On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
I've move this into a separate [DISCUSS] thread as I think it needs separate
discussion.
Jörg gave some objections below about using Milestone releases, as I
proposed earlier to support releasing intermediate versions of a
activity we gather not much has been
happening here for a very long time: the last release 0.9 dates back to
December 2008 and the last serious code commits to June 2011...
Looking back through the history of SCXML, Rahul Akolkar was and pretty much
still is the only maintainer of the code
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
On 10/08/2013 02:18 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Who's there :-)
Agree with all your Commons SCXML related comments below.I've been
out of time for this for a while; you're welcome to have at it. Being
ASF committers helps
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Woonsan Ko woon_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yeah, that's great!
State machine is a generic and simplistic concept which can be applied
anywhere.
In our case (Hippo), we want to leverage SCXML library as a core Document
Processing Engine. By exposing state machines
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:23 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
For components which use a Maven groupId starting with
org.apache.commons., Maven deployment is already enabled via Nexus.
There are a few components which still use a Maven groupId of the form
commons-component.
Some of these are
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Alessandro Scarozza
xan.sc...@gmail.com wrote:
the question is simple:
in w3c standard the final state is:
final id=aa /
but in all test case there is:
state id=aa final=true /
it also seems that by the final attribute does not work, while using
the tag
-
From: Rahul Akolkar
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 3:32 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [scxml] Anybody active?
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Kukosa, Tomas
tomas.kuk...@siemens-enterprise.com wrote:
Hi Rahul,
thanks for your offer.
When I get more familiar with current commons
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Kukosa, Tomas
tomas.kuk...@siemens-enterprise.com wrote:
Hi Rahul,
thanks for your offer.
When I get more familiar with current commons-scxml and have some reasonable
patches I will send them.
After short time playing with it, I can see following topics:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Kukosa, Tomas
tomas.kuk...@siemens-enterprise.com wrote:
Hi,
is anbody working on commons-scxml?
snip/
No. If you (or anyone else) would like to work on it, I can help with
reviewing and applying patches etc.
-Rahul
Tomas
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Eric Rosevear eric.rosev...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello,
I've tried out the eclipse scxml editor and have a question. The project
apparently dates back to 2010.
snip/
That is correct, the above was a GSoC project that summer.
Is this project still active? What is
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Ingo Lütkebohle
iluet...@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Hi All,
I'd be interested in getting a version of commons scxml which supports the
latest SCXML standard and would be willing to contribute code to that
effect, work on open tickets, etc..
snip/
Cool
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Jacob Beard jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca wrote:
Hi Ingo,
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Ingo Lütkebohle
iluet...@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de wrote:
Hi,
Am Mon 16 Jan 2012 04:10:40 PM CET schrieb Rahul Akolkar:
Sounds reasonable. There hasn't been any time put
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I finished the updates to JDK 5 generics and concurrent and updated the
maven-2 build. Still some tests fail, others should never have
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I finished the updates to JDK 5 generics and concurrent and updated the
maven-2 build. Still some tests fail, others should never have passed. I
would like to ask for close review because I basically touched
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
On 22.07.11 11:33, Henri Yandell wrote:
Anyone adverse to me svn moving JCS over from Jakarta? It will mean
someone needing to update the site (which
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone adverse to me svn moving JCS over from Jakarta?
snip/
Not at all, thanks for both the svn moves Hen!
-Rahul
It will mean
someone needing to update the site (which they should do while moving
that over).
Hen
/
redirects from j.a.o).
-Rahul
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
This is half a dozen related votes in one thread (for convenience), namely:
1. Accept BCEL [1] as Commons component
1a. Grant Commons karma to Dave Brosius (dbrosius)
2. Accept JCS [2
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is half a dozen related votes in one thread (for convenience), namely:
1. Accept BCEL [1] as Commons component
1a. Grant
This is half a dozen related votes in one thread (for convenience), namely:
1. Accept BCEL [1] as Commons component
1a. Grant Commons karma to Dave Brosius (dbrosius)
2. Accept JCS [2] as Commons component
2a. Grant Commons karma to Aaron Smuts (asmuts)
2b. Grant Commons karma to Thomas Vandahl
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:51 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Gavin recently updated the details of how the ASF Wiki works, and
added details of how SpamAssassin have completely stopped spam
happening:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Thomas Vandahl t...@apache.org wrote:
On 18.06.11 18:45, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
Just code on its own = -1. As long as committers are coming, +1.
snip/
Proposal is to give existing
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/16/11 8:22 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
(accidentally sent to Jochen personally before, sorry)
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks a lot for the suggestions Phil, very appreciated!!!
