On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 12:50 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 22:29
>> An: httpd
>> Betreff: Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 -
>> /httpd/ht
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Joe Orton [mailto:jor...@redhat.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 09:20
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1824592 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Februar 2018 22:29
> An: httpd
> Betreff: Re: Binary Breakage (was: svn commit: r1824592 -
> /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Plue
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> +1 AIX/xlc/ppc64
>
> I have two quirks to record, both are openssl / openssl 1.1 related
> but given the state of my AIX system I am still +1 on the release.
>
> - proxy/ssl.t almost totally fails with handhsake errors between
> client and o
Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.30:
[ ] +1: It’s not jus
whoops, http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1824811
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:42 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Which patch? I think you are missing a digit.
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> I am hoping this is fixed by
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?v
Which patch? I think you are missing a digit.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> I am hoping this is fixed by
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=182481 which I
> stumbled onto from another direction.
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:29 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>>
Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall
Speaking of, are these needed, or should we create attic/ ?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/flood/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_spdy/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_wombat/
and most content within http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/sandbox/
(as a sandbox/attic/)?
I
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:29 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>>
>>> Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall into this
>>> generally accepted change (expanding the length
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> This probably does not apply to 2.4.x (as a strong statement), in the
> meantime we at least need the helpers and give a hand at updating the
> modules, if we can't avoid extending our own structs...
I agree this discussion, outside of an in
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> Any objections?
+1
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
>> Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall into this
>> generally accepted change (expanding the length of a struct.)
>> Consider the shm array change doesn't fall into th
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> 1. We continue as we do now and allow extending structures at the end. We
>> should probably document more prominently that
>> copying / allocating / creating public structure
I made a fundamental mistake as we removed PCRE from
the source tree of httpd; although we stopped distributing the
pcre library in 2.4.x source tree, our own util_pcre.c is largely
founded on the work of Philip Hazel/Cambridge; although the
larger work doesn't need to be advertised in our LICENSE
On 02/20/2018 09:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Moving a member in a well-defined structure doesn't fall into this
> generally accepted change (expanding the length of a struct.)
> Consider the shm array change doesn't fall into the "it is just
> a longer struct" example.
>
Can you please g
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 02/20/2018 08:20 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
>> In other words, modules from one STABLE release to another ARE binary
>> compatible and do NOT need to be recompiled.
>>
>>
>> This is clearly not true of several recent changes, even t
On 02/20/2018 08:20 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
>
> In other words, modules from one STABLE release to another ARE binary
> compatible and do NOT need to be recompiled.
>
>
> This is clearly not true of several recent changes, even though they
> impact relatively few third party modules.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:50 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 02:06:20PM -, minf...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: minfrin
>> Date: Sat Feb 17 14:06:20 2018
>> New Revision: 1824592
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1824592&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Update proposal with fix fo
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> -1: I think with the release process hiccups and the Win issues
> noted in the "Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues" thread,
> we will need a 2.4.31. Additionally, there are some
> backports in STATUS that could also be folded in.
Very sensibl
Hello,
I would also like to help and learn about the internals of httpd.
Thanks,
Adesh
On 20/02/2018, Prafulla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found following page on apache's "Help Wanted" about httpd.
>
> https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?8de2fbaee4e9d2335083802882abe85940407f8d
>
> I would like to
This is what I've been using:
#!/bin/sh
#
if test "$#" != 1; then
echo "USAGE: $0 TAG" >&2
exit 1
fi
svn copy -m "Tag HEAD of 2.4.x as $1"
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/$1
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 10:17 AM, Yann
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Useful links:
>
> o http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1812440
> o http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1812442
>
> These are easy to automate as well... I would suggest maybe 3
> scripts: pretag.sh (which
Hi,
I found following page on apache's "Help Wanted" about httpd.
https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?8de2fbaee4e9d2335083802882abe85940407f8d
I would like to explore helping httpd project. I can program in c/c++/python.
Can someone suggest how I should start about it?
