On 13 Oct 2004 15:25:06 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
minfrin 2004/10/13 08:25:06
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH CHANGES STATUS
modules/experimental Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH util_ldap.c
Log:
mod_ldap: fix a bogus error message to tell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check for a NULL file name before trying to delete the file
Is this in STATUS?
Regards,
Graham
--
Brad Nicholes wrote:
I'm not sure what you are asking. I haven't proposed any of my
recent changes for backport yet because of the changes required in
include/util_ldap.h. Since util_ldap.h can be considered a public
header, technically any changes to the structure would require an MMN
bump.
Modules (right now, only mod_auth_ldap) depend on util_ldap, and
changing the header would mean a break in binary compatibility (in
theory). I think we should probably stick with an MMN bump for this to
be consistent, even though only the mod_auth_ldap module uses it (to
my
knowledge).
I was
Brad Nicholes wrote:
I was hoping to avoid the MMN bump mainly because that means we can't
backport the changes to the 2.0 branch. If the httpd 2.2 includes a
caching_util module then the only reason for these stabilization patches
is the 2.0 branch. Also, if there are any other modules that do
Agreed, and interested in other thoughts as well.
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, June 28, 2004 11:23:57 AM
Brad Nicholes wrote:
I was hoping to avoid the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#if APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY
+/* If the cache file already exists then delete it. Otherwise we are
+ * going to run into problems creating the shared memory. */
+apr_file_remove(st-cache_file, ptemp);
+if (st-cache_file) {
+
No, I didn't change anything that would allow for anonymous shared
memory. This should probably check for a NULL before calling
apr_file_remove().
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
[EMAIL
Brad Nicholes wrote:
No, I didn't change anything that would allow for anonymous shared
memory. This should probably check for a NULL before calling
apr_file_remove().
+apr_file_remove(st-cache_file, ptemp);
Will this line segfault if ptempt is NULL? If not, then it should be
fine.
ptemp shouldn't ever be NULL on a post_config, right? I just fixed
the code so that it checks for a NULL file name before calling
apr_file_remove().
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes2004/06/11 09:15:43
Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH CHANGES STATUS
modules/experimental Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH util_ldap.c
Log:
Allow relative paths for LDAPTrustedCA to be resolved against ServerRoot PR#26602
Have the docs
* Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to confirm - are docs changes subject to RTC?
No.
nd
Do the docs need to be updated for this change? Allowing relative
paths to be resolved against ServerRoot seemed like fairly standard
procedure.
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brad Nicholes wrote:
Do the docs need to be updated for this change? Allowing relative
paths to be resolved against ServerRoot seemed like fairly standard
procedure.
Looking at the docs there now, I think you're right. Just wanted to
check whether there was anything that implied an absolute
I haven't tested that specific scenario but I can see where this patch
would address that problem as well. The problem has been that if a bind
failed, the connection is left in an unbound state but the connection
record showed that the connection was still bound. As a result, the
connection was
Brad Nicholes wrote:
But my guess
is that this patch should significantly help to resolve the problem that
you are seeing.
I'll give it a whirl on the problem server, and get back to you whether
it fixes it or not.
Regards,
Graham
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:modules/experimental util_ldap.c
Log:
if the call to ldap_simple_bind_s() fails, the connection is left in an unbound
state. Make sure that the connection record is updated to show the current state.
I have been having a problem with auth_ldap in that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes2004/03/31 14:56:08
Modified:modules/experimental util_ldap.c
Log:
Update the DN information associated with each LDAP connection after util_ldap_cache_checkuserid() rebinds the connection.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +12 -0
You are correct although it isn't as bad as it seems. There are
actually two types of caching going on here. There is the ldap
connection cache and the user credential cache. Because the user
credentials are cached, subsequent requests from the same user are not
actually authenticated
19 matches
Mail list logo
