eh folks, any thoughts on using
https://github.com/robohornet/robohornet for benching?
Either way I bet if the events were buffered we could get beter
resolution which would be a win I think Joe was looking at
something similar last year.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
The Android bridge is about 25X faster in the 2.2.0 release
What about bridge performance improvements in 2.2?
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Simon MacDonald
simon.macdon...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, cool. I incorporated your feedback and will post later tonight
if there are no more comments.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Tue,
3 it
can't wait for the future where all cordova.js is just exec fns (and
related ceremony) for each platform
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Gord Tanner g...@tinyhippos.com wrote:
Problem:
- currently BlackBerry has 3 different javascript files:
-- cordova.blackberry.js
--
+1 kill
Pls make sure when you notify the google group the downloads for everything
2.2 will still support it before there is public outcry, pitchforks, etc.
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012, Filip Maj wrote:
+1 !
On 11/6/12 7:21 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
+1. This will
So the consensus is:
./bin/emulate defaults to first 'thing' and take an optional param for an
index if there is more than one
Seems to beg we have a script to list emulators/devices now. =/
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
+1 no user interaction required.
On
This may get some rotton tomatoes thrown at me but I would be in favor of
axing these apis altogether. I think they are more dangerous than useful /
developers should favor browser feature detection for their UI work.
There is no programmatic reason to want these properties otherwise that I
can
huge!
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.orgwrote:
One major feature I'm looking to add for 2.3.0 is a faster edit-refresh
cycle.
Yesterday evening I pushed a refresh plugin to
https://github.com/MobileChromeApps/refresh that adds a refresh button
floating
I really like the API you're proposing Andrew but hesitant to be super
bullish on it since I think we are now in CLI API revision 5 or 6. (lulz,
software dev)
Not attached to the current API but I think this is big enough that
requires buy in from Fil, Anis, Jesse, and Mike whom have done the
yep
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we swipe that table for Cordova?
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Yup this is a very good idea. We sorta have this on the phonegap dist
here
http://phonegap.com/about/feature
...@gmail.com wrote:
Adding jira tasks as per Brian's last comment.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 sounds like a plan
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
+1
On 11/8/12 4:01 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote
general setup advice.
Thoughts?
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
yep
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we swipe that table for Cordova?
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Yup
We did not though if we do, we I believe we had consensus on doing, it
should go here:
http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/DeprecationPolicy
And you should shoot a quick email to the Google Group explaining that this
is for 2.3 and greater.
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Joe Bowser
\o/
h http://96.49.144.164:6969/ttp://ci.cordova.io
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
K its running on port 80
On 11/14/12 4:20 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
eh fil, I love the port choice but can you get it on 80? I'd like to
point
dns
Pinging the board to see.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
bump
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
I think I've heard that sometimes when people send in their CLAs that
they
don't make it to this page:
seems like we just cut a release and typically we hop off the release train
in december so I don't think there is a rush but thought its a good time to
bring up
also, wth, can you believe its almost december?!
wow!
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Patrick Mueller pmue...@gmail.com wrote:
Much thanks to Sergey Grebnov for the latest weinre commits for windows
phone; get the latest unofficial binaries for your convenience from npm or
the weinre home:
http://people.apache.org/~pmuellr/weinre/
agree, all of this work when completed will be documented as to what is
non-standard which we can then take back to the w3c
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Great! Let's stick with one API, since we have Chrome members on the
Cordova team the choice is obvious
\o/
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I don't have edit privlieges on the new repos :/
The cordova group in Apache LDAP was not yet up to speed. Should be
fixed now
not changing too
much before a release cut.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
1. I like the proposal Andrew. We need type checking for sure and
making it
optional for debugging even better. The light touch you have shown seems
good enough for now. I'd
Eh Simon, was just trying to kick the tires using the wiki test page [1]
but always only loads in the webview for me atm. I'm certain I missed
something simple---all I did was create a default project---anything
immediately occur that I might be missing?
