Yes, I can reproduce those steps easily.
Will try to investigate too.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 16:50, Filippo Diotalevi
filippo.diotal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, it is supposed to work and was indeed working afaik.
I fail
Use system property to provide bundle jar file to integration tests
---
Key: FELIX-1735
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1735
Project: Felix
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger resolved FELIX-1735.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Implemented this change in Rev. 824244:
* the bundle jar file
After a restart, fileinstall does not always properly uninstall bundles
---
Key: FELIX-1736
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1736
Project: Felix
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger reopened FELIX-1735:
--
Bamboo build breaks due to this change since the project.build.directory is a
file and
Upgrade to fileinstall 2.0.2
Key: FELIX-1737
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1737
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Karaf
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on FELIX-1737 started by Guillaume Nodet.
Upgrade to fileinstall 2.0.2
Key: FELIX-1737
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved FELIX-1736.
Resolution: Fixed
Committing to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk ...
M
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764590#action_12764590
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-1737:
Committing to
Hi
The Bamboo build is currently failing due to a commit for FELIX-1735. I
am currently working on fixing this and bring the build back to stable.
Regards
Felix
Atlassian Open Source Bamboo schrieb:
FELIX-DEF-2690
http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/FELIX-DEF-2690/ failed.
I've raised a JIRA and committed a fix for that:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1737
I've also upgraded Karaf to fileinstall 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT, so could you
rebuild both and give it a try ?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 08:56, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I can reproduce
ok, Bamboo is back to successful.
Regards
Felix
Felix Meschberger schrieb:
Hi
The Bamboo build is currently failing due to a commit for FELIX-1735. I
am currently working on fixing this and bring the build back to stable.
Regards
Felix
Atlassian Open Source Bamboo schrieb:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Felix Meschberger resolved FELIX-1735.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Looks like the last commit in Rev. 824258 (setting a string property
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved FELIX-1628.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: fileinstall-2.0.2
Assignee: Guillaume
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved FELIX-1626.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: karaf-1.0.2
Committing to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Filippo Diotalevi resolved FELIX-1705.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved after fixes for
FELIX-1736
FELIX-1737
Thanks!
[Karaf]
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
I've raised a JIRA and committed a fix for that:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1737
I've also upgraded Karaf to fileinstall 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT, so could you
rebuild both and give it a try ?
The fix solved the
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Karl Pauls karlpa...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases:
shell 1.4.1
shell.tui 1.4.1
bundlerepository 1.4.2
framework 2.0.1
main 2.0.1
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764637#action_12764637
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-1681:
The goal was mainly to avoid bloating the
+1
I notice the distro has a ._NOTICE file in it, but not a biggie.
- richard
On 10/12/09 0:32, Karl Pauls wrote:
I would like to call a vote on the following subproject releases:
shell 1.4.1
shell.tui 1.4.1
bundlerepository 1.4.2
framework 2.0.1
main 2.0.1
Staging repository:
+1
- Rob
--
Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge
r...@ascert.com
+44 (0)20 7488 3470
www.ascert.com
-defaults assumes path is relative
--
Key: FELIX-1738
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1738
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Sigil
Reporter: Derek Baum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Derek Baum resolved FELIX-1738.
---
Resolution: Fixed
-defaults assumes path is relative
--
After reviewing the latest framework and HTTP Service releases, I
realize that pretty much all of our projects both include and use
Apache developed software (if nothing else, all projects depend on Maven
to build). It seems silly to list Apache under both include and use,
especially since the
Sounds good.
I'd like to have on point clarified though. What's the intent for use
/ include wrt to a binary jar, a source assembly (ready to build), a
binary assembly (composed of multiple bundles like the karaf one), a
source jar (only the source for the jar with no build system), and a
On 10/12/09 14:06, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Sounds good.
I'd like to have on point clarified though. What's the intent for use
/ include wrt to a binary jar, a source assembly (ready to build), a
binary assembly (composed of multiple bundles like the karaf one), a
source jar (only the source for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved FELIX-1682.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: karaf-1.2.0)
FYI, I created a wiki page for the NOTICE file template here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FELIX/NOTICE+file+template+%28PROPOSED%29
Maybe there is a more appropriate place for it on the wiki, but for now
it is just under the developer documentation section.
Feel free to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764664#action_12764664
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-1715:
Not sure how to handle this use case.
The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764665#action_12764665
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-1702:
I think it's fine to use a closed source
Hi,
Thanks for bringing this up (again). The problem I have had for some
time now, is that our NOTICE files are not really consistent with the
legal intent of the NOTICE files.
Basically, the NOTICE files are part of the legal setup of Apache
products. As such they have have a fixed predefined
In general I'm +1, with one exception :)
This software was developed at the Apache Software Foundation
(http://www.apache.org) and may have dependencies on other
Apache software licensed under Apache License 2.0.
While the above sentence is true, I personally would read it that
One thing that might be worth considering if we go this way is to
leverage the maven plugin that has been written for the generation of
those legal files. The maven-remote-resources-plugin is used in most
Apache projects i've dealt with.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 14:46, Felix Meschberger
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764669#action_12764669
]
Filippo Diotalevi commented on FELIX-1702:
--
Pseudo screen-shots are the only
If we are not allowed to do it, then I'd rather have one file so we
don't have to determine whether we need to distinguish between the two
cases and have to maintain additional artifacts. For me, this has
nothing to do with courtesy, it has to do with easing the maintenance.
However, if we
On 10/12/09 14:51, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
In general I'm +1, with one exception :)
This software was developed at the Apache Software Foundation
(http://www.apache.org) and may have dependencies on other
Apache software licensed under Apache License 2.0.
While the
Oops, let me edit that:
If we ARE allowed to do it, then I'd rather have one file so we don't
have to determine whether we need to distinguish between the two cases
and have to maintain additional artifacts. For me, this has nothing to
do with courtesy, it has to do with easing the
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@gmail.com wrote:
...Thanks for bringing this up (again). The problem I have had for some
time now, is that our NOTICE files are not really consistent with the
legal intent of the NOTICE files
FWIW, there's been some discussion
Hi,
Richard S. Hall schrieb:
Oops, let me edit that:
If we ARE allowed to do it, then I'd rather have one file so we don't
have to determine whether we need to distinguish between the two cases
and have to maintain additional artifacts. For me, this has nothing to
do with courtesy, it has
Seems fine to me
- R
Richard S. Hall wrote:
After reviewing the latest framework and HTTP Service releases, I
realize that pretty much all of our projects both include and use
Apache developed software (if nothing else, all projects depend on
Maven to build). It seems silly to list Apache
On 10/12/09 15:03, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Richard S. Hall schrieb:
Oops, let me edit that:
If we ARE allowed to do it, then I'd rather have one file so we don't
have to determine whether we need to distinguish between the two cases
and have to maintain additional artifacts. For me,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
...reading the issue Bertrand references it is not clear. From my point
of view the overall issue to decide is:
1. Two-file approach, one for legal requirements and one for courtesy.
2. One-file approach for both.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
richard stone closed FELIX-1681.
Resolution: Invalid
Agree. Closing this ticket.
Bundles of webconsole feature are not assembled
On 10/12/09 15:17, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Richard S. Hallhe...@ungoverned.org wrote:
...reading the issue Bertrand references it is not clear. From my point
of view the overall issue to decide is:
1. Two-file approach, one for legal requirements and
Hi,
Richard S. Hall schrieb:
On 10/12/09 15:17, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Richard S.
Hallhe...@ungoverned.org wrote:
...reading the issue Bertrand references it is not clear. From my point
of view the overall issue to decide is:
1. Two-file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764687#action_12764687
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-1681:
Note that the webconsole should be
+1
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet reassigned FELIX-1689:
--
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
When deploying a feature, we need to refresh some bundles
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on FELIX-1689 started by Guillaume Nodet.
When deploying a feature, we need to refresh some bundles to cope with newly
resolved optional dependencies
It was working for me ... ;-)
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 17:07, fili...@apache.org wrote:
Author: filippo
Date: Mon Oct 12 15:07:41 2009
New Revision: 824373
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=824373view=rev
Log:
rollback change that does not work
Modified:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
richard stone reopened FELIX-1682:
--
Good, your fix is more general.
I did a test, got a very small issue
1) run feature:install -n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Savage reassigned FELIX-1739:
---
Assignee: David Savage
Bundles containing internal bundle-classpath resources (i.e. libs
Bundles containing internal bundle-classpath resources (i.e. libs and
directories) are not correctly set up on classpath
Key: FELIX-1739
URL:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
It was working for me ... ;-)
Yes,
but it was also breaking the XML syntax coloring in chapter 4.5 and
some other in 6.1.
I'm still messing around with CSS.. not very optimistic to find a
solution that works for every
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764718#action_12764718
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-1682:
Yeah, I do understand that in this case,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Savage closed FELIX-1739.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Ok turns out to be a separate but related problem.
Underlying logic for bundle
Bundles sourced from OBR are not set up with internal bundle classpath
--
Key: FELIX-1740
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1740
Project: Felix
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764725#action_12764725
]
David Savage commented on FELIX-1740:
-
Ok quick review of OBR files suggests
+1,
Regards,
Clement
On 12.10.2009, at 16:03, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
+1
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Filippo Diotalevi
filippo.diotal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
It was working for me ... ;-)
Yes,
but it was also breaking the XML syntax coloring in chapter 4.5 and
some other in 6.1.
I'm
Yeah, I don't have any big problem with that.
I was thinking the screenshot style looks better, but i'd rather
have a clean manual rather than nice snapshots and no manual ;-)
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 17:57, Filippo Diotalevi
filippo.diotal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:31 PM,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, I don't have any big problem with that.
I was thinking the screenshot style looks better, but i'd rather
have a clean manual rather than nice snapshots and no manual ;-)
Ok, I'm updating the wiki and checking that
Allows the configuration handler description to retrieve the managed service PID
Key: FELIX-1741
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1741
Project: Felix
Inject component type managed service pid as a property value
-
Key: FELIX-1742
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1742
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Improvement
Commit karaf-manual in Karaf trunk
--
Key: FELIX-1743
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1743
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Filippo Diotalevi
--
This message is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764756#action_12764756
]
Filippo Diotalevi edited comment on FELIX-1702 at 10/12/09 10:29 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Filippo Diotalevi resolved FELIX-1702.
--
Resolution: Fixed
A first working version of the karaf-manual module is available at:
On 10/12/09 15:46, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi,
Richard S. Hall schrieb:
On 10/12/09 15:17, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Richard S.
Hallhe...@ungoverned.org wrote:
...reading the issue Bertrand references it is not clear. From my point
of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764762#action_12764762
]
Filippo Diotalevi edited comment on FELIX-1743 at 10/12/09 10:38 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12764762#action_12764762
]
Filippo Diotalevi commented on FELIX-1743:
--
The module is a modification of
Add a -C/--context option to shell:grep
---
Key: FELIX-1744
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1744
Project: Felix
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Karaf
Reporter:
Unable to alter/unset a log level after it has been set from the console
Key: FELIX-1745
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1745
Project: Felix
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gert Vanthienen closed FELIX-1745.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=824488
Unable to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved FELIX-1689.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: karaf-1.0.2
Committing to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved FELIX-1682.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed r824529
The above fix contains a small part related to this
Reduce contention on ServiceRegistry.getServiceReferences(String, Filter)
-
Key: FELIX-1746
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1746
Project: Felix
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jed Wesley-Smith updated FELIX-1746:
Attachment: blocked-threads.gif.jpg
jprofiler screenshot attached
Reduce contention on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1746?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jed Wesley-Smith updated FELIX-1746:
Attachment: FELIX-1746.patch
Attached is a patch that adds a fully functional and tested
78 matches
Mail list logo
