Hi, after testing 4.3 I entered a blocker due to UI issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5882
It would be good to discuss,
thanks,
-Sebastien
Just got latest to take a look and there is a dependency issue - looking at
this now.
Are you on a retina screen? I just wonder if this has any effect on the font
sizing etc.
Alex Hitchins
+44 7788 423 969
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 January
Yeah,
swapping out branches is a tricky thing in eclipse. I generally use two
workspaces, one for master and one for current release branch.
I noticed that when you swap branches eclipse keeps the “old” checkstyle
config, but without any of the limitations place on it by the poms, because
Hi,
I just noticed a recent commit by Radhika on documentation about Hyper-V agent:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git;a=blob_plain;f=en-US/hyperv-agent-install.xml;h=5580b90637e864affd144f125dc89c05c42f6fce;hb=c6069b1
Can't you rename the .msi with CloudStack ?
On Jan 16, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Alex Hitchins alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Just got latest to take a look and there is a dependency issue - looking at
this now.
Are you on a retina screen? I just wonder if this has any effect on the font
sizing etc.
no,
I tried Safari 6.05 and
Paul Angus has just sent me a screenshot (possible the line break css change
the other day) - it looks fairly similar only some difference in line breaks.
When I get my dependency issue resolved I'll look in deeper.
Alex Hitchins
+44 7788 423 969
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa
On 14/01/14 9:12 pm, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Abhi,
The code to automate devcloud building never had worked for me which
is why the last one I had published by created by hand [1]. At the
time last year there was
On 14/01/14 6:31 pm, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Abhi,
The code to automate devcloud building never had worked for me which
is why the last one I had published by created by hand [1]. At the
time last year there was some issue with Ubuntu, so Debian instead was
used. I can help
I've got the System VMs creating, but not starting now...
Error seems to be:
POST response
is[{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{result:false,details:com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand
fail on exceptionObject reference not set to an instance of an object
Agent log:
http://pastebin.com/zhfXia9v
+1
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 January 2014 09:53
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath; Donal Lafferty
Subject: HyperV agent is called CloudPlatform
Hi,
I just noticed a recent commit by Radhika on documentation about
Hello,
we use CS 4.2.1 with vmware 5.1.
We create vm templates with disk thick lazy and controller scsi.
We register templates with controller scsi. We cannot choose to
If we deploy a vm from template, it is created
I was wrong about controller
scsi. VM was created with scsi virtual device node.
Anyway thin disk still be used instead of thick ( which we used
to create template ).
Waiting for your reply
Regards
Daan,
So looking at what is available today for guest network, the Redundant VR
can be enabled only for the source nat service. I guess the mention of the
source nat router is in relation to that. I could be wrong though. It
appears that the other services like vpn, dhcp, dns do not benefit much
Hi Paul,
From the logs it looks like you have setup the zone in Basic mode. Basic mode
is right now not supported for Hyper-V. Can you set it up in Advanced mode and
see if it works?
Regards,
Devdeep
P.S. I just tried setting up the zone in Basic mode and confirmed I got the
same exception.
Daan,
A little bit of clarification.
Listed below is the paragraph I was referring in this
descriptionhttps://people.apache.org/~ke4qqq/docs2/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0/html/Admin_Guide/creating-network-offerings.html
:
- Redundant router capability. (v3.0.3 and greater) Available only
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16540/
---
(Updated Jan. 16, 2014, 1:52 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep
Hi,
We are excited to have the 2014 CloudStack conference co-located with Apache
Con in Denver from April 9-11th.
Register and Submit talks early so we can plan a great program:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-collaboration-conference-north-america/attend/register
Yes, that's how i read it.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.com wrote:
Daan,
A little bit of clarification.
Listed below is the paragraph I was referring in this
That sounds good, Hugo - thanks!
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
Yeah,
swapping out branches is a tricky thing in eclipse. I generally use two
workspaces, one for master and one for current release branch.
I noticed that when you swap branches
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:09 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
I am copying Tuna and Chiradeep who have the most experience with this.
@Sebastien: I'm busy with some exams that week. So I will look into
Florin's problem on weekend. I will put GRE and AutoScaling code to 4.2.x
branch as well.
Hello,
I am setting up CloudStack I have a quick question about network
connectivity. I have a block of 18 IP addresses, 96.x IPs. I proceeding
to setup my installation of Cloudstack, with my 96 as guest IPs and the
192.x IPs for the private side of things. Looking at the system virtual
Edison,
Can you have a look at the new nexenta code? It appears to break the RAT build
due to missing headers.
Cheers,
Hugo
Ah right - Forgot to add the right routes, I'm dumb.
Apologies.
- Maurice
On 1/16/14, 11:15 AM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
Hello,
I am setting up CloudStack I have a quick question about network
connectivity. I have a block of 18 IP addresses, 96.x IPs. I
proceeding to setup my installation of
Hi Tuna,
I appreciate your help.
I have used:
- CloudStack 4.2.0, Ubuntu package obtained from
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/precise/4.2/
- Citrix XenServer 6.2.0 from
http://www.citrix.com/products/xenserver/overview.html
Feel free to contact me for more details.
Best
Hi Guys,
I have issues of snapshot on some vms, I using cloudstack 4.1 and xenserver 6.1.
The following are the error logs, any ideas or suggestions will be great
appreciated.
Any other question, if I want clean the error snapshot, how can I achieve it?
As I try to clean it in Cloudstack
Why are we now changing the systemVM to 64 bit?? We are well past
feature freeze, past even RC-generation on the schedule.
Is there a reason this shouldn't be reverted?
--David
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:45 PM, edi...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/4.3 4ccc74e76 - f562579e2
This would mean some pretty interesting upgrade steps for folks. This would
have to be thoroughly tested before bringing this into a release I think.
+1 on postponing this to 4.4
Cheers,
Hugo
Sent from my iPhone
On 16 jan. 2014, at 18:41, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Why are we now
LS,
On upgrading our second production env to 4.2.1 we encountered a bug
(at Schuberg Philis):
during the migration of firewall_rules_cidrs.source_cidr to
network_acl_item.cidr. The source_cidrs are concatenated into a 255
width field. We are using cidr lists that are way longer.
As a quick fix
4.3 and higher tests will folow, of course
Hate that you ran into it, but thrilled by the above sentence.
--David
hate that you (have to) admit to being surprised about that piece of proza.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:13 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
4.3 and higher tests will folow, of course
Hate that you ran into it, but thrilled by the above sentence.
--David
Again; why are we changing sysvm arch this close to release?
Please see my earlier thread about this.
--David
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:17 PM, sate...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/4.3 e49a60c54 - 151c23981
CLOUDSTACK-5868 Default templates are still referring to older
Don't see any issues in the screenshot you posted. The variation in font size
and weight, color, etc. are used to show contrast between content and titles.
Sorry but I do not see this as a blocker issue :) Though feel free to tweak the
fonts yourself.
-Brian
-Original Message-
From:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16974/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16974/#review32050
---
Are these fixes release blockers or can they go into 4.4? The
Hugo, build fails due to check style error in the file you’ve added:
/Users/alena/repos/dr/cloudstack/tools/appliance/convert/Convert.java
/Users/alena/repos/dr/cloudstack/tools/appliance/convert/Convert.java:8: Line
has trailing spaces.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16867/
---
(Updated Jan. 16, 2014, 7:12 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
I remember this discussion for 4.2.1:
http://markmail.org/thread/fgamr5ca67pmcelo
but it does not look like 64bit templates made the code freeze.
On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:35 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Again; why are we changing sysvm arch this close to release?
Please see my earlier
On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.com wrote:
Don't see any issues in the screenshot you posted. The variation in font size
and weight, color, etc. are used to show contrast between content and titles.
