Re: [PROPOSAL][ACS4.2] Stratosphere SDN platform plugin

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:22:49PM +0900, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote: > Thank you for comment, > > SSP is an SDN controller that creates L2 virtual network > backed by vxlan. In cloudstack, the service will shows as > "connectivity" networking service provider. > I'm sorry that the description is so shor

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

jority of the > features, there are quite a few that require community help to build quality. > By adding more features, it would be that much difficult to harden the > release. > > -Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:02:32AM +, Koushik Das wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:36 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze > > > > On Thu, May

Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze

On May 29, 2013, at 7:59 PM, John Burwell wrote: > All, > > Since we have taken an eight (8) week delay completing the 4.1.0 release, I > would like propose that we re-evaluate the timelines for the 4.2.0 release. > When the schedule was originally conceived, it was intended that the project

Re: [ACS][VMWARE][BUG?] job execution does not stop while zone, pod and cluster are disabled

On May 29, 2013, at 9:33 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Certainly the behavior is not robust. Understated but accurate. ;) > > On 5/29/13 10:35 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: > >> Before I file this as a bug, I would like to understand if this is a bug >> or by-design. >> >> Summary: >> Many times,

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:42:49PM +, Edison Su wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:43 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master > > > > All, > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] portable IP vs public IP

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 06:02:59AM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > On 28/05/13 11:42 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > > >+1 to this proposal (with one concern noted below). > > > >> > >> Effort I am proposing is to get API semantics right with minim

Re: to 4.1 from 3.0.2 testing upgrade?

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:16:22AM +0200, France wrote: > I see that vote for 4.1 release will probably succeed. > I wonder has any1 tested upgrade from 3.0.2. to 4.1? > > It is supposed to work, but i'm asking anyway, because we tried to > upgrade our 3.0.2 to 4.0.2 and it failed last time due to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:41:08PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > Or that... ;) Generally, the RM is free to abort for any reason! (Though, > typically, we'd expect it to be a good one.) Yeah, that's just my personal bar. ;) > > > On 29 May 2013 19:39, Chip Childers wro

Re: [MERGE] Storage migration support VMware into MASTER

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:51:55PM +, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: 29 May 2013 00:25 > > To: Sateesh Chodapuneedi > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Su

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:37:59PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > John, note that releases are majority approval, so -1 votes are not vetos. > We'd only abort the vote if we failed to get three binding +1 votes, or > there were more -1 votes than +1 votes. Or if there was something horribly wrong tha

[DISCUSS] How to best do time sync. (WAS: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round))

Ilya, I'm breaking off a new thread for this discussion. If you want to discuss the design options presented in the jira, this would be a good thread for that. ;-) -chip On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 06:24:27PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > John, > > I clearly see your concern, please review my resp

Re: Question about Review Request

rote: > >> Thanks, Chip! >> >> I was busy talking to a customer about CloudStack for a while, but should >> be able to re-submit my patch soon. >> >> >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, May 28,

Re: vhd-util missing in 4.2 snapshot?

Search for vhd-util on this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+on+master+branch It explains what to do (hopefully). On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 08:49:51PM +, La Motta, David wrote: > Here is the stack trace: > > > WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (D

Re: Palo Alto Firewall Integration - Review Process

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:31:27PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote: > Thanks for the reply Chip. Are there any docs / guides for the test > functionality? Yup: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+-+Testing+with+Python

Re: Update on Hyper-V plugin work

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:38:23PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: > Hi Chip, > > Thanks for clarifying the IP info required. I'll take a closer look ASAP. Awesome, thanks! > Citrix have provided some effort for a suitable console proxy, which needs to > be integrated into the System VM. (Volun

Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:58:07AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hey Chip, we had created tickets on infra and now we've a new github mirror > which is up to date: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack > They somehow did not get rid of the incubator-cloudstack/ repo on github > which is very behind

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:42:56AM -0400, John Burwell wrote: > All, > > I have gone a through a large chunk of this patch, and published my review > thus far (https://reviews.apache.org/r/11277/). TL;DR is that this patch > has a number of significant issues which can be summarized as follows

Re: 4.1 release manager

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:18:51PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > I will tentatively say yes - pending my discussion with Chip on Thursday on > the process. Outback - if you want to help, that's still a possibility (see my note about how you could help). Ilya has the commit-bit, so he can be the

Re: [DISCUSS] portable IP vs public IP

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:56:21PM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > In CloudStack, currently there are four distinct operations available with > public IP's at network service and manager layers. > > 1. Acquiring a public IP from zone level public IP pool > 2. Associate acquired public IP with

