Re: [DISCUSS] Allow unstable 0.x OR -Milestone releases [Was: [DISCUSS] Putting several unmaintained components to dormant]

2013-10-10 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Ate Douma wrote: > I've move this into a separate [DISCUSS] thread as I think it needs separate > discussion. > > Jörg gave some objections below about using Milestone releases, as I > proposed earlier to support releasing intermediate versions of a > not-yet-staba

Re: [SCXML] knock knock?

2013-10-08 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote: > Yeah, that's great! > State machine is a generic and simplistic concept which can be applied > anywhere. > In our case (Hippo), we want to leverage SCXML library as a core Document > Processing Engine. By exposing state machines in XML with abi

Re: [SCXML] knock knock?

2013-10-08 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Ate Douma wrote: > On 10/08/2013 02:18 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> >> Who's there :-) >> >> Agree with all your Commons SCXML related comments below.I've been >> >> out of time for this for a while; you're w

Re: [SCXML] knock knock?

2013-10-08 Thread Rahul Akolkar
> From the mailing lists and JIRA activity we gather not much has been > happening here for a very long time: the last release 0.9 dates back to > December 2008 and the last serious code commits to June 2011... > > Looking back through the history of SCXML, Rahul Akolkar was and

Re: [ALL] Deployment of component builds to Maven repo

2012-08-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:23 PM, sebb wrote: > For components which use a Maven groupId starting with > "org.apache.commons.", Maven deployment is already enabled via Nexus. > > There are a few components which still use a Maven groupId of the form > "commons-". > Some of these are already enabled

Re: [scxml] why in all test case there is instead of

2012-06-08 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Alessandro Scarozza wrote: > the question is simple: > > in w3c standard the final state is: > > but in all test case there is: > > > it also seems that by the final attribute does not work, while using > the tag final works fine > > long story short: > commons s

Re: [scxml] Anybody active?

2012-05-31 Thread Rahul Akolkar
t line (unreleased, first release from the line would be 1.0). trunk is the 0.x line, is on JDK 1.4. In theory, the trunk should be a proper subset of the J6 functionality. I'd add to J6 and backport any bugs/essential changes to trunk. -Rahul > Tomas > > -----Original Message--

Re: [scxml] Anybody active?

2012-05-17 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Kukosa, Tomas wrote: > Hi Rahul, > > thanks for your offer. > > When I get more familiar with current commons-scxml and have some reasonable > patches I will send them. > > After short time playing with it, I can see following topics: > - update to the latest SCXM

Re: [scxml] Anybody active?

2012-05-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Kukosa, Tomas wrote: > Hi, > > is anbody working on commons-scxml? > No. If you (or anyone else) would like to work on it, I can help with reviewing and applying patches etc. -Rahul > Tomas

Re: Eclipse SCXML Editor status?

2012-04-12 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Eric Rosevear wrote: > Hello, > > I've tried out the eclipse scxml editor and have a question. The project > apparently dates back to 2010. > That is correct, the above was a GSoC project that summer. > Is this project still active? What is the status of the pr

Re: help for scxml conformance update

2012-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Ingo Lütkebohle > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am Mon 16 Jan 2012 04:10:40 PM CET schrieb Rahul Akolkar: >> >>> Sounds reasonable. There hasn't

Re: help for scxml conformance update

2012-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Ingo Lütkebohle wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd be interested in getting a version of commons scxml which supports the > latest SCXML standard and would be willing to contribute code to that > effect, work on open tickets, etc.. > Cool :-) > If you're interested in t

Re: [JCS] Long standing update: Switched to JDK 5 and Maven 2

2011-08-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I finished the updates to JDK 5 generics and concurrent and updated the >> maven-2 build. Still some tests fail, others should never have

Re: [JCS] Long standing update: Switched to JDK 5 and Maven 2

2011-07-27 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > Hi folks, > > I finished the updates to JDK 5 generics and concurrent and updated the > maven-2 build. Still some tests fail, others should never have passed. I > would like to ask for close review because I basically touched > everything. I

Re: [JCS] Migrating over from Jakarta?

2011-07-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: >> On 22.07.11 11:33, Henri Yandell wrote: >>> Anyone adverse to me svn moving JCS over from Jakarta? It will mean >>> someone needing to update the site (which they should do while mov

Re: [JCS] Migrating over from Jakarta?

