Thank you. How would I correct this and why would the table state something
other then what I have setup, what would have caused that?
On Apr 18, 2013, at 12:27 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
That's probably not what the mshost table thinks?
On 4/17/13 11:00 AM,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10566/#review19373
---
Ship it!
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit:
Prachi thanks for your responses. Makes it pretty clear.
Do we also put this in the disk offering as well for governing how the
Data disks will be allocated ?
Hari's FS is @
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+for+Granular+Glob
al+Configuration+Parameters. Just search for
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go Chiba
to become a committer and we are pleased to announced that they have accepted.
Go has contributed tremendously to the Japanese translations of the
documentation (runbook, UI and docs).
Being a committer allows many
I had a large client ask me for PVLANs for their private cloud just two weeks
ago.
If etiquette allows me to +1 then I'm in.
Regards,
Paul Angus
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Thanks,
I found the error earlier in the log. (long story involving changing ISP)
Cheers.
Regards,
Paul Angus
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 12 April 2013 16:01
To:
On 18/04/13 11:01 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
I have some comments inline
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:17 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] [CLOUDSTACK-2056]
Congratulation :)
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.comwrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go
Chiba to become a committer and we are pleased to announced that they have
accepted.
Go has contributed tremendously to
Congrats Go Chiba
On 18/04/13 12:26 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go
Chiba to become a committer and we are pleased to announced that they
have accepted.
Go has contributed tremendously to the Japanese
On Apr 16, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Kelcey Damage (BT) kel...@backbonetechnology.com
wrote:
I like Joe's proposition of potentially housing the [ACSEDU] tag under
marketing. I do agree that [GSoC] is 'Dev' related and belongs on that list.
I agree that [GSOC] should be on dev
for [ACSEDU] the
Congrats!
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:56 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: New Committer: Go Chiba
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go Chiba
to become a committer
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:04 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
Some of you may have seen:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+University
I also emailed about the
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
32-bit dom0 but 64-bit hypervisor.
o.O As far as I remember and know, at the time of building DevCloud2, I had
used 32-bit xen smp pae (xen-4.1-i386 from Debian Wheezy public repo) which
is 32-bit (and we've
# mvn -P deps
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
Downloading:
http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/apache/11/apache-11.pom
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project - [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] The project
org.apache.cloudstack:cloudstack:4.0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT
I am running into the same issue and I am not able to enable physical network
through API also
-Original Message-
From: Gavin Lee [mailto:gavin@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 10:46 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: physical network is in incorrect
Move the ticket to API issue, the command does emit ( order has been
changed ? bad memory :( ) but doesn't modify the database, my apology.
Regards
Isaac
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Srikanteswararao Talluri
srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote:
I am running into the same issue and
Isaac,
Did you manage to find out which code commit alters the order for the API calls
here ?
Thanks,
Pranav
-Original Message-
From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:isaacchi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:59 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: physical network is in
Yes, updatePhysicalNetwork API call to enable physical network is not modifying
cloud.physical_network table.
Work around is to update the table in the database.
Thanks,
~Talluri
-Original Message-
From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013
Hi,
The feature was given a “Ship It” after the review comments were addressed. Can
someone apply and commit these changes to the master branch. I have verified
that the patch applies cleanly to the latest master.
Regards,
Devdeep
From: edison su [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf
Hi Pranav:
It's 8b40e393b845c4c3d7ca23c8e297dc43288f6863
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Pranav Saxena pranav.sax...@citrix.comwrote:
Yeah that is fine. I already did that but what I was asking Isaac is which
code commit modified that particular API so that we can fix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10548/#review19380
---
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:11:42PM +0700, Ajimangun lintang mas wrote:
# mvn -P deps
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
Downloading:
http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/apache/11/apache-11.pom
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project - [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] The project
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 03:27:07AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
On Apr 16, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Kelcey Damage (BT)
kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
I like Joe's proposition of potentially housing the [ACSEDU] tag under
marketing. I do agree that [GSoC] is 'Dev' related and belongs
Hi
I was testing Add /Remove Network to Virtual Machine Feature and found the
following issues
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2086
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2083
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2061
These are breaking some basic
While debugging the VMWare system template fixed the cd rom device name that
was causing the systemvm.iso not to load.
After this the SSVM and CPVM are coming up fine.
On router VM creation though it failed as this file
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules was present in the template as a
This is the new 4.2 system vm template for VMWare
http://aprateek.com/store/systemvmtemplate-4.2.ova with the below
mentioned fix.
On 18/04/13 7:47 PM, Abhinandan Prateek cloudst...@aprateek.com wrote:
While debugging the VMWare system template fixed the cd rom device name
that
was causing the
2061 is marked as resolved at the moment.