Re: Palo Alto Firewall Integration - Review Process

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:32:48PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote: > Hey All, > I am getting close to finishing up this integration, so I want to make sure > I understand the process and what is required for submitting my code for > review. > > I have read this and am comfortable with its content: > ht

Re: Question about Review Request

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:57:32AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Thanks, Chip! > > I didn't know that would be a problem. > > If you know off hand, can you tell me how to do a squash? > > Thanks again! In your branch, do: git rebase -i HEAD~2 You're editor will pull up something like the fol

Re: Question about Review Request

ut an e-mail under the subject of "Patch File for Review > > > (Storage Plug-in Related)". > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > I supposed we'll need to find out what wasn't working with Review Board > > if > > > my next patch h

Re: [MERGE] security group advanced zone branch into master

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:10:47PM +0200, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Chip, > > It is ok. Hope 4.1 will be released soon. Feel free to test the RC and vote! -chip

Re: [MERGE] security group advanced zone branch into master

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 04:44:59PM +, Anthony Xu wrote: > I didn't hear any objection , I'll merge this today. +1

Re: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:23:20PM +, Daan Hoogland wrote: > And if not how do I manipulate the order of tests? IMO, tests should *never* require that they execute in a specific order. That's what the setup and teardown phases of test execution are for. If you find this is the issue, let's fi

Re: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29)

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:44:10AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hey all, > > The regular scheduled time for the weekly IRC meeting is 17:00 UTC > tomorrow. We've had really low turnouts for the last month or so. > Instead of sending a reminder, I wanted to ping the list and see whether > we had

[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)

Hi All, I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote. The changes from round 4 are related to DEB packaging, some translation strings, and a functional patch to make bridge type optional during the agent setup (for backward compatibility). Git Branch and Commit SH:

Re: [ACS41][PATCH REQ]

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:02:27PM +0900, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote: > Chip, please cherry-pick to 4.1. > # This was my bug, sorry. > > Branch: master > > commit e9a6d47316d8de90eb662e9938ea7fcbe0ee0596 > Author: Hiroaki KAWAI > Date: Tue May 28 11:55:21 2013 +0900 > > agent: fix network.bridge

Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:53:47AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am pleased to report that the following projects have been accepted by > > the 2013 Google Summer of Code: > > > > "CloudStack: LDAP user provisioning", Ia

[VOTE][CANCELLED] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fourth round)

Cancelling this vote officially. On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:54:02AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote. > > The changes from round 3 are two commits related to DEB packaging. > > Git

Re: Review Request: Config value has to be encrypted for Hidden category configs

a65c36a39138308f95049a815fa99f4da0bbde1a Please make sure this is in master - Chip Childers On May 24, 2013, 8:12 a.m., Kishan Kavala wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

Re: Review Request: Update L10N strings for 4.1 (Italian and Chinese) from Transifex to repo

7f8b4773e5bb98c23f1a024a2a2a832c69c2ba0d Please be sure to put this in master. - Chip Childers On May 27, 2013, 11:42 a.m., Milamber ASF wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache

Re: Question about Review Request

er the subject of "Patch File for Review >> (Storage Plug-in Related)". >> >> Thanks! >> >> I supposed we'll need to find out what wasn't working with Review Board if >> my next patch has similar trouble. :) >> >> >> On Mon, May 27, 2013

Re: Question about Review Request

Can you send the patch to the list as a txt attachment with a subject line that indicates you want to have it reviewed and committed? Perhaps we have to do this the old fashioned way. On May 27, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Regardless of those whitespace messages, it looks like my n

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fourth round)

both symlinks and with I listed the files in > /var/lib/dpkg/info/cloudstack-management.list it didn't show these symlinks > are part of the package. > > Anyway, again, this is just packaging issues, code wise it works for me. > > Wido > > On 05/26/2013 04:54 PM,

[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fourth round)

Hi All, I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote. The changes from round 3 are two commits related to DEB packaging. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1 Commit: db007da15290970c842c3229a11

[VOTE][CANCELLED] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)

This vote is cancelled. I'll re-spin a round 4 shortly. On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 01:41:44PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://gi

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)

On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 12:00:19PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi Chip, > > I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to vote -1 on this one. > > It's my bad, but it seems that I made a mistake on the Debian > packaging side. See this commit: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.

