a string payload from the Java side did not
work.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com
wrote:
What bug? Do we have a way to test it?
We're still in an RC, so it's ok
Hey
So what are we waiting on for the 2.2.0 release? When should we
expect the JS to be tagged so we can start tagging?
Joe
Can we get more information on this issue? For example, which version
of Android are you trying this out on? That might help explain what's
going on with touch events, since the issue I was finding was with
multitouch going in as two single touches on Android 2.x, not the
performance of the
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Alessandro Preziosi (licnep)
lsnprezi...@gmail.com wrote:
Either way I bet if the events were buffered we could get better
resolution which would be a win I think Joe was looking at
something similar last year.
Yea that'd be great, (android already batches
!
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
iOS issues all resolved or punted to 2.3.0.
Can the js be tagged?
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
So what are we waiting on for the 2.2.0 release? When should we
expect the JS
I bricked my 3GS trying to downgrade to 4.3, and the iOS 6 iPad3 is
in the office. Of course, I still can't test under iOS 4.3 yet
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Micheal tagged it. GO GO GO!
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com
resolved or punted to 2.3.0.
Can the js be tagged?
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey
So what are we waiting on for the 2.2.0 release? When should we
expect the JS to be tagged so we can start tagging?
Joe
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote:
BriBri Say
This is off topic, but I think this is the first time I've seen Brian
called this on the list.
Hey
Apparently the pause and resume bug still exists, and I think it's caused
by the pause and resume timers not being executed properly. I'm looking at
the Private API to see what this actually does so I can try and write a
JUnit test for this, but I'm not clear what the difference between
Hey
I think that we really need to figure out what's going on in DroidGap. I
know that this isn't a sexy new feature like WebRTC or anything, but we
need to figure this out. Right now, we have the following problem:
1. User uses a plugin that fires an intent and launches an external activity
variables if the JS environment boots up from a
clean slate?
On 11/8/12 10:37 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, further update:
After adding this on the CordovaWebView:
public WebBackForwardList restoreState(Bundle savedInstanceState)
{
WebBackForwardList myList
Hey
Where did we announce the upcoming deprecation of Eclair and
Honeycomb? I'm wondering because I remember that we decided to
deprecate these platforms, but I don't know if we actually told people
that.
Joe
BUMP! Can everyone run these tests? I need to know about failures ASAP
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, wrong thread. Obviously.
The command line version of the unit tests is on the Wiki.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Joe Bowser bows
Hey
I'm going to resurrect this thread. What do people think of our
pre-built camera so far? I still have updated on this branch here:
https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/tree/camera
It'd be good to get more feedback before continuing down this road.
The downside so far is having to
I did notice that the tests all failed today when I forced mine to
Android 4.2. I'll test it again tomorrow when I come in the office.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Simon MacDonald
simon.macdon...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone has a Nexus 7 can they run the mobile spec automated file API
tests?
. The device rebooted itself into Android 4.2
Here's the link to the factory images:
https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/images
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Joe, how did you force it to 4.2?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com
, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I'm going to resurrect this thread. What do people think of our
pre-built camera so far? I still have updated on this branch here:
https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/tree/camera
It'd be good to get more feedback
to
more/different problems by continuing on this route.
Sorry to flip, flop on this issue.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I'm going to resurrect this thread. What do people think of our
pre-built
)
at
android.app.Instrumentation$InstrumentationThread.run(Instrumentation.java:1551)
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
BUMP! Can everyone run these tests? I need to know about failures ASAP
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012
-android.git;a=blob;f=test/AndroidManifest.xml;h=e35f6c678ba6381f4b9e9fcadc86ccf0930969bc;hb=HEAD)
does not have backbuttonmultipage anywhere it in.
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Simon: Looks like it's missing
of WebView. I'll be looking at that. Let me
know if you can reproduce the same epic fail on your end.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly, running JUnit Tests in Eclipse is pretty trivial, as is
running these from the command line. I just tried
BTW: The Wiki has been updated:
http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/RunningTests
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I noticed that the tests are failing. Worse, the tests are failing
randomly and they're not failing all the time. I think we leak
anyways.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW: The Wiki has been updated:
http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/RunningTests
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I noticed that the tests are failing. Worse, the tests
()
Not sure how necessary these things are, but they are leads anyways.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW: The Wiki has been updated:
http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/RunningTests
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com
wrote
It sounds like you don't have the Android Eclipse Plugin. I recommend
downloading it from developer.android.com.