I have downloaded the
Useful links:
o http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1812440
o http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1812442
These are easy to automate as well... I would suggest maybe 3
scripts: pretag.sh (which readies the branch for tagging), tag.sh
which does a simple svn cp
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
> Author: druggeri
> Date: Tue Feb 20 14:33:38 2018
> New Revision: 1824887
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1824887&view=rev
> Log:
> Add some additional convenience tooling
>
> Added:
[]
> httpd/site/trunk/tools/tag.sh (with props)
[]
>
> A
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:47 AM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x:
./
> docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/
>
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 2018, at
> -Original Message-
> From: Ruediger Pluem [mailto:rpl...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:34 AM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./
> docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/
>
>
>
> On 02/19/2018 03:18
Dear Apache Enthusiast,
(You’re receiving this message because you’re subscribed to a user@ or
dev@ list of one or more Apache Software Foundation projects.)
We’re pleased to announce the upcoming ApacheCon [1] in Montréal,
September 24-27. This event is all about you — the Apache project com
If we could see the tooling it might be easier to vet it.
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 8:39 AM, drugg...@primary.net wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 6:10 AM
>> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rele
Thanks Jim.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Yep. All good now (r1824880)
>
>> On Feb 20, 2018, at 8:47 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> Should be OK now with the right merge, right?
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Confirmed that w/ r1824874, w
Yep. All good now (r1824880)
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 8:47 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> Should be OK now with the right merge, right?
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Confirmed that w/ r1824874, where the Event MPM changes
>> had been reverted, this no longer happens.
>>
Should be OK now with the right merge, right?
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Confirmed that w/ r1824874, where the Event MPM changes
> had been reverted, this no longer happens.
>
>> On Feb 20, 2018, at 8:17 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> This is on macOS and using Event
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 6:10 AM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30
>
> Another thing that helps is providing some heads-up
> that a T&R will actually be happening... Yeah, you
Confirmed that w/ r1824874, where the Event MPM changes
had been reverted, this no longer happens.
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 8:17 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> This is on macOS and using Event. Note that trunk
> does not have this issue:
>
> Test Summary Report
> ---
> t/apache/pr352
This is on macOS and using Event. Note that trunk
does not have this issue:
Test Summary Report
---
t/apache/pr35292.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:56 PM, wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Tue Feb 20 12:56:16 2018
> New Revision: 1824868
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1824868&view=rev
> Log:
> Merge r1823047, r1824454, r1824463, r1824464, r1824497, r1824862 from trunk:
[]
>
> MMN bump for CONN_STATE_NUM, pl
elukey did fix the agreements in trunk. Now merged into 2.4.x in r1824871.
Thanks for checking.
> Am 20.02.2018 um 13:42 schrieb Steffen :
>
>
> In the mod_md 2.4 (not in trunk) documentation
> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_md.html
>
>
> I see three times:
>
> MDCertificateAgree
In the mod_md 2.4 (not in trunk) documentation
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_md.html
I see three times:
MDCertificateAgreement
https://letsencrypt.org/documents/LE-SA-v1.1.1-August-1-2016.pdf
This errors if not an existing account.
It should be now (should be nice we have it
Another thing that helps is providing some heads-up
that a T&R will actually be happening... Yeah, you
had noted the you were going to T&R on Monday
(in the "T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal" thread) but sending
out a quick "I plan on doing this in X hours" notice
allows for some possible last-minute items t
-1: I think with the release process hiccups and the Win issues
noted in the "Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues" thread,
we will need a 2.4.31. Additionally, there are some
backports in STATUS that could also be folded in.
> On Feb 19, 2018, at 9:54 AM, drugg...@primary.net wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
>
Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:38:27 +0100):
>Added mod_proxy_uwsgi to installwinconf.awk and BasAddr.ref in trunk
>and branches.
Apache.dsw needs an addition too:
###
Project: "mod_proxy_uwsgi
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:38:05PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 02/19/2018 07:50 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 02:06:20PM -, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: minfrin
> >> Date: Sat Feb 17 14:06:20 2018
> >> New Revision: 1824592
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org
44 matches
Mail list logo