I honestly thought that there was some Maven trick somewhere that I
wasn't aware of :P
So, I think I'll proceed following the first approach, I see it
As Jakarta winds down, we are looking for sustainable homes for couple
of Java libraries -- BCEL [1] and JCS [2]. These aren't very different
from many Commons libraries in size, number of developers, list
traffic etc. Would Commons be interested in accepting these? Couple of
the developers
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Arshad Ansari arshadansar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The project commons-graph is being listed under dormant (here
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/dormant/) as graph2. So, when I
have any questions, the subject line should have [commons-graph] or
you are quiet busy but there's no rush ;)
Have a nice day, all the best!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
New site is online, does someone have some spare time to check[1] and
provide feedbacks about the merge proposal?
snip/
Don't have much time, but if its now compatible with 2.x thats a good
thing :-) You may want to
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to
look at again.
Thanks
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to
look at again.
snip/
Thanks, the initial breakage was from EL trunk changes, if you follow
this trail (if you've begun to look into it, this probably won't be
new
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:41 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
snip/
[As part of this, I noticed and fixed some minor issues in the Ant build
file.]
I understand
+1
-Rahul
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to take the proposal made in [1], modified per
discussion on that thread to a VOTE, so we can start implementing
the policy.
The provisions are as follows:
0) To move a component to dormant
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Yevgen Kogan mitteilun...@live.de wrote:
Dear all,
the line 90 of the
/commons/proper/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/semantics/TransitionTargetComparator
looks like this:
State s = (State) iter.next();
The cast to State causes an
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations to Simone for pushing this release out!
snip/
+1 to that sentiment, but not to using reply all and having things
like announce@ on CC (even if it bounces :-).
-Rahul
Gary
On May 5, 2011, at 8:26,
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few
Commons proper components that are no longer under active
development. I would like to propose that we extend the dormant
classification on the web site to
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:34 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I normally send a separate e-mail to announce @ a.o alone. [Might be
worth separating dev and user announces too.]
This makes it slightly easier to track the bounces (which don't always
reference the original e-mail) as well as
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Ryan rnidef...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the current status of the SCXML project? Is there active development
going on?
snip/
There is little active development going on, for two reasons:
(1) What we have works reasonably in its given state
(2) I haven't had much
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Rahul!
done, but I meant that in mvn3 the scp protocol doesn't come out of
the box, we need to plug the wagon-ssh extension.
For releasing the discovery, I switched to mvn2, but for future mvn3
use I'd suggest
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/19/11 4:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Rahul,
thanks once again for the wise suggestions, much more than appreciated!
I underestimated the importance of the users over the active
developers, so I totally agree
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all mates!!!
I need your support on advising our users that a new version of
Digester is available on sandbox, I already sent more than once an
email on users ML but never got a reply, maybe my name is not so
+1
-Rahul
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:15 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Please may I have your votes for Commons Parent 20?
Maven artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-002/org/apache/commons/
SVN
+1 to both.
-Rahul
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:18 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Please may I have your votes for Commons Skin 3 and Commons Parent 19?
The two have to be tested together because Commons Skin 3 is
referenced from Commons Parent 19.
If the vote for Commons Skin fails, then
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Jacob Beard jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on revising scxml-js so that it implements the
semantics defined by the step algorithm of the SCXML specification (as
opposed to the mixture of SCXML semantics and Rhapsody semantics which
it
at 6:50 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Jacob Beard jbea...@cs.mcgill.ca wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on revising scxml-js so that it implements the
semantics defined by the step algorithm of the SCXML specification (as
opposed
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Good morning all guys,
in the last month I've invested my spare time on redesigning a new
potential version of the Digester component in Sandbox, according to
what I proposed time ago on dev ML[1].
The experiment
2011/2/23 Gavin Lei gavingui2...@gmail.com:
Hi guys,
Do Apache Commons SCXML support XInclude and XPath 2.0? Today i want
to do some experiments to confirm this, but it seems that Commons
SCXML does not support XInclude and XPath 2.0.
1. about XInclude
I try to run such a SCXML document in
in this thread.
Commons SCXML doesn't provide all the I/O processors yet (in the
manner described in the spec), so don't have much to add there.
