On Dec 17, 2007 11:20 AM, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 10:27 AM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:22:02 -0500
Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks; Any particular concerns about the generic fix for 2.0.x?
Haven't looked
On Dec 18, 2007 12:06 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007 17:43
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: proxy returning apr_status_t to handler?
Argh. Without further testing
On 10/14/05, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joost de Heer wrote:
What's 'ulimit -c' (bash, under tcsh it's 'limit -c', other shells may
differ) for the user under which httpd runs?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ulimit -c
unlimited
This is for root though, which spawned httpd, which
On 10/13/05, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look for the Apache HTTP Server 1.3.34 prerelease tarballs in:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+1 (AIX 5.3)
On 10/17/05, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 07:19:18AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
doc says mod_mem_cache can be configured to operate in two modes:
caching open file descriptors or caching objects in heap storage
CacheEnable fd
will use mod_mem_cache
On 10/18/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Tue Oct 18 02:24:02 2005
New Revision: 326058
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=326058view=rev
Log:
C++ comments are not supported by some compilers (ReliantUnix).
or native compilers for AIX, z/OS, HP-UX,
On 10/20/05, artem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All.
When I'm building my own module (using mod_cplusplus) string LoadCPPHandler in
httpd.conf causing
/etc/init.d/apachectl: line 89: 13955 Segmentation fault $HTTPD -k $ARGV,
but when i'm writing it in mod_cplusplus dir using it's own MakeFile
On 10/21/05, chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to build a binary distribution of Apache 2.0.54 for HPUX 32bits.
I can build the binaries, and the tar.gz distrib file, but I can not
deploy it on other servers, since my httpd binary doesn't seem to be
properly linked.
I build the
On 10/19/05, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/19/2005 10:44 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[..cut..]
The problem is -not- in creating the transient buckets (if they are
sent, that's
goodness). The problem is in transforming them to persistant buckets
before the
On 10/21/05, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/21/2005 04:06 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
[..cut..]
I agree that's the correct analysis, your patch to fix the proxy to use
ap_save_brigade looks good to me.
Thanks for feedback. I will commit later to give otherBill a chance for
On 10/21/05, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
I use some hacks for binbuild-like binary distributions on HP-UX:
a) add -Wl,+s for SHLIB_PATH (you tried that)
It works nicely if you tweak libtool's archive_cmds from +b to +s +b
in the hpux* section
On 10/21/05, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:48:23PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Fri Oct 21 15:48:18 2005
New Revision: 327601
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=327601view=rev
Log:
* Move two backports from proposed
On 10/23/05, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) 2.1.N is voted on for BETA.
3) Assuming the vote passes, several days after releasing 2.1.N-BETA, a
vote to mark 2.1.N-BETA as Stable/General Availability will be called
for by the 2.1.N Release Manager.
3 days is maybe enough time to
On 10/24/05, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 24 October 2005 13:22, Joe Orton wrote:
There was a thread about this previously; just checking for consensus,
is there any objection to bumping the apr/apr-util version requirements
to 1.2.x? (1.2.x is already required for mod_dbd,
The patch in PR 10722 seems to be very widely referred to (perhaps
widely used as well ;) ). Are there any known issues with that patch?
Is there any technical reason why it couldn't be applied to 2.0?
ErrorLog /etc/some-important-database
LoadModule hidden_module /usr/local/viewcvs-0.9.3/pipeopen.py
SuexecWrapper /www/abc.example.com/bin/suexec
If random user can edit main conf file, things are pretty bad, at
least when root starts Apache.
Perhaps there are more current limitations on
On 11/10/05, Paul Smedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to get Apache2 2.0.55 building and running on OS/2 using
GCC 3.3.5. There's a current build of Apache using GCC 2.8.1 but that
GCC is getting a bit long in the tooth so I'd like to update things :)
Anyway, I have it
On 10/23/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: brianp
Date: Sun Oct 23 15:38:35 2005
New Revision: 327872
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=327872view=rev
Log:
New version of ap_core_output_filter that does nonblocking writes
...
+static apr_status_t
On 11/11/05, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/11/2005 at 1:40:32 pm, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff
Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/11/05, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reposting to the APR list with a new subject line. Does this need
to
be taken
On 11/12/05, Vadim Chekan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've tryed to compile httpd/trunk and got an error:
core_filters.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
_apr_wait_for_io_or_timeout referenced in function
_send_brigade_blocking
I have apr from apr/branches/1.2.x and looks
On 11/12/05, Brian Pane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 11, 2005, at 6:21 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 11/11/05, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/11/2005 at 1:40:32 pm, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff
Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/11/05, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL
On 11/15/05, Christophe Jaillet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Typo in modules\proxy\mod_proxy.c, in function set_status_opt, line 1388 :
Thanks for the patch! Committed to trunk.
On 11/20/05, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/20/2005 11:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
[..cut..]
If there is consensus that such trivial CHANGES should not be added (which
I would
also tend to with the reasons you mentioned), then I will happily remove
the CHANGE
On input path, ap_xml_parse_input() handles converting xml to native
charset (at least in 2.2). On output, there is no provision for
converting xml in responses.
Some choices:
(a) convert right in DAV before calling ap_fXXX() APIs
(b) have DAV implement a filter that converts xml from native to
On 11/26/05, Paul Smedley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's happening is that it's loading all the modules that are listed
in httpd.conf, then for some reason is trying to load them a second
time which then fails as the library is already open.
loading them again is normal; but they are
On 12/17/05, Christian Parpart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I need is a way to install a hook within the apache
server process that gets invoked ASAP(!) the client connection
of interest has been aborted (mostly by client side).
if a module is busy handling the request (e.g., long-running
On 12/28/05, Fenlason, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running into an issue where Apache 2.2.0 on AIX won't start if there is
more than one Listen directive.
Does it get better if you code
Listen 0.0.0.0:port1
Listen 0.0.0.0:port2
?
What version of AIX (unclear that it matters)?
Can you
On 12/28/05, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/28/05, Fenlason, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running into an issue where Apache 2.2.0 on AIX won't start if there is
more than one Listen directive.
Can you send me truss of startup using the failure configuration?
truss -o
On 1/14/06, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last week bloglines.com upgraded from 2.0.x to 2.2.x. At the same time,
I switched us from mod_cgid to mod_cgi.
mod_cgid has some problems if its path to the cgisock changes at any
time, it really needs to call realpath() on the cgisock path,
(editing subject line slightly)
On 2/16/06, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(perhaps tell me where I go wrong here with the way it is supposed to work)
A module that wants to use an HTTP response code which has no built-in
support in Apache needs to set r-status AND r-status_line
On 2/17/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:03:54AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 2/16/06, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The range support right now isn't smart enough to clear r-status_line
when it sets a new status code (206, 416). That needs
(Apologies if there is juicy past discussion that I didn't find with
my search keywords.)
It isn't clear to me what an input filter should do about
Content-Length when it modifies the length of the body (assuming that
this isn't chunked encoding).
It causes problems for some handlers to modify
On 2/24/06, Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
It isn't clear to me what an input filter should do about
Content-Length when it modifies the length of the body (assuming that
this isn't chunked encoding).
mod_cgi uses brigades to read the body but needs to look
On 3/1/06, R, Rajesh (STSD) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a patch, to kill a cgi process if the client closes the
conenction in Apache 2.0.54/mod_cgid.
Apache only finds out when it tries to do I/O.
CGI needs to write a little output to the client every so often if it
is
Plz forgive any misunderstanding, as well as my use of 2.0 function
names ;) Also, for being slow at learning what ldap stands for. I
know this code has been hashed over many many times over the last few
years.
util_ldap_create_config() creates the per-server config for util_ldap.
That saves a
On 3/15/06, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you are right. I am going to take a closer look at that code
and see about fixing both the mutex problem and the use of the config
pool. This could actually explain some funny things that I have been
seeing on the NetWare build
On 3/16/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/16/2006 03:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 3/15/06, Brad Nicholes wrote:
That is really one pool globally but there is a mutex per server_rec.
So a thread handling a request for one vhost grabs the mutex and uses
the pool
On 3/16/06, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/16/2006 at 7:12 am, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff
Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/16/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/16/2006 03:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 3/15/06, Brad Nicholes wrote
On 3/16/06, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
if ldap server times out the connection and we have to bring one back
up, that is no pool growth, right? we just get pool growth when we
talk to an LDAP server we haven't already talked to yet, or when?
Dead LDAP
On 3/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386477view=rev
Log:
remove the race condition when creating the connection pool mutex. Also
eliminate some unnecessary uses of the global memory pool
cool!
@@ -1753,7 +1753,10 @@
On 3/16/06, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/16/2006 at 7:01 pm, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff
Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386477view=rev
Log:
remove the race condition
On 3/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bnicholes
Date: Fri Mar 17 11:26:27 2006
New Revision: 386698
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386698view=rev
Log:
Fix the server_merge so that the memory pools and mutexes that were created
during the server_create, are
On 3/18/06, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386776view=rev
Log:
LDAPConnectionTimeout and LDAPVerifyServerCert can be configured
per-vhost
We need to note in addition to this that not all LDAP SDK libraries
On 3/31/06, pradeep kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more detail. I get this error only on commenting out the Scriptsock
directive. When I use this directive though I have no trouble in running the
script.
Is there more than one Apache instance with same ServerRoot, such that
using the
On 3/28/06, Rian A Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the httpd trunk in prefork.c ap_process_connection isn't called until
there is data on the new connection (instead of just when a client connects).
Is there a kernel accept filter enabled?
Some discussion has taken place in bugzilla but more discussion and
opinions are needed.
A patch recently posted:
Index: server/core.c
===
--- server/core.c (revision 386843)
+++ server/core.c (working copy)
@@ -3645,7
On 4/1/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/31/2006 06:53 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Some concerns about the else path:
a) is 500 proper? should it just return OK instead?
I think 500 is good.
b) what about logging that path to ensure that the administrator has
some
On 4/1/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
Didn't a Windows guy make that change? (duck)
On 4/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Mon Apr 3 05:10:22 2006
New Revision: 391025
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=391025view=rev
Log:
We actually want to reach the rest of the code :)
Thanks for cleaning up after me!!!
Index: support/htdbm.c
===
--- support/htdbm.c (revision 390811)
+++ support/htdbm.c (working copy)
@@ -308,6 +308,10 @@
case ALG_PLAIN:
/* XXX this len limitation is not in sync with any HTTPd len. */
On 4/3/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taking things one step further, sha1 is far preferred for cryptographic
purposes these days than md5. Suppose its time to switch?
Also, get htpasswd and htdbm defaults in sync. htpasswd says it
defaults to CRYPT where crypt() is
On 4/5/06, pradeep kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I see httpd grows in size on every restart/graceful restart with PHP(4 or
5) enabled. But this doesn't happen when I do a stop and start. Also this
problem is seen only when mod_php is enabled. Is this a know problem with
PHP or Apache?
On 4/5/06, pradeep kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep I tried that. without mod_php there is no growth in the size. So does
that mean this is a bug with PHP then.
PHP is the suspected component and would need to investigate.
On 4/8/06, Alexander Lazic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 05-04-2006 i have get the latest snapshots from:
http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/
httpd-2.0.x_20060405102636.tar.gz
apr-0.9.x_20060405102142.tar.gz
apr-util-0.9.x_20060405102200.tar.gz
Build it on solaris 10 x86 with gcc.
On 4/10/06, Alexander Lazic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon 10.04.2006 09:52, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 4/8/06, Alexander Lazic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a known bug?!
y; I've been looking at this type of problem for a few days...
hopefully I can post a patch before long
On 4/10/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/10/2006 03:58 PM, trawick wrote:
-
+* htdbm: Warn when the user adds a plaintext password on a platform
+ with crypt(). The server will assume that the format is crypt().
+Trunk version of patch:
+
On 4/10/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
Whilst this is clearly an edge-case, is it necessarily true that any
platform with APR_HAVE_CRYPT won't support plaintext passwords?
AIUI - apache has always been an either or - it's either plaintext on
platforms
On 4/10/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This pool is or is not created in the parent? If its the parent it's
gotta be proc mutexed even if using prefork.
It is created in the parent and used only during request processing.
Why does it need to be proc mutexed? Each process
On 4/11/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 4/10/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This pool is or is not created in the parent? If its the parent it's
gotta be proc mutexed even if using prefork.
It is created in the parent and used
On 4/11/06, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can emulaion crypt on platforms that don't support it? or will this be to
slow?
A crypt() implementation could be provided for these platforms whose
system libraries don't already have it.