2011-07-22 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Anyone adverse to me svn moving JCS over from Jakarta? Not at all, thanks for both the svn moves Hen! -Rahul > It will mean > someone needing to update the site (which they should do while moving > that over). > > Hen >

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept BCEL and JCS as Commons components

2011-07-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
/ redirects from j.a.o). -Rahul On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > This is half a dozen related votes in one thread (for convenience), namely: > > 1. Accept BCEL [1] as Commons component > 1a. Grant Commons karma to Dave Brosius (dbrosius) > > 2. Accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept BCEL and JCS as Commons components

2011-06-27 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Rahul Akolkar > wrote: >> This is half a dozen related votes in one thread (for convenience), namely: >> >> 1. Accept BCEL [1] as Commons component >> 1a. Grant Commons k

[VOTE] Accept BCEL and JCS as Commons components

2011-06-25 Thread Rahul Akolkar
This is half a dozen related votes in one thread (for convenience), namely: 1. Accept BCEL [1] as Commons component 1a. Grant Commons karma to Dave Brosius (dbrosius) 2. Accept JCS [2] as Commons component 2a. Grant Commons karma to Aaron Smuts (asmuts) 2b. Grant Commons karma to Thomas Vandahl (

Re: [ALL] Wiki spam prevention measure

2011-06-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:51 AM, sebb wrote: > Gavin recently updated the details of how the ASF Wiki works, and > added details of how SpamAssassin have completely stopped spam > happening: > > http://wiki.apache.org/general/OurWikiFarm#per_wiki_access_control_-_tighten_your_wiki_just_a_little.2C

Re: [ALL] BCEL and JCS as Commons components?

2011-06-19 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > On 18.06.11 18:45, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >>> Just code on its own = -1. As long as committers are coming, +1. >>> >> >> >> Proposal is

Re: [digester] fixing old broken links

2011-06-18 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Thanks a lot for the suggestions Phil, very appreciated!!! > I honestly thought that there was some Maven trick somewhere that I > wasn't aware of :P > So, I think I'll proceed following the first approach, I see it > quicker and easier :)

Re: [ALL] BCEL and JCS as Commons components?

2011-06-18 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 6/16/11 8:22 AM, Matt Benson wrote: >>> (accidentally sent to Jochen personally before, sorry) >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Jochen Wiedmann >>> wrote: On Thu, Jun 1

[ALL] BCEL and JCS as Commons components?

2011-06-15 Thread Rahul Akolkar
As Jakarta winds down, we are looking for sustainable homes for couple of Java libraries -- BCEL [1] and JCS [2]. These aren't very different from many Commons libraries in size, number of developers, list traffic etc. Would Commons be interested in accepting these? Couple of the developers already

Re: [dormant][commons-graph] or [graph2] What must be the subject line?

2011-06-10 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Arshad Ansari wrote: > Hello, > The project commons-graph is being listed under dormant (here > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/dormant/) as graph2. So, when I > have any questions, the subject line should have [commons-graph] or > [graph2]. I have a few q

Re: [DIGESTER][SANDBOX] back proposing the Digester3 merge to trunk

2011-06-01 Thread Rahul Akolkar
ould really appreciate if you have spare time to have a look at the > code, I immagine you are quiet busy but there's no rush ;) > Have a nice day, all the best!!! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 20

Re: [DIGESTER][SANDBOX] back proposing the Digester3 merge to trunk

2011-05-31 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > New site is online, does someone have some spare time to check[1] and > provide feedbacks about the merge proposal? Don't have much time, but if its now compatible with 2.x thats a good thing :-) You may want to confirm using a clirr or eq

Re: [SCXML] Tidy up test cases

2011-05-27 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:06 PM, sebb wrote: > On 26 May 2011 14:46, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote: >>>>> SC

Re: [SCXML] Tidy up test cases

2011-05-26 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote: >>> SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to >>> look at again. >>> >> >> Thanks

Re: [SCXML] Tidy up test cases

2011-05-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:41 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote: >>> [As part of this, I noticed and fixed some minor issues in the Ant build >>> file.] >>> >> >> I under

Re: [SCXML] Tidy up test cases

2011-05-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote: > SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to > look at again. > Thanks, the initial breakage was from EL trunk changes, if you follow this trail (if you've begun to look into it, this probably won't be new information): htt

Re: [VOTE] Revised dormancy policy

2011-05-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+1 -Rahul On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > I would like to take the proposal made in [1], modified per > discussion on that thread to a VOTE, so we can start implementing > the policy. > > The provisions are as follows: > > 0) To move a component to dormant requires a VOTE.