Also, this list is for the development of Cordova itself. For
technical support questions, I recommend asking on Stack Overflow, or
on the PhoneGap Google Group, you may get help
Why do we have the Forward and Back buttons on the browser on Android
when Chrome and the Default Browser only have a refresh button? How
does this handle the hardware back button? I think we should do what
the platform does, except that we don't need multi-tab browsing.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at
OK, so what's the downside of constantly forcing the view to be
redrawn over and over again? That's the thing that I would be most
concerned about.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote:
The first paragraph of his answer is entirely in line with my claim
viewInvalidate() in c++ when in the DOM cursor/scrolling etc.. events
happen, this calls invalidate() in java.
The purpose of invalidate() is to force the re-render of *java* components
painted on the canvas.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com]
Sent: November 22
users a loaded gun that only points at feet.
- Lorin
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
A while ago I did an experiment where I allowed users to restore their
state in the case that Cordova gets killed. This seemed like a good
idea except that I
Hey
I'm looking at the FileWriter API and I have no idea how we could
explicitly write to the app jail on Android
(/data/data/com.yourappnamespace/). I feel like our FileWriter is
pretty dated and that we should re-evaluate how it works, since many
devices don't use SD Cards anymore for their
/detail?id=113088
That issue made me assume that it wasn't possible yet without effort on the
chrome/chromium side.
--
Jarrod Overson
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I know that I brought this up before, but I'm wondering what's going
Joe. One step closer.. .. ..
On 12/6/12 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
I played around with it this afternoon and I got it to build. The
score on html5test has it right on par with my desktop chrome for the
most part. That being said, there's a lot of problems
So, are we getting this ball rolling?
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Jesse purplecabb...@gmail.com wrote:
+me
Also, 2.3.0 final will be the last release of the year with everyone
hopefully enjoying some time off.
Many of the Adobe+Cordova committers will be otherwise occupied much
of next
OK, I'm deleting the duplicates so we don't get confused. Sorry about
getting inpatient!
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
OH crap, I created a duplicate in our tracker. :(
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Michael Brooks
mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote
Please feel free to submit an issue on our issue tracker. I'm not
entirely certain which feature you're asking for here, since it sounds
like you're asking for at least three features.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Jonathan Bond-Caron
Hey
How about Wednesday/Thursday for tagging 2.3.0 final? I know that we
haven't fully released 2.3.0rc2, but I know that many, if not the
majority of the committers are going to be on holiday at the end of
this week and it would be good if we could get 2.3.0 out before break.
Thoughts?
Joe
Can we start tagging the release today?
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Marcel Kinard cmarc...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, FWIW. I'd like to see 2.3.0 out before the break.
-- Marcel Kinard
On 12/17/2012 1:25 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
Hey
How about Wednesday/Thursday for tagging 2.3.0 final? I
...@adobe.com wrote:
It's getting awfully close to a break. I'm heading out on vacation
tomorrow.
How do people feel about letting rc2 simmer over the break and releasing
2.3 first thing January?
On 12/19/12 10:10 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we start tagging the release today
branch is considered good enough, it is
merged into dev, and work continues. Whatever date we happen to pick
for a release that is what dev becomes, we tag, and move that sha to
stable if its not an RC.
?
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm OK
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Am I correct when I say that, with this approach, master becomes a series
of merge commits coming from dev, then ?
That's correct!
A couple questions to follow up:
- features get forked from stable - forked from master, yes?
Agreed! We should just discourage web developers from using iFrames
whenever we can. They don't even work properly on ICS.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
Docs would be the only way we can completely mitigate this. It should
be understood that 3rd party
It's you. The URL should be https, not http! Sending passwords in the
clear is bad!