-Rahul
[1] http://code.google.com/p/scxml4flex/
在 2011年2月24日 上午6:25，Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com 写道：
2011/2/23 Gavin Lei gavingui2...@gmail.com
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 2:22 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 February 2011 22:54, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/18/11 2:14 PM, sebb wrote:
I agree it's helpful to have at least the subject of the JIRA in the
log message, but IMO there should be nothing in the log message
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:06 AM, hen...@apache.org wrote:
Author: henrib
Date: Fri Feb 18 14:06:47 2011
New Revision: 1072000
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072000view=rev
Log:
JEXL-83
snip/
Can you please add a short sentence or two to future commit messages
about the changes?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 15.02.2011 21:23, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Am 10.02.2011 13:09, schrieb sebb:
snip/
FYI:
Note that the Commons Parent POM was changed some while ago to add
profiles java-1.4, java-1.3 etc. which change the
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-02-11, Gump wrote:
[javac]
/srv/gump/public/workspace/apache-commons/attributes/compiler/src/java/org/apache/commons/attributes/compiler/AttributeCompiler.java:245:
incompatible types
[javac] found
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Gary Gregory
ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Luc Maisonobe [mailto:luc.maison...@free.fr]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 14:52
To: Commons
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Gary Gregory
ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 13:56
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Releasing commons-parent
Well, I am digging around
/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Rahul! :)
good point, I think that this is yet another good reason to work on
sandbox
://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Rahul! :)
good point, I think that this is yet another good reason to work on
sandbox before, I'll try to stay
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
I would like to propose a new sandbox to experiment a fresh,
different, new set of Digester APIs that strongly uses a DSL for rules
configuration.
As described in the original proposal[1], the idea
.99soft.org/
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
I would like to propose a new sandbox to experiment a fresh,
different, new set of Digester APIs
are always
accepted, many thanks in advance!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Rahul
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
I have prepared a second release candidate for the release of Lang 2.6
Details of the bug fixes and enhancements in the release are here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.6-rc2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release. I have back-ported compatible
bug fixes and enhancements from the trunk to the 2.x branch, details
of which are here:
This is a post for the user list, but please see below first ...
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Michael musset mickamus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a problem in my scxml project :
state id=STATE_START
onentry
send target=test targettype='x-csta' xmlns:csta=
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
commons:download-page doesn't seem to work correctly with mvn release:prepare
and release:perform. If you manually invoke it before the release the files
will be for the SNAPSHOT before the release. If you run it
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
siegfried.goes...@it20one.at wrote:
Hi folks,
I would like to call a vote for releasing commons-exec-1.1 based on RC1.
snip/
[X] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because
-Rahul
+1
-Rahul
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Niall Pemberton
niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and improvements to the test coverage.
The RC3 changes
Lets continue on the user list if needed. Response inline below.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Michael musset mickamus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i would like to do that :
invoke targettype=x-protocol srcexpr =test
![CDATA[
complicate data that it need to
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all guys,
first of all thanks everybody mentored me during the path of the 2.1
release, especially Rahul and Sebastian, always ready to provide a
valid help, I appreciate it very much :)
I'd like to discuss
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:13 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 September 2010 15:46, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all guys,
first of all thanks everybody mentored me during the path
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:54 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 September 2010 06:30, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks both Antonio and Phil :)
@Phil: absolutely right, but that concerns
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/25/10 5:41 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
2010/9/25 Simone Tripodisimone.trip...@gmail.com:
Hi again guys,
sorry the Digester 2.1 release is taking too much time but I'm still
assembling all the puzzle's pieces :P
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks both Antonio and Phil :)
@Phil: absolutely right, but that concerns the main site, what I was
worried about is the 2.1 specific release site. I already deployed the
2.2 site, you can see them on
2010/9/22 Xun Long Gui ustbco...@gmail.com:
Ok, i will go to check it
snip/
Long - Again, please see:
http://markmail.org/message/5y6sy6kjbcdwnaoa
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For
to resend email to mailing list themselves
(rather than adding the list as CC in reply)
-Rahul
2010/9/23 Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
2010/9/22 Xun Long Gui ustbco...@gmail.com:
Ok, i will go to check it
snip/
Long - Again, please see:
http://markmail.org/message
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all guys,
on behalf of the Digester committers I'd like to invite you to vote
the 2.1 release of the commons-digester, based on the RC2
snip/
-
[X] +1
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:20 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 September 2010 11:43, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all guys,
on behalf of the Digester committers I'd like to invite you to vote
the 2.1 release of the commons-digester.
Tag:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 7:20 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 September 2010 08:09, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Seb,
thanks for the feedbacks, my fault: I misunderstood the tag creation,
I manually forced the -RCn postfix :( So now 2 questions to increase
my
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a lot for the clarifications Rahul!!! :)
snip/
I'd also add its best to wait a few days (3+) before rolling the next
RC to allow time for any additional feedback.