Re: [scxml] Issue with TransitionTargetComparator

2011-05-09 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Yevgen Kogan wrote: > > Dear all, > > the line 90 of the > /commons/proper/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/semantics/TransitionTargetComparator > looks like this: > > State s = (State) iter.next(); > > The cast to State causes an cast exception

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons Discovery 0.5 released!

2011-05-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:34 AM, sebb wrote: > I normally send a separate e-mail to announce @ a.o alone. [Might be > worth separating dev and user announces too.] > > This makes it slightly easier to track the bounces (which don't always > reference the original e-mail) as well as reducing the re

Re: [all][proposal] Extend Dormant to include no longer active released components

2011-05-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few > Commons proper components that are no longer under active > development.  I would like to propose that we extend the "dormant" > classification on the web site to include components

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons Discovery 0.5 released!

2011-05-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Congratulations to Simone for pushing this release out! > +1 to that sentiment, but not to using reply all and having things like announce@ on CC (even if it bounces :-). -Rahul > Gary > > On May 5, 2011, at 8:26, Simone Tripodi wrote: >

Re: [scxml] project status

2011-04-08 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Ryan wrote: > What is the current status of the SCXML project? Is there active development > going on? > There is little active development going on, for two reasons: (1) What we have works reasonably in its given state (2) I haven't had much time to continually t

Re: [parent] wagon protocols & mvn3

2011-04-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Rahul! > done, but I meant that in mvn3 the scp protocol doesn't come out of > the box, we need to plug the wagon-ssh extension. > For releasing the discovery, I switched to mvn2, but for future mvn3 > use I'd suggest to add it in the mave

Re: [parent] wagon protocols & mvn3

2011-04-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > due to unsupported 'scp' protocol by default by mvn3[1], I'd suggest > to add, in the 'maven-3' profile in the commons-parent, the wagon-ssh > extension. For now, you could try tweaking the "commons.deployment.protocol" prope

Re: [discuss][Digester] The future of Digester an the Digester3 in sandbox - Take2

2011-03-19 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 3/19/11 4:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi Rahul, >> thanks once again for the wise suggestions, much more than appreciated! >> >> I underestimated the importance of the users over the active >> developers, so I totally agree with you, mo

Re: [discuss][Digester] The future of Digester an the Digester3 in sandbox - Take2

2011-03-18 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all mates!!! > I need your support on advising our users that a new version of > Digester is available on sandbox, I already sent more than once an > email on users ML but never got a reply, maybe my name is not so > influent between user

Re: [VOTE][SITE] Release Commons Parent 20 based on RC1

2011-03-15 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+1 -Rahul On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:15 AM, sebb wrote: > Please may I have your votes for Commons Parent 20? > > Maven artifacts: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-002/org/apache/commons/ > > SVN > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/commons-pare

Re: [VOTE][SITE] Release Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19

2011-03-13 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+1 to both. -Rahul On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:18 PM, sebb wrote: > Please may I have your votes for Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19? > > The two have to be tested together because Commons Skin 3 is > referenced from Commons Parent 19. > > If the vote for Commons Skin fails, then Commons Par

Re: [discuss][Digester] The future of Digester an the Digester3 in sandbox

2011-03-01 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Good morning all guys, > in the last month I've invested my spare time on redesigning a new > potential version of the Digester component in Sandbox, according to > what I proposed time ago on dev ML[1]. > The experiment is complete at 95%,

Re: [scxml] semantics of nested history in parallel state

2011-03-01 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Please keep an eye on the www-voice thread. I think there may still be > problems with the current step algorithm, and I'm drafting a reply to > elaborate on this. > Sure. -Rahul > Thanks, > > Jake > > On Tu

Re: [scxml] semantics of nested history in parallel state

2011-03-01 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently working on revising scxml-js so that it implements the > semantics defined by the step algorithm of the SCXML specification (as > opposed to the mixture of SCXML semantics and Rhapsody semantics which > it currently imple

Re: [SCXML] Do Apache Commons SCXML support XInclude and XPath 2.0?

2011-02-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
alked about XInclude and XPath 2.0 already in this thread. Commons SCXML doesn't provide all the I/O processors yet (in the manner described in the spec), so don't have much to add there. -Rahul > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/scxml4flex/ > > 在 2011年2月24日 上午6:25,Rahu

Re: [SCXML] Do Apache Commons SCXML support XInclude and XPath 2.0?