Sorry but I do not see this as a blocker issue :) Though
Hello Willam,
The logs that you posted doesn’t contain information about why BackupSnapshot
failed. From the grep information, I can only see the following line in the logs
The result for com.cloud.agent.api.BackupSnapshotCommand is BackupSnapshot
Failed due to Task failed! Task record: uuid:
Hi Marcus,
Sorry for jump in late.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
I've discussed this a bit with various subject matter experts at our
datacenters/business, and so far we're leaning toward a rollout like
this:
* VPC has no global IPv6 prefix
Agreed - there seems to be a ton being dumped into the contrail
plugin. If it wasn't working by feature freeze then we should wait. If
all of these are bugfixes, I'd expect to see more bugs filed and
referenced in commits, but instead have been seeing commits that seem
to expand the functionality
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Sorry for jump in late.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
I've discussed this a bit with various subject matter experts at our
datacenters/business, and so far we're
Why do this in 410to420? It won't get corrected on upgrades that are
already at 4.2.x - realistically it probably needs to be in a 421to422
if we plan on a 4.2.2 or 421to430.
--David
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:22 PM, d...@apache.org wrote:
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/4.3 c375ec62e -
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Daan Hoogland
dhoogl...@schubergphilis.comwrote:
H Marcus, We had a small session on how we plan to go about ipv6
configuration with your bullet list present. Comments are still
brainstorming phase quality but hopefully they will lead to something.
* VPC has
H Kishan,
I see you implemented CLOUDSTACK-763. it merges a lot of cidrs into
one field. The api doesn't check the field length. I enlarged the
field in the create table statement to 2048 for the 4.3 branch. Can
you help me think about a more solid solution, please. It seems to me
those cidrs
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:32 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Why do this in 410to420? It won't get corrected on upgrades that are
already at 4.2.x - realistically it probably needs to be in a 421to422
if we plan on a 4.2.2 or 421to430.
it doesn't mean it won't be done.
alter table
Did you happen to check the View Users page ? the api/secret keys display is
being truncated.
Yes, though to fix that I'll have to rework a bit of the detail view layout to
allow more flexible sizing for long strings. File that as a separate bug for
the next release and I'll take a look at
On Jan 16, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.com wrote:
Did you happen to check the View Users page ? the api/secret keys display
is being truncated.
Yes, though to fix that I'll have to rework a bit of the detail view layout
to allow more flexible sizing for long
-Original Message-
From: Prabhakaran Ganesan [mailto:gprab...@juniper.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 9:34 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Devcloud update for 4.3
Hi Edison
Thanks for the clarification. I'll try to debug why the template is not
Hi Karl,
It's glad to see your work!
But please try to keep the conversation in one thread...
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Karl Harris karl.har...@sungard.comwrote:
I started posting my initial comments in JIRA and was advised
dev@cloudstack.apache.org is the place to
Hello Chandan,
The logs as following, any suggestions?
Great thanks,
William
###
2014-01-16 06:18:14,775 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
(DirectAgent-194:null)
Hi Hugo,
These fixes are blocker for contrail plugin. We missed this fix while
submitting patches to ACS.
Thanks,
Sachin
From: Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.commailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com
Reply-To: Hugo Trippaers
Yes, Edison. I restarted the management server. Here is the output of SSVM
health script.
root@s-2-VM:~# /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
First DNS server is 192.168.56.1
PING 192.168.56.1 (192.168.56.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
but that won't help people doing
an upgrade as they will pass by the 410to420 script.
reading the source we are both right. I will add the alter table
statement as well (to 4.3 and 4.4 scripts)
alter table is good enough.
2014/1/16 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
but that won't help people doing
an upgrade as they will pass by the 410to420 script.
reading the source we are both right. I will
Can you ping 192.168.56.31 from SSVM ?
2014/1/16 Prabhakaran Ganesan gprab...@juniper.net
Yes, Edison. I restarted the management server. Here is the output of SSVM
health script.
root@s-2-VM:~# /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh
First
Yes. The below script was executed on the SSVM and it was able to connect
to the management server on port 8250.
snip
Management server is 192.168.56.31. Checking connectivity.
