Oon the page http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html the addresses for the
httpd testers list are wrong (subscription) etc.
All of them miss the httpd fragment ([EMAIL PROTECTED] -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc.).
Regards,
Rainer
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Zac Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have AllowEncodedSlashes in my conf. I am calling
https://myserver.com/foo.cgi/a/b%2fc/d
In the docs for AllowEncodedSlashes, it says it doesn't mean they will be
decoded.
I believe AllowEncodedSlashes' meaning has been
Eric Covener wrote:
Bill: I saw your veto in the biug below, would that apply to restoring
the original behavior of AllowEncodedSlashes as well or just the
approach in one of the patches?
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35256
I have an interesting idea...
combine the
Hi Krushna,
Thanks for the quick update.It comes in my error_log.I am using Apache
2.2Worker in Red-hat 3.
Regards
-A
On Dec 4, 2007 6:04 PM, Rath, Krushna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can u provide bit more info…..where r u getting Invalid URI in
request.?in ethereal?
Can u provide the trace
Steffen wrote:
To inform you.
We at http://www.apachelounge.com made a binary available which works
with mod-perl and mod-perl etc.
How did the perl-framework regression tests look; and which patch did you
happen to use? Or is this the cobbled-together 2.2.6 + smattering of 2.2.5
sources?
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:20:00 -0500
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steffen wrote:
To inform you.
We at http://www.apachelounge.com made a binary available which
works with mod-perl and mod-perl etc.
How did the perl-framework regression tests look; and which patch did
Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:20:00 -0500
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steffen wrote:
To inform you.
We at http://www.apachelounge.com made a binary available which
works with mod-perl and mod-perl etc.
How did the perl-framework regression tests look
- Forwarded message from Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On 7/22/07, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings.
apxs accepts only *.c files as its input. For other extensions it
doesn't invoke libtool in compile mode and several different issues
leading to empty Apache module
On 7/23/07, Farokh Irani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~covener/apxs-cpp.diff
When I tried to use patch with this, one hunk failed (#3) and the
others appeared to be offset. Does anyone know if this diff file
applies to the apxs with 2.2.4?
From diff file:
--- support
- Forwarded message from Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On 7/22/07, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings.
apxs accepts only *.c files as its input. For other extensions it
doesn't invoke libtool in compile mode and several different issues
leading to empty Apache module creation
[thread moved from users list]
On 5/8/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007 08:11:13 -0500
Frank Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I don't know what to do if apr_dbd_pvselect using the
prepared statement returns 2013 (Lost connection).
What MySQL version are you
On Wed, 9 May 2007 06:39:36 -0500
Frank Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The correct solution is for your module to call apr_dbd_invalidate
to invalidate the stale connection, then grab another from the pool.
But alas, only your module can decide how many times to retry in
case of problems
On 5/9/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaargh! Sorry, I meant apr_reslist_invalidate.
In penance, I'm going to try and find a bug report that discusses
the issue. Aha, I think this is the one:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39329
It was left open for more reports
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:04:03 +0100
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: mod_memcache??
On 2/2/07, Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a need to write a generic way to integrate apr_memcache into httpd.
Basically, I have several otehr modules
and must be replaced by
proxyHTMLLinks. At least the configuration check is thereafter ok.
Greetings
Jens
--
Dr. Jens SchleusenerT-Systems Solutions for Research GmbH
Tel: +49 551 709-2493 Bunsenstr.10
Fax: +49 551 709-2169 D-37073 Goettingen
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Forwarded and closed since there is no apreq product in bugzilla, let
infra know if you want one :)
(this -lipv6api doesn't come from API so I presume it comes form apreq?)
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification
Joe Orton wrote:
Forwarded and closed since there is no apreq product in bugzilla, let
infra know if you want one :)
(this -lipv6api doesn't come from API so I presume it comes form apreq?)
[8:32:02](ttypf)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
/home/pgollucci/dev/repos/asf/httpd/apreq/trunk 100 0
On Dec 11, 2006, at 11:33 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
Forwarded and closed since there is no apreq product in bugzilla,
let infra know if you want one :)
(this -lipv6api doesn't come from API so I presume it comes form
apreq?)
[8:32:02](ttypf)[EMAIL PROTECTED
the idea is to fake document root after they are setted when apache
configuration are readed...
the idea is to correct the document root in chroot jail maked in child init...
Best Regards,
Mathieu
_
From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 27 Nov 2006
that exist in chroot and outside the
chroot...
because apache check if document root is directory at configuration stage...