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Simon MacDonald
simon.macdon...@gmail.com wrote:
It's been awhile since I submitted some code. It appears that the new url:
The three assigned to Android appear to be low-priority issues that
can be bumped to the next version or unscheduled. We need to get
better at gardening issues, since we're getting a lot of old, crufty
issues that are starting to not be relevant.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Don Coleman
What if it takes more than a month to implement? We should probably
defer for later, but at most I'd move it to 2.9. (BTW: I don't think
anyone in their right mind uses an x.9, since it's basically a major
release minus the extra bug fixes and QA that a major gets in the last
month.)
Also, this
Honestly, I noticed that he said that Objective-C HTML5. The reason
I started the Android version of PhoneGap was because I wanted apps on
my phone, and I wasn't going to give Apple any of my money. Android
users are the big losers if iOS fails, because people are just going
to write their
Hey
I'm wanting to merge some of the state code that I was working on
before the break in. Are people still cool with this?
https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/tree/CordovaActivity
Basically, this lets us restore our state if we got the app killed
while we were in Camera. Assuming
BTW: This isn't a JS API change at all.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Blargh! Making things merge cleanly has reduced readibility:
https://github.com/infil00p/cordova-android/commit/5ca233779d11177ec2bef97afa2910d383d6d4a2
That's the meat of it. I'm
I've added this master. Even with the uncertainty, it's better to have
this code than not.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
I'd like to verify if this is the scenario:
1. We invoke
Here it is on one line:
android list target | grep Android 4.2
Basically, if you have a non-zero result, you're good to go as far as
the scripts are concerned. Android's binary backwards compatible, so
as long as you support the minimum SDK and compile against the target
SDK, the user should be
/13 4:22 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Here it is on one line:
android list target | grep Android 4.2
Basically, if you have a non-zero result, you're good to go as far as
the scripts are concerned. Android's binary backwards compatible, so
as long as you support the minimum SDK
Hey
It seems that the recent move to the Config class has broken
whitelisting. I'm currently trying to figure out why, but at the
moment, it's broken. I created a bug and set it to be a blocker, since
we should be able to load whitelisted URIs directly in the
CordovaWebView.
Am I the only one
Andrew Trice's tutorial is out of date and is technically wrong. The
Android target for a project should always be set to the latest. I
would agree with Don about not having Eclipse in our instructions,
except that I don't have that much confidence in the command line
tools on Windows to do that.
Recently we've been noticing that there's been a lot of new features
going into Cordova this release, especially in Android. Now, I know
that I've been guilty of this in the past, which is partly why I'm
saying this now.
I think that we need to talk about features and make sure they work
before
Hey
We're going through the motions for release, and it seems that the we
may have to roll back the recent changes to the JS so that we can tag
for a release. It seems that there were issues with the ArrayBuffer
changes on Android (and likely others) and the most recent work is
displaying alert
Hey
Should we turn on the AppCache on the CordovaWebView and the
InAppBrowser webview? We have this JIRA issue saying that it should be
all good:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2292
Thoughts?
Joe
Whoops, this should be this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2295
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Should we turn on the AppCache on the CordovaWebView and the
InAppBrowser webview? We have this JIRA issue saying that it should be
all
This is not my day:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2282
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoops, this should be this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2295
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Hey
I'm starting to look at adding the xhr2 shim for Android 2.3, and I've
come to this conclusion:
1. This looks like a LOT of work and I'm way over my head
2. This depends on a lot of the recent work that was put into Android
(ArrayBuffer and Blob)
Also, do we know if the new ArrayBuffer and
Hey
I just went added some code to the config class, and I noticed that
certain things don't make any sense. For example, we currently have
this in DroidGap.java:
super.setIntegerProperty(splashscreen,
R.drawable.splash); // load splash.jpg image from the resource
drawable directory
BTW: This does technically work for displaying a splashscreen:
preference name=splashscreen value=0x7f020009 /
That being said, you'd have to look in R.java to see what this value
should be. We should make this a bit more smart.
Thoughts???
Joe
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Joe Bowser
);
So, this way you can just specify the name. We could add the
extension, but we'll just strip that off anyway, since it's not
relevant as long as it's one of the supported Android types. We could
do error checking on that.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
You
Hey
I've tagged it the last few releases and RCs, and I'm thinking that
the people who actually have a commit in the JS for this release
should be the ones tagging on this one so we can avoid re-tagging and
things like that.
Joe
I also disagree with automagically injecting the script tags. If
we're adding the script tags, we have the ability of adding the script
tags wrong, and breaking people's apps with magic. We have enough
trouble directing our users to use Cordova/PhoneGap without us trying
to make things more
I'm not familiar with Chrome's API, but I believe that there is a
FileUtils API as well as the File Picker that Simon added a release
ago that fires an intent to pick a file if you have a file picker
installed. (Note: I don't use one, so it brings up the Gallery, Audio
Player and other things
Hey
Currently, I'm trying to figure out a way to restore state, and it
turns out that I misunderstood how our current plugin architecture
works. We need a way to take a class name and map it back to the
service name of that plugin. For example, I need to know that
Recently there's been numerous bugs open with half-working fixes on
our Geolocation Polyfill. The thing is that I don't understand why we
have this still when we have the browser's geolocation. If ours was
better, or was non-spec, or just didn't suck, I'd understand that, but
ours fails the same
So, are we having a release just to have a release? I'm OK with that,
but a lot hasn't happened between 2.4.x and this release so far.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
+1
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey Guys,
Hey
This is slated for 2.5.x, but I don't think this will ever happen.
What do we plan to do with multi-file upload with FileTransfer?
Joe
Fil and I were working on this issue today:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2494
This code writes the LICENCE file to /mnt/shell/emulated/0 on Android,
which is some unknown location that isn't accessible using the crappy
Android File Transfer app. I have no idea what the relationship
Honestly, this process is too complex and we should just go back to
what we were doing before. I don't think our git flow was what is
slowing us down.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Ok so the flow is: if you are committing into next, always merge into
While investigating this irritating issue
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2085), I found that when we
first open the database, we are using the built-in WebKit Database,
but once I go into child browser and go back, we start to use the
Storage plugin. Does anyone remember which
needed this to polyfill on some older Androids.. But
this is speculation :s
On 2/20/13 4:06 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
While investigating this irritating issue
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2085), I found that when we
first open the database, we are using the built-in WebKit
and Win8 do however support IndexedDB, and apparently BB10 does too.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
--
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
Hey
I'm definitely a fan of pre-compiled libraries for plugins. The main
reason I like JARs instead of Java files is because of the following:
* Cleaner projects
* Installation is extremely easy for non-Activity plugins (drop in the
libs directory)
The downsides on Android:
* You can't verify
That's assuming that we're fixing for release. I've been doing all
work in master at this point. I think we're fine doing both
cherrypicks and merging, but I think that's what makes this process
complicated.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Also, on a side note,
a bit more confusing,
and increase the risk of future merges having conflicts.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
That's assuming that we're fixing for release. I've been doing all
work in master at this point. I think we're fine doing both
cherrypicks
+1
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Michael Brooks
mich...@michaelbrooks.ca wrote:
+1 I'm in favour of moving along unless someone points out a reason to hold
back.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
+1. lets get this over with so we can put some serious
always.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
I've created the parent issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2549
On 2/26/13 11:26 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Michael Brooks
mich...@michaelbrooks.ca
This is compile-time, so I think that the CLI tool should take
responsibility for compile-time attributes. Per-platform CLI is
already virtually unmaintainable as it is.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
I've set up a parent issue to track progress [1].
Since
at 1:18 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
This is compile-time, so I think that the CLI tool should take
responsibility for compile-time attributes. Per-platform CLI is
already virtually unmaintainable as it is.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
I've set up
NOT work
on Android. This is the kind of issue I'm looking to resolve.
On 3/5/13 9:44 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Since it's compile time, the icon should be available anywhere. Why
would it need to be relative to the www directory? I'm assuming the
CLI would copy the appropriate
/phonegap/wiki/App-Icon-Sizes
On 3/5/13 9:54 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, so the icon could exist online as well:
icon src=http://phonegap.com/foo/bar/res/hdpi/icon.png; /
I have no idea what this problem is trying to solve, or why we need
the icon tag other than
Hey
Currently there's a major bug in Cordova with respect to the fact that
we can't blacklist any individual web resource. I saw that
shouldInterceptResource was added to CordovaWebViewClient, and I'm
wondering if we can use that to block resources that aren't
whitelisted.
Anyone used this? And
Hey
How does this work with the fixes for the # that are present in
Android 4.0 and 4.1? I looked at old IceCreamCordovaWebViewClient,
and I'm thinking that this might not actually work if we add a #
behind it.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw
After removing the old DIY history that we had from Cordova, I noticed
that the baseUrl was a part of this code as well, and that this code
actually doesn't do anything. I'm thinking of deleting this so that I
can resolve CB-2534.
Does anyone remember what this does?
Side note: We have too many
the docs right next to the code so
they
are less likely to diverge over time.
-- Marcel Kinard
On Mar 6, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Side note: We have too many weird obscure things in Cordova-Android
that aren't well documented, like how we handle offline
And when I say the tests pass, it didn't appear to break anything. :P
On Mar 6, 2013 5:54 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I deleted it and all the tests pass. I'll check that in tomorrow.
On Mar 6, 2013 5:46 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Yeah, I had a look
You're not on that list? I'll check on this end!
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@google.com wrote:
I'd like to give iclelland permission to assign bugs to himself on JIRA.
Fil, I think you've often been the one to help us with this in the past,
but I'm wondering if I
Hey
When we first set up the deprecation policy, we did it because we
didn't anticipate that we would create massive breakage with Cordova.
Unfortunately as we get closer to 3.0, it seems clear that we agreed
on a policy that isn't allowing us to develop as fast as we would
like. For example, we
Hey
Since we're working towards making the core plugins installable and
uninstallable, I want to go ahead and move all the plugins to a core
directory so that their Java namespace will be
org.apache.cordova.core. This means that adding and removing will be
less painful for scripts since they
will be incorrect? Possibly an update script?
Simon
On Mar 15, 2013 5:01 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
Since we're working towards making the core plugins installable and
uninstallable, I want to go ahead and move all the plugins to a core
directory so that their Java namespace
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Filip Maj f...@adobe.com wrote:
Providing an upgrade path is still something we need to consider.
So yes, an upgrade guide that says change the values of your plugins from
x to y is doable. As well as a script that does a global search/replace.
Not rocket
on installation/uninstallation.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Anis KADRI anis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
What is it that needs to change in the config.xml as far as plugins are
concerned ? I am hoping they will keep the same name
I personally dislike Selenium because it's next to impossible to set
up and write tests for, and it's extremely large and full of cruft.
After many months trying to get Selenium working on Cordova-Android, I
gave up on it and wrote the Purity Class, which basically just
simulates touch events on
-1
I don't want anything public until we have a process to decide on what
we should or should not support. We've been burned in the past by
making certain things public, and then not being able to change those
methods because someone somewhere depends on it for their app.
Architectural
That's so much cooler than branch -d, yo!
On Mar 23, 2013 11:21 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@google.com wrote:
For the other git noobs on the list: Now that the next branch is deleted,
you need to tell your local git instances via:
git remote prune origin
Why aren't we merging them again? I don't remember the reasoning for that.
I'll cherry pick the changes into master today, although I don't remember
us deciding on not merging when we do a release. This seems kind-of weird.
On Mar 28, 2013 6:04 AM, Braden Shepherdson bra...@chromium.org wrote:
Hey
I'm wondering if we should just tag 2.6.0 on the long-lived branch? I
feel like we've taken too long with the RC process, and we really need
to re-evaluate this process, since it's just as slow, if not slower
than the old process.
Thoughts?
Joe
Well, Kaspersky can just decide that it doesn't like Cordova. Do we
have any way to contact someone there to get more info on this Trojan
to see why Cordova looks like it?
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
Hey
I'm just going through the motions for the 2.6.0 release, and I'm
finding that FileTransfer is failing mobile spec. Was there work done
here recently that wasn't tested? It seems that it's FileTransfer's
download method that's failing. Is this happening on any of the other
platforms?
Joe
1 - 100 of 1563 matches
Mail list logo
