On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
I was thinking about creating two bundles: Bundle::ApacheTestMin (to
include the absolute minimum required to run basic tests) and
Bundle::ApacheTestMax to include everything that's needed to run all
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
this works for me. I had to exit on reconfiguration, since otherwise it'd
fail to continue. Should I reconfigure in a different way, so I won't have
to exit?
great. you can use refresh() to reconfigure,
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'd like to start properly document the packages, especially something
like TestUtil. Should I do a pod section at the bottom of the package, or
do inline pods? I know you prefer the former.
i do. which do you prefer? anybody else?
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On 6 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- TestConfig.pm 2001/09/05 16:41:57 1.51
+++ TestConfig.pm 2001/09/06 02:36:44 1.52
@@ -940,6 +940,9 @@
HostnameLookups Off
+# make sure that we test under Taint mode
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:02:51AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas01/09/05 22:02:51
Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm
TestRun.pm
Log:
This patch forces reconfiguration when:
- httpd is newer than
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:02:51AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas01/09/05 22:02:51
Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm
TestRun.pm
Log:
This patch forces
looking back, are these names really supported by CPAN.pm?
libnet 1.0703
libwww-perl5.53
i thought they had to be Perl package names, which is why the current
uses Net::Cmd and LWP instead.
probably you are right. But then the version number should be the one
On 6 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas01/09/05 19:36:44
Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm
TestConfigParse.pm
Log:
- enable taint mode in tests via PerlSwitches -T
- untaint $ENV{PATH} before using open -|
[snip]
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:33:43PM +0100, Gary Benson wrote:
+$ENV{PATH} = '/bin:/usr/bin';
Hmmm, just noticed this in the reply. On Win32, the PATH sep is ';'
(assuming that you want this code to work there, don't know).
Don't know about the taint issues.
- Barrie
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:33:43PM +0100, Gary Benson wrote:
+$ENV{PATH} = '/bin:/usr/bin';
Hmmm, just noticed this in the reply. On Win32, the PATH sep is ';'
(assuming that you want this code to work there, don't know).
Oops,
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Gary Benson wrote:
On 6 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas01/09/05 19:36:44
Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm
TestConfigParse.pm
Log:
- enable taint mode in tests via PerlSwitches -T
-
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Gary Benson wrote:
On 6 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas01/09/05 19:36:44
Modified:perl-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache TestConfig.pm
TestConfigParse.pm
Log:
-
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Gary Benson wrote:
+# untaint
+$ENV{PATH} = '/bin:/usr/bin';
this should be 'local $ENV{PATH} = ...;', does that help at all?
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
The problem is that it's not on CPAN. So you cannot use CPAN::Grab to grab
this bundle.
doesn't need to be on cpan, just needs to be in your @INC or ~/.cpan/Bundle
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Gary Benson wrote:
+# untaint
+$ENV{PATH} = '/bin:/usr/bin';
this should be 'local $ENV{PATH} = ...;', does that help at all?
oops, I've missed the point that you were explicitly set PATH:
% export
You and Kevin never answered my simple question:
Why won't you post mod_gzip 2.0 *today*?
Kevin, the best way to have mod_gzip in Apache 2.0 is to make
it available. You knows i'm using it on Apache 1.3 for many times
and be more than happy to see such an excellent works on 2.0 :)
Hi,
I have noted that apxs is broken:
/home/apache20/apache20/bin/apxs -q PREFIX
apxs:Error: 100 100exec_prefix)/bin/httpd not found or not executable.
Any hints?
Cheers
Jean-frederic
Hi list,
yesterday I found a very obscure entry in my access_log which caused
a complete freeze of my machine. Could it be that this was some kind
of apache attack ?
I'm using apache 1.3.12 on Suse Linux 7.0.
Thanx for your help!
Here's a snippet from my access_log:
XXX.XXX.XX.XX - -
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have noted that apxs is broken:
/home/apache20/apache20/bin/apxs -q PREFIX
apxs:Error: 100 100exec_prefix)/bin/httpd not found or not executable.
Any hints?
what version are you trying to use? Get the HEAD version from cvs (1.26),
this
Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I have noted that apxs is broken:
/home/apache20/apache20/bin/apxs -q PREFIX
apxs:Error: 100 100exec_prefix)/bin/httpd not found or not executable.
Any hints?
what version are you trying to use? Get the
Tobias Kremer :: IT wrote:
yesterday I found a very obscure entry in my access_log which caused
a complete freeze of my machine. Could it be that this was some kind
of apache attack ?
I'm using apache 1.3.12 on Suse Linux 7.0.
1) Upgrade to something more recent.
2) Ask this sort of
Can we get back to basics here?
First of all, we're talking about adding a new module to the standard
Apache build, something which is *not* to be taken lightly. So what
characterizes a candidate module? IMO it's the following aspects:
1. Popular and well used already:
So many people are
Maybe 2) should be made clear in the Apache documentation as it seems to be
happening rather a lot.
-Original Message-
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 September 2001 12:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: too long string in access_log
Tobias Kremer ::
Oh, OK, I see the problem now. I didn't test with the HEAD myself. Now I
did.
Somebody has committed a patch which changed the way build/config_vars.mk
is generated. The variables now are Makefile-like $(foo) instead of
${foo}, of course this completely breaks apxs.
So the fix is to put back
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
Oh, OK, I see the problem now. I didn't test with the HEAD myself. Now I
did.
BTW, this is a quick hack to get you going, in case you don't know what
has to be reverted and cannot move on before somebody fixes it:
perl -pi -e 's|\$\(([^)]+)\)|\${$1}|g'
Why won't you post mod_gzip 2.0 *today*?
Because Apache 2.x is not STABLE, not In BETA and the API set is not yet
FROZEN... When it is, we will release mod_gzip as a third party module,
which we will support and maintain.
In the meantime use mod_gz.
Peter
-Original Message-
From:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 02:19, jean-frederic clere wrote:
John Sachs told me about this yesterday, but I was too busy to do anything
with it. I'll try to fix it today.
Ryan
Hi,
I have noted that apxs is broken:
/home/apache20/apache20/bin/apxs -q PREFIX
apxs:Error: 100
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:05:27PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
Some performance results with mod_gz are available at
http://webperf.org/a2/v25/
(no core dumps.. pages look ok on a real browser while running test)
I'm going to be re-running the tests for a longer period to see
I made the change to the way config_vars is created, and it needs to be
this way for the --with-layout stuff to work correctly. We may be able to
fix that problem, but we have a conflict between shell scripts and perl.
We need to fix apxs to strip the ( ).
Ryan
On Thursday 06 September 2001
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
I actually hit this same seg fault in mod_jk late last night. If
mod_include is changed to fix this, then we are most likely doing it
wrong, and I will veto that.
My point exactly.
The first step is to set r-uri to NULL if it is INTERNALLY GENERATED.
It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
the core. We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util, and nothing
in the core. Since there are at least two people who have mentioned that
they would have voted -1 for mod_ldap, can I get a vote to remove it now?
On Thursday 06 September 2001 07:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes01/09/06 07:48:46
Modified:src/os/netware mod_tls.c
Log:
Added the ability for MOD_TLS to take advantage of the mutual
authentication functionality built into Winsock and NILE on NetWare
Mod_tls isn't
Ryan Bloom wrote:
I made the change to the way config_vars is created, and it needs to be
this way for the --with-layout stuff to work correctly. We may be able to
fix that problem, but we have a conflict between shell scripts and perl.
We need to fix apxs to strip the ( ).
Won't { }
I have some big problems with the way that location walk and directory
walk work now, BTW, because if I write a module that doesn't get pages
from the filesystem, I have to catch those in the map_to_storage hook,
or the server will 500.
Hmm... I'd have thought that was the whole point
+1
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 September 2001 16:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Remove mod_ldap
It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
the core. We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util,
On Thursday 06 September 2001 05:01, Graham Leggett wrote:
o We release apr-x.x.x.tar.gz containing APR, which can be installed
separately (this is the direction APR seems to be going, we should
follow it through to it's logical conclusion).
We have no control over APR. APR will not make a
On Thursday 06 September 2001 08:09, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 07:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes01/09/06 07:48:46
Modified:src/os/netware mod_tls.c
Log:
Added the ability for MOD_TLS to take advantage of the mutual
authentication
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
Hmm... I'd have thought that was the whole point of the map_to_storage
hook, if its name were any indication... shrug
It is, but if I am just putting together a quick module, to solve a
problem and it generates the page itself, all I should have to
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
I made the change to the way config_vars is created, and it needs to be
this way for the --with-layout stuff to work correctly. We may be able to
fix that problem, but we have a conflict between shell scripts and perl.
We need to fix apxs to strip the
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 07:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes01/09/06 07:48:46
Modified:src/os/netware mod_tls.c
Log:
Added the ability for MOD_TLS to take advantage of the mutual
authentication functionality built into
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
mod_gz is just a little bugger off to the side that the core people don't
have to truly worry about.
...
It can go in now and be fixed over time.
...
modules which have *nothing* to do with stability.
so you're saying mod_gz would go into
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
the core. We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util, and nothing
in the core. Since there are at least two people who have mentioned that
they would have voted -1 for
This patch eliminates some run-time conversion of method names to
numbers (something that I noticed while looking through function call
profiles).
--Brian
Index: include/http_request.h
===
RCS file:
Well, I finally made myself look at this and fix it. This passed the httpd-test
cases now, and it looks correct to me. I would like to apply this ASAP.
I dislike that we have to pstrdup the string, but we try to modify that string too
often to use a constant string.
Ryan
Index:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:40:24PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:34:30PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
I got 1 more question about the solaris implementation
of the Threaded/Worker MPM.
should we be called the setconcurrency flag on startup ?
I know solaris
Ryan Bloom wrote:
It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
the core. We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util, and nothing
in the core. Since there are at least two people who have mentioned that
they would have voted -1 for mod_ldap, can I get a
At 11:50 AM 09/06/2001, Brian Pane wrote:
This patch eliminates some run-time conversion of method names to
numbers (something that I noticed while looking through function
call profiles).
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/server/core.c,v
-ap_allow_methods(r, MERGE_ALLOW, GET, OPTIONS,
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
It fixes the problem I had, thanks - Do not forget to commit it -
I don't have commit access to httpd. Ryan will probably commit for me :)
Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
I made the change to the way
Please stop this thread.
the RC folks have decided not to submit mod_gzip 2.0.
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 09:04, Gomez Henri wrote:
Why won't you post mod_gzip 2.0 *today*?
Because Apache 2.x is not STABLE, not In BETA and the API set is not yet
FROZEN... When it is, we will release
Ryan Bloom wrote:
We have no control over APR. APR will not make a release just because
the web server wants it to. Apache needs to either use an already released
APR, or it needs to specify a date/time to check out APR.
We have no control over libc either, and yet we use that. Surely we
On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:36, Ian Holsman wrote:
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 08:12, Ryan Bloom wrote:
I have some big problems with the way that location walk and
directory walk work now, BTW, because if I write a module that
doesn't get pages from the filesystem, I have to catch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am veto'ing this, for now at least. I will support making mod_gz
a separate sub-project of httpd, and possibly rolling it into a later
release of 2.0, but now is not the time to do this.
A separate subproject for something as small as this module sounds a
On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:29, Greg Marr wrote:
At 11:50 AM 09/06/2001, Brian Pane wrote:
This patch eliminates some run-time conversion of method names to
numbers (something that I noticed while looking through function
call profiles).
RCS file:
- Original Message -
From: barries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:30 PM
Subject: [PATCH] add Push...Filter, alter Set...Filter
This patch makes Set...Filter replace all configed filters and
introduces Push...Filters to provide the current
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:35, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
It fixes the problem I had, thanks - Do not forget to commit it -
I don't have commit access to httpd. Ryan will probably commit for me :)
Doug
On Thursday 06 September 2001 10:03, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:35, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
It fixes the problem I had, thanks - Do not forget to commit it -
I don't have
On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:42, Graham Leggett wrote:
Ryan Bloom wrote:
We have no control over APR. APR will not make a release just because
the web server wants it to. Apache needs to either use an already
released APR, or it needs to specify a date/time to check out APR.
We
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 10:03, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:35, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
It fixes the problem I had, thanks - Do not
At 12:58 PM 09/06/2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
Weren't these method numbers recently removed so that there are
no standard methods, and all the methods are added the same way
at run time?
In order to keep backwards compat, keep the patch small, and keep
the performance high for the standard
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Ok, now, I might be a complete idiot, but I'm hearing way-too-many
complaints about apxs not exporting the LD_SHLIB value under Linux.
Did anyone encountered this problem before? Or can I safely assume that
apxs -q LD_SHLIB = apxs -q CC
This
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 10:03, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:35, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Ryan Bloom wrote:
Just ran a few tests with OtherBill. IIS 5.0's default behavior, at least, is
not to gzip an html file. We already support gzip encoding today. This
discussion is about on-the-fly gzip compression.
I tried to negotiate a gzip compressed document from a dynamic ASP file
On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:36, Ian Holsman wrote:
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 08:12, Ryan Bloom wrote:
I have some big problems with the way that location walk and
directory walk work now, BTW, because if I write a module that
doesn't get pages from the filesystem, I have to
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I am a strong +1 in favor of making this a subproject and probably rolling it into a
post
2.0 release. The presence of mod_gz in the core now -will- impact folks who are
working on
stabilizing the server.
What about putting it in the experimental directory? This way
On Thursday 06 September 2001 11:54, Bill Stoddard wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:36, Ian Holsman wrote:
On Thu, 2001-09-06 at 08:12, Ryan Bloom wrote:
I have some big problems with the way that location walk and
directory walk work now, BTW, because if I write a module
At 02:47 PM 09/06/2001, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Well - the vote on the table is to take the LDAP code out of
Apache v2.0
- but the next question is when it's removed, what do we do with
it?
I will probably be a user of mod_ldap, but right now, I am inclined
to remove it from the
core and
Ryan Bloom wrote:
It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
the core. We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util, and nothing
in the core. Since there are at least two people who have mentioned that
they would have voted -1 for mod_ldap, can I get a
removal
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Got it, thanks anyway.
Hany
-Original Message-
From: Farag, Hany M (Hany)
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:00 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: apxs Error
Hi,
I'm getting this error when using apxs (apache 2.0.24):
./apxs -i -a -c iCAP.h iCAP_protocol.h mod_iCAP.h co.h
On Thursday 06 September 2001 11:47, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Ryan Bloom wrote:
We have no control over APR. APR will not make a release just because
the web server wants it to. Apache needs to either use an already
released APR, or it needs to specify a date/time to check out APR.
FYI, The reason that MOD_TLS exists on NetWare is because all of the SSL support
is embedded in our Winsock layer. MOD_TLS doesn't actually do any encryption or
contain any encryption code. It simply an enabling module that makes a WSAIoctl()
call to tell Winsock to enable SSL on a
From: dean gaudet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:17 PM
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Brian Pane wrote:
* memset() is called mostly from apr_pcalloc(), which in turn is
used in too many places to yield any easy optimization opportunities.
sometimes folks are lazy and
On Thursday 06 September 2001 14:10, Aaron Bannert wrote:
No, this should not be done. According to the default Apache layout, the Apache
binary goes into @prefix@/bin/httpd. We use the variable sbindir, but it is still
the bin directory. If it is actually being installed into the sbin
From: Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:42 AM
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
the core. We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util, and nothing
in the core. Since
Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 09:29, Greg Marr wrote:
At 11:50 AM 09/06/2001, Brian Pane wrote:
This patch eliminates some run-time conversion of method names to
numbers (something that I noticed while looking through function
call profiles).
RCS file:
On Thursday 06 September 2001 14:17, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
From: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:09 AM
On Thursday 06 September 2001 07:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes01/09/06 07:48:46
Modified:src/os/netware mod_tls.c
On Thursday 06 September 2001 14:45, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:39:18PM -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote:
+1 on the veto :-)
I am a strong +1 in favor of making this a subproject and probably
rolling it into a post 2.0 release. The presence of mod_gz in the core
now
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:49:56PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
If the module is a part of the server, then it must work before the server
is production ready. You can't have a module that doesn't work in a server
that is going GA, it doesn't make sense. You will find if you read the
archives,
From: Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:36 PM
I've found a small problem (probably more a documentation problem)
FilesMatch only works for 'file-based' storage.
so, using it to set the INCLUDES filter on a page delivered by mod-proxy
doesn't work.
From: Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:56 PM
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:49:56PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
If the module is a part of the server, then it must work before the server
is production ready. You can't have a module that doesn't work in a
From: Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:45 PM
To clarify, I am removing mod_tls from 2.0. I saw mod_tls, and didn't connect it
with Apache 1.3. I will not remove mod_tls from 1.3 this week.
+1 for removing /modules/tls (I was confused as well, sorry.)
And
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 06:06:58PM -0400, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
wrote:
Hi,
'not sure if my views hold any ground here - but I believe we should not be
linking mod_gzip and mod_ssl here..
mod_ssl - it's one of the modules without which lots of users (especially
the
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 03:03:16PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If it's stable and works, but clearly isn't a 'known quantity' in production
servers, it must land in modules/experimental until it's interaction with the
many clients is well understood. Compiling isn't the issue,
you're definitely right. they are not CPU-bound, but more bandwidth bound..
But my point here is that does it make sense to compare mod_ssl with
mod_gzip.. They are 2 totally differnet entities - one of them is a
requirement, and the other is welcome (if available)
-Madhu
-Original
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:27 AM
slive 01/09/06 11:27:57
Modified:docs/conf httpd-std.conf httpd-win.conf
Added: docs/docroot index.html.nn
Log:
Add Norwegian Nynorsk translation of welcome page.
Don't forget index.html.var :)
Ryan Bloom wrote:
If the module is a part of the server, then it must work
before the server is production ready. You can't have a
module that doesn't work in a server that is going GA,
it doesn't make sense. You will find if you read the
archives, that we have cancelled releases in the
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
FWIW, I don't thinking creating a sub-project for one file makes
a lot of sense. -- justin
I agree with Justin on this, and disagree with FirstBill and Ryan.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist
Hi Justin...
Kevin Kiley here...
Justin wrote...
FWIW, we're discussing Ian's mod_gz not Remote Communication's
mod_gzip since an Apache 2.0 version of mod_gzip has not been
submitted to the Apache Group for inclusion. -- justin
Jim Jagielski asked...
Can I ask why the rush? Let's
After the update from suse linux 7.0 to 7.2 there`s a discrepancy with my
apache which is running a program with php and mysql.
When I hit the back-button of the browser, the browser tells me, that there
is data missing. But the program is designed to use the back button of the
browser.
Is
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
You will find if you read the archives, that we have cancelled
releases in the past, because a single module did not work correctly.
Anytime you put something into the core, you take the very real chance
of delaying the core server.
This is true enough.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Anytime you put something into the core,
you take the very real chance of delaying the core server.
Or, as some have suggested - stick it in modules/experimental?
As Ken pointed out, modules in the experimental directory have
historically NOT
In a message dated 01-09-06 19:30:47 EDT, Justin wrote...
I think this functionality belongs in the core (not as a
sub-project or as a separate standalone module). That's it.
Fair enough. Thanks for the quick reply.
You won't get any argument from me on that point.
I was saying that
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 07:39:39PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still don't think you answered the REAL question, though,
and that is why, in light of everything else going on at the
moment trying to get this 2.0 puppy at least to a BETA
tarball so many more people can TEST it ( don't
[ Is it just me or is this message really like 5 or 6? I reread it
and saw all of the stuff at the bottom. ]
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:06:18AM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Push...Filters is a very interesting idea that warrents more consideration,
especially in terms of subrequests
I thought I'd sent this mail earlier.. I never got the mail back - 'just
forwarding it again.. (sorry if it's a duplicate)
-Madhu
--
Hi,
I was wondering if somebody could update the status of mod_ssl in
the STATUS file. I'm providing my inputs - but if you have a more
Hi,
I was wondering if somebody could update the status of mod_ssl in
the STATUS file. I'm providing my inputs - but if you have a more
appropriate comment, please go ahead and update it.
Thanks
-Madhu
Index: STATUS
===
96 matches
Mail list logo