[1]
, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
just considering this, I suppose we could say that cordova.js is a
build
artifact, and the manifest is the 'truth' of the install (from the
issue
tracking perspective)
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Braden Shepherdson
bra
Hi Andy, nothing is really formally documented as that it changes. Any
diagram created today might be accurate for some time now though as we have
stabilized quite a bit in the past year.
Your best bet is to go through http://wiki.cordova.io for the high level
story and if you would really like
[mailto:brian.ler...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Brian LeRoux
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 5:34 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: NO CLA Confirmations issue, but still waiting for committer
validation process !
Hi Paul, can you share that link for me? I think I have the karma to fix
of course just because we can doesn't mean we should
http://www.littlereddoor.co.uk/ios/how-to-enable-the-nitro-javascript-engine-in-ios-applications-directly-through-xcode/
at 2:32 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
of course just because we can doesn't mean we should
http://www.littlereddoor.co.uk/ios/how-to-enable-the-nitro-javascript-engine-in-ios-applications-directly-through-xcode/
state of the art would be marshaling strings aka 'outsider art'
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@google.com wrote:
I'm experimenting with serializing transferring ArrayBuffer's, but
wanted to see what the current state of art for binary data xfers
was? I think I heard at
(multiple plugins battling over a single function) but not worth a
shot?
On 11/28/12 11:13 PM, Anis KADRI anis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
would this not be an indication that we need to modify the plugin
api?
(code munging
Eh Fil, is this so they can detect if they have device apis ultimately?
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Bryce Curtis curtis.br...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the answer depends upon when the app checks to see if it is
running in cordova webview. If it is loading a remote url with remote
these have been submitted fyi
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Plaquette, Paul
paul.plaque...@intel.com wrote:
Hi Jukka,
you just answered to another of my questions about when the vote should
occur ! ;-)
Thanks!
Regards,
Paul
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Jukka Zitting
on href
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Eh Fil, is this so they can detect if they have device apis ultimately?
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Bryce Curtis curtis.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think the answer depends upon when the app checks to see
guys do (even tough they do
it for other reasons).
2) I remember us talking about a capabilities api. Not sure what transpired
from that discussion.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Back to our original thread. I'm seeing a couple of scenarios.
1. wants
login strategy to use (see my previous messages).
if phonegap fires deviceready for me I still won't know if i'm in phonegap
or not
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
So, would that not be deviceready? (I get that those apps that run in
browser probably fake
There is little to report on since our last. Basically I'm thinking a
re-hash of the same. Anything mega you guys can see that should be
mentioned?
This situation all still smells of userland issue not something
Cordova should be doing.
I do think we need device capability detection, but analytics use case
not strong enough to justify adding to the fragmented world that is
user agents strings (and the even more brittle world of code that
agree
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Simon MacDonald
simon.macdon...@gmail.com wrote:
We doing that or going straight to 2.3.0 release? Personally I'd like to
see a 2.3.0rc2 on Monday then if no fixes are checked in cut 2.3.0 the
following week.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
=)
what should be noted?
thread since I was asked about this.]
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
github.com/cordova
This still exists with the apache-board-reports and
community-dashboard repositories in it. The latter hasn't been updated
in a year and the former is mostly used just
Hey guys, don't kill yourselves eh! If we can ship in the next couple
of days awesome. If not, we can do a rapid two release punch in Jan.
No big deal.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
That's cool. I'm suffering from a sinus infection that I caught last week.
yup
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
LGTM
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Simon MacDonald simon.macdon...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anything I'm missing here before I post it?
*1. InAppBrowser – includes events*
More details here
Welcome Max! Where are you based? (Let us know if you need anything to
help.)
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012, Max Woghiren wrote:
Hi everyone,
My name's Max Woghiren, and I'm a Googler joining Andrew Grieve, Michal
Mocny, and Braden Shepherdson as contributors to Cordova. I'm looking
in that profile picture, Max? Are
you
in a band? Karaoke? Staging a revolt?