2011-02-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
2011/2/23 Gavin Lei : > Hi guys, > Do Apache Commons SCXML support XInclude and XPath 2.0? Today i want > to do some experiments to confirm this, but it seems that Commons > SCXML does not support XInclude and XPath 2.0. > 1. about XInclude > I try to run such a SCXML document in Commons SCXML engi

Re: [jexl] Short description in commit messages (was: svn commit: r1072000)

2011-02-19 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:22 PM, sebb wrote: > On 18 February 2011 22:54, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 2/18/11 2:14 PM, sebb wrote: >>> I agree it's helpful to have at least the subject of the JIRA in the >>> log message, but IMO there should be nothing in the log message that >>> is not in the JIRA

Re: [jexl] Short description in commit messages (was: svn commit: r1072000)

2011-02-18 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:06 AM, wrote: > Author: henrib > Date: Fri Feb 18 14:06:47 2011 > New Revision: 1072000 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072000&view=rev > Log: > JEXL-83 > Can you please add a short sentence or two to future commit messages about the changes? (in addition to

Re: [configuration] Compilation under Java 1.4

2011-02-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Am 15.02.2011 21:23, schrieb Oliver Heger: >> >> Am 10.02.2011 13:09, schrieb sebb: >>> >>> >>> FYI: >>> >>> Note that the Commons Parent POM was changed some while ago to add >>> profiles java-1.4, java-1.3 etc. which change the Java version

Re: [attributes] Gump failure after qdox update

2011-02-11 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2011-02-11, Gump wrote: > >>     [javac] >> /srv/gump/public/workspace/apache-commons/attributes/compiler/src/java/org/apache/commons/attributes/compiler/AttributeCompiler.java:245: >> incompatible types >>     [javac] found   : com.tho

Re: [sandbox] new sandbox component

2011-01-31 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Luc Maisonobe [mailto:luc.maison...@free.fr] >>> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 14:52 >>> To: Commons Developers List >>> Subject: Re: [sandbox] ne

Re: Releasing commons-parent

2011-01-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Gary Gregory [mailto:ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com] >> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 13:56 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Releasing commons-parent >> >> Well, I am digging around for instruction

Re: [vote][sandbox] Proposal for Digester3 sandbox

2011-01-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
gt; being yourself also a Digester users, it should be easier for me >>> having you to give a guideline :) >>> Have a nice day! >>> Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> >

Re: [vote][sandbox] Proposal for Digester3 sandbox

2011-01-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
give a guideline :) >> Have a nice day! >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Rahul Akolkar >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM,

Re: [vote][sandbox] Proposal for Digester3 sandbox

2011-01-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
are always > accepted, many thanks in advance!!! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Rahul Akolkar > wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Simone Tripodi >> wrote: >>

Re: [vote][sandbox] Proposal for Digester3 sandbox

2011-01-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
le.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar > wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Simone Tripodi >> wrote: >>> Hi all guys, >>> I would like to propose a new sand

Re: [vote][sandbox] Proposal for Digester3 sandbox

2011-01-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > I would like to propose a new sandbox to experiment a fresh, > different, new set of Digester APIs that strongly uses a DSL for rules > configuration. > As described in the original proposal[1], the idea comes from a James > C

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC2

2011-01-14 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I have prepared a second release candidate for the release of Lang 2.6 > > Details of the bug fixes and enhancements in the release are here: > >  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.6-rc2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >  http://people.apache.org/~

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release. I have back-ported compatible > bug fixes and enhancements from the trunk to the 2.x branch, details > of which are here: > >  http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.6-rc1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >  http://

Re: SCXML : send & transition doesn't work when they are in the same state.

2010-11-26 Thread Rahul Akolkar
This is a post for the user list, but please see below first ... On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Michael musset wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm having a problem in my scxml project : > >     >         >            http://www.ecma.ch/standards/ecma-323/csta";> >                 >                         >

Re: [scxml-eclipse]Hi

2010-11-04 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Bilel Messaoud wrote: > Hi im student and i have a project to create scxml editor so i used emf and > gef now i tried to use Translators but really i was blocked can i show u my > sources and can u help me im blocked and it really stress me > thx I'm not clear on t

Re: commons:download-page

2010-11-04 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > commons:download-page doesn't seem to work correctly with mvn release:prepare > and release:perform.  If you manually invoke it before the release the files > will be for the SNAPSHOT before the release. If you run it after then they > will

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC5

2010-10-15 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+1 -Rahul On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to > rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to > FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and improvements to the test coverage. > > The RC3 changes were improvements to s