Re: 4.1 release manager

On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:52:34AM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > > On May 25, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 25, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Outback Dingo > > w

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:10:25PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] Plan means targeted for 4.2. Community review and technical > quality are of course important and being attended to. The effort to find and > fix issues with this change speaks for the attention to technical qualit

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)

on my own, but the tests I've done all work, which include: > * Deploying instances > * Adding RBD storage > * Attaching RBD volumes > > With the packaging resolved I'd vote +1, but for now it's -1 (binding). > > Wido > > On 05/24/2013 07:41 PM, Chip Childers wro

Re: 4.1 release manager

On May 25, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On May 25, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Outback Dingo wrote: > >> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Some time back I offered to be RM for 4.1.x , since then I took on the >>> GSoC effort and won'

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On May 24, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message----- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:42 PM >> To: >> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master >&g

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On May 24, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message----- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 1:18 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store bra

Re: Update on Hyper-V plugin work

Donal, First, thank you for sending this out! It seems like really good progress. Who are you working with on this? Are you running solo? The technical elements of this seem sound at first review. The licensing implications are going to take some time to parse through though. One of the thin

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:50:49PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] IMHO the goal behind bringing architectural changes early in > release is to ensure stability and proper review and that makes sense. In > this case the goals are being addressed with testing on feature branch and

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (third round)

Hi All, I've created a 4.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1 Commit: 873c1972c7bbe337cee2000a09451d14ebbcb728 List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/a

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:41:30AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > As a way to get more user feedback on our major feature releases, what > does everyone think about releasing one or two -beta releases for each > major feature release? > > This might fall in line with some of the

Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 08:51:56PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > +1, we would need to add this bug to "known issues" Done

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-528) fix some mistakes in configuration table which cause addSecondaryStorage failed when upgrade from 3.0.* to 4.*

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 09:49:12AM +, Nitin Mehta wrote: > Would this not be a problem for folks who are already on 4.0 ? Corrected in 4.1 branch: commit c559c40c3178873177b9f46c46e6c60b5598f2eb Author: Chip Childers Date: Fri May 24 17:06:02 2013 +0100 CLOUDSTACK-528: Addin

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding items

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:52:11PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Chip > > I'm hoping to retry the setup today and will update tonight. (Still waiting > for network team to punch firewall.) If nothing comes thru today, I don't > want to hold up the ACS41 release - since Mice was not able to repr

Re: Nicira NVP + CloudStack 4.1

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:02:22PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > I've updated the documentation. > > Chip, can you pull commit 1201d623a7091517a1e26bc4b82c5daeea3c155f into 4.1? > It's just doc updates. > > The Jenkins build is here > http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-docs-n

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:35:11PM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > Chip, please cherry-pick to 4.1 > > CLOUDSTACK-2587: netscaler_pod_ref DB upgrade is missing from 3.0.2 to 4.x > > added missing schema as part of 4.0 to 4.1 upgrade > > Branch: refs/heads/master > Commit: 623a26e469ca7354a7dbe6b895

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]CLOUDSTACK-2656

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:21:44PM +, Min Chen wrote: > Hi Chip, > Can you please cherry-pick the following commit from master to 4.1? > This is to address empty UUID columns for pre-4.1 schema entities. We > missed two "snapshot_policy" and "dc_storage_network_ip_range". > > commit a46b

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-41 #331

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 02:31:24PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > /me makes a mental note, more beer for Chip at CCC Unlikely to hear a complaint from me on that front...

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-528) fix some mistakes in configuration table which cause addSecondaryStorage failed when upgrade from 3.0.* to 4.*

eady on 4.0 ? > > On 13/05/13 9:22 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > > > >--- > >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > >https://reviews.apache.org/r/11088/#review20489 > >--

[ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wei Zhou

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Wei Zhou to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and elimina

[ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Venkata Swamy to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and el

[ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sailaja Mada to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eli

[ACS41] Outstanding items

CLOUDSTACK-2215 ACS41 SSVM does not use allocated storage ip range The bug above needs to have my questions addressed. Is this (1) reproducible and (2) is it really a blocker if it is reproducible? The other outstanding issue for 4.1.0 are the questions from Alena to Murali and Frank posed in th

Re: [Urgent] Scheduling snapshot failed on CS 4.2.0-snapshot

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:03:04PM +, Min Chen wrote: > Sorry, my bad. I misunderstood Deepti's comment and thought that recurring > snapshot is also broken in 4.1.0 for Xenserver. Now I looked closer at the > comment, it refers to master branch. In that case, this should not block > 4.1.0 rele