-Michal
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io javascript:;
wrote:
Welcome Max! Where are you based? (Let us know if you need anything to
help.)
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012, Max
Michael brought this up yesterday w/ the suggestion that we make
cutting a release even easier still by including a standard ./release
script (actually he suggested ./configure but I think that convention
might come w/ unintended baggage).
I'm not convinced the speed issue w/ cutting a release is
So, it takes us roughly a week to socialize a release. We tag the JS.
We go back and forth on the list a little. We retag the JS. =)
Personally, I think the addition of RC to the process made this
easier. But perhaps its time to add a new channel wherein we are more
strict about the tagging of
(Happy holidays everyone!)
What cordova-client should do to better support plugins:
-Instead of considering JS the same as other assets, treat it as a
first-class thing.
-Build cordova.js from source (check it out as a sibling to
cordova-ios.git)
Yes.
-Change from listing
at 2:52 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
This is pretty close to Lunny's pluginstall spec:
https://github.com/alunny/cordova-plugin-spec
For which the tools are being built. View the current
phonegap/phonegap-plugins repo as a stepping stone. It bought us
time
I thought this meant we move the JS out of CordovaJS and start moving
it into plugin packages.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
time? If so, I disagree. The reason we tag the JS and need consensus on it
Our general goal for Cordova 3.x is composability. Extending the core
should be trivially simple, with tools for discovering, adding,
removing, creating, validating, and publishing Plugin Packages. This
will make creating downstream distributions easier, developers using
Cordova won't be building
Would love more #'s on Bada and BB before we get too aggressive. I
updated the Horizon section to Firefox OS. (Ubuntu is supported by way
of our Qt codebase.)
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Ken Wallis kwal...@rim.com wrote:
Sounds like a plan. I'll do some digging on what plans we will have on
The idea has been proposed that we even add an ./emulate folder for
Ripple to consume ---tests, docs, src, and emulation all into the
Package format.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote:
@fil @dave, yes to both test suite and docs.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013
be nice if it was available as part of the download from
phonegap.com,
which means a release. As it is, Microsoft and I will have
several
blog
posts and videos alluding to 2.3.0 + WP8 but no link to go get
it.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Brian
Its certainly up for debate, while webOS still is out there it is not
shipping on any devices, nor has it for a couple of years.
However, we are seeing an interesting trend towards web operating
systems: chrome, windows, firefox, and tizen. This puts webOS in some
good company and given the trend
That downstream dist called PhoneGap created a directory. Sending this
b/c Cordova devs might be interested.
http://people.phonegap.com
If you are a committer let me know off list and we'll add a shiny star
badge to your profile. =)
/spam
PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Its certainly up for debate, while webOS still is out there it is not
shipping on any devices, nor has it for a couple of years.
However, we are seeing an interesting trend towards web operating
systems: chrome, windows, firefox, and tizen. This puts
wants to create a platform for that in
Cordova they should be able to without having to convince you to add it to
the core platforms on the wiki.
On Friday, January 4, 2013, Brian LeRoux wrote:
Think its still good to make this distinction even though our scope is
going to drastically reduce
like git is a good use case for.
Thoughts?
In the mean time I will stop working on this issue. However, please note
that the CLI tools have not been working for about a month due to the
mirror issues I describe above.
On 1/7/13 12:44 PM, Brian LeRoux (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote
One other thought---when we do move between versions we should be
going from /dist not from the scm.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
As so long as this is abstracted into a discreet module so we can
remove later I'm cool w/ it for dev purposes. Git is great
My ideal would be to have the current version of Cordova vendored
directly into the repo of CLI tool. Upgrade/Downgrade would be to the
CLI tool global and not versioned independently. Willing to be wrong
on this but I think it would have less side effects. (Eg,
cordova-cli-2.5 running against
Docs would be the only way we can completely mitigate this. It should
be understood that 3rd party scripts are a bad idea by web developers.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Denis,
I think you bring up a good point. It's probably not a good idea to
pls review / let me know what I am missing
https://github.com/cordova/apache-board-reports/blob/master/2013-01.md
/13 12:44 PM, Brian LeRoux (JIRA)
j...@apache.orgjavascript:;
wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plu
g
in.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13546245#comm
en
t-13546245 ]
Brian LeRoux commented on CB-2164
The building tool already is a requirement of every platform, no?
Could you describe your solution Jesse? Saying you don't agree w/
something but failing to back it up is kinda passive aggressive.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew,
The approach you
Some of this could be re-purposed there:
https://github.com/phonegap/phonegap/wiki/Platform-Security
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Michael Brooks mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote:
Let's just create a parent section called Security, with sub-articles of
Domain Whitelist and iFrame Security (or
Thank you. I lean to agreement w/ Andrew that more meaningful pull
reqs are better and having named branches for what they do makes
sense. Also agree that tags are for points in time---but I take no
exception to a branch for those as well for dev purposes.
Let me try to capture the conversation
http://goo.gl/fYW3J
Ok. Lets go at this from a workflow perspective. One thing I'd like to
note is the two classifications of branch.
There are canonical branches:
- Dev (or Master)
- Unstable (or Next)
- Stable
And then there are feature branches.
Feature branches merge into Canonical branches as appropriate.
So, what if Canonical branches only received merges from Feature branches...?
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
But do Canonical branches merge into each other? I'm thinking no.
My
Hey shawn, feel free to kick up a new thread about Windows Phone dev.
We'd love your help. You can read how we'd like you to work w/ us
here:
http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/ContributorWorkflow
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Shawn Wildermuth
shawn.li...@agilitrain.com wrote:
Anyone actively
a release. Does that make sense?
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
Could you elaborate on what the workflow would be if we merged only from
Feature branches?
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
So, what
:
Am I correct in assuming US pacific time zone?
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 15, 2013, at 4:36 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Works for me, however, to accommodate EU community we must to consider
times unholy. This is Apache Way from what I understand.
I created a form to help us
Seems really slippery to me. Lets keep this one in the backlog while
we shore up the supporting tools for plugins, etc.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Cool, thanks for the feedback everyone! Sounds like downgrading won't be
supported for now.
On 1/18/13 9:07
Full circle! (Sorry I couldn't resist. This was the approach of a much
older iteration of the tools.)
Indicates to me this function should rest quietly in the backlog for a while.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
From the perspective of upgrading the
I think that spec is defunct and the functionality was removed from
Chrome recently.
=.(
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Simon MacDonald
simon.macdon...@gmail.com wrote:
Just reading everything over and looking at the way things are going it
seems like we should get the Web Intents API
I say we roll w/ the assumption of #3 (but share your pragmatism that
#2 will likely result).
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Not sure how to move forward with this. I don't think that asking plugin
devs to use macros to make their code work in both
Agree, but this should be just the regular flow rather than a formal
check in. Anything big should be in a branch and ideally ppl should
socialize branches on the list before the merge.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Recently we've been noticing that
++
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
+1
On 1/21/13 11:16 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
I would vote for standardizing on node for all our scripts
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Yes, node is already a dependency for
man, sure is nice having continuous integration. which is to say: thank you fil
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
BTW: the last commit on Android bumped the latest results on the ci
dashboard from ~84% to 97%. Thank you everyone for resolving this promptly!
On
Talking w/ Dr. David Charles Johnson about this. We think a F2F would
help but before we go that far I think your proposal is close Andrew.
How about firing it into a Google Doc for commenting/and revisioning?
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Braden Shepherdson
bra...@chromium.org wrote:
I
Thx for this Becky. Agree we should maybe add this analysis to the
wiki [1] (tho it too is in danger of getting dated) and hold out.
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/Core%20API%20Audit
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Becky Gibson gibson.be...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought I would check the
Agree w/ this sentiment Becky. Of late, I've been of the opinion the
target audience for Cordova is and more advanced users and
accommodating the less technical user base is a job for the downstream
distributions. We're not doing a very good job of it here or in the
downstream at any rate.
I know
I'm liking it. Start in 2.5?
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Looks great Andrew!
If everyone's on board, how are we going to test run this? Flip a switch
at a certain point, give it a shot with one repo for one RC?
On 1/22/13 12:29 PM, Andrew Grieve
I think its fine to drop features within the first RC but the second
one probably no.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still unclear on what was decided :/
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.orgwrote:
Max has had his changes
Gettin ppl on board w/ publishing to their own github is a great
start. Make sure to inform them of plugman [1]. It is very likely we
will nuke the phonegap/phonegap-plugins repo once plugman is stable.
(A month or so.)
[1] https://github.com/imhotep/plugman
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:08 PM,
The community is starting to put plugins in their own repos (good). I
noticed this one today:
https://github.com/vstirbu/InstagramPlugin
(Awesome.)
But I can't stand window.plugins any longer. I think this might be a
hangover from the existing plugin space but not totally sure---is
there a good
wrote:
Don't think so. Should be up to the user. That said Cordova should provide
a registration mechanism to enable collision detection (I think Andrew
Grieve has something like this in his symbol mapping branch in cordova-js).
On 1/28/13 10:34 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote
remember: silence is assent!
, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I'm thinking we encourage:
var insta = require('instagram')
insta.share( ... )
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
No reason to exist there, other than that is the way it used to be.
I would rather just see :
var myRef
uh oh. so, does this mean we do both and put prompting behind a
configuration option?
RECURSIVE ERROR
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Gord Tanner gtan...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the reason blackberry doesn't put the sdk on the path is because they
need to have multiple sdk versions (all
ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, fabian boulegue fboule...@me.com wrote:
So any update on release for r2?
Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
g.nat...@gnstudio.com
:
+1
On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote
Would it be possible to implement window.opener ??
I'm thinking no, due to the async nature of stuff, but allergic to
introducing more non-standard API surface. It might be time to start
documenting where Cordova MUST diverge so we can socialize this w/ the
various standards groups we interact
Australia is best done with plenty of advanced warning ;)
Is there any anticipated deadline to the submission process?
- tommy
On 01/02/2013, at 5:47 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
No problem, how about I pencil you in for the USA event and let the talk TBD?
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10
Yup, you only need to update the NOTICE and only if we are distributing.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
isn't mit compatible with apache license?
On 2/1/13 11:41 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Did anyone act on putting this on the wiki?
We'd
Seems like a wiki thing.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Its just a document..
Ill move it / create a spot for it in the wiki ?
On 2/1/13 11:56 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Yup, you only need to update the NOTICE and only if we are distributing
I'm in favor of discreet plugin repos. It shouldn't effect a release
if we automate install/remove and add to the Coho tool... though
perhaps this is a naive assumption.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Thought it'd be worth having a discussion around
).
I'd be ok to ship a set of default plugins and give the ability for
people
to build their 'own' Cordova.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I'm in favor of discreet plugin repos. It shouldn't effect a
release
if we automate install
, and then if we ever implement WebAudio, then we'll have the
name
available for that. Maybe we should even put it the spec-less category
(unless there's some older spec that it was based off of?)
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Just kicked up a quick wiki page
it :)
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
I was thinkin we'd just deprecate the media spec altogether for a
starter/subset of the web audio api (perhaps polyfil the audio element
while we're at it).
should we kick up a thread about that?
(Added file
So instead of revisiting it just let it die and kick up a new one for web audio?
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
So... back to cordova-plugin-media then?
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
exactly! And plugins, I
I am not in favor of prescribing any part of the development stack.
Some ppl like requirejs. Etc. This is really not a problem we need to
add to the list of things we need to solve!
(More detailed feedback on the way.)
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
I am
1 - 100 of 1061 matches
Mail list logo