2086 and 2083, commented on.
Since 4.2 isn't really on my radar right now I haven't assigned them to
myself yet, but if they're around for awhile I'll probably get to them.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Shweta Agarwal
shweta.agar...@citrix.comwrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10605/#review19389
---
Ship it!
It looks a valid fix to me .The physical network db state
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10605/#review19390
---
Commit 34899f9b999e0d92573aa7b8872e07a111811b53 in branch
Maurice,
I was having the same issues, I tried a number of iptables rule changes,
but it seems that whenever a new instance was deployed it would
overwrite my changes and break things again. My temporary fix is to run
a cron job that runs every minute that issues a service iptables stop.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
Min / Rohit,
Joe ran into some changes (documented in CLOUDSTACK-2091) when reviewing
the generated API documentation for 4.1 vs 4.0.x. Can either of you look
at the
bug for us and determine if we do in fact
I updated on the bug, I compared both 4.0 and 4.1 code,
TrafficMonitorResponse is exactly the same, no change at all except that
id to uuid field change. deleteUser api will also just return a
SuccessResponse, no mentioned response parameters at all since 4.0 or even
earlier. So I am not sure if I
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
I updated on the bug, I compared both 4.0 and 4.1 code,
TrafficMonitorResponse is exactly the same, no change at all except that
id to uuid field change. deleteUser api will also just return a
SuccessResponse, no mentioned
I myself haven't used ApiXmlDocReader tool yet. Where are the old and new
xml file in our repo?
Thanks
-min
On 4/18/13 9:47 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
I updated on the bug, I compared both 4.0 and 4.1 code,
I am not quite familiar with this. Alena, are you able to chip in to take
a look? As far as code and functionality is concerned, I don't see API
compatibility issue here.
Thanks
-min
On 4/18/13 9:56 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Min Chen
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
I am not quite familiar with this. Alena, are you able to chip in to take
a look? As far as code and functionality is concerned, I don't see API
compatibility issue here.
Thanks
-min
There are two potential problems
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10078/#review19395
---
server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java
I've just looked at 4.0 code for addTrafficMonitorCmd.java API command, it
had a bug. The responseOjbect annotation has incorrect value -
ExternalFirewallResponse. And as API doc writer relies on this info for
the doc generation, it was generated the wrong way.
4.0:
I would probably leave it for 4.2.0. And update the release notes for 4.0
Chip, what do you think?
-Alena.
On 4/18/13 10:34 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
The same issue for DeleteUser. Basically there are no changes in
Can someone please look at this (Edison, I CC'ed you, perhaps
inappropriately, with the hope that you would be able to look at this).
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2093
The reporter noted a very specific example of where the call to
create_privatetemplate_from_snapshot is
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
I would probably leave it for 4.2.0. And update the release notes for 4.0
Chip, what do you think?
Doesn't 4.1 actually have the right code in it already?
I think Joe is asking about the 4.0 branch, since he's about to cut
On April 10, 2013, 7:42 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
Section 8.3.7.5 Removing Nexus Virtual Switch is specifying steps to delete
VMware dvSwitch. This is not correct. There is no notion of deletion of
VMware dvSwitch (please refer to FS for the feature) in CloudStack. Please
Is this similar to the problem you are now having? I get the following
output from the python script to create DevCloud:
mtutkowski-LT:devcloud mtutkowski$ python
../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py -i devcloud.cfg
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py,
On 4/18/13 10:48 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
I would probably leave it for 4.2.0. And update the release notes for
4.0
Chip, what do you think?
Doesn't 4.1 actually have the right code in it already?
I
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:57:51AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
On 4/18/13 10:48 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
I would probably leave it for 4.2.0. And update the release notes for
4.0
Chip, what
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:07:18AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
On 4/18/13 11:02 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:57:51AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
On 4/18/13 10:48 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18,
I can provide a quick fix on 4.0 branch. For 4.0 branch, what is the
process to commit a fix? Submit a patch for Joe to commit, or I can
directly commit?
Thanks
-min
On 4/18/13 11:08 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:07:18AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk
There should be a way for MySQL to log the connections that get aborted.
At least it will tell you if it was the client that aborted the
connection.
On 4/18/13 6:16 AM, benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm using a cs 4.0.0 preproduction server onto centos 5.3.
I have launched
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013, at 01:15 PM, Min Chen wrote:
I can provide a quick fix on 4.0 branch. For 4.0 branch, what is the
process to commit a fix? Submit a patch for Joe to commit, or I can
directly commit?