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.1 based on RC1

2010-10-15 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: >  Hi folks, > > I would like to call a vote for releasing commons-exec-1.1 based on RC1. > > [X] +1 release it > [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care > [ ] -1 no, do not release it because -Rahul

Re: [SCXML] Invoke & get data

2010-09-30 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Lets continue on the user list if needed. Response inline below. On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Michael musset wrote: > Hi, > > i would like to do that : > >       >             >         > > > and be able to get what's is inside the CDATA balise from this : > > public class protocol implements

Re: [Digester] next release roadmap

2010-09-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:13 AM, sebb wrote: > On 28 September 2010 15:46, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Simone Tripodi >> wrote: >>> Hi all guys, >>> first of all thanks everybody mentored me during the path of the 2.1 >>&g

Re: [Digester] next release roadmap

2010-09-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > first of all thanks everybody mentored me during the path of the 2.1 > release, especially Rahul and Sebastian, always ready to provide a > valid help, I appreciate it very much :) > > I'd like to discuss with you what I'd li

Re: [infra] site deploying

2010-09-26 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:54 AM, sebb wrote: > On 26 September 2010 06:30, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Simone Tripodi >> wrote: >>> Thanks both Antonio and Phil :) >>> >>> @Phil: absolutely right, but that concerns the main

Re: [infra] site deploying

2010-09-25 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Thanks both Antonio and Phil :) > > @Phil: absolutely right, but that concerns the main site, what I was > worried about is the 2.1 specific release site. I already deployed the > 2.2 site, you can see them on http://commons.apache.org/dige

Re: [infra] site deploying

2010-09-25 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 9/25/10 5:41 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote: >> >> 2010/9/25 Simone Tripodi: >>> >>> Hi again guys, >>> sorry the Digester 2.1 release is taking too much time but I'm still >>> assembling all the puzzle's pieces :P >>> What I miss now is how th

Re: [scxml-eclipse] creating modeling diagram wih SCXML

2010-09-22 Thread Rahul Akolkar
nd email to mailing list themselves (rather than adding the list as CC in reply) -Rahul > 2010/9/23 Rahul Akolkar >> >> 2010/9/22 Xun Long Gui : >> > Ok, i will go to check it >> > >> >> >> Long - Again, please see: >> >> http://ma

Re: [scxml-eclipse] creating modeling diagram wih SCXML

2010-09-22 Thread Rahul Akolkar
2010/9/22 Xun Long Gui : > Ok, i will go to check it > Long - Again, please see: http://markmail.org/message/5y6sy6kjbcdwnaoa -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mai

Re: [VOTE] Release Digester 2.1 based on RC2

2010-09-21 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > on behalf of the Digester committers I'd like to invite you to vote > the 2.1 release of the commons-digester, based on the RC2 > > - > > [X] +1 release it > [ ] +0 OK,

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote: > IMO the thread showed that there are enough ways to get to that > information today. > I would not bother and call for the vote. > +1 to not bothering for digester 2.1. -Rahul > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 14:54, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >>

Re: [scxml-eclipse] creating modeling diagram

2010-09-12 Thread Rahul Akolkar
2010/9/12 Xun Long Gui : > Welcome for your feedback, it will help us to improve this project > Suggestions: * Please use email subject prefixes (I've added one here) * Usage questions and/or responses should go to user list * Ask poster to resend to mailing list themselves -Rahul --

Re: [VOTE] Release Digester 2.1 based on RC1

2010-09-12 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > > Release notes: > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/digester/2.1/RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > Since readability is important for release notes, I'll nitpick: * Line width is inconsistent * s/meta data-based/meta-data based/ * s/run

Re: [VOTE] Release Digester 2.1 based on RC1

2010-09-12 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Thanks a lot for the clarifications Rahul!!! :) I'd also add its best to wait a few days (3+) before rolling the next RC to allow time for any additional feedback. -Rahul -

Re: [VOTE] Release Digester 2.1 based on RC1

2010-09-12 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 7:20 AM, sebb wrote: > On 12 September 2010 08:09, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi Seb, >> thanks for the feedbacks, my fault: I misunderstood the tag creation, >> I manually forced the -RCn postfix :( So now 2 questions to increase >> my knowledge: >> >> 1) shall the /DIGESTE