As long as the default doesn't change *to* crypt/plaintext, nobody is
hurt, right? Or do we support the use of htpasswd/htdbm to build
password files for other applications, which might not use apr-util to
check the user/passwd record? (Those users would need to start
overriding the defaults to
On 4/11/06, Chris Darroch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi --
Alexander Lazic wrote:
After 'make install' i started apache, then some seconds later i got the
message '...MaxClients reached...' but there was no entry in the access
log, and nobody have make a request to this server.
Jeff
On 4/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gregames
Date: Thu Apr 13 10:53:04 2006
New Revision: 393868
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=393868view=rev
Log:
MaxClients isn't the only reason the scoreboard can fill up. another
reason should be fixed soon.
On 4/15/06, Brandon Fosdick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might have asked this before, but I've forgotten the answer, and so has
google. Has any of the large file goodness from 2.2.x made it into 2.0.x?
Will it ever?
Different answer than you got before, but I think this is more accurate
On 4/24/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please test and vote on releasing Apache httpd 1.3.35
+1
tested on AIX 5.3; CC=xlc_r
learned a new svn command after all these webyears
svn diff http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/tags/1.3/APACHE_1_3_34
On 4/24/06, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
O.k., for the last time, hopefully :) A candidate for 2.0.58 is
available for testing and voting at;
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+1
tested on AIX 5.3, CC=xlc_r
On 5/1/06, Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
after more thought, there is a simpler patch that should do the job. the key
to both of
these is how threads in SERVER_DEAD state with a pid in the scoreboard are
treated. this
means that p_i_s_m forked on a previous timer
On 5/2/06, Chris Darroch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can bear with me for a day or two more, I should have
a collection of patches ready. These tackle the issue by
tracking the start and listener threads in a nice new spot in
the scoreboard, and also clean up various issues and bugs
On 5/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Thu May 4 04:18:45 2006
New Revision: 399665
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=399665view=rev
Log:
Stop returning DECLINED from the output filter for proxy
requests.
FWIW, this is a rather obscure codepath.
On 5/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sun May 7 14:03:39 2006
New Revision: 404850
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=404850view=rev
Log:
Initialise server generation (Chris Darroch)
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/experimental/event/event.c
On 5/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sun May 7 14:01:48 2006
New Revision: 404849
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=404849view=rev
Log:
Tidy up scoreboard.h (Chris Darroch)
cool; forgot to +1 this and a couple of others
On 5/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sun May 7 14:07:14 2006
New Revision: 404851
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=404851view=rev
Log:
Note scoreboard stuff in changes; leave the 'difficult' patches
to see if they attract any more review.
Modified:
On 5/7/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 22:35, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Remove some obsolete declarations and comments from scoreboard.h. [...] ?
The scoreboard looks the same AFAICT ;) (Some programmers may care.)
There's the memory fix too.
so extra memory
On 5/7/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 04 May 2006 19:16, Chris Darroch wrote:
+#ifdef HAVE_PTHREAD_KILL
+unblock_signal(WORKER_SIGNAL);
+apr_signal(WORKER_SIGNAL, dummy_signal_handler);
+#endif
+
OK, unblock a signal. This happens after child_init, but
On 5/8/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, we all know we get some embarrassing regressions in our new
releases. PR#39490 in 1.3.35. Or 2.0.55 being effectively unusable
in a proxy due to PR#37145. Look at the number of duplicates of
37145 - that's a lot of people with the confidence to
(ignore issues of support for particular versions of Apache)
google pretends to know a lot about this general question, but it
seems to be in discussions between general users with the same
curiosity and there is little or no developer input. OTOH, there is a
great indication that Tomcat
On 5/27/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/27/2006 03:58 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Are there still fundamental pieces missing from mod_proxy_ajp +
mod_proxy_balancer which have to be resolved before mod_proxy_ajp is
the natural solution for anybody on Apache = 2.2?
Currently
On 6/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bnicholes
Date: Fri Jun 2 15:01:53 2006
New Revision: 411306
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411306view=rev
Log:
Fix a problem with invalid auth error detection for LDAP client SDKs that don't
support LDAP_SECURITY_ERROR
On 6/8/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plüm wrote:
Von: Joe Orton
I don't see why it's necessary for the ASF to be in
the business of distributing binaries; letting other people assume the
technical and legal responsibilites for doing that seems reasonable.
Ahhh, the preface
On 6/17/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 17 June 2006 09:47, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not possible
out of the box.