I'd love a fix for this, yes. You can commit directly, reverts are
easy. ;-) Thanks!
Hi,
I tried again. This time between steps 8 and 9 I ran the following command
export MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=800m -Xdebug
-Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8787,server=y,suspend=n
It still hung again after running the mvn-pl client jetty:run command - see
below. The command
Hugo,
Mind looking into this one? CLOUDSTACK-2092
-chip
Running 32 bit macosx was the problem. I overlooked the line where it mentioned
this from all the docs. Macosx 10.6 works fine.
-Original Message-
From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit
Yadav
Sent: donderdag 18 april 2013 10:59
To:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 07:38:13PM +, Daan Hoogland wrote:
LS,
At Schuberg Philis we did some tests on the 4.1 code for the tests in the
following table
Test Case ID Test Description Results
Infrastructure
NVP-001 Create NVP Element pass
NVP-002
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 03:02:03PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Bumping this. I'm about to put out another 4.0.2 for a VOTE and if
anyone is working on this, now would be a very good time to speak up.
Joe, IMO we go forward without this for 4.0.2.
If this is a problem for 4.1.0, then we can
Awesome news, good work Go!
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Mice Xia mice_...@tcloudcomputing.comwrote:
Congrats!
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:56 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: New Committer:
Will,
Images and other attachments are stripped on this list (text only
please!)
Can you post the image somewhere or describe the list?
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:05:36PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote:
In the 'Create network service offering' flow there is this dropdown:
[image: Inline image 1]
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013, at 03:04 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 03:02:03PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Bumping this. I'm about to put out another 4.0.2 for a VOTE and if
anyone is working on this, now would be a very good time to speak up.
Joe, IMO we go forward without
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10548/
---
(Updated April 18, 2013, 8:16 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
Thanks Daan for posting test results !
I have created a place holder for you to update test results [1] - You can
update it at your convenience.
Does this execution cover both of these stories for Nicira [2], [3]. If it
covers both of these stories, may be these can be closed. Looks like doc
Hi All,
Updated screenshot of what happens once the Notifying management server join
event took 56ms proceeds. This is where it just goes displays these types of
messages continuously. It went for 19 hours before I stopped it last time.
[cid:image002.png@01CE3C7A.EF547790]
Aaron
From: Aaron
Oh, my bad. I forgot about that.
On the 'create network service offering' overlay, if you select 'SourceNat'
in Supported Services, there is a drop down which get added. The drop down
has the title of 'Supported Source Nat Type' and has two options: 'Per
zone' and 'Per account'
Thanks,
Will
Hi Will,
Per zone is mostly for external network devices(e.g. SRX). We can
configure one public network address on SRX, and use that one(which is out
of Cloudstack's control) for all the public traffic go through the device.
That's Per zone.
Per account is the other way, used by VR in
Thanks for the answer Sheng.
I currently have the Palo Alto firewall using the 'per account' method and
when 'IpAssocCommand' is run (when the first VM is added to a palo alto
network ), I am dynamically creating a public sub-interface and assigning a
public IP (provided by cloudstack). I am
Hi Will,
per account is perfectly fine in your case. per zone can be used if
user want to preserve some public IPs. And with per zone, CloudStack just
won't care about source nat ip allocation etc any more, it would assume
that the firewall should already has taken care of that. Source NAT IP
Great. Thanks again, this is very helpful.
So the way I am doing it is good for now. If IP space becomes an issue
(when people are actually using it), I could implement the 'per zone'
approach as well.
In the per zone approach, the firewall would be initially configured with a
public IP and a
Hi,
Running the Python script to create a DevCloud environment in 4.1 works
fine for me, but I get this error in 4.2:
mtutkowski-LT:devcloud mtutkowski$ python
../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py -i devcloud.cfg
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9871/#review19414
---
Looks good. Is this the final?
- Chiradeep Vittal
On April 11,
Hi,
Since the DevCloud script wasn't working for me, I decided to use the
wizard to create a cloud from scratch (using info in DevCloud's
devcloud.cfg file).
I think there is a problem with zone-wide versus cluster-wide storage?
Now building your cloud...
Creating primary storage
Something
Your message dated: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:30:56 -0600
Hi:
I ran across this same problem this morning...
I stumbled on the solution: pip install requests
-ron
Hi,
Running the Python script to create a DevCloud environment in 4.1 works
fine for me, but I
Hi Chiradeep,
I've reposted the patch.