Re: [VOTE] Release Digester 2.1 based on RC1

2010-09-12 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote: > On 11 September 2010 11:43, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> on behalf of the Digester committers I'd like to invite you to vote >> the 2.1 release of the commons-digester. >> >> Tag: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/dig

Re: [Digester] RC1 blocked while deploying :(

2010-09-10 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > the RC1 is driving me crazy... once resolved the gpg issues, following > the wiki guide[1] Rahul ans Seb suggested, once launched "mvn -Prc > release:perform" when going to deploy artifacts, the build was > blocked: > > [INFO]

Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-10 Thread Rahul Akolkar
uot;test-deploy" profile. >>> >>> Don't you need to use mvn deploy ? >>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:03 PM,

Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-06 Thread Rahul Akolkar
leases -- note the FAQ indentation in (b) BTW as its different -- WDYT? -Rahul > Thanks in advance, all the best, > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Rahul Akolkar > wrote: >> On Sat,

Re: [Digester] NPE when generating JIRA report

2010-09-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > DONE!!! > the scp has been successfully completed :) > Now waiting to see the update site online :P If you set the browser proxy server to minotaur-2.apache.org [140.211.11.10], you won't have to wait. Which is what I did, and its good to

Re: [all] Apachecon US slot open

2010-09-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > One of our speaker volunteers has had to cancel, so we have a speaker slot > open in the Commons track.  The conference is in Atlanta, November 1-5 and > the Commons track is on Thursday, the 4th. > > Any volunteers? > Too bad I'm away for th

Re: [Digester] NPE when generating JIRA report

2010-09-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
-deploy :-) -Rahul > Thanks in advance, > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Simone Tripodi >> wrote: >>>

Re: [Digester] NPE when generating JIRA report

2010-09-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
'd be good as a preview before the release. We should remove the 1.8 release from the LHS menu (so post release, we'd have 1.8.1, 2.0 and 2.1 there). -Rahul > Thanks in advance, > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > >

Re: [scxml-eclipse] User Feedback

2010-09-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
2010/9/5 Xun Long Gui : > Yeah, I will add this part, but i think it will take me a while, i will > graduate this winter, these days, i was working for my graduate pater, so > may be you should wait for a while, sorry for that :-( > The other option always available would be for someone else to j

Re: [Digester] NPE when generating JIRA report

2010-09-05 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > while attempting to run the mvn site-deploy command I got an NPE when > generating the JIRA report; even if not blocking I stopped the > execution, can anyone please suggest me how to fix it? > Follows below the stacktace, than

Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-04 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Rahul, > thanks a lot for your feedbacks, actions have been completed following > your suggestions. > my final 2 questions: > - I didn't find any reference on wiki about > ${commons.deployment.protocol}... can we have a private chat? Sur

Re: XML Schema and Java 1.5

2010-09-04 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Wrong list. On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I'm tired of Java 1.4. Are there users of XML Schema still stuck there? > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands

Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Sorry, > forgot to ask your opinion on dropping the STATUS.html[1] file that > seems has not been updated anymore since 1.7 release... WDYT? Yup, lets scrap that. -Rahul

Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi again Rahul, all, > just to ask opinions about other details: I'd move the checkstyle > stuff (checkstyle.xml and file-header.txt), on the project root, to a > proper src/test/checkstyle dir to keep the root dir as much clean as > possible

Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
e tweaks. -Rahul [1] http://commons.apache.org/digester/ > I'll use the m2 rc profile, I'm already used to do it with the release > plugin and found it comfortable. > Have a nice day,m > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ &g

Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Rahul, > thanks for your feedbacks!!! :) > At that point I'd try to call a vote for a new release, WDYT? Can you > point me please at some wiki page where described the release > procedure? Depends who is cutting the release. We have atl

Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi again, > I've been fixing PMD-CPD-Checkstyle errors, by now PMD warnings could > be considered trivial since they're detected on Deprecated > methods/constructor, there is a CPD warning I'd like to fix: > > File                            

Re: [digester] svn commit: r991743

2010-09-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
gt; http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:44 PM,   wrote: >>> Author: simonetripodi >>> Date: Wed Sep  1 22:44:15 2010 >>> New Revision:

Re: [digester] svn commit: r991743

2010-09-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:44 PM, wrote: > Author: simonetripodi > Date: Wed Sep  1 22:44:15 2010 > New Revision: 991743 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=991743&view=rev > Log: > moved main src to the default maven archetype dir structure > > Added: >    commons/proper/digester/trunk/src/m

Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
> Thanks in advance, best regards! >>>> Simo >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Simone Tripod

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >