire main branch bumping its version > and seems to compile > > > > > > > > > >> On 9 May 2022, at 21:35, Havret wrote: > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-api 1.8.1-rc2

lease candidate and voting. I will proceed with publishing the release now. Krzysztof On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:12 PM Havret wrote: > I'm adding my official +1 (binding), > > Krzysztof > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 6:32 PM Jeff Genender > wrote: > >> +1 >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-api 1.8.1-rc2

Yeah, I still need to verify my PR locally, but the website is broken on windows. I will deal with it over the weekend. On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 12:15 PM Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Website still needs to be updated and the release announced.. > > On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 22:16, Havr

[ANNOUNCE] Apache ActiveMQ NMS API 1.8.1 Released

I am pleased to announce the release of Apache ActiveMQ NMS API 1.8.1 Downloads are now available at: *https://activemq.apache.org/components/nms/nms-api-downloads * Or via NuGet: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS/ Many thank

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

+1 (binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1]. It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests. Cheers, Krzysztof [1] https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-api 1.8.1-rc2

; too surprising it doesnt work. It seems Jekyll itself isnt 'officially > supported' but can be made to run on Windows, > https://jekyllrb.com/docs/installation/windows/. It is of course > fairly easy to run a Linux guest on a Windows host in one various ways > these days, an

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 2.0.0-rc1

Hi all, I have put together a release of activemq-nms-openwire, please check it and vote accordingly. This release contains the following changes: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-637 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-665 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-5

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 2.0.0-rc1

needed and it not being > > > effective during failover. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-768 > > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-openwire/pull/21 > > > > > > None of the JIRAs seem to have appropriate fix version

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.1

+1 (binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1] 2.7.0. It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests. Cheers, Krzysztof [1] https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-a

[ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.1 release

I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.1 Downloads are now available at: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/ The complete list of updates: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.23.1 This release contains a few fixes and

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.1

gt; This vote has passed with 8 Binding votes > > > > Binding: > > > > Clebert Suconic > > Robbie Gemmel > > Timothy Bish > > Christopher Shannon > > JB Onofre > > Gary Tully > > Havret > > Domenico Bruscino > > > -- > Clebert Suconic >

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 2.0.0-rc2

Hi all, I have put together a release of activemq-nms-openwire, please check it and vote accordingly. Huge kudos to Bruce Dodson for his help with resolving issues signaled in rc1. This release contains the following changes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=123112

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 2.0.0-rc2

+1 (binding) Krzysztof On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 6:43 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 10:47 AM Havret wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I have put together a release of activemq-nms-openwire, plea

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 2.0.0-rc2

1 great community! > > And thanks to Krzysztof for running the release as always! > > Mike > > On 5 Jul 2022, at 16:26, Clebert Suconic > wrote: > > > +1 > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 12:16 PM W B D wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Bruce >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 2.0.0

I am pleased to announce the release of Apache Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 2.0.0 Downloads are now available at: https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua?filename=/activemq/apache-nms-activemq/2.0.0/Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ.2.0.0.nupkg&action=download Or via NuGet: *https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS.Act

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0

+1 (binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1] 2.8.0. It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests. Cheers, Krzysztof [1] *https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-a

Re: [.Net tests] was: Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0

de a run against a broker nightly, > if it doesnt already do so, would make more sense to me. > > On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 05:03, Clebert Suconic > wrote: > > > > @Havret: your .Net tests run quickly ? > > > > Perhaps it would be a good idea to include it as

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.25.0 Release

+1 (binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1] 2.9.0. It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests. Cheers, Krzysztof [1] https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-a

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.26.0 release

I may be a bit ignorant here (not a java dev), but how changing the logging framework may justify and imply removing the whole functional module? On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 8:55 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > We can put a release notes on how to bring the rest from a previous > version and still insta

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.26.0 release

+1 (binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1] 2.10.0. It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests. Cheers, Krzysztof [1] https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-a

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.27.0

+1 (binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1] 2.10.1. It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests. Cheers, Krzysztof [1] https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-a

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.27.1 release

+1 (binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1] 2.11.0. It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests. Cheers, Krzysztof [1] *https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-a

Re: Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v 2.0.0 libs and .net win forms applications problem

ine that way but it's hardly a feasible workaround. [1] https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/issues/381#issuecomment-1279776799 Thanks, Chris On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 10:30 AM Adriana Cass wrote: > Hi, I have updated my .net c#project to use 2.0.0 version of > Apac

Re: Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v 2.0.0 libs and .net win forms applications problem

; app. > But like you said this is not a solution... > > Can this bug be fixed? Is it on the backlog? Could you report it as a bug > so it gets fixed? > > Thanks again, > Adriana > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 11:24 PM Havret wrote: > > > Hi Adriana, > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0

+1 (binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1] 2.12.0. It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests. Cheers, Krzysztof [1] https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-a