Best Regards,
Mathieu
_
From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:14:15 +0100
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: how
On Monday 27 November 2006 00:57, Mathieu CARBONNEAUX wrote:
the idea is to fake document root after chrooting apache.
after reading configuration and setting document root, in child init i make
chroot to the actual document root, and after i whant to correct document
root to reflect the new
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org mailing list.
To confirm that you would like
archive@mail-archive.com
added to the apreq-dev mailing list, please send
an empty reply to this address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usually, this happens when you just hit
://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/developer/documenting.html
Regards,
Mathieu
_
From: Andy Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:09:56 +0100
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: How the PHP works?
Toni - this isn't really the right list for your question
and libneon also: http://www.webdav.org/neon/
Mathieu
_
From: Joachim Zobel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:54:35 +0100
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: How the PHP works?
Am Montag, den 13.11.2006, 21:39 +0100 schrieb Toni Pizà:
I will try
From: Mathieu CARBONNEAUX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:04:47 +0200
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: child_init hook...
if i do :
fchdir(d); chroot(.);
in pre_config or open_logs hook??
i while try
very interesting !!!il while try to implement on base of mod_chroot module...ok i imagine that make : d=open("/", O_RDONLY); chroot("/new/root");in post_config hookand the close in child_init...but how to make reload phase... what is the good hook to do that! or how to detect
if i do : fchdir(d); chroot(".");in pre_config or open_logs hook??i while try it that...From: Mathieu CARBONNEAUX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.orgSent: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:00:25 +0200Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: child_init hook...
very interesting !!!il
this method unusable.
Bellow is the message to users@
Forwarded Message
Subject: Killing apache child processes and logging (how to stop serving
request?)
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:24:31 +0300
From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: users@httpd.apache.org
On Wed, 2006-11-10 at 13:51 +0300, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
Sometimes I need to kill an apache child process serving large file
before
request is completed. I run kill -SIGTERM HTTPD_PID, the child dies
and
transfer is stopped but nothing is written in access log.
I don't know the answer
Guy Hulbert wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-10 at 13:51 +0300, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
Sometimes I need to kill an apache child process serving large file
before
request is completed. I run kill -SIGTERM HTTPD_PID, the child dies
and
transfer is stopped but nothing is written in access log.
I
Following a vote on dev@httpd.apache.org, and with input from the project
participants on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authors' discussion list,
the httpd project is pleased to announce the creation of a new modules-dev
list at httpd.apache.org. Current subscribers to the apache-modules list
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
The vote to create...
+1 pquerna, wrowe, slive, fielding, jim, bnicholes, rpluem, niq, pgollucci,
graham, kess, erikabele, sctemme
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED],
+1
seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED] current subscribers,
-1
Bill
On Friday 01 September 2006 21:25, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
[ ] +1
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1
+1
On 01.09.2006, at 21:25, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from apache-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer
support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
[X] +1
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1
On Sep 1, 2006, at 9:25 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from apache-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer
support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
[ ] +1
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1
+1 on adopting the list.
-1
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
+1.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
[ ] +1
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1
I'd actually expect some feedback from the modperl folks since there is some
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
[X] +1
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
[X] +1
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1
I believe its good to have an email
On 9/1/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
+1
Joshua.
On Sep 1, 2006, at 12:25 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from apache-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer
support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
+1 on creating the list, -1
PROTECTED] (or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and to take end user
questions up with the
module author or [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
I know that you and Nick follow the list, and I'm pretty sure that other
pmc members do as well (and otherwise maybe me with my member hat on
might do the trick).
vh
Mads
On Sep 1, 2006, at 3:25 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED],
+1
seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers,
-1 (we shouldn't just blindly move 'em over)
Actually i was looking for that a while back and was suprized it was
at covalent.
So My non couting vote is +1
I'd vote-0 on the moving over...
a mail with details how to resubscribe or something simular sounds better
On 9/1/2006 at 1:25 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
William A.
Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED],
+1
On 09/01/2006 09:25 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
[ ] +1
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1
+1
On Friday 01 September 2006 20:25, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
[ ] +1
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1
+1
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED], seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
current subscribers, for module authors to use for peer developer support?
(API 'users', essentially.)
[X] +1
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1
I'd actually expect some feedback
communities to try to make them one list. So it won't be abandoned,
it's far to valuable for its users, but if httpd.a.o wants the a new list
[EMAIL PROTECTED], we would seed that migration with the existing
subscribers and send both pre and post migration announcements to all
list space, we would need to leave it with
its existing autonomy.