-Rahul
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
snip/
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/digester/2.1/RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
snap/
Since readability is important for release notes, I'll nitpick:
* Line width is inconsistent
* s/meta
2010/9/12 Xun Long Gui ustbco...@gmail.com:
Welcome for your feedback, it will help us to improve this project
snip/
Suggestions:
* Please use email subject prefixes (I've added one here)
* Usage questions and/or responses should go to user list
* Ask poster to resend to mailing list
://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all, Rahul,
what about the latest deployed website?
snip/
Looks good overall, though I haven't taken a fine
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all guys,
the RC1 is driving me crazy... once resolved the gpg issues, following
the wiki guide[1] Rahul ans Seb suggested, once launched mvn -Prc
release:perform when going to deploy artifacts, the build was
releases -- note the FAQ indentation in (b) BTW as its different --
WDYT?
-Rahul
Thanks in advance, all the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:11
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all guys,
while attempting to run the mvn site-deploy command I got an NPE when
generating the JIRA report; even if not blocking I stopped the
execution, can anyone please suggest me how to fix it?
Follows below
2010/9/5 Xun Long Gui ustbco...@gmail.com:
Yeah, I will add this part, but i think it will take me a while, i will
graduate this winter, these days, i was working for my graduate pater, so
may be you should wait for a while, sorry for that :-(
snip/
The other option always available would be
, that'd be good as a preview before the release.
We should remove the 1.8 release from the LHS menu (so post release,
we'd have 1.8.1, 2.0 and 2.1 there).
-Rahul
Thanks in advance,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Rahul
with
mvn site-deploy :-)
-Rahul
Thanks in advance,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rahul
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
One of our speaker volunteers has had to cancel, so we have a speaker slot
open in the Commons track. The conference is in Atlanta, November 1-5 and
the Commons track is on Thursday, the 4th.
Any volunteers?
snip/
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
DONE!!!
the scp has been successfully completed :)
Now waiting to see the update site online :P
snip/
If you set the browser proxy server to minotaur-2.apache.org
[140.211.11.10], you won't have to wait.
Which is
Wrong list.
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm tired of Java 1.4. Are there users of XML Schema still stuck there?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rahul,
thanks a lot for your feedbacks, actions have been completed following
your suggestions.
my final 2 questions:
- I didn't find any reference on wiki about
${commons.deployment.protocol}... can we have a
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rahul,
thanks for your feedbacks!!! :)
At that point I'd try to call a vote for a new release, WDYT? Can you
point me please at some wiki page where described the release
procedure?
snip/
Depends who is cutting
tweaks.
-Rahul
[1] http://commons.apache.org/digester/
I'll use the m2 rc profile, I'm already used to do it with the release
plugin and found it comfortable.
Have a nice day,m
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Rahul
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again Rahul, all,
just to ask opinions about other details: I'd move the checkstyle
stuff (checkstyle.xml and file-header.txt), on the project root, to a
proper src/test/checkstyle dir to keep the root dir as
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry,
forgot to ask your opinion on dropping the STATUS.html[1] file that
seems has not been updated anymore since 1.7 release... WDYT?
snip/
Yup, lets scrap that.
-Rahul
agreed.
Have a nice day!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:22 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 August 2010 22:54, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:44 PM, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Wed Sep 1 22:44:15 2010
New Revision: 991743
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=991743view=rev
Log:
moved main src to the default maven archetype dir structure
Added:
://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:44 PM, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Wed Sep 1 22:44:15 2010
New Revision: 991743
URL: http
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again,
I've been fixing PMD-CPD-Checkstyle errors, by now PMD warnings could
be considered trivial since they're detected on Deprecated
methods/constructor, there is a CPD warning I'd like to fix:
File
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:02 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 August 2010 14:39, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rahul,
I just added the xdoc version of the documentation present in the
package.html files.
snip/
Nice. BTW, you can even deploy the site if you mark the
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Simone Tripodi
simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
one more question: what about keeping or removing the Test
classes/methods that just declare the Suite? AFAIK are not more
needed...
snip/
Don't have a strong opinion -- if someone wants to do it.
-Rahul
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:12 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 August 2010 19:29, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Seb,
thanks for your feedbacks, always appreciated! I know and understand
the need of having the package.html files, but what do you think about
replacing
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
In the Lucene world, there is always a x.9 release that contains all
deprecations for the upcoming release.
It also generally maintains backward compatibility, but includes all new
API's and may change semantics a bit,
1 - 100 of 751 matches
Mail list logo