Good: Can connect to management server port 8250
\snip
Thanks
Prabhakar
On 1/16/14 12:24 PM, Wei ZHOU
it seems to me it is not for those who will run into a to large cidr
list. For those installations the management server upgrade step will
fail and the ms will stop. both the alter table and the altered create
statement are needed.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com
sorry Wei Zou, David, I take that back. only people with large cidr
lists that upgrade to 4.2.1 will suffer indeed.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
it seems to me it is not for those who will run into a to large cidr
list. For those installations
Greetings,
Ongoing issues with advanced network setup. If someone could please
humor me as to what I am doing incorrectly.
I have everything under one server, KVM / storage / etc.
I have a block of IPs public facing. I also have 192.x for private network.
All the system VM's spin up and are
QA has been testing with 64 bit templates in 4.3 from the beginning. Only
change requested now is to change version number which is referring to older
templates.
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 10:35 AM
To:
Hi All,
The next CloudStack Bay Area Meetup is scheduled for Jan 28th with details
below. The location is SAP Labs office in Palo Alto. Hope to see you there
in large numbers!
Date: Tuesday, January 28th, 2014
Time: 6:00pm - 8:30pm
Details: Registration Pizza / Refreshments / Beer from 6:00pm
http://markmail.org/message/qkhhpelmvwgrrruv Some questinos about
Accounts, Users Domains and Projects by Hollman Enciso R.
http://markmail.org/message/vghxregk5r62job7 Add a node to an existing
clvm cluster by Bjoern Teipel
http://markmail.org/message/4vc7343egrf5ruch Remove/migrate NFS
secondary
Sudha,
I'll be doing a lab test for 4.1.1 to 4.3
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti
sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi All,
Has anyone trying upgrades for ACS 4.3 from ACS 4.x versions ??
4.2 and 42.1 will be covered in our lab. Wondering if anyone else is trying
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/2115/changes
I also get the following error when I try to launch an instance the
tinylinux template. This time I was trying with NFS-based primary storage
and uselocalstorage = false. I did not get this error earlier. The
tinylinux template settings indicate that it is Centos 5.6 x86_64.
INFO
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16999/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Wei Zhou.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5890
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/73/changes
Changes:
[Alena Prokharchyk] CLOUDSTACK-5870: API support for retrieving user data
[sheng.yang] CLOUDSTACK-5779: Refactor mechanism for calling routerProxy in
CitrixResource
[sheng.yang] CLOUDSTACK-5779: Moving bumpUpPriority,
Hi, guys,
In production environment, i set up one zone with one pod and two clusters,
one for xenserver and one for vmware.
In xen cluster have two xenservers 6.1.0 , and one EXI 5.0.0.Each
hypervisor have it's fc-san shared storage, and ssvm, cpvm all runs in
xenserver.
All works well except
-Original Message-
From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: 15 January 2014 20:26
To: SuichII, Christopher
Cc: Hugo Trippaers; dev; sate...@apache.org
Subject: Re: The commit ba96c8cadfa4b1dc7ee74fdb26ba5cea87e29b91 breaks a
clean installation
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16249/#review32129
---
changes look good, patch does not apply on master. Can you please
Are we assuming that the Cloud Provider has a Provider-Independent (PI)
space?
Using a Unique Local Address (ULA) space for the VPC *might* to desirable.
If VPC tiers (subnets) can span zones (not possible today), then NAT66 can
help keep addresses stable as workloads move to a different zone for
Sorry, below are the log when creating a template from volume
DEBUG [cloud.api.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-24:) ===START=== 10.1.21.110
-- GET
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/74/changes
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Daan Hoogland dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
H Marcus, We had a small session on how we plan to go about ipv6
configuration with your bullet list present. Comments are still
Daan,
Similar to firewall_rules_cidrs, separate table can be used to store acl
cidrs. Maybe in network_acl_item_cidrs.
Regards,
kishan
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 17 January 2014 1:05 AM
To: Kishan Kavala
Cc: dev
Good point. These are the kinds of things we should be aware of right
now. Even though we don't necessarily want to bite off too much right
now in initial implementation, we want to plan so that certain things
we may want to do aren't impossible.
I was thinking either the cloud provider would
77 matches
Mail list logo