Re: Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ v 2.0.0 libs and .net win forms applications problem

cting GUI applications now resolved? If so, it would be great to see an > updated NuGet package with this fix applied! (Even if this is the only > change since the 2.0.0 release...) > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 1:24 PM Havret wrote: > > > Hi Adriana, > > > > It seems like a bu

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 2.0.1-rc1

Hi all, I have put together a release of activemq-nms-openwire, please check it and vote accordingly. Huge thanks to Łukasz Cygan for his help in resolving the issue identified in version 2.0.0. This release contains the following change: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?pro

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 2.0.1-rc1

e change did not cause > any regression. > > Bruce > > On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 9:54 AM Havret wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I have put together a release of activemq-nms-openwire, please check it > > and vote accordingly. Huge thanks to Łukasz Cygan

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 2.0.1

I am pleased to announce the release of Apache Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 2.0.1 Downloads are now available at: *https://activemq.apache.org/components/nms/providers/activemq/downloads/apachenmsactivemq-v201

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 2.1.0-rc1

Hi all, I have put together another release of activemq-nms-openwire. Please review it and vote accordingly. This release includes an important new feature that allows users to specify an allow/deny list of types for binary serialization. This can help prevent potential security vulnerabilities.

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-openwire 2.1.0-rc1

> > On Mar 1, 2023, at 4:02 AM, Michael André Pearce < > > > michaelpea...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks Chris, much needed feature! > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > On 2023/0

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 2.1.0-rc1

Hi all, I have put together another release of activemq-nms-amqp. Please review it and vote accordingly. This release includes an important new feature that allows users to specify an allow/deny list of types for binary serialization. This can help prevent potential security vulnerabilities. The

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 2.1.0

I am pleased to announce the release of Apache Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ 2.1.0 Downloads are now available at: https://activemq.apache.org/components/nms/providers/activemq/downloads/apachenmsactivemq-v210 Or via NuGet: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ/2.1.0 Many thanks to the contr

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 2.1.0-rc1

> wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:42 AM Michael André Pearce > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 (Binding0 > > > > > > > > Best > > > > Mike > > > > &

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Apache.NMS. AMQP 2.1.0

I am pleased to announce the release of Apache Apache.NMS.AMQP 2.1.0 Downloads are now available at: https://activemq.apache.org/components/nms/providers/amqp/downloads/nms-amqp-02-01-00-release Or via NuGet: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS.AMQP/2.1.0 Many thanks to the contributors t

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 2.2.0-rc1

Hi all, I have put together another release of activemq-nms-amqp. Please review it and vote accordingly. This update enhances the message acknowledgement functionality by supporting multiple AckType's, This improvement enables clients to utilize broker redelivery configurations automatically and

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-amqp 2.2.0-rc1

lease candidate and voting. I will proceed with publishing the release now. Krzysztof On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 7:55 PM Arthur Naseef wrote: > +1 > > Art > > > On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 7:32 AM wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Jeff > > > > > >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Apache.NMS. AMQP 2.2.0

I am pleased to announce the release of Apache Apache.NMS.AMQP 2.2.0 Downloads are now available at: https://activemq.apache.org/components/nms/providers/amqp/downloads/nms-amqp-02-02-00-release Or via NuGet: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS.AMQP/2.2.0 Many thanks to the contributors t

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.29.0

+1 (binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1] 2.12.0. It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests. Cheers, Krzysztof [1] https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-a

Re: [DISCUSS] Naming convention for official Docker images

+1 On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 8:45 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Jul 10, 2023, at 9:45 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi Justin, > > > > It has been discussed but not the name specifically. > > > > As we use apache/activemq-artemis, I thought "logical" to use > >

[VOTE] Release activemq-nms-api 2.1.0-rc1

Hi all, I have put together another release of activemq-nms-api. Please review it and vote accordingly. This release adds an API allowing users to consume messages asynchronously using the new AsyncMessageListener delegate. The files can be grabbed from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ac

Re: [VOTE] Release activemq-nms-api 2.1.0-rc1

t; > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 7:40 PM Havret wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have put together another release of activemq-nms-api. Please review > it > > > and vote accordin

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Apache.NMS. API 2.1.0

I am pleased to announce the release of Apache Apache.NMS.API 2.1.0 Downloads are now available at: https://activemq.apache.org/components/nms/nms-api-downloads Or via NuGet: https://www.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS/2.1.0 Many thanks to the contributors to this release. Thanks, Krzysztof

Re: [PROPOSAL] Switch to GitHub issues/actions after ActiveMQ 6.0.0

Hi JB, In my humble opinion, moving to GitHub issues would greatly benefit all projects under the ActiveMQ umbrella. Using Jira has been cumbersome. Best, Krzysztof On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 6:05 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > Even if we are pretty busy and focused on ActiveMQ 6.0

Re: [PROPOSAL] Switch to GitHub issues/actions after ActiveMQ 6.0.0

Seeing all these emails, *'The request for a new Jira account, xxx, was denied by yyy'* doesn't seem user/contributor-friendly in my opinion. Sorting this out with GitHub issues would outweigh all that Jira has to offer, which is very little in my opinion, despite the fact that I've been using it f

  1   2   >