+1 to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards
Rüdiger
Projectfolk,
Covalent (incidentally, my own employer) has been proud to host this
module developers' community for many years. There are rather frequent
noises around why [EMAIL PROTECTED] isn't an @h.a.o list, and why the
modules.apache.org is still hosted by Covalent. I have some thoughts
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Projectfolk,
http://asylum.zones.apache.org/modules/
Doesn't fully work yet, but is a work in progress following a discussion
or two a little while back... Feedback welcome. More interest = more
effort gets applied to it :-)
Aim is to replace the website. Moving the
sites is ready, I'd think that moving that list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] would make sense, but it's a very different list
than the apache-modules@ dev discussion.
seconds between ping...From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.orgSent: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:02:11 +0200Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: mod_proxy_balancer/mod_proxy_ajp TODORuediger Pluem wrote: +1. Just one thought: I think it would be useful to have this 'health check
why not add proxy hook like scheme handler do to that ?From: Ruediger Pluem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.orgSent: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:04:55 +0200Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: mod_proxy_balancer/mod_proxy_ajp TODOOn 06/19/2006 10:23 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: Henri Gomez wrote
you must have the possibility to add a wheight to each backend to moderate the load (like nortel alteon)... no?From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.orgSent: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:02:44 +0200Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: mod_proxy_balancer/mod_proxy_ajp TODOHenri Gomez
i'm not sure that only apr solution because is httpd information to log... no hook only information...but can be acheve with hook of hook... and this idea can be posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]but can be apache hook impl super macro to acheve this...and the information to log rely on apache log
is not acceptable...From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.orgSent: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:14:25 +0200Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: debug apacheOn Saturday 17 June 2006 09:47, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote: On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem
On 06/18/2006 02:49 PM, Mathieu CARBONNEAUX wrote:
i think is very usefull to have this in production environment... to debug
probleme without interupting production... in only up the log level with
reload...
with strace you must restart apache with strace...and for desactivating it
you
... not only bug...Regards,MathieuFrom: Ruediger Pluem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.orgSent: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 15:03:59 +0200Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: debug apacheOn 06/18/2006 02:49 PM, Mathieu CARBONNEAUX wrote: i think is very usefull to have this in production environment
On Son 18.06.2006 22:25, Mathieu CARBONNEAUX wrote:
ok i've forget that possibility :)
but using strace directly by attaching to processus can be risky in
production (like gdb!)...
and with apache with 256 or 512 processuss all working can be hard to
debug...
in some time have lost the
with well into the
thousands of processess/threads. Never had a problem in years of doing
that.
Anyway, as others have pointed out, this topic is off-topic here.
--
Colm MacCárthaighPublic Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/18/2006 02:49 PM, Mathieu CARBONNEAUX wrote:
i think is very usefull to have this in production environment... to debug
probleme without interupting production... in only up the log level with
reload...
with strace you must restart apache
what is the version of libstdc++ on solaris and on linux?and version of gcc ?From: Jean-frederic Clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.orgSent: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:14:29 +0200Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Compiling a C++ module with g++ on SolarisPhil Endecott wrote: Dear All
yes try sun studio, v10 and v11 are free for use... than can been download for free on sun site...and work on solaris 8,9 and 10...From: Jean-frederic Clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.orgSent: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:14:29 +0200Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Compiling a C
it's a very good idea to add this!From: Alexander Lazic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.orgSent: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:14:11 +0200Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] debug apacheHi,i have read http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html and asked mefollwing:Is it possible to get a logentry
/9/06, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/24/06, Terry Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am running hundreds of virtual hosts on httpd server and each
virtual host successfully writes its own access log file to an
appropriate place.
In addition to these virtual host logs
Hi,
In proxy_html module, I configured proxyHTMLURLMap value like below
ProxyHTMLURLMap (.*) http://192.168.112.53:8080/${TARGET_SERVER}/$1 RXi
Here i would try to get value of TARGET_SERVER value dynamically from the request structure (recquest_rec *).
How to store value in request_rec ?
Is
-- Forwarded message --
From: Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jan 15, 2006 4:26 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug or feature?
To: users@httpd.apache.org
On Saturday 14 January 2006 18:04, Masanari Iida wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask the list members if following are
bug
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:04:56AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all back under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list doesn't justify a separate list, and the
Apache-Test code is now
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:04:56AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all back under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list doesn't justify a separate list, and the
Apache-Test code is now property of the Apache
While at it, please fold that svn commit list back into [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all back under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list doesn't justify a separate list, and the
Apache-Test
While at it, please fold that svn commit list back into [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all back under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list doesn't justify a separate list, and the
Apache-Test
I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all back under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list doesn't justify a separate list, and the
Apache-Test code is now property of the Apache::Perl PMC, so discussions of
that are now elsewhere too. All that's
to have a crush on someone, an hour to like someone,
and a day to love someone, but it takes a lifetime to forget someone...
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 301.254.5198
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all back under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list doesn't justify a separate list, and the
Apache-Test code is now property of the Apache::Perl PMC, so discussions of
that are now
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Any objections? If no one screams, I'll do it next week. -- justin
+1
I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all back under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list doesn't justify a separate list, and the
Apache-Test code is now property of the Apache::Perl PMC, so discussions of
that are now elsewhere too. All that's
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all back under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list doesn't justify a separate list, and the
Apache-Test code is now property of the Apache::Perl PMC, so discussions of
that are now
* Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all back under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1.
test-cvs should also be merged witth httpd-cvs, IMHO.
nd
to have a crush on someone, an hour to like someone,
and a day to love someone, but it takes a lifetime to forget someone...
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 301.254.5198
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
On Dec 16, 2005, at 12:04 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all
back under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
S.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I'd like to propose shutting down [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it all back under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The traffic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list doesn't justify a separate list, and the
Apache-Test code is now property of the Apache::Perl PMC, so discussions of
that are now
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Any objections? If no one screams, I'll do it next week. -- justin
+1
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If the user must rewrite their content handlers to pay attention to
thread
jumps, and must use some sort of yeild beyond
apr_socket_poll/select(), then
I'd agree it becomes 3.0.
I wouldn't worry about protocol/mpm authors, who are a breed to ourselves
and should
Paul A Houle wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If the user must rewrite their content handlers to pay attention to
thread
jumps, and must use some sort of yeild beyond
apr_socket_poll/select(), then
I'd agree it becomes 3.0.
I wouldn't worry about protocol/mpm authors, who are a breed to
Yo dude, while the community may not catch/catch up with press, if we
planned to 'announce' Apache 2.2 as an httpd splash at the convention
opening plenary, this sort of just deep sixed that - since I'm pretty
sure most convention attendees follow [EMAIL PROTECTED], those who are httpd
users. Oh
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Yo dude, while the community may not catch/catch up with press, if we
planned to 'announce' Apache 2.2 as an httpd splash at the convention
opening plenary, this sort of just deep sixed that - since I'm pretty
sure most convention attendees follow [EMAIL PROTECTED
still feel very happy and proud for this
major release.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Query; you let the mirrors catch up 24 hours, right? Or you just decided
to burn the extra ASF bandwidth?
It appears so; I've just cleaned up all the 2.1 turds left behind, but it will
take the daily -full- rsync in order for those files to disappear from the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I know I'm beating a dead horse here, but I still don't
understand the reason for such a rushed release, when
an extra few days would likely have resolved them...
Because it's httpd-dev tradition, .0 releases are never ready, and most
RM's live to regret them, yet new
Paul Querna wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Oh - why to users@ and not [EMAIL PROTECTED] (announce@apache.org, as
well as [EMAIL PROTECTED], as after all this is big news.)
I have sent it to both of those. It is still waiting moderation.
users@httpd.apache.org is the only one that I
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
++1! On to 2.4 :)
you mean X right? :)
Seriously though, will the inclusion of all the async stuff warrant a
jump to 3.0?
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
Brian Akins wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Seriously though, will the inclusion of all the async stuff warrant a
jump to 3.0?
My 2c CA (yes, I have 2 of them sitting here)...
If the user can write a content handling module that ignores threading and
remains on-thread, then it's a 2.4
Brian Akins wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
++1! On to 2.4 :)
you mean X right? :)
How about dropping numbers totally and using
colors?
Apache HTTP Server Green
:)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL
RM's live to regret them, yet new RM's are always ready to step in :)
:)
With 1.3 now basically in idle-mode, I'm hoping to scratch my RM
itch with 2.2.x's
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http
Just for your info... I've already responded on the users list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bret Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 18, 2005 1:35 PM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.3.x release announcements?
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Some time ago, I subscribed to announce
I believe that we should close down [EMAIL PROTECTED], and move all
discussion of this project to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This way more people can see
some of the really cool things going on, and we get much better review
of ideas than the very limited list of people that are on mbox-dev.
Thoughts
Thoughts?
+1. I'm subscribing to dev@httpd.apache.org tonight.
- Sam
--
Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.bulix.org)
-- gone crazy, back soon. leave message.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