It may
On 6/18/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/18/2006 04:03 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not
possible
out of the box
On 6/20/06, Alexander Lazic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon 19.06.2006 07:07, Jeff Trawick wrote:
If httpd *developers* are interested, we should decide what type of
processing is acceptable/required first and worry about whether it can
be fitted into apr second. As I recall from the last
On 6/20/06, Brian Rectanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a minor patch to mod_proxy_balancer that I would like to get
applied. The patch adds some environment vars to balancer requests to
export info on the chosen route so that it possible to control sticky
sessions entirely from the reverse
On 7/4/06, Tiago Semprebom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_NOTICE, 0, ap_server_conf,IP value:
%d,csd-connected);
Why the csd don't appear to me like a structure allow-me to access their
filds like connected, remote_addr, etc?
The structure definition is available only
On 7/26/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* mod_isapi: Simply backport the host of fixes for compilation on unix,
PR#'s 15993 29098 30022 16637 30033 28089
by pushing to trunk/ rev 416293 of modules/arch/win32/mod_isapi.[ch]
which compiles without
On 8/14/06, pradeep kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More info..
The problem is seen with 2.0.55. It wasn't seen with 2.0.53. Haven't tried
2.0.58 or 2.0.59 yet. The change log for 2.0.58 doesn't seem to indicate any
fix for this problem.
Here is a patch for the proxy connect path for a
On 8/11/06, Sebastian Nohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And now patches against trunk are available too (attached to this mail).
A little more work is required. With this trunk patch and
ServerTokens Off, this is logged
at startup:
[Mon Aug 14 13:54:19 2006] [notice] configured -- resuming
On 8/14/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
ap_get_server_version() always spits out something like
Apache/2.2.4-dev (AP_SERVER_BASEVERSION AFAICT)
Plus wiring in the registered module strings? I think that's extraordinarily
useful information when walking
On 8/16/06, pradeep kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, proxy_connect has been enabled. So we dont have an equivalent patch for
2.0? As I mentioned the problem is seen with 2.0.55 and not 2.0.53.
There's no reason the patch can't be put into 2.0... Apply this patch
and report back on whether
... so that ServerTokens doesn't affect what gets logged to the error
log at startup (or any other place where we want the description of
the server instead of the banner to be written over the network).
This patch axes ap_get_server_version() so that third-party modules
will be forced to make a
On 9/1/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:18:02AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
... so that ServerTokens doesn't affect what gets logged to the error
log at startup (or any other place where we want the description of
the server instead of the banner to be written
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:52:43 +0200, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ake 2004/10/06 06:33:29
Modified:modules/arch/win32 mod_win32.c
server/mpm/winnt service.c
support/win32 ApacheMonitor.c
Log:
WIN64:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:15:51 +0200, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Please do not do that any more. I'm sorry but I'm vetoing your patches.
Use the official API, it is well documented.
strlen() returns size_t, TextOut() requires int; somewhere a cast
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:01:23 -0700, Naik, Roshan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Problem:
---
I notice Apache 2(worker mpm) is not able to correctly handle
a fork/waitpid invoked by a script used with mod_perl.
From Ulrich Drepper: No threaded programs must use anything but _exit
or
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:30:46 +0200, Timo Eckert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
is it possible on Apache1 to pipe the Error-Logs to an own handler?
no; unlike Apache 2, Apache 1.3 has no such capability
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:07:45 +0200, Timo Eckert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 05:46:29 -0400
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it possible on Apache1 to pipe the Error-Logs to an own
handler?
no; unlike Apache 2, Apache 1.3 has no such capability
Ok,
where
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:53:47 -0700, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
I think there needs to be a mod_fork which provides a more general
purpose daemon than that used by mod_cgid, and some Apache API will
know whether or not to send a request over
On 25 Oct 2004 06:40:08 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Index: protocol.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/protocol.c,v
retrieving revision 1.155
retrieving revision 1.156
diff -u -r1.155
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:51:59 +0100, Ivan Ristic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, you may need to have some logic to determine what makes
an attack and what not, but you must have the log entry to
begin with so you feed it to the algorithm.
Something I'm still curious about: Was the
I'm gonna puke if I see another connection-oriented error message with
no client IP.
Am I missing something basic, or is there really no reason NOT to have
ap_log_cerror()? It seems so obvious.
before:
[Fri Oct 29 06:56:16 2004] [info] (32)Broken pipe: core_output_filter:
writing data to the
401 - 500 of 3135 matches
Mail list logo