[VOTE][RESULTS] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 04:15:14PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > All, > > As discussed on another thread [1], we identified a bug > (CLOUDSTACK-2492) in the current 3.x system VMs, where the System VMs > are not configured to sync their time with either the host HV or an NTP >

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:15:15PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > commit 795fd803da3eadee0fae1a13d0e97ae57b239657 > Author: Marcus Sorensen > Date: Wed May 22 23:12:30 2013 -0600 > > Summary: KVM - double migration can fail > > Detail: Undefine VM after migration. Lingering domain def

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:25:10PM +, Edison Su wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:26 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_

Re: [MERGE] security group advanced zone branch into master

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 08:25:37AM +0200, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Guys, > > Is it possible to merge this branch to 4.1? > > Wei Wei - IMO we need to wait for 4.2 for that feature to come back into the product. Re-testing is going to take too long, and we should kick out 4.1 as soon as possible. Are

Re: [WEBSITE] Security page for cloudstack.apache.org

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:47:35PM +, John Kinsella wrote: > Been working through a few ideas in my head, will see movement on this in the > next few days. Awesome. Thanks John. > > On May 15, 2013, at 8:12 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > > > (note mixing of pub

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:08 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [M

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding Blockers - Please Read!

; >I just resolved the ticket, please cherry-pick following commit's from > >master to 4.1 branch. > > > >1) ee0a91d111349b981d5f97fa69c97c34d9f15268 > >2) dce42581710ce3613f4bf765d713fab9552747ca > > > >Thanks, > >Prachi > >-Original Messa

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding Blockers - Please Read!

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 05:09:53AM +, Kishan Kavala wrote: > Chip, > CLOUDSTACK-2516- I've added my comments for documentation. Added to docs. Thanks!

Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 04:15:14PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > All, > > As discussed on another thread [1], we identified a bug > (CLOUDSTACK-2492) in the current 3.x system VMs, where the System VMs > are not configured to sync their time with either the host HV or an NTP >

Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:26:06PM +, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > On 5/22/13 11:11 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:08:52PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > >> Alena and I discussed with folks at Orange, their use-case can be > &

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2568 ACS41 regression in storage subsystem (seen with local storage and 2 or more hosts)

. - Also, let planner search for pools instead of selecting the one reserved - because there is no way currently to pass multiple pool information to the planner and this may cause issues when a VM has multiple disks. Signed-off-by: Chip Childers - Chip Childer

Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:00:51PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 8:51 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master > > > > Edis

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2568 ACS41 regression in storage subsystem (seen with local storage and 2 or more hosts)

) When you have resolved this problem run "git am --resolved". If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip". To restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort". - Chip Childers On May 22, 2013,

Re: 40-41 upgrade

I'm not sure about the Netscaler feature (Murali?). If it's in, then we need that to be corrected in the upgrade script before cutting a release. Bare metal isn't "enabled" for 4.1. *However* if the configs are there for a fresh install then they should be appropriately done for the upgrade too,

Re: Nicira NVP + CloudStack 4.1

Hugo, Was the doc updated for the new 4.1 features? -chip On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:59:49PM +, Kimihiko Kitase wrote: > Hello > > Are there setup guide for the configuration of Nicira NVP and CloudStack 4.1? > > Thanks > Kimi >

Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:08:52PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Alena and I discussed with folks at Orange, their use-case can be supported > in AdvancedZone without SecurityGroup by creating account specific guest > network. Alena will look at their database to help them migrate the db We

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-41 #331

Fixed the Nicira files causing the error. On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 04:50:18PM +, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See > > Changes: > > [chip.childers] Update the Logical Router NatRules to be compatible with the > NVP 3.x.x > > [ch

Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > For those wanting to use the S3-sync for XCP/Xen, they could use the 4.2 > template. Just like the IPV6 feature, that could be deemed experimental. I'm now in agreement with this. The "root issue" is now solved for KVM and VMware users i

Move project bylaws from the wiki to svn/published on the website?

Hi all, I'd like to propose moving the project's bylaws [1] from the wiki to the project's website svn location. IMO, this will allow for a cleaner update process (easier to provide a diff of a proposed change). Any objections? I'll assume lazy consensus on this change and make it next week if

Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2

> is it possible to have a meeting today, May 22 6pm for Europe ? > Guillaume is the privileged interlocutor. > Regards. > > e 21/05/2013 22:20, Chip Childers a écrit : > >Adding Nicolas to the CC line to be sure that he sees Animesh's offer. > > > >Animesh - Nicola

Re: [PATCH][ACS41] Update Nicira NVP api to support NVP version 3.x.x

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:58:12AM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Hey guys, > > I pushed commit 4e090796408152af5c06ce72f346ee9ea5d4d404 to master. This > commit supports the changes to the NVP api introduced in version 3.x.x > > I'm a bit hesitant to request this a this time in the 4.1 release

Re: Product versions support in XcpServerDiscoverer.java

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 10:41:16AM +, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru wrote: > Hi, > > Currently XcpServerDiscoverer.java is coded to support each individual > version of XenSever based on XenSever version. In fact, CS is only talking to > XAPI hence, can we just rely on XAPI version rather the X

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding Blockers - Please Read!