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: ilya musayev [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of ilya
musayev
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 7:03 PM
To: Chiradeep Vittal
Cc: ilya musayev; cloudstack
Subject: Review Request:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10614/#review19416
---
Is the fundamental problem that the data is available under
On 18/04/13 11:01 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
I have some comments inline
-Original Message-
From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:17 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] [CLOUDSTACK-2056]
I think currently how the data disks are allocated is still governed by the
same flag vm.allocation.algorithm - as are the hosts - and it will stay the
same right now.
Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013
I am trying to run the DnsNotifier example in my CloudStack Environment, I am
having trouble with the Spring wiring. I modified the DnsNotifier.java file to
add @Component annotation and modified the two files componentContext.xml.in
and nonossComponentContext.xml.in to add reference to the
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 03:17:21PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.0.2 release, and am asking for you to test the
artifacts and
*after* testing, please submit a vote. Suggested testing procedure here:
pip install requests
That'll fix it.
--
Prasanna.,
- Original Message -
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 05:57 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: DevCloud
I tried
port install py27-requests
On April 18, 2013, 10:45 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
Looks good. Is this the final?
Yes. :-)
Ready to ship? Any comments from anybody else?
- Hiroaki
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
Thanks! That worked perfectly.
So...I've been doing Java for about a dozen years now, but am new to
Python. Do we have any documentation that you know of which would have
helped me with this problem? For example, is this pip solution documented
alongside DevCloud2? I didn't see any, so was
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Will Chan will.c...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:22 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS42]
Sorry Mike, I just changed it couple of days ago. I will document this. Python
tools for the java lobby are going to be problematic. :)
--
Prasanna.,
- Original Message -
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 09:36 AM
To:
On 18/04/13 10:02 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
cloudst...@aprateek.com
wrote:
While debugging the VMWare system template fixed the cd rom device name
that was causing the systemvm.iso not to load.
After this the SSVM and
OK...no problem :) I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something in
the Wiki.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Prasanna Santhanam
prasanna.santha...@citrix.com wrote:
Sorry Mike, I just changed it couple of days ago. I will document this.
Python tools for the java lobby are going to
On April 18, 2013, 10:45 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
Looks good. Is this the final?
Hiroaki Kawai wrote:
Yes. :-)
Ready to ship? Any comments from anybody else?
Any tests?
- Chiradeep
---
This is an
On April 18, 2013, 10:45 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
Looks good. Is this the final?
Hiroaki Kawai wrote:
Yes. :-)
Ready to ship? Any comments from anybody else?
Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
Any tests?
Tested functional with our private plugin, which will be public.
On 4/18/13 6:41 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Will Chan will.c...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:22 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc:
On April 18, 2013, 10:45 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
Looks good. Is this the final?
Hiroaki Kawai wrote:
Yes. :-)
Ready to ship? Any comments from anybody else?
Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
Any tests?
Hiroaki Kawai wrote:
Tested functional with our private
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
On 4/18/13 6:41 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Will Chan will.c...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers
On Apr 18, 2013, at 10:29 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
On 4/18/13 6:41 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Will Chan will.c...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original
I think original consensus was to disable Baremetal for 4.1 only.
ŠParth
On 4/18/13 6:56 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10616/#review19428
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 03:22:51AM +, Parth Jagirdar wrote:
I think original consensus was to disable Baremetal for 4.1 only.
Correct, due to the quality issues with the feature and some (probably
well deserved) vacation time requiring that we disable it.
Now's a good time to ask about
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Abhinandan Prateek cloudst...@aprateek.com
wrote:
On 18/04/13 10:02 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
cloudst...@aprateek.com
wrote:
While debugging the VMWare system template fixed the cd
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:08:51AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Abhinandan Prateek cloudst...@aprateek.com
wrote:
On 18/04/13 10:02 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
cloudst...@aprateek.com
On 04/18/2013 01:56 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go Chiba
to become a committer and we are pleased to announced that they have accepted.
Go has contributed tremendously to the Japanese translations of the
documentation
Those udev rules are often a pain when using VM templates. Their purpose is
to tie a specific MAC address to an eth# dev, so for example if you
configure an IP address for eth0 and then change the mac address (via VM
clone or some such), you suddenly have no IP at all, no eth0, and an eth1
tied to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10548/
---
(Updated April 19, 2013, 4:07 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
Congratulations Go!
On 18 April 2013 12:26, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go
Chiba to become a committer and we are pleased to announced that they have
accepted.
Go has contributed tremendously to the
Hello:I have an odd ball question, upon rebooting the server I have noticed typically the interface eth0 would come online on system boot. However, with Cloud Stack being installed cloudbr0 is the master whereas eht0 is the slave. Cloudbr0 has the IP addresses and eth0 has nothing.My question is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10623/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Description
---
98 matches
Mail list logo
