Re: KVM Tools

The qemu guest agent is installed in the guest, that is... On Mar 28, 2013 12:48 AM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: > What specifically? A large chunk of the tools for VMware/xen are upgraded > drivers, which aren't necessary with Linux and already available for other > operating systems. There's also

Re: KVM Tools

What specifically? A large chunk of the tools for VMware/xen are upgraded drivers, which aren't necessary with Linux and already available for other operating systems. There's also the qemu-guest-agent which can be installed in the host to do things like write files from host to guest, but cloudsta

KVM Tools

Hello, I've been seeing some idle chatter about possible KVM Guest Tools, like there are for VMware and Xen Server. Has anything be done about this?

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1818) DatabaseCreator is not invoking UpgradeChecker to run upgrade logic written in Java, which is required for a success upgrade process

We need to fix reply-to email from issues@ ml. Will open a ticket on INFRA. Re-posting comment from issue 1818 to dev list, just want to understand the recent patch; In 4.1, DatabaseCreator is only used by developers to deploy database, users will still use cloud-setup-databases so why does it ev

Review Request: Remove duplicate plugin dependency, fixes maven build warning

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10165/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- Patch rem

RE: Question pertaining to NAT on Private Gateway Feature of N-Tier

Hi Chandan, You can enable the source NAT for each private gateway. In private gateway is deletion process, we also delete NAT rules on it. There is no separate thread to do it. Thanks, Jayapal From: Chandan Purushothama Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 6:09 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Ja

[PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

I would like to propose the new feature ACL on private gateway. This feature is sub feature of the nTier 2.0 apps. Currently we do not have way to control the traffic on the private gateway. Using this feature we can configure the ingress/egress ACL on the private gateway. Jira Id: https://issu

VI Java API Question

Hi, I was wondering if anyone could answer this question for me. I've been looking at all sorts of properties of various VI Java Objects to find out how to do this and don't see any answers on the web either. I have list line of code: HostScsiDisk[] lstHostScsiDisks = hostDatastoreSystem.queryA

Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins

Awesome work Prasanna! CloudMonkey only needs the request section, and your changes are in the response where you go ahead and serialize class objects which have may objects again, recursively. I'll see the code, otherwise from the gist you shared, the response json looks fine and won't break clou

[PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-1828] NAT on private gateway

I would like to propose feature NAT on private gateway. This feature is sub feature of nTier2.0 apps. Using this feature we can enable/disable the source NAT on the vpc private gateway . Jira ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1828 FS : https://cwiki.apache.org/conflue

Re: [ACS4.2] master blockers

I have sorted the list in order of criticality like blockers first. On 28/03/13 10:40 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: >Abhi > >Thanks for following up on the issues, do you mind sending the list >sorted by the assignee for better readability and spotting overloaded >folks? > >Animesh > >> -

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

> On March 20, 2013, 1:51 a.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > Kawai-san, it looks OK since most NetworkElement::release do not do > > anything, but if you look at the other plugins (e.g., NiciraNvp), they > > destroy the logical port on the NVP switch when release is called. Perhaps > > we need

RE: [ACS4.2] master blockers

Abhi Thanks for following up on the issues, do you mind sending the list sorted by the assignee for better readability and spotting overloaded folks? Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:05 P

RE: [DOCS] Can't build Japanese docs

Many thanks Hiroaki. -Original Message- From: Hiroaki KAWAI [mailto:ka...@stratosphere.co.jp] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DOCS] Can't build Japanese docs I fixed those on transifex. Please feel free to tell me if you still have tro

Re: [ACS4.2] master blockers

Once again a reminder to close the following blockers and criticals in master, if you are assigned but cannot figure out the issue please reach out. >CLOUDSTACK-1687Mice Xia >CLOUDSTACK-1677Kelven Yang >CLOUDSTACK-1774Rohit Yadav >CLOUDSTACK-1721Prachi Damle >CLOUDS

Re: [DOCS] Can't build Japanese docs

I fixed those on transifex. Please feel free to tell me if you still have trouble in building ja-JP docs. :-) Thanks (2013/03/24 19:28), Sebastien Goasguen wrote: I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1796 I can't publican build japanese docs. I managed to fix chinese and po

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

Ok, found the issue. The 4.0 script in the system vm that adds DHCP entries parses args like this: # edithosts.sh -- edit the dhcphosts file on the routing domain # $mac : the mac address # $ip : the associated ip address # $host : the hostname # $4 : default router # $5 : nameserver on default ni

Re: [ACS4.1] blockers

There is some encouraging movement on 4.1 issues but still we have some of the blockers and criticals open: CLOUDSTACK-1819 Kishan Kavala CLOUDSTACK-1805 Kelven Yang CLOUDSTACK-1755 Sheng Yang CLOUDSTACK-1664 Murali Reddy -abhi On 27/03/13 8:03 PM, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: >Text only li

Fwd: CloudStack: Attaching Additional Volumes

Greetings,I am utilizing CloudStack-oss-3.0.2-1 on CentOS 6.3 | KVM.It's running wonderfully, however, I have a Windows Instance I would like to attach a 'storage' volume to. However, when I go to add the volume it only lists the Linux falvor instances that are running to attach to.How can I get th

RE: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

Thanks Murali and Kelven for fixing this . I was almost about to revert the two commits I mentioned :) Regards, Pranav -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 9:11 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers; Kelven

RE: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

Thanks a lot Murali > -Original Message- > From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 9:07 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers; Kelven Yang > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due t

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On 28/03/13 9:00 AM, "Rajesh Battala" wrote: >Jetty is failing to start on latest master building oss. >Am on the latest master, building oss and starting jetty is failing with >below error. > >Error creating bean with name 'globalLoadBalancingRulesServiceImpl': >Injection of autowired dependenc

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On 28/03/13 9:00 AM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: >> >>I was running Non-oss builds, so could not hit this issue. My apologies >>for the breaking OSS build. >> >>Kelven, >> >>I am not sure how to fix this issue. If there is no implementing class, >>why should inject fail? I was under impression it will be

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On 3/27/13 8:30 PM, "Rajesh Battala" wrote: >Jetty is failing to start on latest master building oss. >Am on the latest master, building oss and starting jetty is failing with >below error. > >Error creating bean with name 'globalLoadBalancingRulesServiceImpl': >Injection of autowired dependen

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On 3/27/13 7:53 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: >On 28/03/13 7:42 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >>On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:31:05PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: >>> For UCS issue, I've put a fix in. >>> >>> For GSLB, a work around is to run non-OSS build, hopefully this can >>>unlock >>> developers te

RE: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

Jetty is failing to start on latest master building oss. Am on the latest master, building oss and starting jetty is failing with below error. Error creating bean with name 'globalLoadBalancingRulesServiceImpl': Injection of autowired dependencies failed; nested exception is org.springframewor

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

We can look into it, my guess is that an existing script now has new and/or different parameters. Perhaps it could be adjusted to be backward compatible so people can reboot at their leisure. All just guesswork. On Mar 27, 2013 9:21 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: > Hard to say. Sometimes functional

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

Hard to say. Sometimes functionality/implementation changes even though the feature is the same. On Mar 27, 2013 9:20 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Marcus Sorensen > wrote: > > Just to clarify a step further, this should have been the case with 3.x > to > > 4.0 as

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Just to clarify a step further, this should have been the case with 3.x to > 4.0 as well. We had all of these new vpc scripts that added brand new > functionality that needed to go on the virtual routers. The system VM > template stayed th

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

Just to clarify a step further, this should have been the case with 3.x to 4.0 as well. We had all of these new vpc scripts that added brand new functionality that needed to go on the virtual routers. The system VM template stayed the same, even though new scripts were added via systemvm.iso. On Ma

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

There are two things, upgrade of system VM, and upgrade of software on system VM. Any time you start a system VM the latest scripts get copied to it. This isn't the same as using the new ipv6 template. I can understand needing to reboot the system VMS if the scripts change, but its not the same as

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

>> Deploying Vms in existing networks succeed. But Vms are not given any ip >> address. >> In router, I see that the mac address of the Vm is not populated correctly. >> root@r-4-VM:~# cat /etc/dhcphosts.txt >> 02:00:42:47:00:01,set:10_1_1_17,10.1.1.17,test123,infinite >> -4,set:10_1_1_195,10.1.1.

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On 28/03/13 7:42 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:31:05PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: >> For UCS issue, I've put a fix in. >> >> For GSLB, a work around is to run non-OSS build, hopefully this can >>unlock >> developers temporarily on master branch > >Good work-around for now

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Min Chen wrote: > To answer David's question, this behavior has been there since 3.0.x, API > refactoring didn't touch this listTemplateCmd. > > Thanks > -min Min thanks for putting up with my paranoia :) --David

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

To answer David's question, this behavior has been there since 3.0.x, API refactoring didn't touch this listTemplateCmd. Thanks -min Sent from my iPhone On Mar 27, 2013, at 7:17 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:29:00AM -0700, Min Chen wrote: >> CLOUDSTACK-1810 is not a

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

It makes sense that the system VMS would need to be restarted since we have new software for them too (new systemvm.iso). On Mar 27, 2013 8:16 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 06:43:50PM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > > I tried upgrade from 4.0 -> 4.1 using Rhel6.3 binari

Re: Review Request: Add docs for MidoNet networking plugin [CLOUDSTACK-996]

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10136/#review18453 --- docs/en-US/plugin-midonet-about.xml

Re: Call for 4.2 and 4.1.1 Release Managers!

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:00:52PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > Chip > > > > Would you please collaborate as to what release manager does. An examples > > would be nice. > > > > Thanks > > ilya > > > Hi Ilya: > > So the short descriptio

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:29:00AM -0700, Min Chen wrote: > CLOUDSTACK-1810 is not a bug, update the bug with detailed explanation. Min, Please see David's follow up question about 4.0.x compatibility. > > Thanks > -min > > On 3/27/13 7:34 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >As Pr

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 06:43:50PM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > I tried upgrade from 4.0 -> 4.1 using Rhel6.3 binaries and Xenhost in > Advanced zone set up and upgrade succeeds. > > After upgrade , I was able to deploy Vms in new network without any issues. > That's good news! Is anyone

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:31:05PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: > For UCS issue, I've put a fix in. > > For GSLB, a work around is to run non-OSS build, hopefully this can unlock > developers temporarily on master branch Good work-around for now. Murali - This appears to be something that we *all*

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:09:24PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: > UCS issue is a POM dependency issue, the UCS project is not declared to be > a dependency in the master project. > > GSLB autowiring is caused by that a referenced Netscalar network element > class is only available in Non-OSS build, i

Re: [ACS41] New blocker bug, CLOUDSTACK-1746, Cloudstack Usage Server won't start

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:37:57PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: > Patch has been submitted And now it's been applied. Thanks for jumping on this Kelven! > > Kelven > > On 3/27/13 2:21 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: > > >I'll take this one > >Kelven > > > >On 3/27/13 2:13 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >

Re: Review Request: Usage server startup configuration XML needs to be updated to conform to latest changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10157/#review18452 --- Ship it! Applied to 4.1 now. - Chip Childers On March 28, 2013,

Re: Review Request: Usage server startup configuration XML needs to be updated to conform to latest changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10157/ --- (Updated March 28, 2013, 1:57 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Chip Chil

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

I tried upgrade from 4.0 -> 4.1 using Rhel6.3 binaries and Xenhost in Advanced zone set up and upgrade succeeds. After upgrade , I was able to deploy Vms in new network without any issues. Deploying Vms in existing networks succeed. But Vms are not given any ip address. In router, I see that th

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Following the discussion [1], we have QuickCloud in a rough-but-ready state > for developers to try out > Instructions for developers to try it out with DevCloud2 here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud

Question pertaining to NAT on Private Gateway Feature of N-Tier

Hello Jayapal, I referred to the feature's FS at https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/nat-on-private-gateway.html . May I know whether it is applicable for multiple Private Gateways in a single VPC VR (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-767 ) . Does the NAT rules get cleaned up on

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

This should now be usable for production use as well Follow instructions here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud#QuickClou d-howto2 From: Ahmad Emneina Reply-To: "aemne...@gmail.com" Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:34 AM To: Chiradeep Vittal Cc: "dev@cloud

RE: Question pertaining to the Support of ACL deny rules

Kishan, Can NetworkACLContainer be used for two network tiers belonging to two different VPCs? Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 4:37 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Kishan Kavala

RE: Question pertaining to the Support of ACL deny rules

Kishan, I referred to your FS at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+ACL+deny+rules . May I know how does a user choose a rule priority number. Do we allow two rules with the same priority for any reason? Can the user re-use the priority number of the deleted rule?

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

For UCS issue, I've put a fix in. For GSLB, a work around is to run non-OSS build, hopefully this can unlock developers temporarily on master branch Kelven On 3/27/13 3:03 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Pranav Saxena >wrote: >> Reverting these two commits makes j

Review Request: Remove db id in exception message.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10159/ --- Review request for cloudstack, mice xia and Min Chen. Description --- Repl

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

UCS issue is a POM dependency issue, the UCS project is not declared to be a dependency in the master project. GSLB autowiring is caused by that a referenced Netscalar network element class is only available in Non-OSS build, if Netscalar element is only available in non-OSS, we need to move its r

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

Ok. They may need to do something similar for Ubuntu, or perhaps it's already taken care of. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > No - not done on ubuntu as upgrade hasn't worked at all so far even on CentOS > We will test it if CentOS works. These are the two upgrades that

Re: [ACS41][QA] Release Candidate

On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:00 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti > wrote: >> Chip, >> >> Even though we are going to meet the criteria ( no blockers and less than 5 >> critical failures) today sometime, let QA finish upgrade and verification of >> some of th

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Reverting these two commits makes jetty run successfully and the UI launches > and works fine but the user is already logged in as admin the first time > instead of the user entering the credentials himself (may be due to single > sign on

Re: [ACS41][QA] Release Candidate

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Chip, > > Even though we are going to meet the criteria ( no blockers and less than 5 > critical failures) today sometime, let QA finish upgrade and verification of > some of the resolved issues before cutting RC. Hope that is fine. 1 da

Re: Review Request: Temporarily disabling baremetal functionality in CS 4.1

> On March 24, 2013, 6:08 p.m., Chip Childers wrote: > > This patch still doesn't apply cleanly. Now sure what's going on. Please > > test with a fresh copy of the 4.1 branch to ensure that it's a clean patch. > > > > git am ~/patches/10071.patch > > Applying: CS-1773: Disable baremetal funct

RE: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

Reverting these two commits makes jetty run successfully and the UI launches and works fine but the user is already logged in as admin the first time instead of the user entering the credentials himself (may be due to single sign on ) - 1) Commit: 99ea4011b18356d09686889205ef5df1b170b0dc (

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

No - not done on ubuntu as upgrade hasn't worked at all so far even on CentOS We will test it if CentOS works. These are the two upgrades that are being tested [1] [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+Compatibility+Matrix -Original Message- From: Ma

Re: [ACS41] New blocker bug, CLOUDSTACK-1746, Cloudstack Usage Server won't start

Patch has been submitted Kelven On 3/27/13 2:21 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: >I'll take this one >Kelven > >On 3/27/13 2:13 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>We need someone to take >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1746 >> >>Francois is reporting the following exception

[ACS41][QA] Release Candidate

Chip, Even though we are going to meet the criteria ( no blockers and less than 5 critical failures) today sometime, let QA finish upgrade and verification of some of the resolved issues before cutting RC. Hope that is fine. 1 day should be fine to validate most critical defects. I am skeptica

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

It should be fixed. This should be less difficult in the future, as long as we're not moving the config directories around again. I first tried copying the files over during the upgrade prior to the old RPMs being removed, but RPM's config(noreplace) only seems to work on files that it knew were in

Re: [ACS41] New blocker bug, CLOUDSTACK-1746, Cloudstack Usage Server won't start

I'll take this one Kelven On 3/27/13 2:13 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi all, > >We need someone to take >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1746 > >Francois is reporting the following exception in the bug: > >log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger >(org.springframework.

RE: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

Reverting these two commits makes jetty run successfully and the UI launches and works fine but the user is already logged in as admin the first time instead of the user entering the credentials himself (may be due to single sign on ) - 1) Commit: 99ea4011b18356d09686889205ef5df1b170b0dc ( U

[ACS41] New blocker bug, CLOUDSTACK-1746, Cloudstack Usage Server won't start

Hi all, We need someone to take https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1746 Francois is reporting the following exception in the bug: log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.springframework.core.env.StandardEnvironment). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system pr

Re: [ACS41] Bugs blocking our 4.1 release

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 06:05:09PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: >> >> CLOUDSTACK-1755 IPv6 - When Vm is part of Dual network ,

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud Usage service Start Error

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:00:23PM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > Still having the issue, I think we are 2 or 3 commit behind. I built those > RPM this morning. Once more? If HEAD doesn't work, then bump that up to a blocker severity please. > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Francoi

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Hi Vladimir, I figured you were away and would get back to us when you could. :) I was talking to John Griffith. It sounds like you worked with him on OpenStack. You are correct that I am interested in your Option 1: Mapping a single VM or a single data disk to a single volume on our SAN (via

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud Usage service Start Error

Still having the issue, I think we are 2 or 3 commit behind. I built those RPM this morning. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Francois Gaudreault < fgaudrea...@cloudops.com> wrote: > No problem. Gime couple minutes/hours :) I'll update the ticket and the > list. > > Francois > > > On Wed, Mar

Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

Hi , While starting jetty on latest master , it throws this exception. Could someone resolve the issue , else as discussed with Chip on IRC we'll have to revert the commits which went in yesterday since until day before yesterday , master was stable . - ERROR [web.context.ContextLoader] (mai

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Hi All, I was away for couple of days, so sorry for the delay. I’m completely with Mike & John (& others) on separating storage plugins from hypervisor-related functions. If every plugin will need to implement hypervisor-related code, it will be a big mess. Our use-case is very similar to

[ACS41][Patch Request]

Commit a588efc0cc83c067dbe78bf538be32253072290a in branch refs/heads/master from Marcus Sorensen [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=a588efc ] Summary: RPM - recover configs during upgrade Detail: Uninstallation of old RPMs wipes out some of the configs, and makes it dif

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:46:20PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Commit a588efc0cc83c067dbe78bf538be32253072290a in branch > refs/heads/master from Marcus Sorensen > [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=a588efc ] > > Summary: RPM - recover configs during upgrade > > Det

Summary of IRC meeting in #cloudstack-meeting, Wed Mar 27 17:05:21 2013

Members present: Animesh, sudhap, vogxn, Chandan, sangeetha, chipc, ke4qqq, jzb Meeting summary: 1. Preface 2. Active Feature Release: Overall Status a. http://markmail.org/message/3sh4ftyedjcmycyn (chipc, 2) b. http://markmail.org/message/ibxqqxddzqbxv4bx (

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

On 3/27/13 7:34 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi all, > >As Prasanna said, we're getting close to cutting the RC for 4.1! > >Here's the list of bugs that I'd like to see us address before cutting >the RC. This includes Blocker *and* Critical bugs. I've CC'ed the >current >assignees just to be

Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] >> On Behalf Of prasanna >> Sent: 27 March 2013 8:47 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & M

Re: Review Request: Custom Spring AOP to fully support legacy CloudStack AOP semantics, Removing Component autoscanning, ensure adapter execution ordering and make sure events be issued from AOP inter

Chip, Thanks, I'll check and test it Kelven On 3/27/13 6:23 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >--- >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >https://reviews.apache.org/r/10145/#review18419 >-

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

+1 so awesome! On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Yes (actually that's what the instructions say) > > On 3/26/13 10:46 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" wrote: > > >would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone) > >on one hos

Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:27:44AM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: > > > Right, and I believe that people agree that the KVM agent needs to be re- > > written in non-Java. Could we agree on how to do this, and do the same for > > Hyper-V ? > > > > > > > > > Is Iron Python a possibility? Should be su

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

CLOUDSTACK-1810 is not a bug, update the bug with detailed explanation. Thanks -min On 3/27/13 7:34 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi all, > >As Prasanna said, we're getting close to cutting the RC for 4.1! > >Here's the list of bugs that I'd like to see us address before cutting >the RC. This in

Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:24:39PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: 27 March 2013 1:49 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clear

RE: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: 27 March 2013 1:49 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:27:44AM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: > >

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Sounds good, Edison Last night I finished up code that uses the VI Java API to create a VMware Datastore. I want to test it a bit more before I have you look at it. Today there is a Citrix CloudPlatform demo I'm participating in to handle part of the SolidFire section of the demo, so I might not

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

Yes (actually that's what the instructions say) On 3/26/13 10:46 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" wrote: >would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone) >on one host? > > >On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < >chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Following the

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

For vmware, current cloudstack doesn't create a vmware datastore through vmware's API, admin needs to create the datastore in Vcenter at first, then add it back into cloudstack. I am not familiar with how to create a VMware datastore through Vmware's API, but regarding to add a new host into a c

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

These are my observations I have captured during my testing: 1) 'service cloudstack-management start' is failing for the first time since it did not find tomcat6.conf and server.xml. This will get created (symb links) only if you execute "cloudstack-setup-management" for the first time aft

Re: Call for 4.2 and 4.1.1 Release Managers!

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Chip > > Would you please collaborate as to what release manager does. An examples > would be nice. > > Thanks > ilya Hi Ilya: So the short description is 'cat herder' The real tasks/duties - assuming a feature release: Act as the relea

Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins

On 25 March 2013 18:44, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I'm working to include a couple more things: > > a. Allow a developer to run his/her own integration test written in > marvin. > b. new APIs to be synced automatically without marvin reinstallation In doing b. I realized I had to improve the res

Re: Call for 4.2 and 4.1.1 Release Managers!

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 08:09:50PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Chip > > Would you please collaborate as to what release manager does. An examples > would be nice. > > Thanks > ilya Ilya, I asked David for some help via IRC on writing it up. Two ways to describe it: 1 - Herding Cats 2 - Mor

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 07:57:14AM -0700, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Chip, > > Will check upgrade once Murali's fix is pushed. There are couple of more > issues which seem to be fixed but kelven need to review and mark them > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1811 > https://is

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:39:25PM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > On 27/03/13 8:04 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > > > >Murali Reddy - > > CLOUDSTACK-1673 AWS Regions - Events - User disable event does not > >include the UUID of the user that was disabled. > > > > Murali, you mentioned that you we

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

On 27/03/13 8:04 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >Murali Reddy - > CLOUDSTACK-1673 AWS Regions - Events - User disable event does not >include the UUID of the user that was disabled. > > Murali, you mentioned that you were working on a fix for this. You > happened to note that you would have it

Re: [MERGE] GSLB

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:08:58PM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > > On 20/03/13 7:15 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: > > > > I merged this feature into master with below commit. All review comments > > were addressed except one, I will open a bug fo

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

Chip, Will check upgrade once Murali's fix is pushed. There are couple of more issues which seem to be fixed but kelven need to review and mark them https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1811 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1776 thanks /sudha -Original Mes

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud Usage service Start Error

No problem. Gime couple minutes/hours :) I'll update the ticket and the list. Francois On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:08:53AM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > > Hi again :) > > > > I filed a bug recently about cloud-usage not starting wit

Re: [ACS4.2] master blockers

Sending text only list of 4.2 blockers and critical bugs, please treat these with utmost urgency: CLOUDSTACK-1677 Kelven Yang CLOUDSTACK-1687 Mice Xia CLOUDSTACK-1610 frank zhang CLOUDSTACK-1613 Bharat Kumar CLOUDSTACK-1591 edison su CLOUDSTACK-1392 edison su CLOUDSTACK-1732 Sheng Yang CLOUDSTACK-

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud Usage service Start Error

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:08:53AM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > Hi again :) > > I filed a bug recently about cloud-usage not starting with 4.1. I > logged it as Major, but should I increase the priority to block? > This is kind of ugly having a service not starting :P Also, some > external

Re: [ACS4.1] blockers

1776 is likely redundant with 1811, since if 1811 is resolved and the management server doesn't continue to run on upgrade failure, it won't be running to cause an NPE in checking secondary storage. This is fallout from the failed upgrade. Actually I think several of these are related to the same 4

  1   2   >