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:40:07PM +, Prachi Damle wrote: > Chip, > I just resolved the ticket, please cherry-pick following commit's from > master to 4.1 branch. > > 1) ee0a91d111349b981d5f97fa69c97c34d9f15268 > 2) dce42581710ce3613f4bf765d713fab9552747ca Prachi, These commits don't cherr

Re: Using rados-java as a new Maven dependency for KVM

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:51:55PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > I wrote all the code. So I just released version 0.1.1 which is > licensed ASLv2. > > I just went for LGPLv2 because I needed some license. These are just > bindings, so I don't care that much. > > Any objections against usi

Re: 40-41 upgrade

Please send in a patch for this! Good catch Alena. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > I came across the commit c25d60f1 for 40-41 DB upgrade path: > > +UPDATE `cloud`.`configuration` SET value='KVM,XenServer,VMware,Ovm' WHERE > name='hypervisor.list'; > > W

Re: [ACS402][URGENT] RBD/Ceph integration broken

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:15:20PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > I didn't know we weren't going to release 4.0.3. We've discussed the support lifetime on and off for awhile now. Consensus seemed to be that we would support each minor version release (the feature releases like 4.1 and 4.2) unt

Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 04:15:14PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > All, > > As discussed on another thread [1], we identified a bug > (CLOUDSTACK-2492) in the current 3.x system VMs, where the System VMs > are not configured to sync their time with either the host HV or an NTP >

Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2

Adding Nicolas to the CC line to be sure that he sees Animesh's offer. Animesh - Nicolas is in the EU, so I'd expect a reply tomorrow? On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:01:59PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: nicolas.lamira...@orange.com [mailto:nicolas.la

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we pause merges into master until 4.1 is out the door?

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:34:45AM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I don't see limited interest. It seems that bugs are trickling in every > day and they are being taken up as they come in. Is there any blocker > without any action for more than a few days? The only one I can see > CLOUDSTACK-2463

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a 4.0.3?

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:21:14AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:19:05AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We apparently have a regression in 4.0.2 that will break new deployments > > on Ceph RDB, and I was also CC'ed on

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding Blockers - Please Read!

CC's for specific people that I have questions for below: On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 04:04:12PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Here's where we are. Help resolving or actually reaching consensus on > the path forward would be appreciated: > > CLOUDSTACK-2215 > ACS41 SS

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding Blockers - Please Read!

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:51:29PM +, Prachi Damle wrote: > I am looking into CLOUDSTACK-2568 Thank you Prachi!

Re: Using rados-java as a new Maven dependency for KVM

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 05/21/2013 09:16 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > >Hi, > > > >In the rbd-snap-clone [0] branch I'm working on the new RBD features > >like snapshotting, cloning and deploying System VMs on RBD. > > > >To do this correctly

Re: Review Request: debian: fix build of cloudstack-awsapi package

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11180/#review20854 --- Wido helped sync master and 4.1. - Chip Childers On May 20, 2013

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need a 4.0.3?

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:19:05AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hi all, > > We apparently have a regression in 4.0.2 that will break new deployments > on Ceph RDB, and I was also CC'ed on another fix last week that could > apply to the 4.0.x branch. > > The thought was that we would not have a

Re: [ACS402][URGENT] RBD/Ceph integration broken

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:06:18PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > I just came into contact with a user on IRC who was running into > problems with 4.0.2 due to this RBD bug. > > Can we cherry-pick this back to 4.0 and release 4.0.3? There wasn't a plan to do a 4.0.3, but I guess you

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we pause merges into master until 4.1 is out the door?

On May 20, 2013, at 7:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > >> -Original Message----- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 1:35 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: [DISCUSS] Should we pause mer

Re: [VOTE] Move forward with 4.1 without a Xen-specific fix for CLOUDSTACK-2492?

ention via consistency checks (potential blocker bug IMO). >> >> >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < >> chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On 5/20/13 1:15 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >>>

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >